0xRΞN 🐸

2.3K posts

0xRΞN 🐸 banner
0xRΞN 🐸

0xRΞN 🐸

@0xMeme_Lord

The Telepathy Tapes is a breathtaking podcast. https://t.co/4p3hN5liQL https://t.co/kKQEAlCcBg

Goblin Town Katılım Nisan 2022
2.9K Takip Edilen265 Takipçiler
banteg
banteg@banteg·
i decompiled a cult 2003 game and rewrote it from scratch in 2 weeks using codex. read more about my project. banteg.xyz/posts/crimsonl…
banteg tweet media
English
56
76
630
176.4K
0xRΞN 🐸 retweetledi
Sweep
Sweep@0xSweep·
To all of you curve fanboys here’s some food for thought on Curve and Egorov Two years after the $100M loan and mansions… The protocol actually works. This is the part most criticism gets wrong Q3 2025 numbers: $29B in trading volume, $7.3M in protocol revenue, $2.3B TVL and roughly 44% of all Ethereum DEX fees over a 30 day window at year end By DEX fundamentals, Curve is top tier That makes what comes next worse, not better CRV is at $0.21. Still down 98% from the cycle highs Annualize Q3 revenue: ~$29M Annual emissions on the current schedule: 115.5M CRV per year, cut from 137M in August At $0.21, that’s ~$24M of sell pressure every year The protocol generates ~$29M in fees and mints ~$24M in dilution to LPs Net to the average CRV holder who didn’t farm: nothing The math gets worse when you look at who holds the veCRV Convex liquid lockers hold over 40% of veCRV. Yearn and StakeDAO take more Egorov and Swiss Stake hold roughly 15% directly 100% of swap revenue routes to veCRV That means Egorov’s personal share alone pulls something on the order of $4M-5M per year in fees, before counting Yield Basis, before any token appreciation Retail CRV holders capture once again zero of that flow September 2025 Egorov launches Yield Basis. Raises $5M at $50M FDV and it gets 15x oversubscribed Then he goes to the Curve DAO and proposes minting $60M of crvUSD - Curve’s own stablecoin, to seed three Bitcoin pools running on his new private protocol Curve mints $60M crvUSD as a community liability Pools run on Yield Basis. His protocol… 35-65% of YB revenue routes back to veCRV 25% of YB tokens reserved for the Curve ecosystem Read it twice The Curve community provides $60M of stablecoin liquidity to bootstrap his new venture, and the consolation is partial revenue share from pools that wouldn’t exist without that capital It passed because Egorov controls enough voting power that the outcome was decided before voting opened April 2025. Egorov relocks all his veCRV for the maximum 4 years, until 2029 The 30% team allocation - 900M CRV vesting over 4 years - finished distributing in August 2025 He already pulled what he wanted out via loans and OTC during the unlock window. What’s left got locked into governance. Locked CRV votes the same as unlocked CRV The cash was extracted years ago. The residual is now permanent control of the protocol The May 2025 vote nobody talks about Egorov asks the DAO for a $6.2M Swiss Stake AG grant. Rejected. 54.46% against Yearn and Convex coalitions made up roughly 90% of the opposition That was a real moment. The community said no Months later: revised proposal, 17.45M CRV (~$6.6M) for the same entity. Approved Founder lost a vote, restructured the ask, got the money anyway This is governance in name only DeFi just hasn’t built the infrastructure to call it what it is Until emissions drop below revenue, until veCRV concentration breaks, until the founder stops routing community capital into personal ventures, CRV is a sell on every meaningful rally You can like Curve the protocol and short CRV the token at the same time. Both are true
Sweep tweet media
Sweep@0xSweep

