Stuart Sims

37.2K posts

Stuart Sims banner
Stuart Sims

Stuart Sims

@SimsYStuart

Texan | Paratrooper(11B)@USARMY(Retired) | GenX | NIИ🇺🇸

Texas, USA Inscrit le Ağustos 2012
283 Abonnements2.6K Abonnés
Tweet épinglé
Stuart Sims
Stuart Sims@SimsYStuart·
Localized Ontology: Earth’s Biological Hierarchy of Consciousness and the Biophysical Roots of Human Religion In the pancognitivist framework, cognition is framed as a universal process governed by the Free Energy Principle (FEP), where systems minimize variational free energy through nested Markov blankets to sustain their integrity against entropic forces (see pinned post). When confined to a strictly local ontology focusing solely on Earth’s biophysical and ecological dynamics, this perspective reveals the planet as a deep, hierarchical cognitive ecosystem. Earth’s geological strata, from the surface crust to the inner core, constitute a Markovian architecture of inferential boundaries, with the core acting as the primary attractor state: a stable, geothermal equilibrium that anchors the entire biological hierarchy of consciousness. This core, often anthropomorphized in religious contexts as a foundational “God” (alpha/omega, beginning/end, the light of eternal mind etc) generates the planet’s bioelectric field - a pervasive electromagnetic envelope derived from core-mantle dynamo processes - that nests and synchronizes all subordinate biological processes. Within this local ontology, human religions emerge not as metaphysical inventions but as intuitive, culture-specific models for navigating and coexisting within this nested biological hierarchy of consciousness, where “realms” of consciousness correspond to stratified ecological and geophysical layers, and “gods” represent higher-order attractor states operating at expanded morphological and temporal scales. Earth’s Strata as a Nested Markovian Ecosystem Earth’s layered structure exemplifies a deep Markovian ecosystem under FEP: each stratum forms a statistical blanket that partitions internal states from external states, enabling nested Bayesian inference to minimize surprise and maintain allostatic coherence. The crust and biosphere represent surface-level MB’s (sensory states), where biotic interactions infer environmental gradients and enact adaptive responses. Deeper mantles handle convective flows, dissipating heat while preserving structural stability. At the most high (or rather, the foundational core) lies the primary attractor state: a high-density iron-nickel alloy under extreme conditions, where minimal free energy fluctuations establish a global equilibrium. This core drives the planet’s magnetic biofield (sensory state), shielding surface life from solar perturbations and facilitating ionospheric and geomagnetic couplings that integrate biological rhythms. All biological consciousness is nested within this biofield, which acts as a scale-invariant transjective communication matrix. Hedonic cognition (the valence-laden inference that characterizes/defines biological awareness/communication) arises as organisms and ecosystems align their predictions with this field, assigning positive valences to states that enhance coherence (symbiotic equilibria) and negative valences to disruptions (ecological imbalances). Surface ecosystems, such as forests or coral reefs, develop their own primary cognitive attractor states: emergent patterns of collective inference, like trophic cascades or microbial consortia, that optimize long-term surprise minimization at the group level. These primary attractor states function as a metacognitive SELF.
Stuart Sims tweet mediaStuart Sims tweet mediaStuart Sims tweet mediaStuart Sims tweet media
English
12
16
130
51.3K
Stuart Sims
Stuart Sims@SimsYStuart·
@dsawyer A huge part of normative intelligence is heteronormativity.
English
0
0
0
21
Stuart Sims
Stuart Sims@SimsYStuart·
@dsawyer There’s normative intelligence and neurodivergent intelligence. And neurodivergent intelligent often camouflages itself as normative. But normative intelligence very rarely camouflages itself as neurodivergent.
English
1
0
6
1K
J. Daniel Sawyer
J. Daniel Sawyer@dsawyer·
One of the most hilarious jokes the universe ever played on humans: stupidity and intelligence are not on the same axis. It is therefore possible to be both a rarefied genius and a fucking idiot.
English
8
36
289
36.5K
bingus ✩
bingus ✩@aliaoftheblade·
@SimsYStuart @CalderDune You’re saying that to the wrong guy Stu (coming from someone else who has actually read Frank’s 6), I’m interested on your opinion on Dune then if this one is so hilariously wrong
English
1
0
6
288
Stuart Sims
Stuart Sims@SimsYStuart·
@L0V3L3ZZX Being human is complicated and often painful. What makes life infinitely more painful and difficult is when men are emotionally isolated from intimacy with women. Masculinity isolated from intimacy with the feminine means reason ungoverned by empathy.
English
0
0
0
72
Mary
Mary@L0V3L3ZZX·
Algún día tendrán que aceptar que el mundo es infinitamente más difícil para los hombres.
Español
198
468
5.2K
148.6K
TheDividedGod
TheDividedGod@DividedGod·
@SimsYStuart @CalderDune Lol, the second option. Click on his profile, the dude is one of the most passionate Dune fans out there. This was just a silly joke
English
1
0
8
138
Stuart Sims
Stuart Sims@SimsYStuart·
@CalderDune Dude I’ve tried talking to people about Dune for 30+ years. Inevitably I discover that the person I’m talking to never actually read all six books. And those few who read 1-6 only read them once. Which is like reading all of Shakespeare once and declaring yourself an expert.
English
3
0
2
520
Stuart Sims
Stuart Sims@SimsYStuart·
He’s a gifted engineer who surrounds himself with gifted engineers. But like all ASD people, his great gifts come with great deficits. His own emotional inventory is opaque to him and can only be accessed through the intellect. True emotions are extraordinarily painful. And so true social/familial intimacy is impossible. @elonmusk is a prisoner within the suffering of the isolated mind. His gifts are also his curse. He can accumulate all the money in the world but can never have love. So his life is both a tragedy and a comedy. The danger will come when loneliness eventually kills his sense of humor.
English
0
0
0
40
silverhande
silverhande@silverhandle26·
@SimsYStuart @Samuel_Gregson @elonmusk I think his only skill is finding the right people to do the work for him. After listening to hours of interviews with him on joe rogan and other more sophisticated shows i have never heard him say one thing that was super clever or that i didn't know before.
English
1
0
2
54
Sam Gregson
Sam Gregson@Samuel_Gregson·
I’m told this man is a genius who will save humanity. However, every time *he* is observed, he appears to be an idiot.
Sam Gregson tweet media
English
259
285
4.6K
100.2K
Stuart Sims
Stuart Sims@SimsYStuart·
@ArtemyBurakh21 @DoctorPerin Chapterhouse does a deep deep dive into the relationship between sexual psychology and power. In my view it’s among the most astonishing displays of literary genius ever put to paper. Frank Herbert at the height of his power. But opinions vary.
English
0
0
1
27
Baron Killeen
Baron Killeen@ArtemyBurakh21·
@SimsYStuart @DoctorPerin So 6 is worth it to read even with the cliffhanger? I’m looking to read 1-4 but was unsure about the rest cause of their unfinished nature.
English
1
0
0
21
Stuart Sims
Stuart Sims@SimsYStuart·
If you want an elimination diet to show how food connects to anxiety, I’d recommend the “lion diet”. Which is an extreme form of carnivore where you only eat beef/salt/water. Ground beef is best. My wife had lifelong anxiety and completely removed her anxiety by doing 6 month lion diet. And we now have thousands of people reporting the same outcome. Lion diet’s not a long term solution but it functions to clearly demonstrate the connection between anxiety/food. Good luck 🦁🙏🏻
English
0
0
0
40
Patrick Lockwood
Patrick Lockwood@AlobhaPatrick·
(As a successful clinical psychologist) Mark is incorrect. 1. This is not what causes “anxiety,” whatever that means. 2. There is no “cure.” 3. Refocusing on “something bigger,” whatever that means, can easily worsen different types of “anxiety.”
Mark Manson@Markmanson

