arenwald

166 posts

arenwald banner
arenwald

arenwald

@4renwald

انضم Mayıs 2019
511 يتبع25 المتابعون
ℏεsam
ℏεsam@Hesamation·
btw Mitchell has 21.8K followers, ghostty has 51.9K stars, and his contribution heatmap is green af. you got to push this guy to the absolute limit to leave GitHub for another platform, and I won't be surprised if more developers follow the same path.
ℏεsam tweet media
Mitchell Hashimoto@mitchellh

Ghostty is leaving GitHub. I'm GitHub user 1299, joined Feb 2008. I've visited GitHub almost every single day for over 18 years. It's never been a question for me where I'd put my projects: always GitHub. I'm super sad to say this, but its time to go. mitchellh.com/writing/ghostt…

English
47
126
3.1K
302.4K
arenwald
arenwald@4renwald·
@paiahsdvkk @KingGeorge @JokersPlanet The guy was proven to sell cheats. If he has a private connection to someone that develops chears, he could 100% get help from them to clean up traces (if any), especially since he's most likely using private cheats
English
0
0
1
130
000
000@paiahsdvkk·
@KingGeorge @JokersPlanet perfect example of someone with low knowledge but talks very much😂 pc checks are not unreliable by any means
English
2
0
6
526
arenwald
arenwald@4renwald·
@zeeg @JJ_StuJordan Dont waste your time on him. Its a shitposting account trying to ragebait people..
English
0
0
2
41
David Cramer
David Cramer@zeeg·
@JJ_StuJordan I did not say agents dont provide value, not once. But now I see what kind of interaction this is so count me out!
English
1
0
5
264
David Cramer
David Cramer@zeeg·
Everyone is slowly coming to this realization, and I assure you, no one is running multitudes of agents overnight. No one that is doing anything of substance at least. There _are_ people pretending to be scientists, or fully caught up in their drug infused AI overdose, that think their slop machines are changing the world. They're not tho, and they're just wasting a bunch of money and compute to create a lot of LoC that will just get thrown away. The state of the art is still "can we even one shot a production quality patch that we wont regret later", and its rarer than you'd expect based on discourse.
Ronan Berder@hunvreus

Talking to smarter folks than me, I'm convinced many of the AI folks in my timeline are full of shit. Nobody is "running 20 agents over night" and building stuff for actual users. Maybe some are building internal tools or disposable software. Maybe. But building software people like using? That doesn't get hacked on day one or blow up after the 3rd user? Nope. I don't even understand what that's supposed to look like. Do you work out a 57 pages document that perfectly describes what you want to build and then summon 14 agents and have them run wild for 6 hours? And what comes out on the other end isn't a broken pile of shit? Nope. Not buying it. PS: it may also be that I have an IQ of 82 and can't figure it out.

English
169
193
2.6K
706.5K
arenwald
arenwald@4renwald·
@HackingDave Has anyone from Anthropic acknowledged those degradations? Afaik, all i've seen from staff was something in the lines of "no degradation, just small tweaks to defaults" or "skill issue"... and it's annoying me.
English
0
0
0
40
Dave Kennedy
Dave Kennedy@HackingDave·
Article I'm quoted in on Forbes on the recent Claude model degrading. Note, I am not anti-Anthropic in anyway. I loved Opus 4.6 when it first came out. I almost bought a I <3 Claude t-shirt (kinda joking there). My concern here is intentional or unintentional model degrades over time with these frontier models releasing bad code to enterprise and causing substantial risk/exposure/breaches. While Claude is the topic here, this can happen at any of the frontier models. forbes.com/sites/the-wire…
English
16
24
137
11.2K
Bryan Johnson
Bryan Johnson@bryan_johnson·
I now can't help but think about humans the same way I think about AI agents.
English
499
80
2K
243.7K
arenwald
arenwald@4renwald·
@gnukeith What distro do you personally use?
English
1
0
0
425
arenwald
arenwald@4renwald·
@divyanshkul He didnt change his mind, claude code still sucks in it's current state and he just says mythos is scary good? Those are two different things lol
English
0
0
1
111
arenwald
arenwald@4renwald·
@Pirat_Nation Creating a public facing website using the company's IP and saying it's secure because you've put in place a "password" is crazy work not gonna lie. It's shitty from Riot Games how they handled that tho. Witht the given facts they probably were already looking to fire her...
English
0
0
12
7.5K
Pirat_Nation 🔴
Pirat_Nation 🔴@Pirat_Nation·
Nicole Clash says she was fired from Riot Games after sharing an AI pitch deck focused on reducing toxicity and improving player feedback. She revealed that she turned down a $15,000 offer that included a silence agreement, saying she chose to speak openly about the situation instead.
Nic0le@nicole_clash

