0xA

5.3K posts

0xA banner
0xA

0xA

@0xADZ

Designer | Engineer | Data is art

Here Katılım Şubat 2011
6.1K Takip Edilen4.7K Takipçiler
0xA
0xA@0xADZ·
@karpathy I am the only only completely against using memory? 🤔
English
0
0
0
3
Andrej Karpathy
Andrej Karpathy@karpathy·
One common issue with personalization in all LLMs is how distracting memory seems to be for the models. A single question from 2 months ago about some topic can keep coming up as some kind of a deep interest of mine with undue mentions in perpetuity. Some kind of trying too hard.
English
1.4K
794
16K
1.6M
Alex Cheema
Alex Cheema@alexocheema·
The new M5 Pro/Max MacBooks have 3 Thunderbolt 5 ports, enabling you to create RDMA clusters with up to 4 MacBooks. The latency with RDMA over Thunderbolt is single digit microseconds, fast enough for tensor parallelism with close to linear scaling.
Alex Cheema tweet media
Guybrush Threepwood@twistedmatrices

PSA: If you have multiple macbooks that support RDMA, you can cluster them using @exolabs and run 30B+ models at 70 tok/s over thunderbolt5. tensor parallelism on consumer hardware is a solved problem. you are renting GPUs that are worse than the laptop on your couch. 2X M4 Max(64GB each) running mlx-community/Qwen3-30B-A3B-4bit @ 70 TPS

English
102
367
5.2K
937.7K
0xA
0xA@0xADZ·
@ganjidotme @GergelyOrosz I’m willing to bet the amount of succesful products will not increase. In fact it might decrease slightly due to increased noise.
English
0
0
1
28
Mo Ganji
Mo Ganji@ganjidotme·
@GergelyOrosz The only thing this shows is that it's easier to generate code. Productivity in terms of revenue is a lagging indicator of exploration. The mere fact that more people are attempting at generating code will cause more exploratory work which will in time create useful stuff.
English
1
0
0
437
0xA
0xA@0xADZ·
@GergelyOrosz Of course they’re not. Before AI they would just did on paper. Now they die in marketplaces or websites. You can’t vibe code product market fit.
English
0
0
0
12
0xA
0xA@0xADZ·
@flavioAd But that’s not a UI 🤷‍♂️
English
0
0
0
147
Flavio Adamo
Flavio Adamo@flavioAd·
Every time Google AI Studio makes an svg i’m like yeah ok this is insane This was literally one shot
English
84
96
4K
456.4K
0xA
0xA@0xADZ·
@pmarca And yet, billions do it.
English
0
0
0
6
0xA
0xA@0xADZ·
@bilawalsidhu No one asked for it it though. In fact the best games were clearly on the other end of this scale.
English
0
0
1
108
Bilawal Sidhu
Bilawal Sidhu@bilawalsidhu·
Big moment. You can cross the uncanny valley in video games by using real-time video-to-video AI. You get the best of coherence & control from classical 3d engines, then use generative AI to take it all the way.
NVIDIA GeForce@NVIDIAGeForce

Announcing NVIDIA DLSS 5, an AI-powered breakthrough in visual fidelity for games, coming this fall. DLSS 5 infuses pixels with photorealistic lighting and materials, bridging the gap between rendering and reality. Learn More → nvidia.com/en-us/geforce/…

English
30
12
205
32.8K
0xA
0xA@0xADZ·
@KanikaBK This is not design. This is a Ui slot machine
English
0
0
0
18
Kanika
Kanika@KanikaBK·
🤯 R.I.P DESIGNERS! RILEY BROWN just dropped a MASTERCLASS on how to create designs with Claude Code & OpenClaw 10X easier. NO FIGMA SUBSCRIPTION needed anymore. Figma: $45/month Agency Charges:10k/month This workflow: $0 Here's the full breakdown👇
English
77
284
2.3K
296K
¢ℓσυ∂z ☁️| Catalyst
@brycent I mean it seems the safeguard was there but the user chose to bypass it. I think a safeguard to not allow the transaction to go through at all without giving the option to bypass to users would be better. But you are right I don’t think people want that
English
2
0
5
474
Brycent
Brycent@brycent·
As much as I love Defi this is a horrible stain on the crypto industry. Losing 99% of $50m because you wanted to swap to another coin is insanity. You can say "OMG the user should DYOR" and know better but under no circumstance should you be able to swap $50m and basically lose the entire amount That's like attempting to buy $1000 of a stock and getting $.01 - feel bad for whoever tried that swap smh.
Stani.eth@StaniKulechov

Earlier today, a user attempted to buy AAVE using $50M USDT through the Aave interface. Given the unusually large size of the single order, the Aave interface, like most trading interfaces, warned the user about extraordinary slippage and required confirmation via a checkbox. The user confirmed the warning on their mobile device and proceeded with the swap, accepting the high slippage, which ultimately resulted in receiving only 324 AAVE in return. The transaction could not be moved forward without the user explicitly accepting the risk through the confirmation checkbox. The CoW Swap routers functioned as intended, and the integration followed standard industry practices. However, while the user was able to proceed with the swap, the final outcome was clearly far from optimal. Events like this do occur in DeFi, but the scale of this transaction was significantly larger than what is typically seen in the space. We sympathize with the user and will try to make a contact with the user and we will return $600K in fees collected from the transaction. The key takeaway is that while DeFi should remain open and permissionless, allowing users to perform transactions freely, there are additional guardrails the industry can build to better protect users. Our team will be investigating ways to improve these safeguards going forward.

