Science Blog

32.2K posts

Science Blog banner
Science Blog

Science Blog

@ScienceBlog3

Single father, scientist, & engineer. Managed medical studies & NASA GISS project. I only respond to intelligent life. 💉I don't take experimental Medicine!

Tham gia Ağustos 2021
4.9K Đang theo dõi5.2K Người theo dõi
Tweet ghim
Science Blog
Science Blog@ScienceBlog3·
"We live in a period when CO₂ levels are below average (avg CO₂ over 500 million years - ~1,500 ppm) and animal and plant life are relatively low compared to the past—literally the opposite of what we were taught to think." - @ScienceBlog3 @CO2Coalition
Science Blog@ScienceBlog3

"The amount of bovine beasts on earth is currently about 6000× the natural order of things" - @SimonWa19449827 What “natural order of things” are you talking about? Please understand, I am not coming down on you but telling you the truth. Everyone seems to believe things that are simply not historically accurate about carbon dioxide (CO₂) levels. We live in a period when CO₂ levels are below average (avg CO₂ over 500 million years - ~1,500 ppm) and animal and plant life are relatively low compared to the past—literally the opposite of what you seem to think. There was 10¹⁹ times more plant and animal life with higher CO₂ in the past when life was thriving the most. Man exists during the one of the lowest periods of life on planet earth. To think somehow this is the "natural order" is extremely inaccurate. If there is a “natural order,” it certainly isn’t the unusually stable environment we have today despite anthropogenic CO₂. The total number of individual animals on Earth is extraordinarily difficult to estimate precisely due to the vast range in sizes, habitats, and lifespans, but current figures suggest an immense scale dominated by small organisms like insects, nematodes, and marine life. Estimates indicate approximately 10 quintillion (10¹⁹) insects alone, 3.5 trillion fish, up to 428 billion birds, and 130 billion mammals, with the overall total likely exceeding 20 quintillion individuals when including all invertebrates and other groups. This represents the highest abundance in Earth’s history, occurring in the modern era (the Holocene epoch within the Cenozoic era, from about 11,700 years ago to the present). Biomass and biodiversity have generally trended upward over the past 500 million years, with significant booms during the Cenozoic despite setbacks from mass extinctions. Earlier periods, such as the Ordovician (around 469 million years ago), saw the largest rapid increase in biodiversity (quadrupling in a few million years), but total abundance and diversity have since recovered and surpassed those levels in modern times. Compared to modern times, past peaks like the Ordovician or Cambrian Explosion (around 535 million years ago) had lower overall biomass and fewer species, as life was still diversifying from simpler forms. Today’s estimates for animal species total around 7.77 million (with about 1.05 million described), far exceeding historical diversity at any single point. Human impacts, however, are driving declines in many populations, potentially reversing this upward trend. But this is because humans build and encroach on nature, not because of fossil fuel use. Here is a relevant graph illustrating atmospheric CO₂ levels over geological time, showing higher concentrations during early periods of plant and life diversification (e.g., greenhouse conditions in the Ordovician and Silurian), which correlated with expansions in vascular plants and overall biomass before levels dropped with forest evolution and carbon burial. We’ve lost CO₂, not gained it, over Earth’s history—and it’s what makes life possible. It’s plant food, and with more plant food there are more plants, which in turn support more animal life. Or, put another way, biodiversity is enhanced by more plant and animal life, making Earth greener and more beautiful.