Yesterday was my last day at Riot Games. It’s been 3 years since I dropped out and joined the company. And despite the way my relationship with Riot ended, this has been the best learning experience I could have asked for. I had the chance to work with an amazing, passionate group of people, and count it among my many blessings. I was fired. I did not leave, and I was not laid off. I’m not going to come on here and pretend otherwise. They flat out fired me, and offered me 15k to keep my mouth shut. Needless to say, I did not take them up on that. The official reason for my termination that I was given was about an Applied AI pitch deck I made. I had put it up as a website with a password protection on it before sharing the site with our execs. They are claiming that I broke confidentiality. While I highly doubt that this was the real reason, I’m not gonna open myself up to libel by saying here what I believe the real reason to be. There has been no proof that anyone outside of Riot has seen the pitch deck, and that the security measures I’ve taken were not enough. What is more absurd, however, is that our CEO and various other execs have read it, told me how much they enjoyed reading it, and further encouraged me to explore the concepts I’ve outlined in the deck. Zero mention of needing me to take it down. If this was the decision of a random middle manager up my chain of command, I would have found that a lot easier to accept. What broke me though was the fact that an exec who I viewed as a role model, one of two people that I shared the deck with originally, who explicitly told me to share it out further, he knew about my termination ahead of time. And he did nothing to stop it. I was sad. Then I was pissed. Then I was sad and pissed. Now though, all I feel is an overwhelming sense of freedom. Normally, posting something like this is a big no no, since it will kill your chances of ever working in corporate. Luckily for me, I have made the decision that I will never work corporate again. Riot, if you’re reading this, I have also made the decision to not legally pursue the case of wrongful termination. We’re cool. I’m taking today off. Tomorrow is my first day as an entrepreneur. This is a step that I’ve thought about taking for a while now, but could never bring myself to leave Riot for. In a twisted way, I’m grateful the decision’s been made for me. I have a few ideas on direction. I will not be raising money. And I cannot wait to build, truly build.

English
73
97
2.3K
563.4K
ThePrimeagen
ThePrimeagen@ThePrimeagen·
i just paru -Syu without a single thing breaking i'll be taking no questions
English
56
8
623
43K
arenwald
arenwald@4renwald·
@__tanstaafl @trq212 I was on my phone when I did it. It opened a new tab on the browser each time and the box wasn't present. I refreshed the page and the claim message re-appeared and when I clicked it was adding up... All my devices show that ammount now lol
English
0
0
0
26
arenwald
arenwald@4renwald·
@LLMJunky Im on Pro so I was supposed to claim ~$20 CAD and it claimed ~160$ more than that:
arenwald tweet media
English
3
0
3
7.6K
am.will
am.will@LLMJunky·
If you have an Anthropic Plan, stop what you're doing right now Go claim your free credits on your usage page. (Link in comments) They are gifting users the same value their plan costs, which is nice. They have finally clarified: no third party harnesses allowed on their plans. You can still use them, but at discounted API pricing. Glad they finally clarified this, even if I don't like it.
am.will tweet media
Numman Ali@nummanali

Didn’t know Claude sub wasn’t outright banned in OpenClaw This is helpful clarity - you CAN use your existing account with extra usage bundles at 10%, 20% and 30% discounts There’s also £150 bonus available for the next two weeks Had to tap a few times before it applied

