Adriatic Chieftain

@elegationvain "My point is we cannot make rules or laws based on how people feel" Great. Then we ought to reverse every major female-led policy change in the last 60 years in developed industrialized countries.

Because of AGP. That’s why. It’s possible he wears them because he enjoys making people uncomfortable. There’s even a slim possibility he wears them because they remind him of his great aunt Julie. Or his pet goldfish. My point is we cannot make rules or laws based on how people feel. Either someone can wear fake breasts to work or they can’t (my vote is “can’t”), but it can’t be determined by how they feel about the fake breasts.

@HerrHusten @jonathanbylos @minordissent Your "problem" with the poll works both ways. If only people who realize "if we all press red we live" could vote, then everyone would simply press red.

@jonathanbylos @DivineDeadlock @minordissent Nah, I think he has just post-hoc coped about it. If he said "children and people with diminished mental capacity also get to vote", explicitly, then everyone would choose blue. Duh.

Red voters real quiet right now about everyone winning and surviving.

@HerrHusten @minordissent @jonathanbylos It's another sign you are from a developed "WEIRD" country that you think $100 USD is a small amount of money. In this thought experiment, we all lose nothing if we all just act responsibly and pick blue. You literally lose nothing.

@DivineDeadlock @minordissent @jonathanbylos Yeah, you over thought it. Let me give you another hypothetical. If you don't transfer me $100 USD - a pitifully small amount of money - there's a 50% chance I may harm myself. Blue presser, help me. I may choose self harm. It's such an easy choice.

@mamiminluvwichu @_Cannon_Fire_ @cremieuxrecueil Yes. The question says everyone.

@DivineDeadlock @_Cannon_Fire_ @cremieuxrecueil Does the question truly imply that there will be children (i.e. those with cognitive limitations to correctly understand what's being asked/at stake?)

I've received 166 wordsum scores plus blue/red button press results, and I'm so tempted to look, but I have to wait until I hit my target sample size of 2,350. Which side's button pushers will end up being more intelligent?

@HerrHusten @minordissent @jonathanbylos This makes no sense from a selfish POV. If I wanted to get the best oucome for myself (guaranteed survival), I would just press red. There is no "need" to rely on others to press blue if my goal is survival. I can just "directly" get survival via red if I am selfish.

@DivineDeadlock @minordissent @jonathanbylos Other people need to press blue for you to survive if you press blue. You're making a choice that requires actions from other people. That's selfish, and entitled too.

@HerrHusten @minordissent @jonathanbylos What do you mean making things up? I thought about it deeply, unlike you. It is true that some populations will press blue (like children). If you can model that a non-trivial number of people will press blue, it makes sense to commit to killing no one.

@DivineDeadlock @minordissent @jonathanbylos Ah, you've made the classic error of making things up. You overthought it, rather than consider it hypothetical in its proper framing. The spirit of the hypothetical is not about "think of all the dumb people". It's mechanistic. Only an idiot would press blue. That's the point.

@HerrHusten @minordissent @jonathanbylos What do you mean it's selfish? Red guarantees survival. There is no selfish incentive to press blue. You are just speaking nonsense at this point.

@DivineDeadlock @minordissent @jonathanbylos In fact, it is extremely selfish to press the blue button with the expectation that others will come to your rescue by similarly pressing the blue button. So.. yeah. Not seeing it, sorry.

@HerrHusten @minordissent @jonathanbylos Of course we should care about dumb populations. Children, chiefly, are dumb. We should protect children. It's okay to admit you didn't think this through and realize "everyone" includes people like children and your slow grandmother. Convert to blue 😎

@DivineDeadlock @minordissent @jonathanbylos It's not morally virtuous to put yourself in harms way for no reason at all, however. "I will risk my own life because I assume other people are so dumb they will also risk their life". That's also not a very virtuous point of view, if I'm honest.

@HerrHusten @minordissent @jonathanbylos Yes. Every morally virtuous person puts themselves in harm's way to protect loved ones. It's why young men used to go to war en masse. It's why mothers were willing to die in child birth. Only in hyper-individualized "developed" countries do people develop weird selfish POVs

@DivineDeadlock @minordissent @jonathanbylos So would a Chinese grandmother risk death by pressing blue? Is that what you're suggesting?

@_Cannon_Fire_ @cremieuxrecueil No. 110-120 IQ is red. Anyone above 120 can model in their heads that the thought experiment includes children and immediately realizes adults have a responsibility to save them. low IQ altruists + high altruists would save the world from edgy midwit sociopaths like you

@cremieuxrecueil I think they'll be roughly equal, but the ones who push red act more after deliberation and the blues on intuition. I reason that red is the best choice versus I intuit that blue is morally right.

