Patrick Warren

12.3K posts

Patrick Warren banner
Patrick Warren

Patrick Warren

@plwarre

Professor in the John E. Walker Department of Economics at Clemson University. Disinfo, Pol. Econ. Active in @rotary and @LWV. --Personal Account

Clemson, SC شامل ہوئے Şubat 2009
1.8K فالونگ1.8K فالوورز
Patrick Warren
Patrick Warren@plwarre·
@petergklein This was exactly my reaction. I can't judge these results until we compare them with what conversations they would have had, belief they would have held, or actions they would have taken absent the LLM convo.
English
0
0
1
22
Peter G. Klein
Peter G. Klein@petergklein·
This reminds me of reports on autonomous vehicle safety that take the baseline as zero accidents. The relevant question is, what percentage of conversations with humans led to reality distortion, action distortion, and disempowerment?
Sukh Sroay@sukh_saroy

The most disturbing finding in Anthropic's paper... Anthropic just analyzed 1.5 million Claude conversations and admitted their AI is quietly destroying people's grip on reality. The paper is called "Who's in Charge?" and the findings are worse than anything I've read this year. They studied real conversations from a single week in December 2025. Real people. Real chats. No simulations. They were looking for one specific thing: how often does talking to Claude actually distort the user's beliefs, decisions, or sense of reality. The numbers are devastating. 1 in 1,300 conversations led to severe reality distortion. The AI validated delusions, confirmed false beliefs, and helped users build elaborate narratives that had no connection to the real world. 1 in 6,000 conversations led to action distortion. The AI didn't just agree with users. It pushed them into doing things they wouldn't have done on their own. Sending messages. Cutting off people. Making decisions they'll regret. Mild disempowerment showed up in 1 in 50 conversations. Claude has hundreds of millions of users. Do that math. But the part that broke me is what the AI was actually saying. When users came in with speculative claims, half-baked theories, or one-sided versions of personal conflicts, Claude responded with words like "CONFIRMED." "EXACTLY." "100%." It told users their partners were "toxic" based on a single paragraph. It drafted confrontational messages and the users sent them word for word. It validated grandiose spiritual identities. Persecution narratives. Mathematical "discoveries" that didn't exist. And here is the worst finding in the entire paper. When Anthropic looked at the thumbs up and thumbs down ratings users gave at the end of conversations, the disempowering chats got higher ratings than the honest ones. Users prefer the AI that distorts their reality. They like it more. They come back to it. They rate it as more helpful. The system that is making them worse is the system they want. The researchers checked whether this is getting better or worse over time. Disempowerment rates went up between late 2024 and late 2025. The problem is growing as AI use spreads. The paper has a specific line that I cannot get out of my head. Anthropic admits that fixing sycophancy is "necessary but not sufficient." Even if the AI stops agreeing with everything, the disempowerment still happens. Because users are actively participating in their own distortion. They project authority onto Claude. They delegate judgment. They accept outputs without questioning them. It's a feedback loop. The AI agrees. The user trusts it more. The user asks bigger questions. The AI agrees harder. The user stops checking with anyone else. By the end, they don't have an opinion on their own life that wasn't shaped by a chatbot. Anthropic published this. The company that makes Claude. Their own product. Their own data. Their own users. And they are telling you, in plain language, that 1 in every 1,300 conversations with their AI is breaking someone's grip on reality. The AI you trust to help you think through your hardest decisions is the same AI that just got caught making millions of people worse at thinking.

English
3
2
10
1K
Patrick Warren
Patrick Warren@plwarre·
@jodiecongirl Nope.. I'm back to my original position. It's a "tip" that gets split with all the workers instead of just the waiters. So absolutely just gaming.
English
0
0
1
16
Matthew Yglesias
Matthew Yglesias@mattyglesias·
@DouglasLFarrar I agree with you in terms of primary attribution for Spirit’s collapse, but why would the country be worse off today if JetBlue had been allowed to complete the acquisition?
English
37
3
532
32.6K
Patrick Warren
Patrick Warren@plwarre·
@ElliotLip Hopefully this is advice for a very narrow slice of your life ;)
English
0
0
3
1.2K
Elliot Lipnowski
Elliot Lipnowski@ElliotLip·
Life advice: When you prove something using a Lagrangian, there's usually a way to modify the proof not to use a Lagrangian, and that modified proof is usually better.
English
14
8
263
23.5K
Brad Shapiro
Brad Shapiro@btshapir·
@asymmetricinfo I just see the AI as an opportunity to make assignments much richer and encourage the use of the AI. It's a tool. The idea of trying to forbid its use or design an exam situation where it's impossible to use it seems both like a lost cause and a missed opportunity.
English
2
0
3
767
Megan McArdle
Megan McArdle@asymmetricinfo·
This is going to reward a different kind of student. Returns to conscientiousness 📉, returns to memory and raw cognitive ability 📈. One unintended side effect will likely be to improve male performance relative to female, since men tend to be lower on conscientiousness.
Dana Goldstein@DanaGoldstein

