Lisa BaTbo

Good morning. Stay cozy, Colorado.

@OliLondonTV While it was annoying, she was minding her own business, tryin to look cute. No problems here. (But I hate that nail tap they all do)

Man calls out Influencer filming herself applying makeup on a plane. “There are people who are looking at that, are they all crazy?…I say it’s not a beauty salon.” Who is in the right?

Oh @GIFFORDS_org, let’s stop playing word games. The term “gun violence” deliberately shifts blame from criminals to an inanimate object, pushing a narrative instead of addressing reality. Violence is committed by people. Period. Calling it “gun violence” is no different than saying “knife violence” or “car violence," except you only hear one of those constantly, and that’s not by accident. This ridiculous stupid term paints firearms as the root problem, while ignoring the real drivers: crime, broken communities, mental health, and repeat offenders. It also lumps everything together: suicide, self-defense, etc. into one misleading category designed to push an agenda, not solve a problem. If organizations like Giffords and the Office of Gun Violence Prevention (which Colorado pays over 3 million dollars to every year, and who I criticize in this video) is serious about reducing violence, they would stop blaming objects.

@s_front91178 @Kris_Ptak @BillMelugin_ Disregard this terrorists opinion.

@Kris_Ptak @BillMelugin_ How are they terrorists again?

NEW: Border Patrol caught & arrested four British nationals entering the US illegally in a remote part of Maine after crossing from Canada. Their names: Ali Mohammed Ali Abdullah, Hameed Mohammed Nagi, Ibrahim Ayyub Khan, and Mohammed Sultan Saleh. robinsonreport.substack.com/p/four-british…

@loganclarkhall 😂 seriously??!!

When the “British Nationals” apprehended by Border Patrol are named Ali Mohammed Ali Abdullah, Hameed Mohammed Nagi, Ibrahim Ayyub Khan, and Mohammed Sultan Saleh.

@robbystarbuck I'll take this content all day. Thank you.

Both of these lanes are built to maximize clicks and income. There's another lane though where, and hear me out, you just tell the truth. You criticize what's bad and praise what's good, while offering sound ideas that can make a difference. Not as many clicks though!

@jeffhunt I don't know yet! I want to hear more from Scott and Victor. I've seen Scott fighting at the Capitol for our kids. This is a good race.

Colorado Republican Assembly this weekend! Who has your vote for Governor?

If you take $500 from someone who works, and give $100 to five lazy people then you lost one vote, but gained five votes. Thats the Democrat Party in a nut shell.

Fox has posted my column on Colorado continuing its pattern of passing unconstitutional measures, particularly in the area of the First Amendment. Ironically, its growing list of losses has proven a bonanza for free speech. foxnews.com/opinion/jonath…

@megynkelly Haven't you had enough time to vet Steve Baker's reporting? Where is that interview? Are you afraid to share this with your audience?

Trump Agrees to Temporary Ceasefire with Iran, DOJ Fraud Crackdown, Ye's UK Setback AM Update for April 8:

@FmrRepKenBuck Why didn't you finish your term and fight for America? I was one of your constituents who was really disappointed in your last year of service.

In my latest column, I write about American billionaires who are using their fortune to fund the rise of socialism here in the United States.

@Pathofmostresi1 @GovofCO @jaredpolis Damn!!

@GovofCO That's only $24.7 BILLION less than what Coloradans payed in State imposed FEES. So sick of your gaslighting @jaredpolis You're a fucking jackass. GO FUCK YOURSELF x.com/i/grok/share/0…

Donald Trump’s so-called “Mad King” tariffs are still hitting Coloradans hard. Coloradans paid more than $1.1 billion in tariffs last year, creating uncertainty for employers, raising prices, and impacting industries across our state — from agriculture to aerospace. kunc.org/politics/2026-…

@GovofCO Actually my property tax, car insurance and gas/power bills are impacting my budget more than this tariff nonsense. Pretty sure big bad Trump doesn't impact those things as much as State & local government. But okay.

We always hear that Social Security is about to run out of money. How come we never hear that foreign aid is about to run out of money? Why do all of the federal programs with massive fraud never run out of money?

😆

Colorado elections have been a joke for a long time, folks.

@BreakTheChainsM We need better accountability for the judiciary! They should automatically be up for recall if they are overruled by a higher court, or if their decision to let someone out early results in another crime.

@BreakTheChainsM I struggle with this philosophy. If we boot old school Democrat judges to allow appointments of more radical, social or reformative justice, neo-lib judges won't the result be worse?

Vote no on every single judge on the ballot.

@SteveBakerUSA @theblaze Is Megyn Kelly ever going to air your interview either?? Everyone is afraid to see what crawls out of the swamp by discussing the details of your investigation. That's worrisome.

