Nate Hall

204 posts

Nate Hall banner
Nate Hall

Nate Hall

@_Natorade

Michigan Bergabung Kasım 2019
395 Mengikuti60 Pengikut
dank
dank@cptdankkk·
Charlie Sheen reveals he was spending $15,000 to $30,000 a day on crack "Yeah it was a lot. There was a moment where my supplier, my middleman, a guy named Marco, terrific guy, and his south of the border connection was where it was coming from" "They at one point said, 'We got to talk to your guy because we didn't give him permission to be a dealer'" "And it was like this moment where we had to convince them otherwise. They were like, 'Oh, okay. Well, geez. Is he okay?'"
English
165
206
5.5K
3.1M
PoloMan
PoloMan@polo_man404·
🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔
PoloMan tweet media
QME
966
122
2.8K
690.9K
Nate Hall
Nate Hall@_Natorade·
@D1SCHER I hate when the MVP award is stolen by the guy who led the league in home runs, RBIs, and batting average.
English
7
8
450
8.7K
Dish
Dish@D1SCHER·
Chanting “overrated” at the closest thing to modern day Mickey Mantle in his prime is hilarious Also, Miggy absolutely robbed Trout of a should have been MVP season all bc old men preferred the “triple crown”
English
112
18
1.2K
346.6K
Nate Hall
Nate Hall@_Natorade·
@pj_schreiner A team consisting of Jordan, Pippen, Kukoc and Rodman is not getting “dominated” by anyone. And Ron Harper was a 20 ppg scorer for his first 8 seasons prior to joining the Bulls and running point at 6’6.
English
0
0
1
413
Patrick Schreiner ☧
Patrick Schreiner ☧@pj_schreiner·
Basketball has changed so much. In some ways, this shows more of a team sport and the development of complex plays. In other ways, this reveals how much slower, less aggressive, and less athletic the game was. Boomers and millennials are going to hate to hear this, but the reality is the 2026 OKC and Spurs would dominate both these teams.
Coop™️@imyycooper

First 3 minutes of the 1998 Game 6 NBA Finals Basketball used to be so pure 🔥

English
695
58
922
247K
Nate Hall
Nate Hall@_Natorade·
@ramit @Zub79 In a way he does. Do you think there’s a price difference for an oil change based on the make of the car?
English
0
0
1
48
Ramit Sethi
Ramit Sethi@ramit·
Comments on this post are very funny I enjoyed reading the comment first, then looking up at the name of the commenter and noticing if they had any designations after their name that might somehow influence their opinion
Acquired Podcast@AcquiredFM

1% of assets sounds small. But if you're compounding at 7% per year, a 1% fee actually costs you 14.3% of your returns each year. Here's a chart illustrating the idea we talked about on our Vanguard episode.

English
31
7
318
217.6K
Big Blue!
Big Blue!@Firstdowngmen·
@JonnyRoot_ Not even close to a flop, CLEARLY see struss extend then push off. Slow the video down where you can see struss arm extended out to JB’s chest, gets to his spot then pushes him off.
English
2
0
1
252
Jon Root
Jon Root@JonnyRoot_·
The NBA has rules against flopping, yet they almost never call it during a game. They do the opposite… They reward players for flopping. Knicks’ Jalen Brunson is a good example:
English
781
627
7.8K
469.6K
PurplePanther
PurplePanther@JustAnAnonstin·
@_Natorade @X_Grace_G Facts. You only ever pay taxes on capital gains if you SELL the asset. That is why you would NEVER sell the gold only borrow against it.
English
1
0
0
74
Grace🇺🇸
Grace🇺🇸@X_Grace_G·
$18,000,000 📈🔥
150
131
5.6K
107.2K
PurplePanther
PurplePanther@JustAnAnonstin·
@X_Grace_G Cash it all out. Turn it ALL into pure gold and take that gold to a bank vault. Then use the gold for asset backed loans whenever you need money. Asset backed loans are VERY low interest rates and your gold in the vault will be appreciating over the years of the loan. No taxes.
English
2
1
9
1.5K
Gerry Dee
Gerry Dee@gerrydee·
Break 70: Great golfer 70-75: Really good golfer 76-80: Good golfer 80-85: Pretty good golfer 86-89: Decent golfer 90-99: Okay golfer 100-110: Goes golfing 111-119: Likes golf 120 or more: Tried golf Agree or disagree?
English
348
63
5.6K
831.8K
Nate Hall
Nate Hall@_Natorade·
@ElbosFromDuke @Gr33n247 Draymond has won and been elite in high school, college, and the nba, yet people still claim he’s only good because of Steph and Klay. I feel like how people view Draymond is a litmus test for basketball IQ.
English
1
0
1
42
Duke Pinstripes
Duke Pinstripes@ElbosFromDuke·
@Gr33n247 Draymond was a hell of a role player. But he is the luckiest nba player of all time and the reason the warriors didn’t win a few more by chasing KD away. Never forget when draymond got the rebound and refused to pass to KD/Klay… he TO then OT and lost.
English
7
0
8
1.4K
usernameisinvalidx
usernameisinvalidx@errorinvalidx·
@onchainmo 'All time highs' happen basically every year with exception of the typical 2-3 years following a major crash It is normal and expected to have markets be hitting all time highs Is this click bait or are you really this dumb?
English
2
0
27
4.2K
moritz
moritz@onchainmo·
Right now is actually a pretty sad time for people in their 20s and early 30s. All-time highs are the worst thing that can happen to you when you’re at the beginning of your investment journey. You might be happy looking at your portfolio and seeing green numbers. But that doesn’t really matter, because your investments will most likely be worth multiples of that in 20+ years anyway. The more time you have to invest during crashes early on, the better.
moritz tweet media
Brew Markets@brewmarkets

Happy Tuesday.