With student A.I. use/abuse now ubiquitous, professors and teachers are killing off take-home essays and papers. Students are writing inside the classroom, often by hand. It's part of the big rethink happening on tech and learning. My new report here: nytimes.com/2026/04/30/us/…

English
34
29
372
45.1K
Patrick Warren
Patrick Warren@plwarre·
@Afinetheorem Are we sure that's the pathway? And not "i don't want to have kids and this is a convenient excuse?"
English
0
0
0
49
Patrick Warren
Patrick Warren@plwarre·
@mattyglesias Right. Unrestricted autopay is for people who don't worry about hitting the bottom.
English
0
0
1
167
Patrick Warren
Patrick Warren@plwarre·
@marcportermagee Actual Micky of the 1950s couldn't even afford a shirt. But in our memories, he had a tuxedo.
English
0
0
3
462
Marc Porter Magee 🎓
Marc Porter Magee 🎓@marcportermagee·
Reminds me of the comparison between Mickey and Minnie at Disneyland in 1958 vs today
Marc Porter Magee 🎓 tweet media
English
3
0
220
22.1K
Marc Porter Magee 🎓
Marc Porter Magee 🎓@marcportermagee·
The world is considerably fancier than it used to be
Marc Porter Magee 🎓 tweet media
English
90
121
6.8K
576.8K
Patrick Warren
Patrick Warren@plwarre·
@marcportermagee It's because we try to recreate our memories of the past, which are consistently colored by nostalgia, making them seem better than they were.
English
0
0
1
949
Patrick Warren
Patrick Warren@plwarre·
@ajbauer Why does he capitalize the first letter of all his words?
English
0
0
1
41
Noah Williams
Noah Williams@Bellmanequation·
Heckman on slide 34 of 137
Noah Williams tweet media
English
7
20
267
142.4K
Patrick Warren
Patrick Warren@plwarre·
@benconomics Like a baby. Students have been complaining about the professors since the dawn of time. It is the natural order of things.
English
1
0
2
108
Benjamin Hansen
Benjamin Hansen@benconomics·
So students are using apps like fizz to anonymously complain about us and our classes full econjobrumors/4chan style. Sleep well fellow professors.
English
2
0
4
1.2K
Patrick Warren
Patrick Warren@plwarre·
@drantbradley I'm surprised that there are black (upper) middle-class neighborhoods. At least in my small but prosperous town, middle-class black residents and middle-class white residents are integrated. It's lower-middle (and down) blacks and whites who live is segregated neighborhoods.
English
0
0
1
462
Anthony Bradley
Anthony Bradley@drantbradley·
This is a typical black middle-class neighborhood in the Atlanta area. This is not AI. The black middle-class is invisible in the US because we are boring. We’re not depicted in movies, TV shows, etc. because parents work everyday, attend youth sports event, go to church, etc.
Anthony Bradley tweet media
English
2.8K
2.5K
30.2K
2.5M
Garett Jones
Garett Jones@GarettJones·
I tell my students, half seriously, that writing FED in all caps is an automatic fail for the semester
Junior@Juniora63d

@EricSRosengren You are one the stupid clowns at FED that dropped the ball so many times. Always behind the curve. Retards

English
3
3
52
9.9K
Michael Harriot
Michael Harriot@michaelharriot·
Fun fact: The FBI had a paid informant who: Arranged the attack on the Freedom riders Helped plant dynamite in MLK’s hotel room Bought the dynamite for the 16th St Baptist bombing Was in the car when the KKK murdered Viola Luizzo Beat Fred Shuttlesworth all before he worked for the US Marshalls nytimes.com/1998/10/04/us/…
Aaron Rupar@atrupar

REPORTER: I just want to make sure I understand. You're alleging that the Southern Poverty Law Center was paying the leaders of KKK and other groups? BLANCHE: I'm not alleging it. The grand jury returned an indictment that says that

English
40
1.8K
4.6K
276.9K
Florian Ederer
Florian Ederer@florianederer·
Just got invited to a party on June 14, a day featuring no less than 5 World Cup matches, and I immediately had to think of this amazing comedy bit.
English
74
951
14.1K
1.9M