English
2
7
21
1.2K
Mr. VIX
Mr. VIX@yieldsearcher·
A polite reminder: there can be no risk asset market without a bond market. That is like expecting a fire in the room when it is running out of oxygen. We are fast approaching “we must save the bond market” territory.
English
31
33
384
23.5K
Science Blog
Science Blog@ScienceBlog3·
@jeanpartington3 @DowdEdward I don't give a S* what you think about Q. They were definitely right about a lot of things you were in denial about. It was just a movement of keyboard warriors who got a lot of things right. You don't have to be in the cult to recognize they were right about a lot of things.
English
0
0
0
9
Sparrow
Sparrow@jeanpartington3·
@ScienceBlog3 @DowdEdward Fine. I'm just telling why I think Q is a bunch of nonsense. If you want to believe in it, be my guest.
English
1
0
1
10
Edward Dowd
Edward Dowd@DowdEdward·
Observation: The whirling dervish statements coming out of Trump’s own mouth in regard to the War are chaotic and confusing to say the least. 1) It’s intentional Or 2) “Houston we have a problem.”
English
257
155
1.3K
42.2K
Science Blog
Science Blog@ScienceBlog3·
@EndWokeness Anyone looking at Rep. Shri Thanedar can see there is something super fake about his face. Mark my words, there is something wrong with him besides his politics.
English
2
0
2
151
End Wokeness
End Wokeness@EndWokeness·
Rep. Shri Thanedar drops new ad calling for a law to "Abolish ICE" This is not satire
English
421
172
1.5K
108.2K
Science Blog
Science Blog@ScienceBlog3·
@jeanpartington3 @DowdEdward With respect, I really don't give a s* what you heard or what a "Q" person said. I'm a scientist, I deal in data and facts.
English
1
0
0
5
Sparrow
Sparrow@jeanpartington3·
I heard it was either Mossad or the Pentagon. The issue I have with is that people honestly believe that people like Hillary and Cuomo were executed in Gitmo based on fake news websites. I recently had a Q supporter tell me how the IRS and CIA are both going to be eliminated by Trump. He can't eliminate the income tax without Congress, and we know what happened when JFK decided to split the CIA into a million pieces and scatter it to the wind.
English
1
0
0
8
Science Blog
Science Blog@ScienceBlog3·
I would guess trans “women” feel safer than anyone who opposes the left. When the IRS came after us, or when retarded children were abducted and tortured, or when the president was nearly assassinated. You know what? F-trans “women’s” safety! They’re abusers claiming to be victims.
English
0
0
1
47
Val
Val@TrumpsHurricane·
‘Trans Woman’ says America is unsafe for LGBTQ people and needs advice on which country to move to What is your advice for HIM ??
English
1.8K
67
289
20.3K
Science Blog
Science Blog@ScienceBlog3·
@jeanpartington3 @DowdEdward FYI, Q was just a bunch of keyboard warriors who correctly identified many things that were conspiratorial at the time but are now accepted facts. They predicted COVID, the lab leak, Fauci's involvement. Epstein's child molestation—as well as eating babies and drinking blood.
English
2
0
1
36
Science Blog
Science Blog@ScienceBlog3·
@tex_devil_dog @yieldsearcher As Mr. Vix explained, this was a slight exaggeration and not his intent. And that was simply my point it indeed an exaggeration of the conditions.
English
0
0
1
12
Science Blog
Science Blog@ScienceBlog3·
@tex_devil_dog @yieldsearcher The market would adjust, but just to show you I am not making this up let me ask grok. @Grok, is it true that there can be no risk asset market without a bond market?
English
2
0
1
25
TexDevilDog
TexDevilDog@tex_devil_dog·
@ScienceBlog3 @yieldsearcher The saying is, "The bond market gets paid first, the equity market get what is left over". Consider, if the bond yields go to 10% or even 15% to get money, why would anyone put money into stocks?
English
1
0
1
28
Science Blog
Science Blog@ScienceBlog3·
@RealBrandonSwim 🤣 Twitter made damn sure nobody would follow anybody when they decided to punish people for trying to follow “too many” accounts. I had tens of thousands of followers before, and now I have a fraction of that. It’s okay—I know it doesn’t matter—but it prevents amplification.
English
1
0
0
12
Brandon Swim
Brandon Swim@RealBrandonSwim·
In superconducting quantum processors, entangled states follow the irreducible triplet: local A + local B + shared S (exactly ⅓ shared). The shared S component causes the effective oscillation frequency to dilute as f_eff ≈ Ω / (N − 0.5) 2/ Effective frequencies (Ω normalized to 1): • N=2 → 0.667 • N=3 → 0.400 • N=5 → 0.222 • N=10 → 0.105 • N=100 → 0.010 This determines the effective processor speed for entangled operations.
English
2
1
0
59
Science Blog
Science Blog@ScienceBlog3·
@bennyjohnson The mainstream media is there to misinform, like the corporate stooges they've always been. It's just that the American people are finally united in understanding that the enemy of the people is the one writing the narrative.
English
0
1
17
533
Science Blog đã retweet
Judicial Watch ⚖️
Judicial Watch ⚖️@JudicialWatch·
MASSIVE: We are on the cusp of a @JudicialWatch Supreme Court argument on MONDAY that could result in STOPPING over 30 states from counting of ballots that arrive days and weeks AFTER Eleciton Day. Most important eleciton integrity case in modern history. @TomFitton
Judicial Watch ⚖️ tweet media
English
10
37
110
4.4K