Jason Brenizer

3.7K posts

Jason Brenizer banner
Jason Brenizer

Jason Brenizer

@jbrenizer

Exploring the convergence of exponential technologies & intentional living. TOPICS: AI, blockchain, storytelling, health-span, graceful aging & personal growth.

Austin, TX Beigetreten Mart 2009
508 Folgt521 Follower
Angehefteter Tweet
Jason Brenizer
Jason Brenizer@jbrenizer·
For 50 years people have been pining for a future presented in The Jetsons. That future is here, moving with such force that it feels like rock and dirt are liquifying under our feet from a unending earthquake. Hold on to your door jamb, steady those nerves. Take a deep breath. Hold it. Then let it out slowly. Feudal states gave way to kingdoms, which turned to empires, that coalesced into nation states after two world wars. Horsepower lost to coal and steam power. Next, oil and gas greased the global economy. AI will force a breakthrough in abundant energy, then abundant everything. First, expanding AI will consume more and more energy, so solar and fission will need to be tapped to fill the tank. When AI becomes embodied within the next 5 years, compact, rapid energy demands will force fusion energy solutions to emerge. When our ability to make energy becomes essentially infinite and immediate (no lag to mine, pump, and process fossil fuels), embodied AI proliferation magnifies, as does the level of intelligence itself. There will be breakthroughs in physics (after a long dry spell) and materials science and medicine. AI will soon help us double our lifespan, maybe even reverse effects of aging. This shaking reality feels unsafe. Truthfully, it is for those of us alive today who experience it. But the fears being peddled in the news, right or left, are a distraction. Don't be fooled. The challenge of our time is not Us versus Them. It's not Rich versus Poor. It's not Left versus Right. It's not Good versus Evil. The challenge that's coming is complex and very well may be chaotic. As we transition from scarcity and competition to abundance and cooperation, we will need a new, grand vision for the future of humanity. The Good Book says, "Without vision, the people will perish." I'm not particularly religious, but I'll take wisdom where it resides. We need a massively transformative purpose for the human race, all of us, that will take us boldly into our next stage of evolution. Elon Musk has stated that he wants to make us a multi-planetary species. He wants to colonize Mars. People call him crazy. There are countless people homeless in the richest country in the world, so why would we spend all those resources on a fool's errand? When the founding fathers of the United States drafted their vision for a new society, some people called them crazy, too. I think the dreams of science fiction authors like Isaac Asimov, Robert Heinlein, Iain M. Banks, and Arthur C. Clarke could guide us toward a grand vision. How amazing it is to be alive at this very time when the history of life on earth could give birth to the history of life in our galaxy.
English
0
1
39
1.2K
Jason Brenizer
Jason Brenizer@jbrenizer·
Life as a game of RISK. It's easy to comfortably sit in a lounge chair and watch pundits talk grand strategy and statistics about the effectiveness of military campaigns. Surgical strikes and decimated enemy installations. But never forget that individuals fight to survive. The soldier at the base that just got hit in retaliation. The mother whose carefully cultivated garden no longer receives water to keep it from withering away. The journalist who runs into the fray to capture what's really going on.
Jason Brenizer tweet media
English
1
0
0
13
Chamath Palihapitiya
@SenWarren spend transparently with accountability, sign up to term limits, give us voter id. then take whatever you want.
English
364
534
11.5K
152.4K
Elizabeth Warren
Elizabeth Warren@SenWarren·
Elon Musk has 6.5 MILLION times more wealth than the typical American. It’s time for a wealth tax — billionaires must pay their fair share.
English
10.4K
1.4K
5K
729.7K
Fandom Pulse
Fandom Pulse@fandompulse·
The Domes of Calrathia novelist Isaac Young on the state of modern Star Trek: "It’s about emasculated men and raging girlbosses. It’s about celebrating every sexual appetite except the one that produces functional families. It’s about fetishizing racial revenge and elevating mediocrity at the expense of excellence. You’ll find Star Trek has never been more vulgar, more profane, more debauched. It’s small-minded in everything from the cast to production values to the storytelling. It’s about lecturing to the untouchables about their privilege and holding victimhood as the highest virtue. All those tiny elements which we ignored or snickered at in previous shows became the substance of their successors, while those parts we loved about Star Trek—the parts that made it great—were left behind or turned into nostalgia-bait." Why did this happen?
Fandom Pulse tweet mediaFandom Pulse tweet media
English
59
196
1.4K
37.8K
Jason Brenizer
Jason Brenizer@jbrenizer·
@AzureLionProd @GaryMarcus You are under the false impression that I’m trying to impress someone. Enjoy your high horse, up where it’s quite lonely.
English
1
0
0
10
Richard H Fay - Artist/Illustrator/Poet/Polymath
@jbrenizer @GaryMarcus Seriously, dude? On DuckDuckGo, I'm not seeing much of anything that's not Substack, YouTube, or social media platforms. A few entries on IMDb. That's it! You're talking to the wrong person if you think I'm going to be impressed by that!
English
1
0
0
11
Gary Marcus
Gary Marcus@GaryMarcus·
Either we accept this as a society, and set a precedent for allowing virtually all jobs to be replaced with almost no compensation. Or we speak up now. For artists. For writers. For musicians. For everybody.
Simplifying AI@simplifyinAI

