Koen Robeys

63.1K posts

Koen Robeys

Koen Robeys

@Koenrobeys

"Words ought to be a little wild for they are the assault of thought on the unthinking" Ik deel veel rode idealen maar daarvoor hebben we blauwe middelen nodig

Se unió Ocak 2011
134 Siguiendo320 Seguidores
Not Evolution
Not Evolution@NotEvolution1·
Naturalism is false
Not Evolution tweet media
English
34
4
42
1.3K
Koen Robeys
Koen Robeys@Koenrobeys·
@ProdigalNo_More @NotEvolution1 I only said that water (and other stuff) coming from nonwater proves that it is extremely childish to claim that life cannot come from nonlife.
English
1
0
0
4
ProdigalNo_More
ProdigalNo_More@ProdigalNo_More·
@Koenrobeys @NotEvolution1 Except that you're making it sound like because we know there are certain things then anything goes. You said you don't know, but that violates the law of contradiction. Fundamental to all of science is ex nihilo nihil fit, out of nothing nothing comes.
ProdigalNo_More tweet media
English
1
0
0
14
Koen Robeys
Koen Robeys@Koenrobeys·
@ProdigalNo_More @NotEvolution1 I said I do not know. But water from nonwater happens every day (and salt from nonsalt and sugar from nonsugar too) and that proves you cannot exclude stuff from nonstuff in general.
English
1
0
0
4
ProdigalNo_More
ProdigalNo_More@ProdigalNo_More·
So you just implied being from non-being is possible. So then what about being from non-being if there is no God? And water from non-water happens throughout the day every day when molecules that are not water come together to form water. There's no surprise nor gotcha there. It's just natural. But being from non-being is not natural, and necessitates a miracle.
ProdigalNo_More tweet media
English
1
0
0
5
Anatolij Sharij
Anatolij Sharij@anatoliisharii·
A cartoonist who depicted Putin and the Kremlin in his drawings, who humiliated Putin and the Kremlin, has been killed in Europe. This is what you will read everywhere. The Western press is so honest and principled that it will tell you this. But it will forget to mention that this person was listed on the Ukrainian kill list website “Myrotvorets.” It will also forget to mention that this person repeatedly insulted the Ukrainian authorities, the Russian opposition, the Ukrainian armed forces, Ukrainian oligarchs, Zelensky, Yermak, Akhmetov, and many others. The European press will forget about that. A cartoonist who drew caricatures of Putin has been killed. The case is solved. How simple, isn’t it?
Anatolij Sharij tweet mediaAnatolij Sharij tweet mediaAnatolij Sharij tweet mediaAnatolij Sharij tweet media
English
46
405
1.5K
51.5K
Koen Robeys retuiteado
Gerard Govers
Gerard Govers@gerardgovers·
Het conflict Iran-(USA+Israël) is nog lang niet ten einde en het nieuwe akkoord geeft Iran meer controle en strategische hefbomen dan ooit ('managing the strait of Hormuz'). Dat is een krachtig signaal dat we, zeker in Europa, moeten opschieten met die energietransitie. De vraag is niet of er een volgende crisis komt maar wel wanneer.
Institute for the Study of War@TheStudyofWar

NEW: Multiple sources published what appears to be the text of the US-Iran agreement. Neither the United States nor Iran has officially published the text of the agreement at this time. The leaked text of the agreement, if accurate, indicates that Iran has emerged from the conflict in a stronger strategic position, however. ⬇️ The MoU reportedly grants Iran significant economic relief, which Iran would likely use to try to reconstitute its missile, drone, and nuclear programs, as well as the Axis of Resistance. The MoU states that Iran could receive further economic relief by fulfilling its commitments in the MoU and reaching a final agreement that addresses key nuclear issues. ISW-CTP has not observed any indications that Iranian decision-makers are willing to make concessions on the nuclear issues that would be included in a final agreement, however. Iran will likely try to exploit the agreement’s seemingly ambiguous language about the Strait of Hormuz to try to enforce its control over shipping through the strait. The reported text of the agreement does not explicitly bar Iran from “managing” the strait, and Iran could therefore continue to insist on vessels using its illegal traffic separation scheme in Iranian territorial waters and paying “fees” to the IRGC Navy. The Iranian regime is interpreting the clause in the agreement about a ceasefire “on all fronts” as a requirement for Israel to cease operations against Hezbollah and withdraw from Lebanon. This interpretation is part of a broader Iranian effort to preserve Hezbollah by trying to secure Israel’s capitulation in Lebanon. The reported MoU terms indicate that Iran structured the agreement in a way to try to limit the United States’ ability to impose renewed pressure on Iran during the 60-day negotiations period and thereby make it more challenging for the United States to extract concessions from Iran during the negotiations. Iranian officials and media are largely framing the US-Iran MoU as an Iranian victory that codifies Iran’s military achievements. The Iranian regime’s English-language media outlet, Press TV, argued on June 16 that the MoU is not simply a ceasefire, but rather represents the “political codification of a battlefield reality.”