Curve's founder pulled $100 MILLION out of his own token to buy two Australian mansions and left holders with a token that dumped 98% In 2023 Curve Finance founder Michael Egorov took out $100 million in stablecoin loans across Aave, Frax, Inverse, Abracadabra and other protocols His collateral was 427 million CRV, which was 47% of the circulating supply of his own token Lookonchain traced $31 million in stablecoins flowing from Egorov to Bitfinex in April 2023 One month later his wife bought a $41 million mansion in Melbourne, right next door to the $18 million home they had purchased the year before That's $59 million in Australian real estate funded by loans against the token his own community was holding In July 2023 Curve was hacked for $70 million through a Vyper bug, CRV crashed and his positions almost got liquidated A liquidation would have created tens of millions in bad debt across Aave, Frax and other protocols and triggered a DeFi wide catastrophe To avoid this Egorov sold 106 million CRV in OTC deals at $0.40 per token, well below the market price, to a roster that included Justin Sun, convicted felon Michael Patryn, Jeffrey Huang, DWF Labs and several anonymous wallets He raised $42 million in stablecoins from these deals while community holders watched CRV dump In April 2024 he had to do it again, selling another 159 million CRV in OTC to 33 different buyers for $63 million In June 2024 CRV crashed 24% in 3 hours and he got fully liquidated for $140 million across 5 protocols The liquidation created $10 million of bad debt that the community had to absorb Ethereum developer Eric Conner did the math: "He got 100 million in stables out of a 140 million CRV position. He just transferred the rektage to the community instead" Egorov's response was that he was "committed to building Curve more than ever" thanks to veTokenomics, meaning he locked his remaining CRV to keep control of governance CRV is down 98% from its all time high and Egorov still owns the two mansions and the protocol When the founder of your protocol uses your bag as collateral for his mansion, you're not an investor You're his ATM

English
26
16
184
41.4K
0xRΞN 🐸
0xRΞN 🐸@0xMeme_Lord·
@spicyofc Do you have a list of recommended articles to read for beginners and in what order? Keep up the good work.
English
1
0
1
64
0xRΞN 🐸
0xRΞN 🐸@0xMeme_Lord·
All I heard was all your problems, did you ever stop and ask why she does what she does? The phone became the escape but never fixed the actual underlying issue.
Eliakim Art@Eliakim_Art

2/2 Le salon ressemble à un champ de bataille : jouets partout, assiettes du petit-déj encore sur la table à 13 h, couches sales qui traînent, machine pleine depuis 3 jours. J'ouvre le frigo : ça sent le renfermé, la même serviette pour les mains est là depuis une semaine, humide et qui pue. Le petit dernier de 3 ans me dit « papa, j'ai faim » et je vois qu'il n'a pas mangé depuis le goûter. Je deviens dingue. Je fais tout le reste : je range, je lave, je cuisine, je baigne les enfants, je les couche, je les lève le lendemain à 6 h 30 même quand je rentre à 5 h. Et elle ? Elle passe sa journée sur son téléphone. TikTok, Snapchat, lives d'influenceuses, vidéos de maquillage, de mode, de gossip... Je lui ai dit 50 fois : « Pose le téléphone juste 2 h, pour t'occuper des enfants et de la maison. » Elle me répond : « J'ai besoin de me détendre, tu comprends pas, je suis toute la journée avec eux. » Et elle continue. Elle continue. Elle continue. Je l'aime encore. Je l'aime pour les moments où elle est douce avec les enfants, pour les rares fois où elle me sourit, pour les souvenirs d'avant.Mais je me sens seul à porter la famille sur mes épaules. Je me sens exploité, invisible, pris pour un distributeur de billets et de corvées. Et le pire : j'ai peur du divorce. Si je pars, elle aura probablement la garde principale (elle est à la maison, elle est la mère). Je vois mes enfants grandir avec elle, dans le désordre, sans rythme, sans repas équilibrés, sans limites. Je les imagine manger des céréales à 20 h, se coucher à minuit, manquer l'école parce qu'elle a « pas vu l'heure ». Je préfère rester et tout assumer que de les laisser dans cette situation. Du coup je reste. Pour eux. Je me tais. Je serre les dents. Je fais semblant que tout va bien. Mais je suis en train de mourir à petit feu. Père qui portent tout financièrement et à la maison parce que leur femme ne fait rien, vous avez tenu combien de temps ? Ou vous avez fini par divorcer malgré la peur pour les enfants? Celles qui sont restées à la maison et qui ont entendu ces reproches, comment vous avez réagi ? J'aimerais votre avis sincère. Merci à vous la #lifestyle #motivation