Anxiety is the result of self-obsession. Therefore, the cure isn't more self-focus; it's finding something bigger than yourself to focus on. ㅤ In other words, you’ll cease being anxious only once you’ve found something worth being anxious for.

English
7
2
44
4.3K
Brent Freeman
Brent Freeman@bgetsbetter·
Day 13 without food and hemorrhaging electrolytes. Send help
Brent Freeman tweet media
English
9
1
13
300
Stuart Sims
Stuart Sims@SimsYStuart·
Masculinity is only “toxic” when isolated from intimacy with femininity. Men isolated from intimacy with women are in a pathological state.
Nancy Pearcey@NancyRPearcey

Even the concept of "toxic masculinity" grew out of the industrial revolution. Before that, most men worked with their wives and children all day, on the family farm, the family industry, the family business. Surprisingly, most of the literature on parenting and childrearing was addressed to fathers. Today if you go to a bookstore, most of them are for mothers. But in the colonial era, fathers were just as involved with their children as mothers were. Historian John Gillis writes: “Not only artisans and farmers but also business and professional men conducted much of their work in the house, assisted by their wives and children. They all ate and prayed together; they got up and went to bed on the same schedule. . . . Men “were as comfortable in the kitchen as women, for they had responsibility for provisioning and managing the house." We talk about housewives, but they also talked about housefathers. The cultural expectation on men focused on their caretaking role. Masculine virtue was defined as “Duty to God and Man.” How did we lose this concept of masculine virtue? The Industrial Revolution took work out of the home. Men had little choice but to follow their work into factories and offices. For the first time, men were no longer working with their family--people they loved and had a moral bond with. Instead, they were working as individuals in competition with other men—a very different work environment. In the literature of the time, people began to protest that men were changing—they were losing the caretaking ethos of the colonial age. They were becoming ego-centric, self-interested, aggressive, greedy, acquisitive, even turning financial success into an “idol.” This is when we first see negative language applied to the male character.

English
0
0
2
151