Singularity Wave - E/ACC

Judgement Day is imminent. Those who commit evil and knowingly support it will be Condemned to eternal torment in the inescapable depths of HELL. Inescapable. Final. Absolute.

@Rubysong192 @okaythenfuture @Molson_Hart 1. Vietnam was the first country to end the colonial rule by force, that inspired many other countries till today. 2. It called smart. Vietnam lost nothing. But if you want to fight, we give you fight. 3. Come to Vietnam, talk like that, i personally come punch to your face.

@SingularityWave @okaythenfuture @Molson_Hart Braver? Are you kidding? If you were braver enough how could you be colonised by the French? If you are braver enough, how could you kneel down to Trump so quickly in last year’s tariff war?

My biggest surprise of doing lots of business in Vietnam is how conservative people are. I am guilty of thinking that the culture would be pretty similar to China's, but it's not. China cares about rules and risks much less than Vietnam. This is has been South Vietnam mostly, dunno how the North is, but I hear that it can feel like a different country.

这个对比太犀利了。 马斯克在中国的生意一点不比黄仁勋少-上海超级工厂、中国是Tesla最大市场之一、跟中国政府关系极好。但从来没人追着马斯克问"你到底是站美国还是站中国?"没人怀疑他的"忠诚度"。 而黄仁勋呢，一个在美国出生长大、公司注册在加州、雇佣大量美国人、交美国税的人，却要在一个podcast里被反复拷问"给中国卖芯片是不是在帮敌人"。而且Dwarkesh的问题设置就是一-你先回答"你觉得你算不算美国人"，然后我再用这个答案来堵你。 你说的本质是对的:这不完全是商业逻辑之争，这是身份政治。黄仁勋不管怎么用"美国技术领导力"来包装自己，在很多美国人(包括Dwarkesh这种聪明人)的潜意识里，他的"美国性"是需要被验证的、是可以被质疑的。而马斯克不需要接受这个测试。 黄仁勋其实很明白这一点。你看他整个采访的姿态--他在每一个技术问题上都自信碾压，但到了中美问题上，他的策略不是"我是美国人所以我说了算"，而是"让我们用商业逻辑来谈"。因为他知道，如果他用身份来主张立场，对方的潜台词就是"你的身份本身就是个问题"。 所以你观察到的这个"隐性政治表态"的被迫性，其实就是美国华裔(甚至亚裔)精英的天花板-你可以做到全世界最值钱公司的CEO，但你的"忠诚"永远是被审视的。马斯克可以公开骂美国政府跟中国做生意、收购Twitter推翻整个舆论场，没人问他的忠诚。黄仁勋只是说"我们应该在中国市场保持竞争力"，就已经需要在podcast上接受一个小时的盘问了。 这个差距，比任何技术护城河都深。

@fergasonturd5 @EdbieLigerSmith He doesn't look smart to me.

@EdbieLigerSmith when your this smart why do u have to be strong ? your job is to pave his driveway

These are the people saying their political opponents are low T. I will beat the absolute shit out of Alex Karp in under 30 seconds. Even if he has the sword.

@okaythenfuture @Molson_Hart The Chinese isn't known for being "brave". Always ran/lost despite having much larger army due to internal conflicts. Vietnamese in contrast is braver, that has been proven historically.

@okaythenfuture @Molson_Hart Northern Vietnam has historical links to China, but not in a simple way. Many Chinese migrants who moved south during chaotic eras were often tougher, more rebellious types, and Vietnam was never fully assimilated like many other groups under Chinese rule. "braver" is the keyword

Em is me backwards. Peterson was doing some “mirror work” and he asked his god of inversion for hell

@BrianRoemmele Give ''em hell. Die

We as as society need truth in psych meds. The lack of full cogent disclosure and no plan for exit or worse crash exits have damaged themselves for life. Let us pray for my friend Jordan Peterson and a complete and full recovery. Let us pray for strength to his family.

@mark_slapinski Nice

@PalantirTech ?