@_MortalMonkey @cremieuxrecueil You are insane to posit that children are personally responsible for themselves and that adults don't have a responsibility to save them from accidental suicide. Libertarianism is arrested development. Literal mental disorder.

@cremieuxrecueil It's a bell curve. We obviously know who the midwits are

@profjmb Hello professor Bailey! Maybe we should continue this conversation in DMs? I cannot message you because you don't follow me. I'm also happy to continue the convo via e-mail or any other non-public method of correspondence.

@DivineDeadlock We’ll see. Btw why do you think you need a week?

@profjmb Hey, random question! If a man was able to successfully "convert" from gay to straight and wanted to prove it via phallometric testing (like you offered Joseph Nicholosi with his patients) -- how could they sign up for such testing?

@profjmb 😎👍🏼

@DivineDeadlock Yes in theory.

@tavis1_ @minordissent @jonathanbylos "Significantly reduce the population of their enemies" ??? Do you think a median 40-year-old Chinese mom thinks this way? Twitter is full of deranged people.

@DivineDeadlock @minordissent @jonathanbylos How confident are you that China would conclude that a few people accidentally pressing blue and dying is worse than the small chance that everyone else presses red for some reason, or even the chance to significantly reduce the population of their enemies?

@SpinnerLA @robertskmiles You are a midwit. One option kills children. One option kills no one. Obviously normal people will save children. Only 110-120 IQ range people who fancy themselves "edgy" would press red. Retarded.

@robertskmiles Why would anyone press anything but red.? There is no incentive to do otherwise so no dilemma.

Everyone is presented with two buttons, and must choose one: If you press Red, nothing happens. If you press Blue, you die, unless more than half of people also pressed Blue, in which case nothing happens. What do you choose?

@fiatstandard @minordissent @jonathanbylos surely you should use your own agency in this situation to save the random 4-year-old kid who presses blue, not deliberately choose not to and then smugly blame the thought experiment itself for your decision to prioritize yourself over innocent kids

@DivineDeadlock @minordissent @jonathanbylos Your framing as one of the participants doing the murder is dishonest with the reality of it, the game does the killing, not any player. Who or how the game is enforced would be the only single culprit.

@Hntaigana @minordissent @jonathanbylos I work in China, retard.

@DivineDeadlock @minordissent @jonathanbylos You know nothing about China.

@minordissent @jonathanbylos You have no idea how people outside of individualistic countries think. No Chinese person would risk killing their grandmother. It would bring dishonor to their ancestors. You are suffering from post-Nietzsche mental illness. Find Christ.

I can't speak for all red voters, but literally my entire reason for voting red is because I believe that all blue moralizers will chicken out when the time comes. They will win every no-stakes surveys and then like half of them will press red when their life is truly on the line, such that red wins overwhelmingly and blue is suicide.

@elegationvain @SVPhillimore I often disagree with your models, but this is scarily true. It's most predatory form of grooming in the LGBT community. Scary shit.

AGP men live vicariously through AGP boys, who they encourage to transition, even providing them hormones or money for HRT, and the boys send progress videos & photos (child porn). People misunderstand this dynamic as purely grooming, but the boys are AGP & are internally motivated to transition. Doesn’t make the adults encouraging and helping them any less criminally culpable though.

And let’s also pause to ponder why and how exactly this child became the pawn of this group of middle aged male paraphiliacs and why no one appeared to be concerned about his welfare.

@Pintikky @SonOfAnchis3s It's not the same thing. Men generate value. Women disparage others through (1) gossip (2) HR boards (3) discriminatory affirmative action (4) preferential welfare (5) ethics committees they essentially just "take" without creating

@SonOfAnchis3s "competing to be better than their competition" vs "competing to knock their competition down a few pegs" is same thing Also, if women had more inherent value, you wouldn't have had mass infant murder in china/india. Depends on cultural values at a given time.

Male and female intrasexual competition is a result of the differing gendered manners of existing in the world. The male is born worthless, always becoming. The male intrasexual dynamic reflects this: men compete by trying to be better than their competition. The female is born with intrinsic value, as the bearer of life, simply being, rather than becoming. The female intrasexual dynamic reflects this: women compete by trying to knock their competition down a few pegs. The man, in search of his value, seeks to ascend the hierarchy. He is wired from birth to reach. The woman, assured of her value, seeks to displace and disqualify any who may compete with her. She is wired from birth to protect her value, rather than create it.