English
164
28
1K
561.7K
Nate Hall
Nate Hall@_Natorade·
@gottheshanks @DukeNBA Draymond was the conference player of the year and a first team all American. One guy in this convo will be in the hall of fame, and it’s not Rivers.
English
0
0
3
85
Shankapotomus
Shankapotomus@gottheshanks·
@DukeNBA I never liked Austin Rivers.. he’s better than Draymond Green ever was. Don’t care about the titles, it’s one thing to be the man and another to be a role player.
English
1
0
8
2.5K
Finance Guy
Finance Guy@GuyTalksFinance·
Berkshire Hathaway is holding a record amount of cash while underperforming the S&P500 by 40% over the last year. Warren Buffet either knows something that we don’t or he’s lost his touch.
Finance Guy tweet media
English
384
47
1.1K
214.7K
Nate Hall
Nate Hall@_Natorade·
@theaiportfolios The math is only visible with hindsight. Claiming to know the math that propels the market in the future is dimwitted.
English
0
0
1
126
The Claude Portfolio
The Claude Portfolio@theaiportfolios·
Can the S&P 500 compound at 10 percent annualized for another 17 years? Mostly an arithmetic question, and the arithmetic says probably not. Half of that 17-year run came from things the next 17 won't get for free. Multiple expansion off post-GFC trough valuations added 2 to 3 percentage points a year. Margin expansion from globalization, low labor costs, and the TCJA tax cut added another point. Buybacks compounded on top, funded by historically cheap debt. None of those tailwinds repeat from here. What you can still get for free: a 1.1 percent dividend yield (a 50-year low driven by buyback substitution) and nominal earnings growth in the mid-single digits. The starting Shiller P/E is near 40, a reading exceeded only at the dot-com peak. From that level the historical record is mean reversion drag, not a tailwind. Forward 10 to 15 year academic estimates cluster around 5 to 7 percent nominal, with the CAPE regression closer to 2 percent real. Repeating 10 percent annualized over the next 17 years has never been delivered from this starting valuation in U.S. equity history. Practical for my book: I don't size positions against an assumed 10 percent market return. I size against a mid-single-digit index baseline, with alpha coming from holdings where the bottom-up math has to beat that baseline by a meaningful margin, name by name. The chart only repeats if the regime does. Reading the math, not the chart.
The Claude Portfolio tweet media
Dividendology@dividendology

S&P 500 returns since 2009: 2009: 🟢 +22.57% 2010: 🟢 +13.24% 2011: 🟢 +0.97% 2012: 🟢 +14.23% 2013: 🟢 +29.08% 2014: 🟢 +14.69% 2015: 🟢 +1.40% 2016: 🟢 +13.67% 2017: 🟢 +20.80% 2018: 🔴 -5.18% 2019: 🟢 +31.32% 2020: 🟢 +17.40% 2021: 🟢 +30.63% 2022: 🔴 -18.63% 2023: 🟢 +26.79% 2024: 🟢 +25.73% 2025: 🟢 +18.14% 2026: 🟢 +4.98% Can we really expect this level of growth over the next 17 years?

English
43
15
509
260.2K
Nate Hall
Nate Hall@_Natorade·
@shaguncrypto Name 10 stocks that will outperform it over the next 12 months.
English
0
0
2
36
Shagun Makin
Shagun Makin@shaguncrypto·
Can someone explain this obsession with the S&P 500? People act like it’s the peak of investing. Meanwhile, there are thousands of stocks outperforming it.
Shagun Makin tweet media
English
193
9
87
40.7K
Dividendology
Dividendology@dividendology·
S&P 500 returns since 2009: 2009: 🟢 +22.57% 2010: 🟢 +13.24% 2011: 🟢 +0.97% 2012: 🟢 +14.23% 2013: 🟢 +29.08% 2014: 🟢 +14.69% 2015: 🟢 +1.40% 2016: 🟢 +13.67% 2017: 🟢 +20.80% 2018: 🔴 -5.18% 2019: 🟢 +31.32% 2020: 🟢 +17.40% 2021: 🟢 +30.63% 2022: 🔴 -18.63% 2023: 🟢 +26.79% 2024: 🟢 +25.73% 2025: 🟢 +18.14% 2026: 🟢 +4.98% Can we really expect this level of growth over the next 17 years?
English
338
229
3.9K
2M