Proud Lover of Liberty 🇺🇸

@TheChaosWeeber

While the pursuit of absolute adherence to the non-aggression principle is of course fundamental to the libertarian movement, what is also necessary and foundational to our success is the ability to be wrong. I disagreed with @liquid2ulu (aka @Not_LiquidZulu) for his take about the LPNH (who have me blocked), and for his take on Nick Fuentes. I've publicly voiced my disagreement with Zulu about this take, and guess what? I wasn't attacked by a cult, we're still allies in the liberty movement and we're still going to host our podcast together. The reason for that is simple: theorists on the cutting edge of the libertarian movement are allowed to get things wrong. Fuck it, they're even allowed to continue believing wrong things so long as they believe they are advocating for liberty. I fundamentally disagree with and abhor @AlisDekay and others' reaction to Zulu's error, because I think if taken to its logical conclusion such a reaction would be the condemnation of freedom of thought within our movement. I want to be free to take controversial stances within the movement, and disagree with my allies, because that's how we make our philosophy better. I also think that the person who, in my estimation, has done more than any other person in existence to combat the infiltration of pragmatism into the liberty movement, deserves - at the barest of minimums - the 'benefit of the doubt'. Zulu deserves better than to be ruthlessly outcast for getting one thing wrong. Heck, he deserves to get multiple things wrong, without being condemned as a hypocritical neoprag. If you want to take myself and Zulu to task, then the next episode of the Remnant will be coming soon. I implore any of our detractors to show up and take their best shot.

@AChevyWolf Consumer friendly my ass.