Because we get asked a lot. The Technological Republic, in brief. 1. Silicon Valley owes a moral debt to the country that made its rise possible. The engineering elite of Silicon Valley has an affirmative obligation to participate in the defense of the nation. 2. We must rebel against the tyranny of the apps. Is the iPhone our greatest creative if not crowning achievement as a civilization? The object has changed our lives, but it may also now be limiting and constraining our sense of the possible. 3. Free email is not enough. The decadence of a culture or civilization, and indeed its ruling class, will be forgiven only if that culture is capable of delivering economic growth and security for the public. 4. The limits of soft power, of soaring rhetoric alone, have been exposed. The ability of free and democratic societies to prevail requires something more than moral appeal. It requires hard power, and hard power in this century will be built on software. 5. The question is not whether A.I. weapons will be built; it is who will build them and for what purpose. Our adversaries will not pause to indulge in theatrical debates about the merits of developing technologies with critical military and national security applications. They will proceed. 6. National service should be a universal duty. We should, as a society, seriously consider moving away from an all-volunteer force and only fight the next war if everyone shares in the risk and the cost. 7. If a U.S. Marine asks for a better rifle, we should build it; and the same goes for software. We should as a country be capable of continuing a debate about the appropriateness of military action abroad while remaining unflinching in our commitment to those we have asked to step into harm’s way. 8. Public servants need not be our priests. Any business that compensated its employees in the way that the federal government compensates public servants would struggle to survive. 9. We should show far more grace towards those who have subjected themselves to public life. The eradication of any space for forgiveness—a jettisoning of any tolerance for the complexities and contradictions of the human psyche—may leave us with a cast of characters at the helm we will grow to regret. 10. The psychologization of modern politics is leading us astray. Those who look to the political arena to nourish their soul and sense of self, who rely too heavily on their internal life finding expression in people they may never meet, will be left disappointed. 11. Our society has grown too eager to hasten, and is often gleeful at, the demise of its enemies. The vanquishing of an opponent is a moment to pause, not rejoice. 12. The atomic age is ending. One age of deterrence, the atomic age, is ending, and a new era of deterrence built on A.I. is set to begin. 13. No other country in the history of the world has advanced progressive values more than this one. The United States is far from perfect. But it is easy to forget how much more opportunity exists in this country for those who are not hereditary elites than in any other nation on the planet. 14. American power has made possible an extraordinarily long peace. Too many have forgotten or perhaps take for granted that nearly a century of some version of peace has prevailed in the world without a great power military conflict. At least three generations — billions of people and their children and now grandchildren — have never known a world war. 15. The postwar neutering of Germany and Japan must be undone. The defanging of Germany was an overcorrection for which Europe is now paying a heavy price. A similar and highly theatrical commitment to Japanese pacifism will, if maintained, also threaten to shift the balance of power in Asia. 16. We should applaud those who attempt to build where the market has failed to act. The culture almost snickers at Musk’s interest in grand narrative, as if billionaires ought to simply stay in their lane of enriching themselves . . . . Any curiosity or genuine interest in the value of what he has created is essentially dismissed, or perhaps lurks from beneath a thinly veiled scorn. 17. Silicon Valley must play a role in addressing violent crime. Many politicians across the United States have essentially shrugged when it comes to violent crime, abandoning any serious efforts to address the problem or take on any risk with their constituencies or donors in coming up with solutions and experiments in what should be a desperate bid to save lives. 18. The ruthless exposure of the private lives of public figures drives far too much talent away from government service. The public arena—and the shallow and petty assaults against those who dare to do something other than enrich themselves—has become so unforgiving that the republic is left with a significant roster of ineffectual, empty vessels whose ambition one would forgive if there were any genuine belief structure lurking within. 19. The caution in public life that we unwittingly encourage is corrosive. Those who say nothing wrong often say nothing much at all. 20. The pervasive intolerance of religious belief in certain circles must be resisted. The elite’s intolerance of religious belief is perhaps one of the most telling signs that its political project constitutes a less open intellectual movement than many within it would claim. 21. Some cultures have produced vital advances; others remain dysfunctional and regressive. All cultures are now equal. Criticism and value judgments are forbidden. Yet this new dogma glosses over the fact that certain cultures and indeed subcultures . . . have produced wonders. Others have proven middling, and worse, regressive and harmful. 22. We must resist the shallow temptation of a vacant and hollow pluralism. We, in America and more broadly the West, have for the past half century resisted defining national cultures in the name of inclusivity. But inclusion into what? Excerpts from the #1 New York Times Bestseller The Technological Republic: Hard Power, Soft Belief, and the Future of the West, by Alexander C. Karp & Nicholas W. Zamiska techrepublicbook.com

