Truth Hunter ☀️🐭

One of my injured patients is in Japan getting treatment. He emailed: “I am going full throttle on legal. I am so angry at these people. They are not going to sweep this under the rug. There is going to be hell to pay for this.  I am smart and driven and have conviction. My story is unbelievable.” I’m going to help him sue Houston Methodist when he recovers. Here’s @KevinMcCairnPhD explaining the treatment:

@peptidemaxxer @TheEdPill same shitty manufacturing processes and contaminants

@TheEdPill mRNA and amino acids. learn the difference

You dodged the vaccine but fell for peptides 🕊️

@tobi this you, bro?

The word `expert` in media has come to mean pundit with davos-liberal talking points

If the FDA approves Moderna's mRNA flu shot in June I think President Trump and everyone in the White House along with Marty Makary and all of his staff should be the first people to get it. Because it works so well and is so safe and effective. 😉

This is one of the sloppiest studies related to COVID infection and HPV cancers out there. It’s shocking it passed peer review. The study is so flawed that I couldn’t bring myself to include it in the scoping review we published on COVID infection/vaccines and cancer. First, it relied on data from TriNetX. TriNetX is owned and operated by a health-tech company headquartered in Cambridge, MA, which was acquired by a majority stake by The Carlyle Group in 2020- a private equity firm in DC. This in of itself makes the data and the rigor of the study highly questionable. Second, the cohorts used for the study were “people diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 between January 1 and December 31, 2020”, compared to people who remained uninfected during the same period. There is ZERO indication on how this was documented and what that even means. What exactly were the clinical presentations for these cohorts? How and which were cofounder’s s excluded? The lack of details related to the study methodology is highly suspect and calls into question the validity of the study. Third, and most importantly, the study assessed cancer development of the cohort after the majority of the population had been vaccinated and did not exclude or discriminate between vaccinated and unvaccinated. So in essence the results of this study are completely uninterpretable. This is one of those papers that is embarrassing to defend.

@Jikkyleaks @SpaceflightNow lmfao

@SpaceflightNow Oops. Don't suppose you have a real picture handy? fotoforensics.com/analysis.php?i…

NASA has released the first high-quality images of Earth captured from inside the Orion capsule by the Artemis 2 crew.

For decades we’ve called it “multifactorial risk.” Now @NEJM calls corporations vectors of disease. Same problem. Different language. Still no accountability for the exposures driving it. @US_FDA @SecKennedy @NIHDirector_Jay @DrMakaryFDA @EPA nejm.org/doi/full/10.10…

@KUPERWASSERLAB @US_FDA Adulterated products.

And the @US_FDA has also failed to provide any pre-marketing or post-marketing data related to the DNA contaminants/byproducts (particularly related to Spike DNA) in the mRNA vaccines. And they have also failed to provide any safety limits or any guidance related to LNP encapsulated DNA in mRNA vaccine products…..

Most people don’t understand the gravity of what Steve etched into Bitcoin. Evidence that the WIV was putting a Furin cleavage sites into a 20-30% mortality MERS virus. Not maybe.. found in their own published data as a contaminant. There is no hiding from this crime. If they did this, it stands to reason they made C19. Retract the proximal origins paper and investigate all those people involved in the cover up.

🚨 New documents obtained by Sen. Ron Johnson add to existing evidence that health officials under the Biden administration downplayed COVID-19 vaccine safety risks and delayed warning the public.

If a vaccine injures your child, you can't sue the company that made it. They have a special legal shield no one voted for. My End the Vaccine Carve Out Act changes that.

1/ Stroke after Vaccination No graphs - No statistics Use your own brain - Do NOT rely on experts Excerpts from THE ACIP MEMORANDUM CDC committed fraud by deleting "Y59.0"

Wasn’t the clinical definition of Long-COVID precisely defined by “something bad happens anytime after being infected with Sars-CoV-2”? Isn’t LC now recognized as “viral infection induced injury”. And isn’t LC being attributed to the virulence of the spike protein from the virus.? And yet, when there is substantial evidence from numerous papers all showing long term persistence of spike from the vaccine, this is dismissed? Not to mention the vaccine also introduces DNA byproducts from vaccine manufacturing… and that’s dismissed as well? Why dismiss the virulence of the spike from the vaccine but not from the virus?

Today we filed a #FOIA lawsuit against the Central Intelligence Agency regarding two FOIA requests. Our requests seek communications between the CIA and Dr. Ralph Baric, a coronavirus expert at the University of North Carolina. We also seek intelligence products relating to Dr. Baric and his work. usrtk.org/wp-content/upl… This is our 44th FOIA lawsuit for documents related to the origin of COVID-19, gain-of-function research and related matters. For background, see: usrtk.org/covid-19-origi…

It’s time to end the liability shield. For nearly 40 years, one law has denied patients the basic right to sue for vaccine injuries in the normal justice system. I’m standing with the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation to change that. → vacsafety.org

@EthicalSkeptic @nobulart Need 3 copies 🙏🏼

Limited release forthcoming in April. A new knowledge. The most disruptive discovery in the recent history of mankind.

In my lecture at @NIH, at the invitation of @NIHDirector_Jay, I explained why I changed my mind from thinking the lab leak theory of covid origins was unlikely to thinking it was almost certainly true. Please watch and assess the evidence yourself. videocast.nih.gov/watch/244438a5…

BREAKING: @CDC approved proposal for ICD-10 diagnosis codes for COVID-19 vaccine injuries including chronic ones! Now open for public comments! Public health & moral imperative that must be supported! x.com/react19org/sta…

If Ralph Baric & the EcoHealth Alliance had revealed the Defuse proposal to the public in Jan 2020, I believe there would've been a strong case to be made for their integrity as scientists, patriotism to the US, and concern for people all over the world. But they did not.