🚨 BREAKING: OpenAI and Google are about to have a massive legal problem. OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic have repeatedly sworn to courts that their models do not store exact copies of copyrighted books. They claim their "safety training" prevents regurgitation. Researchers just dropped a paper called "Alignment Whack-a-Mole" that proves otherwise. They didn't use complex jailbreaks or malicious prompts. They just took GPT-4o, Gemini, and DeepSeek, and fine-tuned them on a normal, benign task: expanding plot summaries into full text. The safety guardrails instantly collapsed. Without ever seeing the actual book text in the prompt, the models started spitting out exact, verbatim copies of copyrighted books. Up to 90% of entire novels, word-for-word. Continuous passages exceeding 460 words at a time. But here is the part that changes everything. They fine-tuned a model exclusively on Haruki Murakami novels. It didn't just learn Murakami. It unlocked the verbatim text of over 30 completely unrelated authors across different genres. The AI wasn't learning the text during fine-tuning. The text was already permanently trapped inside its weights from pre-training. The fine-tuning just turned off the filter. It gets worse. They tested models from three completely different tech giants. All three had memorized the exact same books, in the exact same spots. A 90% overlap. It's a fundamental, industry-wide vulnerability. For years, AI companies have argued in court that their models are just "learning patterns," not storing raw data. This paper provides the smoking gun.

English
63
1.5K
5.1K
127.7K
Marcus Pittman
Marcus Pittman@ImKingGinger·
Lot’s of people are responding negatively to my analysis that Project Hail Mary is a Christian movie. Especially Christians. Faith Based Entertainment has spoon fed Church Slop to Christians for so long they don’t know how to do critical analysis of stories anymore. They can’t comprehend that a story about a man named Grace aboard a ship called Hail Mary who sacrifices his life to save humanity is a Christian story. Because nobody said a sinner’s prayer at the end and there wasn’t an altar call in the third act. Twenty years of Church Movies broke your brain. Faith Based entertainment has absolutely dumbed down Evangelicals.
Marcus Pittman tweet media
English
244
146
2.9K
180.8K
Anthony Scaramucci
Anthony Scaramucci@Scaramucci·
After years of telling everybody else how to run the country and months of deliberation, I have a special announcement: I’m running for President of the United States in 2028. I am aware of what happened the last time I worked in the White House. But I do believe I can help guide this country in the right direction. Join me and help me heal America. Mooch 2028 🇺🇸
English
2.5K
502
4.9K
720.2K
Jason Brenizer
Jason Brenizer@jbrenizer·
@twunkez That sounds like judgement and punitive damages awarded by legislation rather than the justice department. Likely, there’s precedent, but still…
English
0
0
0
165
Konstantin Kisin
Konstantin Kisin@KonstantinKisin·
Delighted to announce I have accepted a position as lead speechwriter and PR advisor to the greatest Prime Minister in British history, Sir Keir Starmer. Together, we will continue to rebuild our country's military and ensure Britain's energy security in a turbulent world.
English
3.1K
374
12.1K
565K
Stephanie Ⓥ
Stephanie Ⓥ@SVcrazycatlady·
You have to choose. You can have ChatGPT, or you can have water. You can have Claude, or you can have clean soil. You can have Grok, or you can have a survivable future. You cannot have both.
CNN@CNN

The vast data centers that power artificial intelligence guzzle huge amounts of energy but they also have another alarming impact, according to new research. They are creating “heat islands,” warming the land around them by up to 16 degrees Fahrenheit, and making life hotter for more than 340 million people. cnn.it/4rZSiG5

