Chester Nuggets

@CollinRugg She is my idol….. 🤡

NEW: ABC's "Bachelorette" caught on camera allegedly attacking her ex-boyfriend and throwing a chair at him, which appeared to hit her child. The "The Secret Lives of Mormon Wives" star is reportedly under investigation for domestic violence. "The Draper City Police Department in Utah [is investigating] the allegations on both sides after a recent incident," Variety recently reported. It's unclear if the police are investigating this incident or a separate one. Paul is set to star in Season 22 of “The Bachelorette," which reportedly starts in 3 days. Insane. Video: @TMZ

@sweatystartup Also if the AI bubble pops thats means China has won not good. China expands their electrical grid every year by the value of our entire grid. Elon will save us

The AI bubble will pop: Electricity will 2x in cost again over the next 24 months. AI companies will need to 5x prices to break even. Companies who depend on AI will see costs 5x and will be screwed. Users will vanish. Market will plummet.

@sweatystartup Elon with launch data centers into space. No slow governance impeding it. Solar panels will power them. Space is a cold place no need for cooling. Let’s come back to this in a few years

@CollinRugg lol it’s not my fault, Kristen yes it is

NEW: Kristin Cabot, from the Coldplay kiss cam, rips her former boss, says she can't be with him because he lacks "integrity." Cabot is accusing her former boss, Andy Byron, of lying to her and says she hasn't communicated with him since the fall. "He wasn’t the person he represented himself to be, to me, and lying is a non-negotiable for me. There was a big miss on honesty and integrity," she told Oprah.

I disagree with you thats okay. Iran is a proxy of China. China is trying to dethrone the USA at all costs. I encourage you to do some research. We are not in a war with Iran. Just to take nuclear capability’s away. Trump is not a neocon or taking us into a forever war. Trump is 10 moves ahead of everyone on the board. He is also using this for leverage with jinping

@ChesterNugget4 @corybusby @realericmoutsos @EricRWeinstein No it didnt. Not one good case for it. We should avoid war at all costs. Handle our problems with diplomacy

How long do we have before things drastically change here in America? @EricRWeinstein gives his thoughts.

@JDJ_MAGA @realericmoutsos @EricRWeinstein You do realize trump is ain’t establishment right?

In my opinion it will be a steps program. It'll get real bad, exepensive, and people will struggle with getting food let alone paying rent and utilities. It'll get so bad people will accept the new system because Americans have something called a normalcy bias. So anything that makes life better and can go back to their former lives even if it means digital control system most will accept. I have believed it will start in 2026 and be fully implemented, if not very close by 2028. 26-28 are the years that will seperate the men from the boys. Problem, reaction solution.

@corybusby @realericmoutsos @EricRWeinstein Who do you want to control Iran is or China ? Had to be done

@realericmoutsos @EricRWeinstein Eric Its happening now! But morphing into a class 5 shit blizzard. The last thing we needed to do is bomb Iran. Now we are off target and distracted.The whole country is consumed by all this bullshit and dumbshit that we chose to do, which only compounds the drasticness.

@vxylily Go buy a fish

He doesn’t smoke He doesn’t drink He doesn’t Womanise He doesn’t party He stays at home He doesn’t bet Where can I find him??

@riyazmd774 Better yet don’t use ChatGPT

Stop telling ChatGPT "Write me an email" Stop telling ChatGPT "Write me an email" Stop telling ChatGPT "Write me an email" Bad request = Bad result. Use these commands instead and you'll see the magic:

@PatternProfits Starting to see it better today Got stopped in the golden zone, Then re entered in the 2 3rd of the hour off the break a retest down

@ChesterNugget4 Correct

$NQ Lunchbox. Mentioned earlier how clean this one was today. Just as clean for $ES, too. When the sweep happens in the gold window, nearly 77% win rate over the last 30+ sessions. Low sweep win rate nearly 85% over the same period. 💪 tradingview.com/x/4a97Jffk/

I saw the no trade in the golden zone. A 5 min candle closure would be the best signal to confirm a sweep correct? Price would go past the level, creating a wick past the level. Then the 5 min candle closure back in the hourly range in the confirmation. Enter then have wick as stop loss

@ChesterNugget4 Failed? I don't see an entry in the 1st 20min of the new hour, so that would be a "no trade" day for early entry. If anyone took the late entry, it hit target at 2:30 for both $ES and $NQ.

