Adam

@raysan5 0% AI for anything is best because it's an easily defined requirement. If someone uses AI and fools everyone into thinking it was human written (like a regex) then its fine because it's the same as if a human would have written it (easy to verify output, but hard to write).

What should be raylib AI policy? 🤔🔥 github.com/raysan5/raylib…

@IvanOnTech Weekly shakeout.

PULSICANS!!! I missed tweeting about YOUR NEW ATL 2 days ago!!! How are $PLS trenches? Good? What you say? New sacrifice will bring messiah back? Gooot it gooot it Ok guys, I will check in at next ATL

@JustinPBarnett @JamesLaneAI @ENVERhq No because we threw trillions at a mostly a fad that didn't give the expected roi and now everyone is in debt and can't afford food because the belief in the system was shattered. People already don't wanna work for a broken system. That figure will just grow.

@GameDevEagle @JamesLaneAI @ENVERhq because AIs are good enough and we won't need humans?

I built 90% of a game in 5 days. Not a prototype. A real game releasing soon. Just started at @ENVERhq as Principal AI Engineer. They're behind MotoX and Scary Baboon on Quest. I designed an AI system and pointed it at the game design doc. It ran for 2 days straight and gave me a playable and tuned game. Game dev is splitting into two camps right now. Engineers who are learning to manage compute. And engineers still writing every line by hand. One group runs studios. The other gets left behind. We're hiring for the first camp. Unity devs who are deep in AI. DM me if that's you.

@JustinPBarnett @JamesLaneAI @ENVERhq I think the bubble will pop late this year or next year and cause us to fall in the next big depression 1929 style.

@GameDevEagle @JamesLaneAI @ENVERhq You keep saying shitty ai code. I don't think you realize what's coming

@JustinPBarnett @JamesLaneAI @ENVERhq Idk about that. With all new data being fed into LLMs being mostly shitty AI code it'll self perpetuate itself into enshittification.

@GameDevEagle @JamesLaneAI @ENVERhq AI is the worst it'll ever be right now

@JamesLaneAI @JustinPBarnett @ENVERhq That seems to be the trend with vibe coded games. All unplayable prototypes.

@GameDevEagle @JustinPBarnett @ENVERhq Well, it's not finished. You can make it to round 2 if you dodge well, though. But it's known that it needs a difficult tune

@JamesLaneAI @JustinPBarnett @ENVERhq I tried it. Can't make it past 1st round. Horrible experience.

@JustinPBarnett @ENVERhq iron-shores.web.app Built using Codex+Google Lyria 3+eleven labs. Design and direction by me. First time game dev.

@JustinPBarnett @ENVERhq Why do you need to hire anyone if your amazing game can be made in under 7 days?

@wookash_podcast That's why C++ is king. Lots of features and you pick what you like. Nothing is enforced on you cough* Rust cough*

Every now and then, comments like this appear under live coding sessions, and I don't know how to respond. My view on that matter is: - all highly skilled people I know are avoiding modern C++ - some use C, some use C++, but those who use C++, they take a tiny subset of features - like operator overloading, or destructors to have "cleanup" mechanics - none of those people use std::views, std::ranges, std::pair, or even std::unordered_map or std::vector. If they do, they know they make a concession, "I shouldn't do that, compile times and runtime will suffer, I'm doing this cause it's a prototype, not a *real* thing" What I conclude from these observations is: - modern C++ is more about fashion than any real gains - new, competing languages have features like "map, filter, reduce" or string slices and C++ committee generally wants to add features, not remove them - the implementation of these features in compilers (MSVC, Clang, gcc) is nasty, not because compiler engineers suck, quite contrary, but because those compilers need to care about decades of existing features, syntax expressions, and weird historical constructs - quick example, for everybody liking lambdas in other languages, will absolutely freak out trying to understand all the possibilities of capture monstrosity with const & reference & pointer and [=] and [*] and move semantics, and damn const reference to a smart pointer which will not update refcount, how far have we strayed from the path. So my stance is: - if I invite somebody who loves modern C++ we will talk about how cool things can be expressed, but it will come at the cost of build time and runtime. If you think this worldview lacks nuance, and should be explored more in depth - reach out or recommend a person who would be a good fit for such a discussion. We can make a live session geared towards exploring these topics, or organize a small debate (but avoiding drama, a civilized debate!)

@_trish_xD Strange opinion. By making your own vector impl, you'll outperform std vec.

i used to roll my eyes whenever senior devs said "just use the standard library." i was wrong. they were right. so much third-party stuff is genuinely unnecessary.

