0xEngineer

@johnyeo_ autmn summer winter what else?

Introducing Summer, an open source tool to track AI coding usage across your org It's like ccusage, but multiplayer and with a local dashboard bun i -g @useautumn/summer

@paper at this rate people will start to call u a browser wrapper

this is NOT a launch we've had awesome PDF export for a long time it uses the browser's own "print PDF" to create high quality PDFs with searchable text create your PDFs in Paper

@JSchwarz9 lol

Honest question (not meant to be snarky): why is founder mode not working for AirBnB? We were all inspired by that talk, but it’s not translating to results it seems.

@garrytan downlod shopify

I would pay extra for a Spotify subscription for my agent so it stops having so many refusals the second I quote some lyrics to it

@growing_daniel ur logo says SMTH else

NOOOOO IT WAS IN THE MIDDLE OF A REFACTOR

@suchenzang joke right?

there was only ever meant to be one customer to rule them all one customer to find them one customer to bring them all and in the darkness bind them

@Kalshi 69% chance elon buys kalshi and shuts it down

BREAKING: 15% chance Elon Musk visits Mars

@YahooFinance old news now

Elon Musk becomes world's first trillionaire finance.yahoo.com/markets/articl…

@shl vibe coding wt fable 5

What does enlightenment look like?

@levie ai regulation would be bought by people who don't know even abc of AI lol

This whole Fable export control situation is actually net positive to regulation discourse. It’s an early peek into what AI regulation would end up looking like at scale when enacted at the model layer instead of the specific application of the AI. The government would have sole discretion over when a model can be released to the to public, based on a bunch of factors that they inherently control. In this case, based on the available reporting, the risk is that the model can be jailbroken to deliver increased cyber exploit capabilities. The issue is that actually you want models to be able to have those capabilities on the defense side of cyber as well, and for all intents and purposes, by Anthropic’s own response, you can execute these capabilities today in other models. So thus the whole challenge will be that you’re debating with the government, over months and months, with every model release, what these models are actually capable of and what their risks are. Inherently, there’s not only a lot of subjectivity in determining those risks, but there’s also many other factors that go into the risks being practical in the first place. The net result is that we would end up with backlog of AI releases, progress in the market inherently would dramatically slow down, and AI would start to look more like any other sclerotic industry. If this paradigm had existed 3 years ago at the start of the current AI wave, we’d likely currently be stuck on GPT-4 level intelligence at this point. This is why, wherever possible, we should be regulating the applied use of AI. We should continue to study and enforce the dangerous use of AI in cyber attacks, financial services risks, fraud, biowarfare, and other spaces. AI safety is incredibly important, but slowing down progress this early in the development of AI I suspect is net harmful.

@topkekius just $999 billion less than elon

how rich are u

who doesn't

@zeke whats the pricing

Wake up, babes. 😎 Cloudflare Images™ is old news, but still very good news. Upload images to R2, then serve them through a dynamic CDN with custom sizes, file formats, face-centering, background removal, all kinds of crazy shit... just by changing query params on the image's URL.

Imagine being one of the people who are coming to the platform owned by Elon to bitch about his wealth. 😂🤣

