Pinker Pinkterion (⚖️,⚖️)

Today Enter became the first AI unicorn out of Latin America. Mateus, Michael and Henrique are building the best Legal AI product in the world from São Paulo. Not a copilot, an AI litigator that absorbs the entire workflow end-to-end and is already running 300,000+ lawsuits a year for clients like Airbnb, Bradesco, Nubank, Latam and Azul. At @KaszekVentures we could not be prouder to back this team. Congrats Mateus, Michael, Henrique and everyone at Enter.

⚖️ April Juror Rewards just hit wallets. ~14% APR on @gnosischain ~19% APR on @ethereum Claim and re-stake to compound next month's payout.

💻 Lavalle es el primer departamento de Mendoza en usar jurados digitales para resolver conflictos. Junto a la jueza Fernanda Díaz, del Juzgado de Paz y Contravencional de Lavalle, estamos corriendo un piloto de instancias consultivas: las partes someten su disputa a un jurado descentralizado de Kleros y reciben una recomendación antes del proceso formal. Fuimos a Mendoza a reunirnos con el Municipio de Lavalle y la Suprema Corte de Justicia, para ver la implementación en territorio. Y dimos un taller con estudiantes secundarios sobre blockchain, justicia y resolución de conflictos. Gracias a Mario Adaro (Suprema Corte de Mendoza) y a Fernanda Díaz por impulsar esto, y a @MarcosPernas1 y @facundo_trotz del equipo por el trabajo en territorio. El lunes 11 de Mayor contamos más de esta iniciativa 👇

🇦🇷 Mendoza y Junín ya resuelven disputas con jurados ciudadanos digitales. ¿Cómo funciona? ¿Qué casos se resolvieron? ¿Qué resultados tuvieron? Lunes 11 de Mayo · 18:00 ART · Jueza M. Fernanda Díaz | Poder Judicial Mendoza · M. Alejandra Tomasone | Defensa del Consumidor Junín · Sergio Mohadeb | @derechoenzapatillas · Facundo Trotz | Kleros · Modera: Federico Ast | CEO Kleros Registrate 👉 bit.ly/kleroswebinar

@Kleros_io is voting to launch a hidden-ballot curation court on Gnosis Chain, where jurors commit their verdict in secret before anyone sees how others voted. Kleros is a decentralized arbitration protocol: $PNK holders stake to serve as jurors on disputes. Curation courts rule on whether listings, token registries, and similar entries are legitimate. 2025 data showed jurors copying early votes rather than judging independently, a herding problem the hidden-voting parameter fixes, but only in a new court since it cannot be toggled on after creation. The proposal frames this as a parallel experiment, not a replacement, following earlier hidden-vote courts on Ethereum (2020) and Gnosis (2021). @clesaege supports hidden voting but flags an unresolved structural issue: parenting the new court under the General Court "would split staking between hidden and not hidden." His alternatives - attach it to the existing Curation Court, or price the old one out via higher fees. One wallet has voted 22,791 $PNK in favor so far (100% For). Voting closes May 11. 9:29 UTC Proposal: snapshot.box/#/s:kleros.eth…

This Brazilian startup uses AI to help large corporations win cases against consumers. Others will use AI to defend consumers against corporations. For a fair decision, just use @Kleros_io.

"A prediction market is only as good as its oracle" I'm glad we're finally seeing PMs start to move to oracles that are both not centralized and not financialized. Next step is to make attester voting private. x.com/llamaonthebrin…

💻 Lavalle es el primer departamento de Mendoza en usar jurados digitales para resolver conflictos. Junto a la jueza Fernanda Díaz, del Juzgado de Paz y Contravencional de Lavalle, estamos corriendo un piloto de instancias consultivas: las partes someten su disputa a un jurado descentralizado de Kleros y reciben una recomendación antes del proceso formal. Fuimos a Mendoza a reunirnos con el Municipio de Lavalle y la Suprema Corte de Justicia, para ver la implementación en territorio. Y dimos un taller con estudiantes secundarios sobre blockchain, justicia y resolución de conflictos. Gracias a Mario Adaro (Suprema Corte de Mendoza) y a Fernanda Díaz por impulsar esto, y a @MarcosPernas1 y @facundo_trotz del equipo por el trabajo en territorio. El lunes 11 de Mayor contamos más de esta iniciativa 👇

@NeerajKA keeps deleting his replies so here’s my response to his series of excuses for Circle. CIRCLE is responsible for the things it builds and the decisions they make and the people they provide services too. Just like every other person and company in this space. In this situation EVERYONE ELSE ACTED to the respond to the incident and take the steps THEY COULD to mitigate the harm. Not because they were forced to. But because they could and they don’t want the hackers to fucking win. That’s the fucking difference and why Circles actions are fucking unacceptable. They could. Not only can they—they have a bigger staff and more money than every other one of these teams. And they chose not to. A lot of bridges can’t freeze. But they can block on the frontends or APIs. They can refuse to process transactions that are 100% stolen funds. AND IN THIS CASE EVERYONE DID EVERYTHING THEY COULD. EXCEPT CIRCLE. The frontends blocked. The bridges limited the SOL->ETH routes temporarily. The people who could freeze froze. Drift and Squads and security experts worked instantly to identify and contain the threat and ensure no further loss could be realized—to Drift AND to others. The only ones who sat and did NOTHING was Circle. They watched. As people alerted and worked together and said FUCK YOU to the hackers and tried to stop them, Circle sat in their ivory tower and said FUCK YOU to all the innocent people impacted. CIRCLE has decided that they don’t want to work together to make the world better. Fuck that. CIRCLE fucking CHOSE to keep servicing blatant fucking stolen funds via their stablecoin, their bridge, their frontend, their apis, their servers. For fucking HOURS. And then they made excuses for not acting after. No. That’s unacceptable. You are responsible for your actions. You don’t get to make excuses when you fuck up. Own it and be better or literally get the actual fuck OUT.