English
111
9.5K
25.2K
474K
Michael Shellenberger
Michael Shellenberger@shellenberger·
The Iran conflict triggered the energy crisis, but its roots lie in the West's opposition to the production of oil and gas outside the Persian Gulf. The climate movement is, says former radical environmentalist @ziontree, "fundamentally anti-human in its thinking."
Michael Shellenberger tweet media
English
14
227
969
51.5K
Wall Street Apes
Wall Street Apes@WallStreetApes·
New ballot initiative in Oregon called ‘Initiative Petition 28, the PEACE Act, will make it illegal to hunt, fish or raise animals, even if it’s on your own land If passed it will be ILLEGAL to - Hunt or fish for food (even on your own property or for sustenance - Raise and slaughter animals like chickens, rabbits, pigs, cows, etc., for meat on your own land or farm. - Engage in common livestock practices (e.g., breeding via artificial insemination) - Control pests by killing them (in many cases) If passes it will lead to investigations and prosecutions of farmers and individuals raising animals for food, including small scale or backyard operations with rabbits and chickens “They're going to raid all of our farmers and go after them because they're trying to quietly pass it and then make it where we all have to eat from the stores instead of farmer's markets and stuff.”
English
3.1K
16.7K
31.7K
753.8K
Jason Brenizer
Jason Brenizer@jbrenizer·
Initiative Petition 28 (the PEACE Act) is real and gunning for the November 2026 Oregon ballot. It wipes out exemptions in the state’s animal cruelty laws (ORS Chapter 167). That means hunting, fishing, trapping, raising livestock, even pest control or basic farm practices like slaughtering your own chickens on private land could become crimes—animal abuse, neglect, or worse. No more “good husbandry” carve-outs. Opponents call it a stealth ban on rural life; supporters frame it as ending “exploitation.” It’s collecting signatures now and has sparked massive pushback from hunters, farmers, and tribes. Would a law like this be unconstitutional? Short answer: Almost certainly yes—at least parts of it would get shredded in court. It overreaches hard on property rights and everyday liberties. Here’s the punch list of clauses it slams into: 1. U.S. Constitution, 5th Amendment Takings Clause (via the 14th Amendment)
This is the big one. Banning animal husbandry on your own land is a classic regulatory taking. You own the property, but suddenly you can’t use it for its most basic economic purpose (raising food animals). Courts have struck down similar total-use bans—think Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council (1992). If it denies all “economically beneficial use,” the state owes just compensation. No carve-outs here? Expect lawsuits from ranchers and homeowners saying, “You took my rights without paying.” 2. U.S. Constitution, 14th Amendment Substantive Due Process
This protects your fundamental liberty to pursue a lawful occupation and enjoy your property. Farming livestock or fishing your own pond isn’t some fringe hobby—it’s how families eat and earn. The law would criminalize “good animal husbandry” practices that have been legal forever. Post-Lochner, courts give economic regs wide latitude, but this isn’t rational regulation—it’s a blanket ban dressed as cruelty prevention. It fails even rational-basis review because it’s arbitrary and destroys entire industries without a real public health hook. 3. Oregon Constitution, Article I, Section 18 (Takings Clause)
Oregon’s own version: “Private property shall not be taken for public use… without just compensation.” Same logic as federal—your land, your animals, your tools suddenly worthless for traditional use. State courts would hit this hard too. Bonus angles that could pile on: • Tribal treaty rights (federal supremacy)—Oregon tribes have hunting/fishing rights that this would gut. • No state right to hunt/fish in Oregon’s Constitution (unlike 24 other states), so that defense is weak here. But property rights still win. Opponents already say this thing is headed straight to court if it passes—like the failed attempts before it. History shows these extreme animal-rights pushes crash on constitutional rocks.
English
1
0
1
31
Jason Brenizer
Jason Brenizer@jbrenizer·
@AndrewYang That must be the saddest thing you’ve heard all year. You’ve been beating this drum in earnest at since your 2020 presidential run. Make America Think Harder indeed.
English
0
0
1
60
Andrew Yang🧢⬆️🇺🇸
Had dinner with an investor who said this: “I thought you were wrong about AI and jobs. But I’m on the Board of a bunch of companies and every one of them is now cutting staff due to AI. So now I think you’re right.”
English
271
115
1.3K
108.2K
Jason Brenizer
Jason Brenizer@jbrenizer·
@ewarren Prove you’ll be able to spend it wisely and audit where it goes so we can end the widespread fraud fiasco. Then we can talk about raising taxes.
English
1
0
3
29
Elizabeth Warren
Elizabeth Warren@ewarren·
The Ultra-Millionaire Tax Act would generate over $6 trillion over the next decade—without raising taxes on 99.85% of American households. This wealth tax for millionaires and billionaires could pay for universal child care, free community college, Medicare expansion, and more.
English
4.3K
1.9K
7.9K
835.7K