Spooky Baba

743 posts

Spooky Baba banner
Spooky Baba

Spooky Baba

@SpookyBaba

There may be other imitators copying my moniker. But, I am the original Spooky Baba. The others evidently can't think up their own names!

Schweiz/Deutschland/England Joined Haziran 2014
36 Following33 Followers
Pinned Tweet
Spooky Baba
Spooky Baba@SpookyBaba·
Marmite ; You either love it. Or, you hate it...
Spooky Baba tweet media
English
1
1
3
322
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Graham Moore 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿
“While a moderate and necessary use of administrative law cannot be a bad thing if consented to by the general population, its over use to restrict Rights and Liberties”. It cannot and should not be used to erase rights or constitutional statutes that say in various phrases “forever” even A.V Dicey said that!
The Secret People 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿@SecretPeopleTSP

To clarity, des-ue-tude is a state of inactivity or disuse. A precedent established under our English Common Law can always be relied on, no matter how ancient or unused since its establishment. These Laws are never purged through lack of use. Whereas unused Roman laws (administrative laws, legislation) are periodically purged. Administrative laws have the ability to coerce the restriction or non practice of established common law Rights, such as our Right to govern ourselves, and to arm ourselves. Our problem is when compacts confirming these Rights are enacted into law which are then purged when there is no authority to do so. While a moderate and necessary use of administrative law cannot be a bad thing if consented to by the general population, its over use to restrict Rights and Liberties, and enacted arbitrarily as it is today, puts us in the weak position of slave to the legislative master contrary to all established Right and reason, ... and as such there is no obligation to accept that status. 'Political therefore, or civil, liberty, which is that of a member of society, is no other than natural liberty so far restrained by human laws (and not farther) as is necessary and expedient for the general advantage of the public.' - William Blackstone

English
3
8
12
333
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Graham Moore 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿
VISCOUNT SIMON “ If I may say so, in a sentence, the Lord Chancellor is perfectly right. It is a very important principle of our law of nationality that, if we choose to naturalise a person, that person from that time on is in exactly the same position as though he were natural-born. That is really the principle, and I am glad the Lord Chancellor has moved this Amendment.'
The Secret People 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿@SecretPeopleTSP

As we know, Sir John Knight's predictions came true. 1948 was the nail in the coffin when the British Parliament did what was unthinkable to our English People. They amended one of our written compacts with the Monarchy without being expressly authorised. They called it 'the old law', as if it was irrelevant and useless. #contribution-f4234d01-a145-448a-aff3-672860142db1" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">hansard.parliament.uk/Lords/1948-06-… 'THE LORD CHANCELLOR moved, after Clause 30 to insert the following new clause: Assimilation of status of natural-born and other British subjects under existing enactments. "For the purpose of assimilating the rights and liabilities of natural-born and other British subjects under the enactments specified in Part I of the Third Schedule to this Act, those enactments are hereby repealed to the extent specified in the third column of that Part." The noble and learned Viscount said: This Amendment, which should be read with the Amendment to page 22, line 2, is designed to assimilate the status of natural-born and other British subjects—for example, naturalised subjects, under existing enactments. The older Acts, for instance, the Act of Settlement provides that: "No person born out of the kingdoms of England, Scotland or Ireland or the dominions thereto belonging (although he be naturalised or made a denizen, except such as are born of England parents) shall be capable to be of the Privy Council or a member of either House of Parliament.…" That was the old law. The Naturalisation Act of 1870 did away with that distinction—or rather, it did not do away with it; it did not repeal it, but it treated natural born and naturalised British subjects on the same basis. So did the Act of 1914, which repealed the Act of 1870. But there was still enough doubt and complication left as to where this matter stood to enable an argument to be raised on the matter. It was raised, in fact, shortly after the First World War, in a case which we all remember, as to whether a Privy Councillor was properly appointed by reason of the Act of Settlement, or whether the provisions of the Act of Settlement had been repealed by the 1870 and 1914 Acts. This clause is designed to make it quite clear that if we naturalise somebody, his rights are just the same as though he were born a British subject. It puts the controversy at an end, and I commend the Amendment to your Lordships. I beg to move. Amendment moved— After Clause 30, insert the said new clause—(The Lord Chancellor.) VISCOUNT SIMON If I may say so, in a sentence, the Lord Chancellor is perfectly right. It is a very important principle of our law of nationality that, if we choose to naturalise a person, that person from that time on is in exactly the same position as though he were natural-born. That is really the principle, and I am glad the Lord Chancellor has moved this Amendment.'

English
2
14
21
512
Spooky Baba
Spooky Baba@SpookyBaba·
@gabby_cabby Graham has talked about it, a few times. He's teaching us well.
English
0
0
0
40
All For England
All For England@AllForEnglandHQ·
England is NOT a dirty word! 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿
English
9
23
105
2.2K
Andy The Gabby Cabby
Andy The Gabby Cabby@gabby_cabby·
Makerfield could be the first crack in the establishment wall. Rebecca Shepherd must win — but Restore Britain must also understand one thing: You cannot restore Britain while preserving the very statutory union that helped break it. The Constitution is the solution. @RupertLowe10 @RestoreBritain @lucyjaynewhite1
English
42
82
281
10.7K
Spooky Baba
Spooky Baba@SpookyBaba·
@CCrowley100 Irving is my living Hero, and I don't do Heroes. I absolutely love him, even more than Graham Moore 😉 Sorry, DD. I'd still fight till the death for your life if you ever needed.
English
0
0
1
73
Chad Crowley
Chad Crowley@CCrowley100·
“If the soldiers who stormed the beaches of Normandy could see England as it is today, they wouldn’t have gone 40 yards up that beach.” — David Irving
Chad Crowley tweet media
English
28
200
1.5K
11.5K
Spooky Baba
Spooky Baba@SpookyBaba·
@gabby_cabby @J_H_Sharp I think we need to start accepting he's not gonna be fighting so much for England. Restore Britain kinda says what he's more interested in, sadly. He has some good ideas. But, he's not the complete fix that's urgently needed
English
2
0
1
7
Spooky Baba
Spooky Baba@SpookyBaba·
@AngloSaxon449 Absolute SCUM! In the real fourth Reich they'd be the first to go. (variation on a line from Nazi punks fuck off) Seemed appropriate.
English
0
0
0
3
Spooky Baba
Spooky Baba@SpookyBaba·
@Neccccy Shameless whores, and that's how they sleep at night. They really shouldn't do, though. They should sleep with one eye open, and ears fully alert.
English
0
0
0
11
Spooky Baba
Spooky Baba@SpookyBaba·
@Botervlootje3 @Xmusknewsx I can't really speak. I'm a German, fully supporting England only, and it's Constitution, living in Switzerland.
English
0
0
1
9
Hope X
Hope X@Xmusknewsx·
Do you Support this? Yes or No?
Hope X tweet media
English
237
272
1.3K
111.5K
Spooky Baba
Spooky Baba@SpookyBaba·
One of many sidelines. Not a kink, just photography!
Spooky Baba tweet media
English
0
0
0
10