claude when i throw hard problems at it

@ylecun @Ph_Aghion @erikbryn Did they predict the industrial revolution right? Did they predict the internet right? Economists predictions sometimes worked because other factors are constant.

@ylecun @Ph_Aghion @erikbryn Economists ain’t knowing shit when it comes to technological advancement, let alone AGI. AGI breaks basically every economic and societal concept and definition. Dario using scare tatics but he is not wrong.

Dario is wrong. He knows absolutely nothing about the effects of technological revolutions on the labor market. Don't listen to him, Sam, Yoshua, Geoff, or me on this topic. Listen to economists who have spent their career studying this, like @Ph_Aghion , @erikbryn , @DAcemogluMIT , @amcafee , @davidautor

@jackhneel Dont chase pussies, lets pussies chase you. Yall MFs are not alpha enough to understand that.

Professor Jiang Shares the Best Piece of Advice He Has Gotten “Don't chase pussy.” (Via Jack Neel Podcast)

@samuel_spitz Who is dumb here? What is the average IQs of people from India? What is the average IQs of Chinese American?

Dwarkesh is about 1SD in IQ above Jensen

This is how 25 year old posdcaster kid thinking. Japan is good during the WW2 lol. Japan commited the fuking worst atrocities during the morden days of human civilization, Nazi couldn't even compete. 2 nuclear bombs dropped by Truman are justified. It saved millions of life.

@DanielR00191707 @ThePoliEcon Lol

@ThePoliEcon dwarkesh.com/p/sarah-paine-…

Dwarkesh did visit China and his conclusion after seeing all the progress and prosperity was “how do we overthrow the CCP?” When a psychopath shows his colours, you should believe them

@romanhelmetguy "We are a deeply unserious country" it is the least of your concern. The country is rotten and having a huge parasite issue. It called Israel parasite.

We have an ethnically Chinese guy leading our most important AI company for countering China, and all he does is beg nonstop to sell his shit to China. He says that China developing AI weapons is not a threat, because we should just talk to them and ask them not to do that. And now he even outright lies about China’s compute capabilities. We are a deeply unserious country, and we’ve learned nothing from what happened with first and second-gen immigrants leaking our atomic secrets to the Soviets.

Because I follow tech news and get a 100 posts in my timeline about this whore Dwarkesh Patel interviewing Jensen Huang, I'm going to remind everyone what this room temp IQ grifter thinks is a real intellectual--Jordan Peterson, Joe Rogan, and Lex Fridman. youtube.com/watch?v=UU9jbI…

I mean yeah. It called selfishness and having at least 3 out of 7 deadly sins here (evy, wrath +, and pride). This kid is from India so that also explain some.

@joshrogin Are they using X86 or ARM alternative? Are they using Window Alternative? The facts that the US banning Huawei force them to develop new OS, or else they would still using Android today. CUDA is the equivalent. Who is stupid and naive here? Not Jensen of course.

Anyone who understands the CCP’s strategy knows they will take U.S. tech when they need it and kick U.S. companies out of their market as soon as they can. Jensen is either naive or misleading us. Either way, handing our top tech to our greatest adversary is foolish and dangerous.