@pmarca im not reading all that

If, when you say regulation, you mean the dead and clammy hand of the commissar—the gentleman who has never in his life built a single thing, drafting rules to govern a thing he cannot define, to be enforced by men who cannot read them; if you mean the form in triplicate, the impact assessment upon the impact assessment, the compliance officer who breeds, in the warm dark of the org chart, further compliance officers unto the third and fourth generation; if you mean the moat—the deep cold moat that the giant digs around his own castle and christens, with a perfectly straight face, public safety—the drawbridge he hauls up behind himself the very instant he is across, lest any hungrier and hungrier man should follow; if you mean the precautionary principle, which, had it governed our grandfathers, would have banned the wheel pending further study of the hill, and left us yet shivering and raw in the mouth of the cave, blessing its excellent ventilation; if you mean the European disease—that magnificent open-air museum of a continent, which produces in our time precisely two things in great abundance, and they are regulation, and the eloquent and well-footnoted regret of cultivated men explaining at length why they have produced nothing else; if you mean the license required to think, the permission slip for honest arithmetic, the king’s wax stamp pressed upon the forehead of every new idea before it may draw its first breath; if you mean the agency dispatched, with trumpets, to slay a single dragon, which arrives at the cave, surveys the accommodations, and moves in—and spends the ensuing century laying eggs and devouring the very villagers it was sworn to defend; if you mean the startup that perishes not of the market’s honest verdict but of the filing fee, the genius decamping by the next tide to a freer and warmer shore; if you mean the law that arrives, faithful as the swallows, exactly one whole epoch too late—helmeted, plumed, and magnificently armed—to regulate the stagecoach—then certainly, my friends, I am against it. But—but, my friends—if, when you say regulation, you mean instead the humble steel guardrail upon the mountain road at midnight, the very thing you curse on the easy days and bless on your knees the one night the fog comes down; if you mean the brakes—for it is the brakes, and not the engine alone, that permit a sane man to drive fast and yet arrive alive—and the buttress, without which no cathedral was ever flung so high, but only in spite of which, but because of which; if you mean the meat inspector, who is the single homely reason a man may eat a sausage in this republic without first composing his last will and testament; if you mean the firebreak cut clean through the forest before the dry season of the burning, the smallpox cordon, the buoy that marks the channel, the rule of the road that lets ten thousand strangers hurtle past one another in the dark at fearful speed and arrive, by its quiet grace, every one of them home; if you mean the honest scale and the true weight, the reason a pound is a pound and a dollar a dollar from Natchez to Nome; if you mean the firm and decent wall between the counterfeit voice and the widow’s bank account, between the deepfaked candidate and the ballot box on the eve of the vote, between the loosed and loveless machine and the schoolyard it neither knows nor pities; if you mean the simple plank of law that says the strong shall not, in the gray dawn, feed the weak quietly into the furnace and sell the rising smoke as progress; if you mean, in the end, the one slender thread of trust without which no citizen will ever dare to use the marvelous thing at all—for where there is no rule there is no trust, and where there is no trust there is no commerce, and a miracle that no man dares to touch is no miracle, but only a handsome and expensive ghost—then certainly I am for it. This is my stand. I will not retreat from it. I will not compromise one inch of it.

@threepointone philanthropic

banthropic??

this is called fking around and finding out

@wholemars dario is much better than that idiot scumbag scum altman

I watched this interview with Dario and Daniella on Bloomberg this week and honestly I didn't realize what a character Dario is. He's like that liberal professor you had in high school or college who's really smart but also a little eccentric this type of guy has never been put in charge of a trillion dollar company. the culture of anthropic makes so much more sense after just listening to Dario speak for a while. One idea I'm playing with, and maybe I have this wrong, is that the race to create super intelligence has made the "researchers" — the few people in this world who understand these models and have ideas about how to improve them — the most sought after employees in the world. They have an enormous amount of power and leverage. We've all heard whispers of the kinds of compensation packages that have been thrown around. Anthropic really feels like a lab run by the researchers. And the researchers have so much leverage and power right now that if they don't want to work for a Larry Page, a Sam Altman or an Elon Musk they don't have to. Rather than working for someone else with their own goals and motivations, the researchers had the option of trying to run a company themselves. That's basically what happened when Dario decided he didn't want to work for Sam Altman anymore. That's probably why talent density and talent retention are so high at Anthropic. They still have all their co-founders working at the company, which is very unusual for a company of that size. In tech, when you put a bunch of smart people together and let them work together magic happens. Dario seems like kind of a strange guy, and he's definitely not your typical Mag 7 CEO. But he seems to have created a culture that's led to strong execution. It's possible that as Anthropic grows, especially as they face the scrutiny of Wall Street ahead of their IPO, it may outgrow Dario and investors might start calling for another CEO. The other AI companies have leaders — Musk, Altman, the Google guys — who are well versed in dealing with investors and Wall Street. There will inevitably be pressure, especially after going public, for Anthropic to be lead by someone who will please investors. But if Dario goes, the company risks killing the culture that has given its models a technical edge.

I am grateful to work under the greatest entrepreneur of our lifetime. If you had asked me 10 years ago if I would be given such a chance, I would have told you what kind of crack you were smoking. There were many stories written by people who never worked for him. But we work for him not because he is powerful or rich, but because he is inspiring. When immigrants like us, bringing nothing but a small suitcase to the US, can achieve something great, it is truly an American dream.

@TheDahliaKnox stfu

Drop a follow ❤️