English
0
0
0
142
Derpy.m🐜인생버거MemeMax⚡️
What gives you the right to threaten reporting people to the U.S. while living in West Asia? And who are you to label Asians as “third world”? By income standards, countries like China and South Korea are not low at all.Making accusations based on flimsy photos is genuinely disgraceful. You’re not a detective—you’re just an internet clout-chaser stirring things up.
Derpy.m🐜인생버거MemeMax⚡️ tweet media
English
7
0
29
14.5K
Ice.m🐜
Ice.m🐜@MeCo_ICE·
"Why are you trying to change MemeCore?" "It's MemeCore that is changing you." . . . . . . . @zachxbt. 🫦 We crave for more. Welcome to our world of pleasure. 🌑 50 Shades of $M: The Sweet Pleasure x.com/zachxbt/status…
Ice.m🐜 tweet media
ZachXBT@zachxbt

@MemeCore_M @Grayscale Officially recognized on @ZachXBT ! We’re just getting started. Please provide a single data point to support your $6B mkt cap at a top 20 token and why insiders hold >90% of supply.

English
84
293
924
348.8K
Sam 🇦🇺🇺🇦
Sam 🇦🇺🇺🇦@samstrades·
no one is gonna be jumping into the property market when rate are rising, property prices already falling, inflation raging and gov tightening fiscal policy (NDIS this is no post 2008 or post 2020, cash buffers are exhausted, mortgage default rates will go up, household debt interest expense is approaching early 1990s levels (read what Chris Joye has written recently on AFR, this will be the mother of all default cycles in Australia)
Sam 🇦🇺🇺🇦 tweet media
English
5
5
18
881
Tarric Brooker aka Avid Commentator 🇦🇺
I'm noticing we are back at the: "The government will throw huge money at the property market, they cant let it fall" stage of the narrative To be fair they are entirely correct, if today's status quo continues there will be intervention. But how absurdly broken is that...
English
48
5
279
36.4K
0xRΞN 🐸 retweetledi
Evan
Evan@EvanWritesOnX·
I am surprised how my tweet below entered the political spheres of Australians. It means that many Australians actually care about their country. But if you want to do something about it, the first thing to understand is that the answer is not the other party. The two parties run the visible layer. The operators underneath is the same regardless of who is in office. Same mining multinationals. Same four banks. Same supermarket duopoly. Same media owners. Same property speculation engine. Same gas exporters paying almost no resource rent. The faces rotate. The arrangement does not. So voting harder for Labor when the Liberals disappoint you, or harder for the Liberals when Labor disappoints you, is not resistance. It is the trap. It is the pressure-release valve doing exactly what it was built to do. The way to move the operators in Australia, is how you move any operator in any country. Stop voting tribally. Strengthen the cross bench. Vote for community independents and minor parties willing to put structural questions on the table that the majors have agreed never to discuss. A senate full of crossbenchers extracting concessions is worth more than another majority for either side. Learn who owns what. Find out who owns your bank, your supermarket, your toll road, your energy retailer, your superannuation, your media. Most Australians have no idea how much of the country routes back to a small handful of foreign asset managers and resource multinationals. Once you see it, the arguments between the parties stop looking like a contest and start looking like theatre. Build parallel structures. Move your money to a credit union or mutual bank. Buy from local cooperatives where you can. Read independent media. Put solar and battery on your own roof so you stop buying back your own gas at a markup from the people who exported it. Demand specific reforms, not vague good intentions. Ask every candidate, federal and state, whether they will support a real Petroleum Resource Rent Tax. Whether they will support a Norway-style sovereign wealth fund built on actual resource royalties. Whether they will support ending negative gearing and the capital gains discount. Whether they will support breaking up the media monopolies. Whether they will support foreign investment screening with teeth. Whether they will support rebuilding domestic refining capacity and downstream processing of the minerals that's shipped out raw. Vote on the answers. Politicians respond to specificity. They absorb and neutralise vagueness. Tell the truth in your daily conversations. The deepest defense of the system is the conditioning that tells Australians their own sovereignty over their own resources, their own currency, their own land and their own future is the unrealistic option. Norway did it. South Korea did it. Singapore did it. Australia chose, repeatedly, through both parties, not to. That is a choice. Choices can be made differently. Saying so out loud, in private and in public, in conversations with family and friends and colleagues, slowly breaks the spell. Australia is managed. That is the bad news and that is also the good news. Anything that can be managed can be unmanaged. But not by waiting for the next election to deliver a saviour from inside the same recruiting pipeline that produced the current arrangement. The change starts when enough citizens stop voting for the marketing departments and start asking who actually owns the building.
Evan@EvanWritesOnX

