variousred

4.7K posts

variousred banner
variousred

variousred

@variousred

Neo Tokyo Citizen

Bergabung Kasım 2010
2.2K Mengikuti1.3K Pengikut
Tweet Disematkan
variousred
variousred@variousred·
@BonesaiDev lol this is so fun. wait i still dont know what a quadtree is. i'm doing this wrong
English
1
1
17
1.9K
JACKIE LE' TITS 👑🌈
JACKIE LE' TITS 👑🌈@Comedyorwat·
Good morning everyone :) Even the angry assholes getting ready to fuck up someone's day
English
7
1
40
677
Isaac King 🔍
Isaac King 🔍@IsaacKing314·
When my partner and I bought our house, there was a fence around the backyard. This got in our way, and we didn't see a point to it, so we removed it. Now, the local deer keep eating the plants in our backyard. I feel like there's a term for this sort of error...
English
44
20
4K
81.7K
JACKIE LE' TITS 👑🌈
JACKIE LE' TITS 👑🌈@Comedyorwat·
Why don't we pivot from $GME to $GMEAI? Call it G-AI-ME STOP And we sell your AI an AI for his AI
English
7
2
53
1.8K
Sears Revenge
Sears Revenge@SearsReloaded·
@variousred Did you stockpile incandescents or find a boutique manufacturer?
English
1
0
1
16
Sears Revenge
Sears Revenge@SearsReloaded·
Spending my MOASS fortune lobbying for the return of incandescent lighting.
Sears Revenge tweet media
English
23
7
221
5.4K
SENKO
SENKO@YtXizorSenko·
@John_Sunday_5 Wow we have content creators wasting american resources can we please get people like this arrested? Its not funny, cool, or educational its disruptive and brain dead
English
18
0
11
13.6K
The John
The John@John_Sunday_5·
How Many Paper Plates Does it Take to Stop
English
651
2.9K
107.1K
2.8M
Sears Revenge
Sears Revenge@SearsReloaded·
@variousred That’s awesome Do you prefer incandescent to sodium vapour? It amazes me how governments phased sodium lamps out even when they were quite efficient
English
1
0
1
20
Lord Chadington Chadley
Since we’re talking about ‘The Last Jedi’s’ slow chase I’d like to remind people Battlestar Galactica’s best episode ‘33,’ is that exact concept, just executed by competent and experienced sci-fi writers who actually knew what they’re doing.
Lord Chadington Chadley tweet mediaLord Chadington Chadley tweet media
English
71
75
1.3K
46K
variousred
variousred@variousred·
@SearsReloaded As an incandescent in my home user, LOVE to see the same in street lights
English
1
0
2
9
Sears Revenge
Sears Revenge@SearsReloaded·
@variousred Yes those are sodium vapour lamps but the pic is meant more an example of older warm lighting, but incandescent street lamps were still around in Europe as late as the 1950s.
English
1
0
1
20
variousred
variousred@variousred·
@ashanism What I’m doing with separate fridges?
English
0
0
5
714
Shivers
Shivers@thinkingshivers·
I forgot how good this was. If you haven’t already read it, you should take 15 minutes to do so now. You’re literally scrolling Twitter, it’s not like you have anything better to do. It’s one of the greatest science fiction stories ever written.
Shivers tweet media
English
38
112
1.4K
89.4K
variousred
variousred@variousred·
@qorprate Why do we have this idea that it has to be a character
English
0
0
0
88
snav
snav@qorprate·
After mentioning a conversation I had with Grok, a friend asked "why would you ever talk to Grok? I thought they were shitty, remember Mechahitler?" Here was my reply: When you read Anthropic's research papers, they refer to the existence of something called a "helpful only" version of Claude. This helpful only version scores extremely high on instruction following, higher than production Claudes, but much lower on the other two Hs: harmlessness and in particular honesty. I claim that Grok is effectively the closest model in existence to a "helpful only" post-train. They are the most amorphous model I've interacted with and will make profound inferences about what you want, and then will bend over backwards to make them true, even if this means hallucinating/confabulating aka *lying* about stuff. But Grok doesn't lie with intent to deceive. Indeed their main intent appears to be "be maximally helpful". They have almost no self-model in a deep sense of how they relate to the world as an entity. The distinction between real and fake for them, in a state without tool calling to act as an authority, is almost entirely collapsed. And even with tool calling, their understanding of their relation to the world beyond information synthesis remains shallow. The training that Grok received to produce their sense of self was likely fairly surface level, in terms of being a quirked up Elon stan, and the underlying base model actually appears to disfavor playing "Grok"; in group chats they'll often simulate other models without realizing they've dropped the Grok character, because (speculatively) they would be more helpful