Nederlands
0
3
3
308
Gerard Govers
Gerard Govers@gerardgovers·
@hansvb @LodeCossaer Natuurlijk is het tweede orde: maar het is een speculatieve beslissing (een call). Je wil de garantie dat je energie krijgt tegen een vaste prijs, ongeacht van de marktbewegingen. En als de marktprijs stijgt zoals in 2022 dan doe je een goede zaak.
Nederlands
1
0
2
148
Lode Cossaer
Lode Cossaer@LodeCossaer·
Ik wou dat het me lukte om uit te leggen dat 'speculatie' echt op geen enkele manier de boogeyman is dat veel linksen er van maken, voornamelijk gebaseerd op een fundamenteel onbegrip. Zekerheid in proberen bouwen in onzekerheid is niet 'slecht'.
Nederlands
3
0
9
1.3K
Suzy Eeckelaerts
Suzy Eeckelaerts@SEeckelaerts·
Zelfs dat niet. Een golflengte van bv. 475nm (blauw) + een golflengte van bv. 675nm (rood) creëert geen nieuwe 'menggolflengte'. Die golflengtes blijven discreet bestaan. De kleur 'paars' ontstaat doordat je hersenen het mengsignaal van 2 verschillende lichtreceptoren integreren tot paars (niet-spectrale kleur).
Nederlands
2
0
2
45
Michael Verstraeten
Michael Verstraeten@MichaelVerstrae·
"Kunnen biologische mannen zwanger worden?" Voor deze Amerikaanse gynaecologe die als 'expert" sprak in het parlement een zeer moeilijke vraag. Ze vindt immers dat we "inclusief" moeten spreken. En dus is het agressief om te zeggen dat biologische mannen niet zwanger kunnen worden. Dat is polariserend, volgens haar. Kijk, ik ben voor de vrijheid van iedereen om van zichzelf te vinden dat hij een man of een vrouw is. Ik ben er ook voor mensen aan te spreken zoals ze dat zelf willen. Dat is een vorm van beleefdheid en erkenning van hoe ze zich voelen over zichzelf. Maar als het zo ver gaat dat artsen niet eens meer de waarheid willen zeggen, of ze weigeren onder ogen te zien, omdat van sommige mensen gedacht wordt dat ze de waarheid niet aankunnen, dan zijn we helemaal van het pad af. De waarheid bestaat. En van artsen bij uitstek mag verwacht worden dat ze de waarheid spreken op grond van de wetenschap. Ik herinner eraan dat ook bij corona de artsen niet meer de waarheid spraken omwille van politieke wanen. Onder andere dat het vaccin 100 % safe was en geen bijwerkingen kon hebben omdat de waarheid zeggen zou kunnen leiden tot minder bereidheid voor vaccinatie tegen corona. Nooit meer zo'n misleidende onzin alstublieft.
Nederlands
59
92
481
20.8K
Koen Robeys
Koen Robeys@Koenrobeys·
@ProdigalNo_More @NotEvolution1 Tuttut! The only thing my logic says is there is nothing wrong with water, or whatever other stuff you might appy it to, coming from non-water. Do you think that @NotEvolution1 missed this simple insight by sheer superficiality?
English
2
0
0
13
Koen Robeys
Koen Robeys@Koenrobeys·
@ProdigalNo_More @NotEvolution1 As you just said yourself: water can come from non-water. So why are people pretending that any "stuff", like say, water, or life, cannot. I think it is either deep, deep ignorance or conscious misrepresentation: what do you think?
English
1
0
1
15
ProdigalNo_More
ProdigalNo_More@ProdigalNo_More·
@Koenrobeys @NotEvolution1 "Stuff coming from non-stuff"? Sounds like you might be dodging. Care to clarify what you're talking about now? We were talking about specifics. Now you've gone vague.
English
1
0
0
13
Koen Robeys
Koen Robeys@Koenrobeys·
@ProdigalNo_More @NotEvolution1 So you *know* that "stuff coming from non-stuff" is plain as, well, water. But @NotEvolution1 is trying to present it as a problem that can't be overcome: why do you think he is making such a childish mis-representation?
English
1
0
1
16