Jmac

14.1K posts

Jmac

Jmac

@Jmacwillkillyou

加入时间 Eylül 2010
175 关注118 粉丝
Godog8
Godog8@RodgersBj88008·
@Jmacwillkillyou @TondaMacC @RyanTumilty @aballinga @TorontoStar WHY? it is NOT how our system was designed. It is supposed to be a bottom ups system. y guess is you have NO education about the history of Canada and how our electoral system works. If you do not like it, work to change the rules!
Godog8 tweet mediaGodog8 tweet media
English
1
0
0
6
Jmac
Jmac@Jmacwillkillyou·
@StittLogan Right but the same libs that are accepting that statement now didn't accept it then.
English
0
0
0
190
Jmac
Jmac@Jmacwillkillyou·
@Dude95316547 @VanIsleInvestor The current system is way better than what is being proposed, that doesn't mean the current system is good, it means you need to go back to the drawing board anc come up with a plan that works. You people and you egos are exhausting.
English
0
0
0
3
Bort
Bort@Dude95316547·
@VanIsleInvestor Hey you're right. The current system is way better and we shouldn't do a single thing to disrupt our billionaire overlords. Thanks for being a good human
English
1
0
0
23
Jmac
Jmac@Jmacwillkillyou·
@VanIsleInvestor Oh you think his plan is for ALL Canadians? This will strictly be a means tested vote buying scam for the welfare class like everything else the NDP suggests.
English
0
0
0
13
Jmac
Jmac@Jmacwillkillyou·
@davidconstable6 @sarobertsonca Except the ridings that get stuck with a candidate from a party they didn't vote for, plus we'd need a process to determine which ridings those are.
English
0
0
0
8
Dave's a real name
Dave's a real name@davidconstable6·
@sarobertsonca Most of us vote party most times. FPTP pretends we vote for an individual person. Proportional Representation would more accurately reflect how we voters choose, and would give us more accurate representation.
English
1
0
2
60
Scott Robertson
Scott Robertson@sarobertsonca·
Avi Lewis on floor crossing: "I think at this point Canadians are starting to go, 'Does our vote count if we vote for somebody and then they just end up in the other party?'"
English
45
68
426
11.6K
Jmac
Jmac@Jmacwillkillyou·
@sarobertsonca Yes that is what we want, that's why we didn't vote liberal.
English
0
0
0
0
Scott Robertson
Scott Robertson@sarobertsonca·
Steven MacKinnon: "I can assure you that Canadians who live in Conservative ridings or in opposition ridings across Canada are asking their Members of Parliament, we want you to be part of solutions, we want you to be part of a positive vision for building Canada."
English
533
147
754
57.7K
Jmac
Jmac@Jmacwillkillyou·
@RM_Transit Like everything else in Toronto, there is too much bureaucracy, obstructionist unions, a focus on wants instead of needs, and no consequence for failure.
English
0
0
0
8
Reece Martin
Reece Martin@RM_Transit·
Why are they leaving though? I'd argue it's in no small part because Toronto has systematically deprioritized public transit speed. Look at the disaster along Finch West, but also how the Toronto street cars have been among the slowest in the world for a very long time.
Edgardo Sepulveda@E_R_Sepulveda

Toronto's wealthy are opting out of the TTC, increasingly taking Uber and Lyft—and leaving a fiscal hole in the public system the rest of us depend on. In transportation, we're now seeing the same high-income flight that we've already seen in health and education. The rich exit. The public system suffers fiscally—and, because of the service cuts that follow, politically too. Progressive taxation has always been the answer: tax the private luxury good to fund the public good. New York figured this out in 2018. They capped ride-hailing vehicles and slapped a $2.75/trip levy on every Uber and Lyft ride. That single policy now generates more than $300 million a year—plowed directly into the transit system used by working-class New Yorkers. Toronto has done nothing. No cap. No levy. No accountability. Just 80,000 licensed ride-hailing drivers—more per capita than NYC—circling a city whose transit system still sits at only 82% of pre-pandemic ridership. The math isn't complicated: ride-hailing mostly used by the wealthy is cannibalizing the TTC. A per-trip levy on every ride should fund the public transit those trips displace. My latest in @jacobin in the reply.