English
96
41
866
392K
arenwald
arenwald@4renwald·
@theo You can click the claim credits as many times as you want too in the same email
English
0
0
0
237
Theo - t3.gg
Theo - t3.gg@theo·
I got the email too. Anthropic is on a sentiment suicide speed-run right now
Theo - t3.gg tweet media
English
237
113
3.8K
957.1K
arenwald
arenwald@4renwald·
@HackingDave Did you notice instances where codex didn't want to do something because of "security" where claude did? Or the other way around? Personally, I feel like I get way less friction using Claude for anything related to offensive tooling tasks..
English
1
0
2
257
Dave Kennedy
Dave Kennedy@HackingDave·
Comparing heavy Codex vs Claude use, a couple thoughts. Codex is much more well thought out on design, checking every step, re-checking every step - and producing much better results long term but it is much slower. Claude is really good at fast hit items, but produces a lot of issues/errors as you go through. I'm pretty much using Codex now exclusively, as Claude has seemed to decline over the past couple weeks.
English
24
5
111
14.3K
arenwald
arenwald@4renwald·
@ippsec @NetworkChuck Yeah I also feel like price jacking is inevitable at this point too. And we're all gonna be so addicted/dependent on the product, were gonna pay the big price for it. I already see many people here paying thousands of dollars per month to ship nothingness.. we'll see how it goes!
English
0
0
0
79
ippsec
ippsec@ippsec·
Probably one of my favorite @NetworkChuck Videos - youtube.com/watch?v=dbMXi9…, loved the take on his hatred for ai, but also loves it. Definitely in the same boat, it scares me how capable it has become in such a short time. The other thing that really scares me is the frontier labs will likely always be a black box. The specific thing that scares me is how they use the data they collect. AFAIK - The Terms of Service when paying for the API and Subscription are wildly different, and I don't see much talk about that. I believe the API gives the user a lot more ownership over the data, where-as subscription, it is retained longer, and there are far fewer legal protections. I hear numbers like my $200 subscription can cost them anywhere from $2000 to $10,000/m. That's a lot of money to lose, and I know the money loss is offset by many things like the majority of users not making full use of their subscription -- But I can't imagine AI always being this cheap. So, a fear is that I will become dependent on a service that I will be priced out of in the future. Additionally, many platforms (ex: reddit/twitter) put things in place to stop AIs from freely harvesting data, but I don't think those types of stops really block them when users are installing tools on their devices. For example, the "anti-bot captcha" isn't really doing much when the user has an extension that gives the Frontier Lab the data behind that block anyway. Is this data sent to them? I really don't know but it seems the threat landscape has rapidly changed when it comes to data collection. I don't hate AI; it is wildly fun and does make me feel like a "10x engineer". I just hope it's a service that always remains available, and places don't start closing the doors once they have everything they need. As odd as it sounds, and I can't believe I'm saying this, but I hope GRC can aid us here. It would be nice if AIs obeyed when sites told them to go away, but my experience is the AI recognizes the site doesn't want them, but also acknowledges it could be prompt injection, so it trusts the user over the service. Obviously, the user could do some type of prompt injection so the AI doesn't see the refusal, and local models can always ignore it -- but atleast it would help places stop the unintentional leakages due to ignorance. I imagine it's easier to kick users off the platform that use prompt injection to bypass gaurdrails versus when nothing is stopping them. I really hope I'm just ignorant here, and someone can post why I'm wrong.
YouTube video
YouTube
English
16
20
279
46.6K
ali
ali@endingwithali·
setting up my first home server what flavor of linux should i use
English
302
6
511
57.1K
TenZ
TenZ@TenZOfficial·
To celebrate my launch with Wooting, I'm giving away FOUR hand signed editions of my 80HE keyboard! To enter: - Like & RT - Follow @WootingKB & @TenZOfficial - Tag a friend Ends on 01/27, GL!
TenZ tweet media
English
7.1K
6.8K
13.6K
932.7K
arenwald
arenwald@4renwald·
@007GameIOI Recommended is 60fps at 1080p in the big 2026???
English
0
0
0
41
007 First Light
007 First Light@007GameIOI·
We are providing today an update to the PC system requirements for 007 First Light after the community flagged some inconsistencies in an earlier version of the listing. The earlier mistake was due to an internal miscommunication leading to an older version of the specs to be shared. After a thorough re-examination and additional testing, the recommended RAM has been corrected from 32GB to 16GB, VRAM values have been updated, and the minimum CPU line has been fixed. Additional performance targets will be shared closer to launch. We’re sorry for the confusion this caused and appreciate everyone who brought it to our attention. The updated specs are now live on our store pages, and we’re looking forward to sharing more of 007 First Light with you ahead of launch. #EarnTheNumber #007FirstLight
007 First Light tweet media
English
326
296
4K
481.9K