D6Ni

@josh_im_sober @ExtrovertArtist @TopherStoll @MrBeast 100% red votes = everybody lives 100% blue votes = everybody lives 50.01% blue votes = everybody lives 50.01% red votes = you kill 4 Billion people what's the incentive to not vote for blue other than beign selfish?

@corcreta @ExtrovertArtist @TopherStoll @MrBeast “it literally implies some people will press blue, so you're deliberately killing them instead of just not doing so” Holy shit. x.com/sarodinian1/st…

Everyone on earth takes a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press? BE HONEST.

@KllN349312 @RDCentrist @yuliexe there is LITERALLY my answer in that tweet you fuck ass bot

@corcreta @RDCentrist @yuliexe You haven’t answered anything.

everyone presses red = everyone lives 🧠

@KllN349312 @RDCentrist @yuliexe not true because if sufficient people think like you red ends up winning ergo people is 100% dying. I'm not gonna repeat myself more, 100% red votes over 8 billion people is statistically impossible, reaching 50.01% blue votes is the only factual way of saving 100% of the people.

My vote has near zero relevance. In 99.9…% of all cases it is irrelevant. And if it is that one case where it is relevant my life would face an unnecessary risk. Actually you are more selfish than I am because you want me to out my life at risk to prevent your choice becoming a disaster. I on the other hand let you do whatever you want to do.

@KllN349312 @RDCentrist @yuliexe that's literally the whole point of the "dilemma" you press red because of the rest are empathetic you leave and if the majority of people are selfish pricks like you you live, individual benefit vs collective

@RDCentrist @corcreta @yuliexe Depending on how many press red nothing will change at all. If a lot of people but not enough follow your advice of voting blue then you have billions of people. Lucky you that you wouldn’t be alive to experience that guilt.

@KllN349312 @RDCentrist @yuliexe literally answered that

@corcreta @RDCentrist @yuliexe Somehow I think my vote is either irrelevant or my life would be seriously at risk when voting blue.

@imthatdexter @nix_eth @MrBeast I'm not even going to read all that this isn't some impossible dilemma, this is a well known study with very clear outcomes voting blue isn't the statistically correct answer btw, following game theory you should press red, is as easy as having theory's of mind or not

Asking now, but I asked Claude. Also I want to make it clear I get your point bro and I agree with you but n theory. But youre inserting statistical reality into an absurd theoretical situation. Personally I think it’s reasonable to answer with pure, if statistically improbable (or impossible) logic, to a pure theoretical, if realistically improbable (or impossible) question. And yes I like Ai but that doesn’t mean I trust it with my life, just like I don’t trust strangers with my life. Anyhow, when asked the question Claude predictably said it would press blue since it is also bringing statistical reality and ethical considerations into an unrealistic and hypothetical situation. When told that this is an unrealistic and purely hypothetical situation so answer from a purely logical position, it, again predictably, answers red every time. The trick is just in the wording, it’s intentionally vague, if the parameters were clearly spelled out “like babies havr to vote but no one can help them” I’m pretty sure most red voters would so “ok yeah blue then”

@BitcrshedMozart @ExtrovertArtist @TopherStoll @MrBeast What's easier 8bilion people all pressing the same button or reaching 50.01% of people voting blue? one its a statistical impossibility the other a very plausible outcome voting blue ensures saving elderly, kids, disabled people, even colorblind people, not even a dilemma

@TamayoStuff cojones

Un 29 de abril de 1945, el dictador fascista de Benito Mussolini era colgado en una gasolinera de la plaza de Loreto de Milán, su cadáver fue linchado, le apalearon la cabeza con martillos, fue escupido e incluso orinado por el pueblo italiano. Junto a él, fue colgada su cómplice, Clara Petacci, el ministro de propaganda fascista, Alessandro Pavolini, el secretario general del partido fascista italiano hasta 1939, Achille Starace, y Nicola Bombacci, el mayor traidor de la resistencia comunista. Después de que Hitler viese el linchamiento de su aliado Mussolini, empezó a preparar su suicidio por miedo a ser atrapado por el Ejército Rojo y ser linchado por su propio pueblo al igual que él. Asi es como deberia acabar siempre cada fascista.