English
24
9
170
12.5K
Jmac
Jmac@Jmacwillkillyou·
@Oakvillejaysfan @kinsellawarren Chretien would have, Martin maybe, Trudeau definitely not. 2026 CPC views are just Chretien era Liberal and left wing views, you guys just forgot because Trudy took the party so far left.
Jmac tweet media
English
0
0
0
25
Oakville Jays
Oakville Jays@Oakvillejaysfan·
@kinsellawarren I don't think Chrétien, Martin, or Trudeau would let her be part of the caucus.
English
3
0
10
309
Jmac
Jmac@Jmacwillkillyou·
@kinsellawarren Liberals used to support free speech and the right to protest.
English
0
0
0
12
Jmac
Jmac@Jmacwillkillyou·
@SpencerFernando So Carney announcing today that she is expected to vote the party line on a number of issues is upsetting to you?
English
0
0
0
2
Spencer Fernando
Spencer Fernando@SpencerFernando·
We need politicians with their own minds, not drones. Every party loves floor crossings when the floor crossing is in their direction, and hates floor crossings when it’s going the other way, so there is little point in considering the inevitable lamentations of the Conservatives, just as the celebration of the Liberals is of little intellectual value here. However, what must be stated is that whether you agree with individual floor crossing decisions or not, the ability of MPs to cross the floor must be protected. Our political system is built so that we elect individuals, not a party, and this is profoundly important because it ensures that those we elect have their own minds. The individual mind is the only real kind of mind there is. There is no ‘group mind’ or ‘collective mind.’
English
105
16
57
6.4K
Jmac
Jmac@Jmacwillkillyou·
@scottmhayward Maybe not, but doesn't make it any less true, and at this point who gives a shit? Even if we manage to elect our preferred government they can't get past a highly partisan un-elected senate, or judiciary anyway. At least now we can stop pretending we have a democracy.
English
0
0
0
28
Jmac
Jmac@Jmacwillkillyou·
@notthatkhalid LGBT isn't a thing. They are all separate things, and and there are zero rights that other Canadians have that they don't.
English
0
0
2
93
K
K@notthatkhalid·
I can’t believe I’m saying this, but there’s only the NDP and Greens are the only nationwide parties ideologically committed to LGBT rights.
English
45
86
1K
12.7K
Jmac
Jmac@Jmacwillkillyou·
@sheryltibo Eh, even if it did count you still have to get past the unelected senate and judiciary, at least now we can stop pretending to be a democracy.
English
1
0
6
180
Sheryl Blais
Sheryl Blais@sheryltibo·
In Canada - your vote doesn’t count anymore. Those in Western Canada already feel this. Those in the East - how does it feel??
English
48
61
578
5.8K
Jmac
Jmac@Jmacwillkillyou·
@SpencerFernando So instead we should subvert the will of voters for the feelings of this one individual, and with zero avenue for repercussions? This is an incredibly stupid take.
English
1
0
5
42
Spencer Fernando
Spencer Fernando@SpencerFernando·
Were Canada to ban floor crossing, we would be suppressing the individual minds of those we elect, and further concentrating power in party leaders. As things stand now, floor crossing protects independence and keeps pressure on leaders to treat their colleagues well lest they watch those colleagues head elsewhere. Floor crossing – and the threat of it – protects us from a system where those we elect turn into mindless drones serving nothing more than the centralized will of ‘the leader.’ So, whether you agree with Gladu’s decision or not, it is essential to protect the right of MPs to cross the floor. The individual mind is the most precious resource we have.
English
1.4K
58
287
62.6K
Jmac
Jmac@Jmacwillkillyou·
@CanadianPolling Given that the Liberals can't build anything and the 90 billion budget is definitely going to be more than double for a train that has no viable use case is this HSR project
English
0
0
1
39
Polling Canada
Polling Canada@CanadianPolling·
More than 60% of Canadians say they support the ALTO High-speed railway From Liberals to Conservatives, Canadians want the railway built Read it for free below
Polling Canada tweet media
English
133
68
328
24.6K
Jmac
Jmac@Jmacwillkillyou·
@CanadianPolling Poll question is heavily biased, quotes the wrong cost for the project, uses a completely unsubstantiated economic benefit stat, and doesn't list any of the negatives. You used to call out this type of low quality polling.
Jmac tweet media
English
0
0
2
64
Jmac
Jmac@Jmacwillkillyou·
@SpencerFernando Sure, but then if they need to decide that when they are choosing the party they run for. If they can no longer support the direction of their party, they should resign and let the people vote. Why bother voting at all if democracy doesn't matter?
English
0
0
0
13
Jmac
Jmac@Jmacwillkillyou·
@Rusev_Jace @rupasubramanya Prove it with a by-election then. They overwhelmingly voted for the Conservative platform it's not like it was a close race.
English
0
0
1
11
Rupa Subramanya
Rupa Subramanya@rupasubramanya·
This is what winning looks like. Politics isn' t a charity but about coalition building. The fact that Carney was able to entice a hard core Conservative tells you exactly where the momentum is. If people prefer purity, there’s always the NDP, a party that will never win an election, much like what the CPC is increasingly being reduced to.
Robyn Urback@RobynUrback

Reflects poorly on both. Gladu for obvious reasons. But if ever one needed proof that Liberal principles are first and foremost about the acquisition of power and not a coherent set of values and perspectives, it's accepting an unapologetic conservative like Gladu into caucus

English
437
42
238
41.7K