John bushnell

Wow aren’t we just sooooooooo surprised by this????

@tylerbowyer It’s crazy to see people with TPUSA in their bios pushing a war with Iran.

“Small Children Who Knew Nothing of Politics or Wars” ⁦@DropSiteNews⁩ sent a reporter to the scene of a horrific strike that hit a girls elementary school. More than a hundred killed, most between the ages of 7 and 12. For nothing. dropsitenews.com/p/iran-minab-e…

@DeVere_2022 @ComicDaveSmith Yeah so much peace…

@ComicDaveSmith What a stupid take. Hundreds of thousands deported, millions self-deported, inflation tamed, trade deficit cut in half, peace in Middle East, economy strengthening, but you hate Trump.

As of right now the legacy of Trump’s second term is covering up the Epstein scandal and doing anything Israel wants, but I repeat myself.

🇦🇺 $11 Billion for 900 homes 👀👇🏻

Can you, the people, “vote your way out of this?” Honestly, not if you get your news from these folks. The swamp has tricks for deceiving the public, and most even work on congressmen. Here’s an example of how Laura and Greg played along as happy tools of the swamp. Please ask yourself why your own congressman has never talked about this. He either hasn’t gotten this far in the game (80% chance), or he likes the way the swamp obscures what’s going on (10% chance), or he dislikes the system but the price he’d pay for telling you is too high (10% chance). If a congressman sees this post and wants to debate me, I accept! The House has rules we adopt at the beginning of each Congress. Honestly we should just use those - some go all the way back to Thomas Jefferson. Some are like Robert’s Rules of Order which branched from House rules a century ago. But we have a rules committee that modifies the rules every week. I served on the rules committee for two years. When I was on the committee, I refused to vote for rules changes if the purpose was to mislead or obscure. Every week, the rules committee bends the rules to suit the Speaker, but you can’t place the blame just on the committee or the Speaker. Every rules change must be approved by the whole House with a majority vote. Rank and file congressmen are told to vote for these rules modifications each week for the sake of party loyalty because the rules are temporarily modified by the majority to keep the minority from using the permanent rules against us. This is partly true, so most congressmen never question beyond this. Typically, every week the rules committee meets before other committees and writes a rules package to protect bills that will come to the floor that week. Then the whole house votes on this rules package early in the week before significant legislation comes to the floor. The vote is typically on party lines. Sometimes a block of congressmen in the majority will take the rules package hostage and withhold their vote to get something else that has nothing to do with the rules. I’m not a big fan of this, but after 13 years, my hands aren’t completely clean of this tactic. The high-road position that I try to maintain is that if the rules package is bad, you shouldn’t vote for the rules package, and in general you shouldn’t withhold your vote from a rules package if there’s nothing wrong with the rules package… even if you disagree with the policy that is enabled to come to the floor by the rules package. There are more details, but that’s all you need to know to understand what I’m going to explain next. This week the Speaker wanted to do two things outside of our base rules, so he put those inside of the rules package that also had the rules for bringing bills like the popular SAVE Act to the floor, knowing members would be afraid to vote against something associated with SAVE. THIS IS INTENTIONAL. The Speaker wanted to circumvent the National Emergencies Act of 1976 to avoid voting on tariffs and he wanted to turn off the ban on bringing a spending bill to the floor the same day it’s introduced. The first rules package that came to the floor this week failed because myself and other republicans objected to it. The rules committee met again, wrote a new rules package without the tariff-trick, and we voted on the second rules package. I voted no but internet goons, like clockwork, characterized this as a vote against the SAVE Act. The swamp used that second rules package to give them authority to pass a bill before anyone could read it. They hid that authority inside the rule for the SAVE act because they knew people like Laura and Greg would help them disparage anyone who didn’t go along. If you fell for Laura and Greg’s slop you were cheering for the Pelosi doctrine that we should pass bills to see what’s in them. If the rules package had failed, the rules committee would have written a better one and SAVE Act would have still come to the floor.

Hey @AlboMP, if you’ve ever wondered whether you and your handpicked team of economic illiterates could organise a piss up in a brewery, here’s your answer.

🚨IMMEDIATE RELEASE🚨 I Am Being Threatened For Protecting Children... If you would like to read both letters yourself, you can do so here: drive.google.com/drive/u/2/fold…

@dbongino Yeah I’m sure covering for pedophiles wasn’t much fun, making yourself look like a clown on X sounds like a much better option out of those 2

You have no idea how much I missed this.

BREAKING: Australians are now being accosted by police for displaying an Australian Flag and sign that says “We are sick of terrorism and those that support it”. The claim? INCITEMENT…. Australia is on the expressway to a very dark place…

@libsoftiktok @Sec_Noem Americans are now essentially slaves to them

Somalian in the US mocks Americans: ‌ “You work all f*cking day… Thank you for working so hard so I can be home all day free. Go to work for me white boy… Go to work for me you f*cking white animals!” WE WANT HIS IMMEDIATE ARREST AND DEPORTATION LIVESTREAMED PLEASE @Sec_Noem @DHSgov Video from @LibOrNormal

@MattWalshBlog How about he gets proven guilty in the court of law before you before you advocate for his death

Death penalty

One has to be truly stupid or willfully disingenuous (or both, as the case may be) to think that “neutralized” here means anything other than its most common usages. Quit lying.

@persianjewess @ComicDaveSmith He has condemned Hamas for October 7th multiple times .. maybe do some research first

Dave Smith: “To any normal person do I seem like I’m sympathetic to Hamas?” The answer is yes, @ComicDaveSmith, you do. You’ve spent two years blindly parroting Hamas propaganda as truth. You’ve refused to condemn Hamas for the Oct 7 massacre, for raping, kidnapping, torturing and murdering Israelis, for stealing aid, or for brutalizing Palestinians. You’ve never once held Hamas accountable for their war crimes or genocidal ideology. Instead, you’ve devoted your platform to attacking Israel while intentionally deflecting from Hamas atrocities. Even now, as you try to choke out a pathetic criticism of Hamas to try to redeem your tainted reputation, you’re unable to do so without turning the criticism back on Israel. You’re not only sympathetic, you’re complicit.

@RepFine @TrackAIPAC

This is actual starvation. Not AI/Yemeni/genetic disorder/next to fat people bullshit Gazans fake to manipulate the weak and stupid. Israel, do whatever is necessary in and to Gaza to secure the release of Rom Braslavski and the other 49 hostages. Anything. Bombs away.