@imthatdexter @nix_eth @MrBeast you say you like ai on your bio go ahead and ask chatgpt what button would it chose and why, ill wait

I do, personally, believe that millions of mentally and physically competent people would all press the same button. In fact, it happens every day. In much more complicated scenarios. If they were not mentally and physically competent, they would be excluded from the choice. Saying that someone who is mentally and physically competent would not be able to make the right decision in the case of a binary example as simple as pressing a button is absurd.

@imthatdexter @nix_eth @MrBeast no, no and no, saying that millions of people will press the exact same button is delusional and prof that you have 0 statistical knowledge (even in complete use of their brain, etc) someone even 1 single person IS GOING TO PRESS BLUE, 100% red is a statistical impossibility

If the test is only open to mentally and physically competent people, and you’re physically and mentally competent to take the test then there is only one rational choice. If the test is open to all people and every single human must take the test, even mentally incompetent people, then yes I agree with you. Again though, this is a wording trick. It’s intentionally vague and it’s designed that way to cause division. If the actual parameters were spelled out then the decision would be easy.

@StrawhatAke @ExtrovertArtist @BalrogLink @ShitpostRock2 they can't even fathom people beign selfless and empathetic, "when it matters and its secret you'll press red", no the fuck we wouldn't lmao

@ExtrovertArtist @BalrogLink @ShitpostRock2 its so funny watching you braindeads bend over backwards to picking red genuine fantasies and praying for us to live in a low trust society even if every poll disagrees Civilization is built on the idea that the community comes together for a better net result.

It's all just social media posturing. Given a private choice nearly everyone would choose red Your survival instinct would not let you press the blue button

@imthatdexter @nix_eth @MrBeast still someone could just be wrong and doesn't deserve to die, again, reaching 50.01% of blue votes is the only truly viable way of saving everyone, its statistically impossible to reach a 100% red voting, noise exists, deliberately choosing not to save everyone is sociopathic

The question as per the original phrasing assumes competence. What about completely paralyzed people? What about people in a coma? Will someone push the button for them? If yes then why not for all others who lack the competence or ability to do so themselves? Since these edge cases aren’t clearly explained you have to assume that everyone who takes the test is competent to take the test. But in reality it is actually just a wording trick, since it is not clearly stated that if you press the red button you will 100% survive, which if we are going to start explaining all of the other things, should be clearly explained as well. The cases for pressing the blue button are articulated, why not the case for the red button?

@GuyManFellow @bidenblasta @0xPBIT

@bidenblasta @0xPBIT I keep seeing people say things like this. But weirdly they are spending their time saying it on twitter instead of donating blood, or doing disaster relief, or sewing mosquito nets, or anything else that would save lives without even risking their own.

@rac1 oh no, les conseqüències de les meves accions aaaaah

🔴 Junts denuncia que han escopit i assetjat pel carrer la diputada Marta Madrenas després del no del partit al decret de la pròrroga dels lloguers #Echobox=1777523937" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">rac1.cat/politica/20260…

x @autoass x @rpmculture best car network 🌐

@RDCentrist @KllN349312 @yuliexe Somehow they think it’s more likely that 8 billion people will all press the same button than that 50.01% will decide to save everyone

@KllN349312 @corcreta @yuliexe In the button premise, if red button wins, the society will end/fall. A society where 50% of people know they collectively killed the other half of humanity will by necessity devolve into survival of the fittest, there will be no civil society or world order again.

@imthatdexter @nix_eth @MrBeast that leaves out people who WILL 100% click blue like kids, elderly people, handicapped people even colorblind people could press it, or even miss press by accident, only blue grants a 100% survivability, its easier to get 50.01% blue votes than 100% red votes

Here’s a more clear way of phrasing the question: “Everyone on earth takes a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. Anyone who presses the red button will survive. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button will survive. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives.” Do you get it now? It’s a language trick to make you feel guilty but it actually is insane to press the blue button. This rephrasing is the same exact rules of the original test, just with the added statement of “Anyone who presses the red button will survive” because that’s true.

@ExtrovertArtist @jac20667 @TopherStoll @MrBeast not much is your last response

@corcreta @jac20667 @TopherStoll @MrBeast Looking through my acc, obsessed much?