A). Natural Formation B). Ancient Structure I know which one I lean towards but what about you?

@TheProjectUnity Because you are a dunning-Kruger idiot that doesn’t read about any of the subjects you cover. Have you ever walked up steps like that before? Derrrrr.

@TheProjectUnity I am going with Robert Schoch and other geologists, it's almost certainly a natural feature with some areas that might have been partly modified by humans.

@TheProjectUnity I think ancient quarry

From deep questions to stunning visuals - Grok does it all. Sign up and start imagining instantly.

@TheProjectUnity A) Because of its location and depth is only 26 m (85 ft), which might be that it used to be on ground level millions of years ago, but got only recently submerged like 12,000-6,000 years ago. Coordinates: 24°26′09″N 123°00′41″E

@TheProjectUnity Ancient Structure. Nature can’t do that.

@TheProjectUnity Anyone choosing A is a bit off in the head. Imagine nature producing that .

@TheProjectUnity So I think I saw Josh Gates do an episode on this, concluded natural structure, something about the type of stone, I can't remember a tile of lime stone? Pressure cracks, showed how it worked in a lab replicated the same type of formations and step breaks...

@TheProjectUnity B for sure. Thank you for all of the content you post. I’d love to visit some of these sites in my lifetime.

@TheProjectUnity Because its not tidal erosion its geological fracturing of giant exposed bedrock broken in linear lines.. when a cloud looks like a bunny is there really a rabit in the sky??

@TheProjectUnity Ancient Structure. Roughly 70% of all lost civilizations have been swallowed by the rising sea levels. The answers to the greatest mysteries lay beneath the waters.

@TheProjectUnity Natural formation, have seen video of above the waterline looks the same very close to there. Could have been used certainly but natural.

With more than 8,500 satellites in orbit, Starlink provides connectivity through harsh weather conditions and natural disasters. Order online in under 2 minutes.

@TheProjectUnity I think B, a vastly ancient structure of some kind.

@TheProjectUnity There’s just too much to suggest it’s not 100% either way. Maybe it was both. My question is… “How long ago was that site above sea level?”

@TheProjectUnity B) Ancient Structure, IMO 😎

@TheProjectUnity B) Ancient Structure. There are too many right angles for it to be natural.

@TheProjectUnity We've been around for 300000 years at least. Is it really that far-fetched to believe if we came this far in 6000 years, that we weren't capable of more in the other 294000? I have a feeling we are the tribal remnants of a once united humanity.

@TheProjectUnity It's natural. Just Like Muley point, Utah the blocks naturally break apart like this.

@TheProjectUnity There's no way in hell that's a natural phenomenon.

@TheProjectUnity Too many perfectly cut lines in different directions. I think its man-made.

@TheProjectUnity @grok What is the mainstream science explanation for how these features could be natural? They look awfully deliberate with right angles.

@TheProjectUnity Obviously I'm no expert in this but I cannot see how this could possibly be a natural formation? Or how anyone can claim as such with a straight face?!

@TheProjectUnity Sharp angles is odd in nature, especially with the pounding of the water against every edge

@TheProjectUnity B until I hear a plausible process for a natural formation looking like that.

@TheProjectUnity May look natural to Flint Dibble, but definitely an ancient structure to me!

@TheProjectUnity I’m gonna have to say natural formation. I think there would be some type of stairs left over and not ones that were for giants. Who knows I’m an idiot.

@TheProjectUnity As far as I’m aware, nature doesn’t do straight lines?

@TheProjectUnity 9000 years ago, white people did not exist. They seem determined to convince people that only white people were civilized.

@TheProjectUnity Probably an ancient quarry where megaliths were harvested. Doesn't appear to have any aesthetic or functional purpose, otherwise.

@TheProjectUnity Certainly doesn't look like anything humans would construct, but resembles other sandstone formations, including those onshore at Yonaguni which aren't publicised as man-made because more obviously they're bedding plates & joints.

@TheProjectUnity Humans could have made it when the water wasn't that deep as it is today. It was probably on the coast when it was made.

@TheProjectUnity I think it's less artificial than the altheads claim and less natural than the mainstream claim. A modified natural feature

@TheProjectUnity Clearly man made

@TheProjectUnity Definitivamente estructura. Las líneas costeras han cambiado constantemente con el tiempo. Es extremadamente probable que haya muchas pruebas de civilizaciones bajo el agua que aún no conocemos.

@TheProjectUnity I would need more mapping and info Many people think that Rockwall in Texas is man made but there is a geological explanation to it

@TheProjectUnity From Japan, to the North Sea, Golf of Mexico , India, etc... there sure seems to be a pattern.

@TheProjectUnity Ancient structure. Pre-Flood civilization.