Australia was not established as a nation-building project. It was established as an extraction platform. The British did not colonize Australia to build a civilization. They colonized it to extract l; first convict labor, then wool, then gold, then minerals, then gas. The political architecture was built around that extraction logic from day one, and it has never been restructured away from it. You assume the state exists to serve the population, and therefore bad outcomes must mean the state is being run poorly. Australia is not a sovereign state that happens to have a mining sector. It is a private sector extraction platform that happens to have citizens. Every Australian who “owns” a home is servicing a debt instrument that enriches the FIC. The minerals get dug up by foreign-owned multinationals. The profits get distributed to global shareholders. The taxation office is structured; by design, through decades of lobbying, to ensure the extraction proceeds leave the country with minimal sovereign capture. The politicians are doing exactly what the structure requires of them: absorbing public anger, rotating every few years to reset the pressure valve. Australia is not mismanaged. Australia is managed perfectly, just not for Australians.

English
111
795
2.2K
108.2K
0xRΞN 🐸 retweetledi
ZachXBT
ZachXBT@zachxbt·
Pump and dump activity for $RAVE originated on @bitget @binance @Gate Call to action for both @heyibinance @GracyBitget to do better and launch internal investigation offboarding the responsible actors. Offering up to $10K bounty of my personal funds for whistleblowers to come forward privately to share evidence about parties involved We cannot allow this blatant market manipulation by insiders controlling >90% RAVE support to further extract from retail investors.
ZachXBT tweet mediaZachXBT tweet media
English
1.1K
1.1K
6.8K
2.2M
DineroDom
DineroDom@DineroDom0·
I wasted a lot of time learning everything ICT. The concepts are taken from Richard Wycoff, except presented in a much worse way. Once you learn how institutions need to accumulate and distribute to fill orders, the market will become much more clear. Studying Wyckoff is 1000x more beneficial than ICT and “smart money concepts”
English
4
0
13
4K
Mayne
Mayne@Tradermayne·
I spent years deep in ICT content... Order Blocks, Breaker Blocks, Mitigation Blocks, Lego Blocks, FVGs, the Kuala Lumpur Power Hour Killzone and my favourite the Inverted Reaper Death Seal FVG. Some of those are obviously fake, hard to tell which ones though. Whether you believe ICT invented them or just repackaged things that already existed, some of them work. I still trade these ICT concepts to this day. The issue with these concepts IMO is that nobody tells you which ones actually matter and for the most part they are made out to be way more complicated than they actually are. Half of them contradict each other depending on the timeframe and you end up second-guessing every trade because you've got 5 different confluences telling you 5 different things. So I've spent a bunch of time behind the scenes working on some educational content that I'll be released over the coming months. Videos as well as a free written newsletter. The goal is to demystify some of these topics and break them down into an easy to understand and easy to apply framework. You can get access to the first couple videos and newsletters with the link below. These are and will remain completely FREE.
English
70
35
908
75.4K
fooo
fooo@bitcoinpanda69·
I have returned to home and hearth and have not gamed for some time And I find myself in the mood to play a game for many hours a day until completion The gaming spirits are calling to me and I shall not refuse it So should it be Crimson Desert Or something else recent?
English
58
1
168
11.4K