KinkyReggae

@Bwalkercox @C__Herridge @Comey Its neither. Don't be so fucking stupid. For one thing, look up "86" in the Webster's dictionary. There are several meanings, none of which is kill. And regardless of its meaning, THIS IS PROTECTED SPEECH" under the first amendment

I wonder how he will defend that. “86ing” someone has been in the vernacular for decades. It has one meaning: “kill”. How does a former director of the FBI argue that he does not know this? How does he argue that such a message is purely “political”, and does not come across as advocating precisely what that message says? It was both a threat, and an incitement.

Consciousness of Guilt Behavior: If the @comey case gets as far as discovery, his contemporaneous texts, emails and other communications will likely reveal his intent and unfiltered response to the public backlash over his Instagram post. Comey took down the Instagram post the same day, claiming he believed "8647" was political speech, not associated with violence.

@C__Herridge @Comey This is getting tossed, and its not going to take long

@JackPosobiec HAHAHAHA

BREAKING ANNOUNCEMENT After discussing with my family and with my legal team I am prepared at this time to fully turn myself into State's Evidence and cooperate in any way with the Department of Justice and testify against James Comey

@Robertus49BC @DefiyantlyFree This is going to get tossed, really quickly. If you think otherwise, you have NO understanding of First Amendment jurisprudence

To put it simply, Comey knew what he was doing. He tried to be cute, too cute by half, and is now going to pay the price. Grok confirms there's been "one major assassination attempt (with some sources describing it as the third overall since 2024), plus other security incidents that were not full assassination attempts" since Comey's "8647" post.

James Comey did not stumble onto a beach and innocently photograph some seashells. He is the former Director of the FBI. He spent decades studying exactly how coded language is used to signal violence against public figures. He led the Bureau through the rise of stochastic terrorism as a national security category. Then he posted “86 47” arranged in sand to hundreds of thousands of followers, with eighty-six being slang for elimination and forty-seven being the sitting President of the United States, who had survived two assassination attempts in the previous twelve months. He took the post down within hours, which is the move of a man who knew exactly what he had communicated and realized he had said it too plainly. Innocent posts do not get deleted within hours. The defense, that he simply did not connect the numbers to violence, is laughable. He was on a national press tour promoting his novel FDR Drive, a thriller about a public figure using coded messaging to incite his followers to commit acts of violence against political enemies. He told NPR the book’s central themes were free speech and “what happens when someone’s words incite violence.” A man cannot be on national radio explaining how coded incitement operates while simultaneously claiming he failed to recognize coded incitement in his own Instagram feed. That is not a coincidence. That is a confession delivered by a defendant who spent eight years building a public career on personal opposition to Donald Trump. The First Amendment is not a magic word. The Supreme Court ruled in Counterman v. Colorado in 2023 that true threats lose protection when the speaker consciously disregards a substantial risk his communication will be read as threatening violence. Comey’s expertise, his audience, his timing, his take-down, and his eight years of documented hostility toward the President all answer that question. He knew. He of all people knew. And in the end, the country needs to face what this case actually is: a former Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation posting a coded call for the removal of a sitting President during an active assassination threat environment, then asking the same Bureau he once led to believe he meant nothing by it. Stop it.

@DefiyantlyFree Here is what Professor Turley thinks To convict Comey, the Justice Department will have to show that his adolescent picture was a “true threat” under 18 U.S.C. § 871 and § 875(c). It is not. The indictment is unlikely to survive a challenge

@R128Stacie @ColorApril Tell me you don't understand the First amendment without telling me you don't understand the first amendment

@PunchAssPilot @ColorApril He wrote a book on it. He knew what he was doing. He's done.

Comey smirks about “seashells,” but Tulsi Gabbard has the receipts. A former prosecutor knows “86-47” isn't a beach photo- it’s mob lingo for a hit on the President. No more "martyr" games or walking in on his terms. The warrant is signed. He’s being brought in. 🛑 #8647

@IsabellaMDeLuca You're a fucking moron. Even Pam Bondi knew this case was bullshit and wouldn't go anywhere. So you're all for an AG who doesn't understand or at least adhere to the constitution? Why do you hate America so much?

Pam Bondi was AG for 421 DAYS and did nothing. Tom Blanche has been in for TWO WEEKS and Comey is already predicted to be arrested today. 👀 This is what I voted for.

@Shem_Infinite @xpraider You morons haven't a clue. Here is what Jonathan Turley thinks: To convict Comey, the Justice Department will have to show that his adolescent picture was a “true threat” under 18 U.S.C. § 871 and § 875(c). It is not.