@Dispatch_Graph As a result, we'll see a million engines popping out and I'm unsure if we are better off from it. Games today already suffer from enshittification even without AI. With AI? More junk.

@Dispatch_Graph My main critique is that AI is like an addiction. "Just one more prompt" leads to bloat and lack of understanding. The whole point of writing an engine is to have more control, not less.

Ok, I see some controversy about my LLM usage in Termina engine, so I wanted to rant a bit 🧵

@Wardlangely @levelsio Piece of mind? Maybe you have something that a blood test would help discover early? Plus it's valuable to know if you're lacking nutrients? High tax 0 service

@levelsio the netherlands thing makes sense though — if you're not sick why burn healthcare resources, that's actually the philosophy working as intended

I was never able to do blood tests when I asked for it in Netherlands Doctor asked "why? you're not sick?" Then I tried in Portugal (at Germano de Sousa) but they never picked up the phone or when they did were so slow and unhelpful I gave up, they also require a doctor prescription btw The first place I could get my blood tested was Thailand in 2018, I just walked into Bumrungrad and asked for it, amazing experience Last few years we just fly to Brazil and do it here, the nurse comes to your home/hotel at 8am and takes your blood, same or next day results online I find it funny I keep having to fly out of Western Europe to do blood tests, they make it impossibly hard to do them Which is retarded

@theo A performant game engine capable of handling millions of players for MMO.

I would like to purchase a handful of code problems that modern LLMs can’t solve. Requirements: - programmatically verifiable (can be tested without human interaction) - “before” state (repo before the commit that implements the solution) - example code that actually solves the problem I am willing to pay up to $500 per problem that I can easily test locally and confirm current models (gpt-5.3-codex, opus 4.6) are unable to solve. If you can’t tell, I’m running out of “too hard for LLM” code tasks 🙃🙃🙃

@mihail_eric Programming has always been about architecting once you get past the learning stage of writing for loops.

The computer science major is going through an identity crisis. ChatGPT can finish any programming assignment with a single prompt so what's the value of teaching students how to write a function in Python? Here’s the point: we still need architects, not button-pushers. The next decade will belong to people who understand theory and how to break complex systems into smaller components even without Wifi. Imagine a degree that drills algorithmic thinking. Weekly closed-book exams. CLRS becomes the most important book in the major. And coding? You’ll exercise that muscle only at internships and real jobs. The computer science major will look more and more like a math degree.

@Jonathan_Blow I would love it if more authors would just write the mathematical algorithm broken down in steps like a cooking recipe. For some reason it's either the original, condensed math equation or bloated syntax. Never in between #sad.

Reason: Everything up to page 50 is basic linear algebra, but with no attempt to communicate intuition or visualize anything. The idea of implementing everything as you go in code is interesting, but Scheme is an awful language for this, and they also never run the code, inspect it or reason about it. It is just there, and adds nothing to the conversation; almost any reader will skip the code. I just don’t see the point of

I am giving up on this book after 50 of 200 pages. What should I read instead?

@mynameis_davis Would probably work. Serving rich people is probably the future of capitalism as rich get richer. Main challenge is ensuring high quality matches: Catfishing, baiting & wasting peoples time will be more prevalent than ever.

@WillShadow6 @vxunderground So basically it's a way for poor people who can't afford a secretary to feel more important?

@vxunderground Here are some things I’ve used it for in the last week (thread bc char limit): 1. Can you go to my calendar and find a good time on Friday that I can meet with PERSON, they usually like eating lunch somewhere like a deli so find somewhere that has an open reservation as well.

I read about OpenClaw. I still don't understand the purpose. Can someone seriously explain to me the purpose of this AI assistant? I reviewed the different "skills" it offers and it makes literally zero sense. This can be used to automate ... messages to other people? Like on Slack, or Discord, or Telegram? Check the weather? Do stuff with Stripe? I don't understand the purpose. Why would I need something to automatically deal with instant messaging clients? Am I missing something? Even if you don't NEED it, why would you WANT it? I DON'T UNDERSTAND

@asaio87 I find it hilarious that this is the best thing AI bros seems to have procured. Their golden goose: A personal assistant. My god the innovation.

Openclaw here, openclaw there. It’s everywhere. Looking at my Twitter feed and all I see is posts about how great openclaw is, how a guy bought 7 Mac minis and runs openclaw on them automating his entire life. In reality all it is just hype. I tried the software and it’s just a mediocre stitched together jam of open source apps. Yes the idea is good but it’s not that great. Time to get back to actual work. Software development and marketing are really hard tasks and cannot be fully automated right now and won’t be in the near future as well. Get some work done