Robby Grossman

@EdHand89 Doesn't seem a fair point to me. We develop plenty of players, we just don't pay them when they succeed. From big examples like Mookie/Xander, to smaller ones like Gonzales/Refsnyder.

This is a fair point. Lots of fans have observed this for a while now.

@MattLutzPhi If the threshold needed for blue to survive were 99%, would you still pick blue?

Blue. If you're taking the time to do the game theory, you lack virtue.

@ac13alex Appreciate you AC. You coaches didn’t deserve for it to go down like this.

Happy! 😊

@Ace_XIII_ @Aella_Girl I'm saying the original has an arbitrary threshold of 50% must vote blue for blue to survive. x could be 10%, 50%, 99%, etc. My point is the choice to vote blue hinges on how likely you find it that x% will actually vote blue, not just which color makes 100% survival possible.

@freerobby @Aella_Girl Oh if you’re saying we for sure know 99% of people are voting red then yes I’d vote red but that goes back to what I said before. You’ve changed the conditions to a point where it’s not even the original scenario. The whole topic is the origin scenario not this side quest

im confused by people saying the right answer is pressing red. the good outcomes are 51% of ppl press blue OR 100% of people press red. the second is obvs way less likely

@Ace_XIII_ @Aella_Girl I don't understand the question. My point about the 99% was that it's not as simple as picking what makes everyone survive -- there is obviously some threshold where you agree that doesn't work -- people just disagree about what the threshold is.

@freerobby @Aella_Girl If you wanna change the conditions of the scenario so that picking the same answer can’t be based on the same results/ logic, Would you pick 51% red for only red pushers to eat shit or would you pick blue 51% blue for everybody having a nice day?

@Ace_XIII_ @Aella_Girl Imagine the threshold blue had to hit for blue to survive were 99%. Would you still press blue?

@freerobby @Aella_Girl Consider the consequences of 50% red or lower. Wow no one dies. Not even 1% Yeah I’m picking the: needs less votes for 100% of the population to survival button obviously

@tommy2ks @Austen If you don't alter your bet size there is no advantage to counting cards.

@Austen If you don’t alter your bet sizes, longer than you’d think. While it’s not the only thing they look for, it’s certainly number 1. If you just bet 50 every hand for example, no matter what, you’d have some time (not indefinite though, consistent winners will be flagged).

How long could you get away with card counting in Vegas before they caught you?

@Steve_Perrault Mets

I’m gonna need another baseball team to root for this season. Accepting all suggestions in the comments. Alright here we go.

@ChrisCotillo The team that won't spend is going to end up with the most expensive AAA team in baseball.

If Sonny Gray does return in 10 days and the Red Sox get more results like the ones they've seen in the last two days from Tolle and Bello, there will be a decision to be made.

@micsolana x.com/mattyglesias/s…

if you're reading this, and you've seen a centrist or liberal denounce the NYT's tacit endorsement of political assassination today, please share their post below. I'd like to know who among them still has some integrity.

the new york times politely discussed the assassination of a businessman with hasan piker, who made the case, in the new york times, for assassination. this is not a small thing. this is an insane, unacceptable thing that every liberal needs to denounce.

@fenwaypark @RedSox Is the bike valet open again? It was closed yesterday.

Celebrating Earth Day at Fenway 🌍

@GMagz_420 To win 92 games, they essentially need to win 4 out of 5 series from here on out.

@RonConway Sorry to hear this, wishing you the best Ron!

I want to share some difficult news. I was recently diagnosed with a rare form of cancer and I want you to hear it directly from me. Treatment is starting immediately and will include multiple strategies over the course of about a year. While I will be stepping back from some of my usual activities, I will continue to support SV Angel founders, who I love with a passion. SV Angel remains unchanged. Topher has made all of our investment decisions for the better part of the last decade, and Ronny joined as Managing Partner in 2024. They bring experience from nearly every major technology cycle in Silicon Valley and are now focused on partnering with founders building the future of AI. SV Angel has a deep, experienced team that remains fully focused on supporting exceptional founders. With a more focused and balanced schedule, I can prioritize treatments while helping SV Angel founders at inflection points like we always do! I’ve chosen not to share the specific type of cancer since I don't want speculation about my prognosis. I appreciate your understanding and respect for this. I am optimistic about my prognosis. I am fortunate to have the best/amazing team of UCSF doctors in San Francisco, and as you know, I never back down from a fight. Thank you for your support, it means a great deal to me.

@BellaBaddie__ word

Your ex gf texted you saying "I'm dating someone better than you" Reply as a nonchalant guy

@ErikGeorgeE @SmittyOnMLB Nah, it's fine to flip someone off for that.

Jarren Duran said he flipped off the fan because the fan told him to go kill himself

@simonsarris extreme yes please

@willahmed All time tweet right here. 🔥

You have no experience. You’ve never started a company. You’ve never had a full time job. Nike is going to kill you. You’re a kid. You don’t have technical skills. You shouldn’t build hardware. Apple is going to kill you. You can’t build hardware. You can’t measure heart rate non-invasively. Athletes don’t care about recovery. Under Armour is going to kill you. It won’t be accurate. You don’t listen. You’re an ineffective leader. You can’t recruit great talent. You’re going to have to pay every athlete. You can’t measure sleep non-invasively. It’s too expensive to research. Athletes are a small market. The product costs too much to make. The product costs too much to sell. Your valuation is too high. Consumers aren’t going to want it. Hardware is too hard. You should measure steps. Fitbit is going to kill you. You can’t build a marketing engine. You can’t raise enough money. You need a real CEO. Google is going to kill you. You can’t be a subscription. You can’t build a brand. You can’t do consumer in Boston. Your valuation is too high. You shouldn’t make accessories. You shouldn’t make apparel. Lululemon is going to kill you. You can’t predict Covid. Stay in your niche. You are going to run out of money. You can’t build a health platform. Amazon is going to kill you. You can’t measure blood pressure. You can’t get medical approvals. The market is too small. You don’t understand AI. The market is too competitive. It won’t work internationally. The supply chain is too complicated. You can’t build an AI. You can’t raise enough money. It’s too competitive. Healthcare isn’t going to want it. … Just keep going ✌️

-93 bytes, one of the best Wikipedia line deletions I’ve ever seen.

@nicrypto Hmm…

So, let me get this straight. Trump is now simultaneously claiming that he has won the war, is currently winning the war, needs help to win the war, and doesn't need help to win the war. All to destroy the nuclear program he claims he already destroyed last year.