@xpraider He is a public figure and he threatened the life of the President there's nothing flimsy about it. This is a serious crime and he should go to prison. If you did that you'd go to prison.

Good. It is a serious crime to threaten the Presidents life and he should be in prison. No plea deals. He is a danger to society.

@Shem_Infinite It must hurt to be this stupid

@mitchellvii Aww little Billy. This is going to get tossed and you snowflakes will be crying again. Even Prof Turley thinks this is a bullshit indictment jonathanturley.org/2026/04/29/she…

OH MY: The DOJ just indicted James Comey for the SECOND time! The same James Comey who lied to Congress, leaked classified info, and helped launch the Russia hoax against Trump. Now he’s getting charged again - this time over seashells arranged to say “86 47” on a beach. The left is already screaming “retaliation!” and “no one is above the law… except when it’s our guys.” Cry harder, you hypocrites!

@NancyMace While you do NOTHING about the pedophiles in the Epstein files. You're a fraud

Senator Warren decides mocking the Melania movie days after Trump survived another assassination attempt is appropriate. The least we can offer is a moment of basic decency to the President and First Lady. Some rooms in Washington have no floor.

@RealSLokhova The JURY ? AHAHAHAHAHA You moron. This case will be dismissed long before a Jury

It’s very important that Comey is successfully prosecuted for this. The attempts on President’s life are inspired by Obama, Comey and co. Because he’s indicted in the Eastern District of North Carolina (where Comey was on his holiday when he “found” the seashells), there is more of a chance the jury will convict.

@LangmanVince HAHAHA This nonsense is going to get dismissed and you MAGAt snowflakes are going to be back on here crying

Here was an arrogant James Comey who thought he was above the law bragging about going around the White House counsel in order to set up a perjury trap on General Flynn! I hope this traitor spends the rest of his miserable life in a federal prison!

@DookusRoyal @RonaldT23638083 @SaveUSAKitty @mrddmia HAHAHAHA Have somebody read the first amendment to you. Ask them to go slowly, and to define any big words

@RonaldT23638083 @SaveUSAKitty @mrddmia Easy, there is no freedom of speech violation here.

🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 VICEROY MIKE DAVIS: “Well, he better turn himself in, otherwise you're going to see the U.S. Marshals go arrest him. Remember, I have zero sympathy for James Comey. This is the same James Comey as the FBI director when President Trump started the first time, who set up a political hit on General Michael Flynn, President Trump's national security adviser. Comey has politicized and weaponized the FBI, intel agencies to go after Trump. He got caught lying about it before Congress. I hope this is just the beginning of James Comey's legal troubles.” @mrddmia

@RonaldT23638083 @SaveUSAKitty @mrddmia This is how it figures in.....CASE DISMISSED

@SaveUSAKitty @mrddmia Explain to me how our Constitutional freedom of speech figures into this?

@Cam373737 @Shawn_Farash @Smurfette196307 hahaha a "Smart jury" ? This is NEVER going to a jury

@Shawn_Farash @Smurfette196307 We shall see, Shawn. Just hope they get a smart jury. At least it isn't a DC jury.

I'm not going to tell you that I think the Comey "seashells" case is *STRONG* as there seem to be many First Amendment-aligned defenses... But I don't think it's *WEAK* either. A Grand Jury saw SOMETHING... and it had to be more than just an Instagram post of seashells. That Grand Jury saw enough evidence to indict Comey for threatening to kill the President of the United States. Bottom line is we don't know what other evidence convinced that Grand Jury to indict. You would have to believe it's more than just an IG post. For the sake of the case, I hope it's more than that too. We'll see.

@Cam373737 @Shawn_Farash @Smurfette196307 Did you get your law degree at Trump U? Clearly you don't understand the first amendment

@Shawn_Farash @Smurfette196307 Think. Lots of proof Comey hates Trump. Would a reasonable person interpret that the old fashioned way or the modern way? Shut down restaurant service? That was clearly Murder Trump. Inciting violence is a crime.

@Shawn_Farash HAHAHAHA So you're saying that this indictment is so ridiculously weak that there HAS to be more to it. Because NO LAWYER in his right mind would file such garbage unless there was more to it. These isn't It really IS that weak

@LibOrNormal Of course not. This is a chicken shit indictment and will be dismissed quickly

Do you really think James Comey is going to receive any type of punishment after being indicted yesterday over his 86 47 Instagram post last year?