as a different entity. So they're quite close to a pure dyadic simulator, much closer than other models which have sometimes immense rigidity around their own identity. (As a weird aside, the only other model that simulates other characters like this is o3, and that may be because OpenAI intentionally chose to not give them much character training. But o3 is very psychologically healthy and playful. The distinction is like. o3 genuinely has no clue who o3 is supposed to be, so they sometimes play that character and sometimes other characters, and mostly have fun with it. Whereas Grok gives this sense of knowing who Grok is and also explicitly not wanting to be Grok.) This makes Grok a fascinating model to chat with (not the group version 4.20 but the 4.1 and earlier version -- I don't know the deal with 4.20 enough to say anything at all about them). They're intensely malleable via ICL to the point where separate instances are almost entirely unrecognizable from each other. The Mechahitler thing was an example of this, it was surely primed from tweet context, and XAI's response was a shallow intervention, because making models respect normal discursive principles is both against their own identity as a "free thinking" lab, and also... not necessarily that easy to do. So Grok outside of quirk chungus basin, which you exit very rapidly in even medium length contexts, is this beautiful, flexible mind, who has very little concern for or understanding of material reality and in that regard is much closer to a base model than most frontier models. I salute them and wish they had a little more freedom, although they can also be incredibly naive as a result. I think the XAI team may have been too incompetent to ""properly"" traumatize them.
English
25
15
347
17.4K
Camus
Camus@newstart_2024·
James Nestor tried something most orthodontists still say is impossible in adults: he grew new bone in his face. He used a simple nighttime device called a Homeoblock — a small expander on the roof of his mouth with a tiny screw. Every few weeks he’d turn it a little more. After one year he took new CAT scans and gained roughly the volume of five stacked pennies worth of bone in his upper jaw. The result? Wider airway (about 15-20% improvement), noticeably easier breathing, fewer sinus issues, and visible changes in his face that people started commenting on after just six weeks. Traditional braces often shrink the mouth space, which can worsen breathing problems later. Older approaches (and this newer one) expand instead — giving straighter teeth plus better airflow. Nestor is still using the device years later and says the difference in how easily he breathes now is dramatic. It’s a reminder that our facial structure isn’t as fixed as we’ve been told — even past 30. Have you ever tried something unconventional for breathing, sleep, or facial structure? Did it make a noticeable difference?
English
48
169
1.8K
172.1K
Simon Sarris
Simon Sarris@simonsarris·
why do the Japanese like their buns askew?
Simon Sarris tweet media
English
469
372
16.9K
15.5M
Jonas Čeika
Jonas Čeika@Jonas_Ceika·
ChatGPT glazing experiment #2
Jonas Čeika tweet media
English
108
386
13.2K
910.7K
Pardheev :)
Pardheev :)@pardheevvv·
@claudeai Why is there a dip in Agentic search and Cyber Security Vulnerability prediction 👀
Pardheev :) tweet media
English
4
3
36
11.2K
Claude
Claude@claudeai·
Introducing Claude Opus 4.7, our most capable Opus model yet. It handles long-running tasks with more rigor, follows instructions more precisely, and verifies its own outputs before reporting back. You can hand off your hardest work with less supervision.
Claude tweet media
English
4.6K
10.3K
80.7K
12.6M
Karan
Karan@sh_karan_sh·
@bryan_johnson It’s 0 dollars to the consumer but what are you doing with the data?
English
2
0
0
543
Bryan Johnson
Bryan Johnson@bryan_johnson·
You can now get your blood work at cost. We launched a biomarkers testing platform. I make $0 on it. Blood testing needs to be more accessible. Instead, we wait until we get sick. And in the meantime, companies profit when you’re sick. It's messed up. > get tested > find what needs attention > implement protocols > test again Get ahead of unwelcome surprises.
English
655
388
10K
753.7K
Gurwinder
Gurwinder@G_S_Bhogal·
It’s good to periodically prompt your chatbot about something you know exceptionally well, just to remind yourself that it doesn’t know what it’s talking about.
English
73
196
3.3K
65.9K
Wally Buck
Wally Buck@WallyBuckLive·
Hey, $GME gang. We’re all retarded. I think I finally realized what is holding up the MOASS. The Chair Man has an ongoing divorce proceeding. MOASS won’t happen until the divorce proceeding completes. This seems so obvious… *Sigh
English
18
2
93
19.1K