Humza

3.1K posts

Humza banner
Humza

Humza

@0xHumza

I like to build things. e/acc to infinity and beyond

Montreal, QC Katılım Nisan 2012
2.5K Takip Edilen1.1K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Humza
Humza@0xHumza·
GPT 5.6 Sol, 24hrs and 1 billion tokens later I triggered a major migration for one of my projects from a single org deployment to multi-tenant SaaS overnight and honestly, I'm quite impressed by the results. Here is an example: The following piece of code was not planned. It was just part of the broader instructions, and 5.6 Sol independently arrived at the conclusion that this is needed. This is a NestJS interceptor that sets up per-tenant org identity. It's the exact code that leaks one customer's data into another's account when you get it subtly wrong. It didn't. → It runs AsyncLocalStorage across the RxJS subscription, so the org context survives every async hop in the handler. That's the bit everyone loses across await boundaries. → It establishes identity after the auth guards, not before. Ordering matters and it knew it. → It keys the internal-org id off a Symbol, so no untrusted input can forge an internal identity. Only code holding the Symbol can set it. None of this is flashy. It's the boring, load-bearing stuff that stops one client's data bleeding into another's and losing you the account, the kind of bug a rushed review waves straight through.
Humza tweet mediaHumza tweet media
English
0
0
0
127
Humza
Humza@0xHumza·
@kr0der @robinebers I was using it, but the only problem is that its CPU and RAM usage had a lot of random spikes.
English
0
0
0
6
Humza
Humza@0xHumza·
@cyrusnewday Cool project, but just want to let you know there's a whole group of people out there who absolutely hate AI-based outreach, and it actually disqualifies you faster than any other thing.
English
0
0
0
3
Cyrus
Cyrus@cyrusnewday·
I built a thing for technical founders It's called social — a CLI for LinkedIn & X, built for agents. Here are 3 things I actually use it for, with demos 🧵 usesocial.dev
English
64
27
730
104.6K
Humza
Humza@0xHumza·
@cjzafir Man I don't even look at the usage anymore.
Humza tweet media
English
0
0
0
264
CJ Zafir
CJ Zafir@cjzafir·
Codex 20x pro plan is hell cheap when you get limit resets everyday!!!
CJ Zafir tweet media
English
13
1
71
7.9K
Humza
Humza@0xHumza·
@thsottiaux This is amazing honestly, but I feel my weekly limits are draining way faster after this change has gone in. It would be terrible if the weekly limits end up being a few 5-hour limits, as compared to more previously. Just highlighting this here @OpenAIDevs @thsottiaux
English
0
1
2
447
Tibo
Tibo@thsottiaux·
Morning. The last 48 hours of Codex and ChatGPT Work have been intense! Three important updates: - Temporarily removing the 5 hour usage limit restriction for all Plus, Business and Pro plans - Rolling out changes that will make GPT 5.6 Sol more efficient across the board and that will be reflected in less usage being used so that it can take you further. Exact impact to be quantified and shared - We hit 6M active users, and are landing a usage reset in the next hour Go do things
English
2.8K
2K
25.5K
4.5M
Humza
Humza@0xHumza·
@bridgebench This is not accurate. You still have a weekly limit, and it's draining faster.
English
1
0
4
435
Humza
Humza@0xHumza·
OpenAI: → remove 5hr limit windows → weekly limit draining way faster As a result, everyone will be forced to use the banked limit resets they have accumulated. I see what you guys did there @OpenAIDevs 👀
English
0
0
0
28
Humza
Humza@0xHumza·
@GaelBreton It's using the weekly limit way faster. I'm not sure removing the five-hour limit is a good thing.
English
0
0
0
61
Humza
Humza@0xHumza·
Okay, I think my weekly limits are draining way faster. I don't want the weekly limit to end up being just one more 5-hour limit, very clever of OpenAI.
English
0
0
0
17
Humza
Humza@0xHumza·
So in the next six hours: - There's going to be one more hard reset on your codex limit. - OpenAI is removing the 5-hour limit. I think this is all sorts of people who have accumulated a lot of limit resets. Can just use them, and OpenAI can empty those banks. Regardless, I have a lot of work to go, and I'm using all my limit resets in the next few days. This is getting interesting. I don't see how Anthropic competes with this. I'm sure they have something up their sleeve, but I just don't know personally how.
English
2
0
0
68
Humza
Humza@0xHumza·
@toddsaunders Exactly. This is such a bad look for their optics. I hope they come around.
English
0
0
1
56
Humza
Humza@0xHumza·
OpenAI is going for the good ol' strategy of capturing volume and trying to spread out the margins evenly across a multitude of models. Anthropic, on the other hand, seems to be positioning themselves as the most premium intelligence company, but I don't think it's going to work with the latest OpenAI model release. Either way, I get cheap tokens. My subscriptions are heavily subsidized, so I'm not complaining at all lol
English
0
0
2
152
Bindu Reddy
Bindu Reddy@bindureddy·
Anthropic keeps increasing their effective API prices.... Sonnet 5 literally costs 2x that of Sonnet 4.6 In sharp contrast, OpenAI is becoming more efficient and effective - Terra is an excellent option Overtime, this will make OpenAI more profitable than Anthropic
English
56
25
342
20.3K
Humza
Humza@0xHumza·
@_catwu Not good for optics tbh
English
0
0
1
17
Humza
Humza@0xHumza·
Well, when it comes to doing business, a lot of companies actually are very much not concerned about the bad press, but about the quality and the cost value of the intelligence they can access. I'm sure there are a few companies out there that they wouldn't do business with certain companies based on morals, but let's be honest: how often that happens when you have access to the same level of intelligence way cheaper than their competitor? Irrelevant, I would say.
English
0
0
1
4.5K
signüll
signüll@signulll·
there is a very very simple reason why openai gets clowned on x now (even reddit) & why they lost a ton of public support at least with the closest power audiences. they face more negative press & vibes than any other ai company today. why? - it is not because of their product execution or execution in general. - it is not because of the owner of this platform. - it is not because of the transition from non profit to profit. - it is not because ppl are afraid of ai or job loss. - it is not because of their communication strategy or lack of potential strategy in general. - it is not because of their acquisitions. - it is not because of the lawsuits. - it is not because of their relationship deterioration with microsoft or apple. - it is certainly not because of the personality of sam altman. - it is not because of the endless drama on the personnel or the founders attempted coup. if you understand the mechanics of culture, you figure it out rather quickly. & it’s only one word. can you guess what it is?
English
215
7
370
123.3K
Humza
Humza@0xHumza·
AI subscriptions are gonna stay heavily subsidized for a while. GPT-5.6 made the math obvious. A model that's maybe 80% of Fable 5, but flat-rate in a subscription, is just better value than a frontier model getting walled off behind API pricing and usage caps. Why it holds: → Most subscription users can't tell thinking mode from the frontend model. Same product to them. → What they can tell is the bill. Price is the only spec they actually feel. → So an 80%-as-good plan at a flat price beats a frontier model gated behind credits and 50% weekly limits. → And the labs are too busy undercutting each other to quietly nerf subscription value. Competition keeps them honest. Cheap, near-frontier intelligence on tap for whoever's paying 200 bucks a month. Honestly, not a bad deal at all.
Humza tweet media
English
1
0
2
72