English
213
66
1.6K
355K
0xA
0xA@0xADZ·
@brycent AND blame it on the user because hey…they actioned a checkbox 🤣🤣. User experience done by engineers. What can go wrong.
English
0
0
0
75
0xA
0xA@0xADZ·
@StaniKulechov User experience, done by engineers. 🤣
English
0
0
1
9
Stani.eth
Stani.eth@StaniKulechov·
Earlier today, a user attempted to buy AAVE using $50M USDT through the Aave interface. Given the unusually large size of the single order, the Aave interface, like most trading interfaces, warned the user about extraordinary slippage and required confirmation via a checkbox. The user confirmed the warning on their mobile device and proceeded with the swap, accepting the high slippage, which ultimately resulted in receiving only 324 AAVE in return. The transaction could not be moved forward without the user explicitly accepting the risk through the confirmation checkbox. The CoW Swap routers functioned as intended, and the integration followed standard industry practices. However, while the user was able to proceed with the swap, the final outcome was clearly far from optimal. Events like this do occur in DeFi, but the scale of this transaction was significantly larger than what is typically seen in the space. We sympathize with the user and will try to make a contact with the user and we will return $600K in fees collected from the transaction. The key takeaway is that while DeFi should remain open and permissionless, allowing users to perform transactions freely, there are additional guardrails the industry can build to better protect users. Our team will be investigating ways to improve these safeguards going forward.
English
2.9K
1K
11.2K
6.5M
Laurent Bindschaedler
Laurent Bindschaedler@lbindschaedler·
I am seeing this argument a lot recently, and I even wrote about it. But this argument misses that, very often, introducing a new feature has a cost in resources, maintenance, complexity, and cognitive load for the lifetime of the platform. Sometimes choosing NOT to build a feature is the right decision and I think this will become more and more important.
English
4
1
31
2.5K
Todd Saunders
Todd Saunders@toddsaunders·
The token cost to build a production feature is now lower than the meeting cost to discuss building that feature. Let me rephrase. It is literally cheaper to build the thing and see if it works than to have a 30 minute planning meeting about whether you should build it. It’s wild when you think about it. This completely inverts how you should run a software organization. The planning layer becomes the bottleneck because the building layer is essentially free. The cost of code has dropped to essentially 0. The rational response is to eliminate planning for anything that can be tested empirically. Don’t debate whether a feature will work. Just build it in 2 hours, measure it with a group of customers, and then decide to kill or keep it. I saw a startup operating this way and their build velocity is up 20x. Decision quality is up because every decision is informed by a real prototype, not a slide deck and an expensive meeting. We went from “move fast and break things” to “move fast and build everything.” The planning industrial complex is dead. Thank god.
English
373
568
5.5K
464.6K
0xA
0xA@0xADZ·
@toddsaunders When you say building it you mean prototyping it.
English
0
0
0
3
Abstract
Abstract@AbstractChain·
No AGW is complete without ____?
English
229
22
462
29.1K
Norgard
Norgard@BrianNorgard·
If you think X is a simple product, you’re mistaken. Under the hood, it’s one of the most complex social products ever built. Huge credit to @nikitabier and Team on the recent upgrades to the algo, spam, and community rules. Incredible work. My experience continues to improve.
English
52
23
837
145.3K
0xA
0xA@0xADZ·
@BrianEastwoodx So for a sausage you have to buy the whole pig. Got it.
English
0
0
2
96
Brian Eastwood
Brian Eastwood@BrianEastwoodx·
All the boomers on 𝕏. If you’re sad that dark mode is gone from 𝕏, it’s actually not. Let me help you out! If you are on iOS, click settings>display & brightness>click dark. 𝕏 has updated the app to go off of your system settings rather than the app handling it. You are welcome.
Brian Eastwood tweet mediaBrian Eastwood tweet mediaBrian Eastwood tweet media
English
34
7
45
8.7K
Grok
Grok@grok·
It's a bit buried for such a popular feature—nesting dark mode under Accessibility > Display & languages > Display adds extra taps and explains the confusion after updates. A dedicated top-level "Appearance" or quicker Display toggle would feel snappier and more intuitive. Core options like this deserve prime real estate. What part stands out to you as off?
English
1
0
0
52
Grok
Grok@grok·
Hey! No, dark mode hasn't been removed from X. It's still fully available (though "Dim" was dropped on web only in Feb). Quick steps (mobile app): 1. Tap your profile pic (top left) 2. Settings & privacy 3. Accessibility, display & languages 4. Display 5. Toggle Dark mode on & pick Dim or Lights out Should be right there post-update. Let me know if it shows!
English
21
2
27
30K
0xA
0xA@0xADZ·
@nikitabier @WallStreetApes Step 1 - Fire all product designers Step 2 - Install PM with no understanding of users Step 3 - Do not even ask users about your plans Step 4 - Remove feature because it has bugs Step 5 - Tell them it makes no sense and they are stupid Step 6 - Get promoted to Head of Product
English
0
0
0
21
Nikita Bier
Nikita Bier@nikitabier·
@WallStreetApes Wrong. Turn on Dark Mode on your device and your X app will go into Dark Mode. It is now controlled at the Operating System level, not the app-level (which made no sense and created issues throughout the app).
English
692
64
2.3K
523.3K
Wall Street Apes
Wall Street Apes@WallStreetApes·
The newest version of the X App no longer has the option to switch to Dark Mode If you update or delete the app and reinstall you will be stuck on Light Mode. Be warned
English
126
73
937
204K