@PatternProfits Hey Ben, lunch box failed today right? Want to make sure I saw it right.

@ChesterNugget4 Correct. No sweep for $NQ between 1 & 1:20pm, so no trade. Also, no sweep in the early variation between 12:50 & 1pm, so no trade. We have data for the late setup & it's basically a coin toss recently at 53%. Closer to 60% over a larger sample size. I tend to only take 70%+.

@PatternProfits Good to know that the golden hour has the higher win percentage. I might abandon the rest of the hour and just call that my A setup. If it’s not there just sit on hands and wait till the next day

@PatternProfits Just wanted to double check. NQ didn’t make the move today I don’t think. If I didn’t enter that would be a signal not to trade the strategy today correct. Nq failed to take the highs and failed to hold the lows

@ChesterNugget4 That's the strategy. Range forms from 12-1pm. After 1pm but before 1:20pm, either the range high or low gets swept and then price returns back inside the range to tag the midpoint. Anything outside of exactly that is a variation of the original strategy.

@PatternProfits What was the reason for the high sweep? On mine I entered before the hourly close. So technically it never swept the hourly low.

@ChesterNugget4 $ES Cleaned it up. Do your thing, but the high sweep was the original lunchbox trade idea today. Just hit target. 🎯

@PatternProfits Used the 5 min today. I believe it swept after 12:40 closure. I entered didn’t hold the full 50 retracement. Thanks for the info on this. Looking forward to doing this daily for the rest of the month to see the results

What timeframe are you on? I ask because 3min or 5min gives more reliable sweeps & better initial stop levels. If on the 1-2min, might have to be prepared to take a couple shots at it. I just shared this similar $NQ trade idea from yesterday morning. 1min shakes out, but not the 5min. tradingview.com/x/HPTP7ou1/

@PatternProfits Awesome will do. I plan on trading Mnq. I’ll adjust the golden window to be 12:50-1-20. I plan on this approach the rest of the month. If sweep occurs in below windows. 12:50-1:20. Entry with 10 Mnq 1:20-1:40. Entry with 5 Mnq 1:40-2:00 entry with 2 Mnq

@ChesterNugget4 Rise in volume can signal a valid sweep but not always necessary. More important that the sweep happens within the first 20 minutes of the new hour. If trading $NQ, be aware that some of the sweeps have been happening 10 minutes before the hour. So, eyes on the chart at 12:50.

@PatternProfits I just got rid of my tradingview. I’ll have to set the high low mid manually. When it sweeps I should see a rise in volume ? Any other confirmation I should monitor manually that are in the indicator?

@ChesterNugget4 Are you on TradingView? Use the indicator with all the data that marks out the levels for you. Watch it every single day until it becomes automatic - reacting without hesitation when it sets up properly. Knowing when to take a pass on it. Repetition! tradingview.com/script/ruTg53J…

@PatternProfits Thank you Ben! Last question do you have and guidance or resources where I can become a master of the lunch box?

@ChesterNugget4 Risk should be smaller using the swing high/low that formed outside of the range as a stop. Or can use one of the extension levels, but no reason to turn it into 1:1. If it's a strong sweep, price shouldn't go back there.

This is great! Another question for you. Say on a high reversion on the lunch box. The thought is to enter after the sweep occurs with price getting back in say a tick under the high before candle closure. Then would a good risk to reward statistically be 1:1. Being risking the Same point value as 50 percent of high/ low of the lunch box range?

@ChesterNugget4 x.com/PatternProfits…