So, this is how it is. This carefully crafted language is the kind of lawyerly deception we expect from those with no moral guiding star. (FWIW … @theblaze CEO is a lawyer.) At its very heart though, the post I’m responding to is a calculated deception. I have never asked for or expected any of my work for The Blaze to be exempt from editorial review. NEVER. NOT ONCE. In fact, my last piece written for The Blaze, with @hannereports, was subjected to eleven days of review from filing to publication. It went through rigorous editorial and legal review. After it was published by the editor in chief, it was almost immediately taken off the front page and buried behind the paywall … with “comments” turned off. Our last several articles have been subjected to deliberate in-house reach suppression and no promotion on social media or from BlazeTV hosts. So fearful Blaze executives have become that our work elicits people to think about and/or speak of that name which should not be uttered. That’s the regime we’ve been subjected to since our November 8 story revealing the identity of the J6 pipe bomber, after which I was immediately forbidden to do any interviews, on ANY topic, even on @BlazeTV programs. Even about articles and subject matter unrelated to that name which should not be uttered, or that had cleared editorial review. This deception is nuanced. They will now respond and contend that all my speech is subject to editorial review. TV, podcasts, social media, and the Blaze website. But the lede, as most TL;DR people will read and understand it, is that I no longer wanted to have my work subject to rigorous editorial and legal review. I categorically reject false that assertion. Even our November 8 article — ultimately retracted by The Blaze — went through 4-5 different editors, legal, and executive suite review before its publication. Joe and I did our jobs, and THEY ALL signed off on the story. They could have killed it before publication. They’ve spiked stories of ours before and since November 8. It happens. I eventually reached my moral, spiritual, emotional, psychological, and even physical end to accepting the censorship about a particularly “difficult subject.” In fact, in my final conference call with attorneys and other Blaze leadership, the company’s in-house counsel instructed me to limit my social media use to only “posting about your children and butterflies.” That was neither the beginning of the end, or the final straw, but from that point forward it only required some unknown future trigger to push me past my limit of being able to refrain from telling the whole truth about the January 6 pipe bomber. Truths and a “difficult subject” The Blaze does in fact fear covering. Last week there was such a trigger. The final straw. I then informed my editor in chief that I could no longer work under “the post November 8 censorship regime.” I NEVER said I wanted my work exempt from editorial review. We simply reached cross purposes in our employee/employer relationship. No biggie. It happens. But I’ll not allow that public misrepresentation from Blaze management to go unchallenged. FWIW … The old motto for The Blaze used to be, “The Truth Lives Here.” I’ll let you be the judge of that.

‼️ from a father in Jeffco that attended the Chloe Castro trial. "I was in the Jefferson County Courthouse earlier this afternoon, and the world doesn’t make sense anymore. I watched a school social worker admit to sexual assault of a student and get sentenced to probation with zero prison time. I don’t spend time in court. I’m a transaction guy. People hear “lawyer” and assume I live in a courtroom, but that’s not my world. Maybe in another life I would have been good at it, but not this one. I went today for one reason, to support a local family. For most of the hearing, I was sitting behind a combat veteran, and the whole time I kept thinking he looked like the guy who didn’t belong there. He was tense in a way you can’t fake, the kind of tension you see when everything is on the line and you’re waiting for someone else to decide how your life is about to change. When he finally had a chance to speak, his voice was strong, but it caught in the parts that mattered most. If you didn’t know any better, you’d assume he was the one facing prison. He wasn’t. He was the father of the victim. His son is a special needs middle school student who had been violated by someone inside the school system. The molester was the social worker assigned to that kid, the person responsible for his IEP, someone in a position of direct authority and trust. And there was no real dispute about what happened. The conduct had been admitted, stipulated to, and pled out as Sexual Assault on a Child by One in a Position of Trust, Victim Less Than 15, under C.R.S. 18-3-405.3(1),(2)(a), a Class 3 felony. In open court, across the board, people used the same language, including grooming and sexual conduct that developed over time. The judge himself described the harm as irreparable, so there wasn’t any confusion about the seriousness of it. After the victim statements, I watched one of the most effective courtroom presentations I’ve ever seen. It was controlled, deliberate, and persuasive in a way that stands out, even if you don’t spend your life in courtrooms. It walked through the defendant’s background, the therapy she had gone through since being caught, and why she supposedly didn’t present a meaningful risk going forward. It was the kind of argument that, if you walked in halfway through, you’d assume you were listening to defense counsel doing their job at a very high level. You weren’t. That argument came from Tyra Forbes, the Chief Deputy District Attorney for Jefferson County, the person tasked with handling cases involving vulnerable victims, the one who is supposed to stand in that room and protect that 14-year-old boy. Instead, she stood up and built the strongest case in the room for the 29-year-old who admitted to abusing that position of trust in the most vile and terrible way. Judge Diego Hunt then went through the statutory factors out loud, talking about the seriousness of the harm, the risk to others, and whether imposing probation would depreciate the severity of the conduct or undermine respect for the law. He acknowledged those factors, and he even noted that he has two children in this same school district, saying that cases like this are particularly important to him. And then he imposed probation and zero time in prison. After the hearing, that father wasn’t confused. He understood this might be the outcome. What he couldn’t understand was why the prosecutor stood up and made the case for it. He called her out directly, asking why she would argue for no prison time, why remorse and therapy were being used to justify that result for someone who did this to his son. And instead of engaging, she shut it down and called deputies over. That’s what makes this hit so hard. Not just the slap on the wrist of a sentence, but hearing the prosecutor make that argument and then watching a father get that response when he asked why."

@SteveBakerUSA @Billdozer74__ @KellyLMcCarty @HanneReports @FBI 😡 cowards!! The Blaze are supposed to be fighting for truth - a light to shine in dark places! This makes me boil that they are more concerned with protecting fraudsters and corrupt narratives than breaking the damn open.

@Billdozer74__ @KellyLMcCarty @HanneReports @FBI Yes.

We retracted NOTHING, and nothing that @HanneReports and I have published has been “debunked.” Oh, sure … MSM outlets, @FBI “sources,” and members of the Former Agents Group (F.A.G.s) have all said, “Nuh-uh,” but that isn’t “debunking.” That’s not doing the work themselves, and showing different results. No one has yet done that. They are still only parroting the intel community’s narrative — told through “sources” who also haven’t done the work — delivering the message they’ve been assigned to spread. The muzzle has been discarded. There is no longer a paycheck-imposed gag order. Joe and I are now free to tell all. Announcements coming soon.