SteeperBasket

The most retarded person you know is excited abt prediction markets

@ashrobin Good stuff. Anything below 100k mc is exploitative by nature and is dominated by dumb bundlers who wouldn't last a day in real markets.

here’s how I made $6,000 buying $SCAM above 4 million marketcap there should be more people making content about trading coins that aren’t under 20K marketcap I suppose I will have to fill that role I posted this video across other platforms as well

@claudeai Just fired my designer. Thanks Claude!

Claude now connects to the tools creative professionals already use. With the new Blender connector, you can debug a scene, build new tools, or batch-apply changes across every object, directly from Claude.

@skewga_capital No brainer obv since Claude doesn't generate any visual work. Was more curious about about workflow, tasks, and overall LLM performance though, any noticeable differences?

@0xSteeper Really liking it so far, especially the image generation stuff

Just switched over to chatGPT and it feels good, man.

@tradexyz Yo @tradexyz list Avis $CAR ASAP

BIRD is now live. 10x leverage, 24/7, 365.

Nobody in crypto has the skillset, credibility, and reach to take on RAVE and the broader extractive coin meta the way @zachxbt does. Proven track record, high signal, zero grift. Sending him 10K for future bounties specifically on these manipulated scam coins. Every large KOL who monetizes should follow through and fund this. If he kills this meta, it will be a far bigger win for crypto than most people realize. We need to back him.

@astro_reid @Astro_Christina The memories on your photos app will be insane lol. Btw, how did the iPhone behave in terms of screen rotation in microgravity?

Only one chance in this lifetime… Like watching sunset at the beach from the most foreign seat in the cosmos, I couldn’t resist a cell phone video of Earthset. You can hear the shutter on the Nikon as @Astro_Christina is hammering away on 3-shot brackets and capturing those exceptional Earthset photos through the 400mm lens. @AstroVicGlover was in window 3 watching with @Astro_Jeremy next to him. I could barely see the Moon through the docking hatch window but the iPhone was the perfect size to catch the view…this is uncropped, uncut with 8x zoom which is quite comparable to the view of the human eye. Enjoy.

@WazzCrypto Share the audit skill pls

Auditmaxxing my vibecoded apps rn On my claude skills arc

@smartestmoney You just had to be there 😂

#Bitget may be on track to become #FTX 2.0. The way it handled the $RAVE incident was immature, unethical, and unprofessional, triggering user losses and casting serious doubts over its integrity. Despite presenting itself as an innovative exchange with a bold vision, Bitget operates more like an offshore bucket shop , enabling illicit flows and bad actors. The decision to pump and dump the $RAVE market and liquidate users positions both ways sets a dangerous precedent. Trust—not capital—is the foundation of any exchange (CEX and DEX alike), and once lost, it’s almost impossible to recover. Moreover, the platform's listing team reveals alarming flaws: asset selection that expose users to systemic risk that open the door to manipulation. Unless these issues are addressed, more altcoins may be weaponized against Bitget—putting it at risk of becoming the next catastrophic failure in crypto.

I hope @tradexyz factors in such data should they ever airdrop a token

@haarverzamelaar @dethective @nikitabier please purge him and his circle of grifters

@dethective The fucked up part is that he actually gets recommended to you by X when you start an X account and select Crypto as your interests. Why this butthole hasn't even been banned yet baffles me

Updated list of dumb money. > $9.8k sent to James Wynn > ~230 unique wallet sent him money > No one received a single token from Wynn presale > He is sitting on ~80k profit

Good, lower.

Mfs on this app buy their first home and immediately add “real estate” to their bio.

when you're 20 minutes from reset and you have 50% usage left

@boldleonidas Disagree. Good accounts still live on afaik. We still need more tough action against slop accounts.

We are facing massively reduced hospitality for crypto accounts of all types on X. This is excellent news when it comes to removing accounts that had bad intent. However, it seems to be driving away much of the quality content I used to see, or at least not showing that to me in the hope I too reduce my usage of the app. It seems that killing all crypto culture entirely on twitter is becoming a casualty the team are willing to accept. They will claim to have removed the bots, but really they’re disincentivising the entire sector.

@mlmabc I wanna see how he'll top this April fools next year lol x.com/0xSteeper/stat…

Technorevenant, one of the biggest individual HYPE holders, unstaked 2.42M HYPE ($95M) on April 1. hypurrscan.io/address/0x179f… He sold a small amount to short HYPE and long XRP, SOL, and ETH, even traded a random coin called PENIS on Hyperliquid. Then restaked the full amount on a new wallet. hypurrscan.io/address/0x4eb8… HYPE pumped over 3% right after, as a lot of people were watching his wallet and waiting to react. Happy april fools.

April fools of the year award goes to @Techno_Revenant

@coinbase 2/10 90% are absolute clowns and it has only like 5 good people

Rate my list of CT accounts to follow.

@HollanderAdam Waiting for your response @HollanderAdam

There is no answer to the question of where the money from waves 1 and 2 is. Read the room; the entirety of CT believes that waves 1 and 2 are non-refundable because, unlike the latter drier waves, they were very profitable for OpenSea (to put it simply, greed). It'd be an infinitely better look and a decent show of good faith if you include waves 1 and 2 in refunds. It's only fair since it's public consensus that chest waves were the final sprint before the TGE/airdrop.

alright, let's address a few items that keep popping up on the timeline. every single dollar that opensea received in platform fees over the last 5 months was used for one of two purposes: 1. to purchase prizes which were distributed via treasure chests 2. to offer optional refunds via our claim site imagine all of the platform fees in a single account. we spent some of the funds on prizes. and then had to figure out the right way to distribute what was remaining across hundreds of thousands of wallets. on the refund page we shared a ledger of: 1. how much each user spent on platform fees (i.e. how much they contributed to the "account" above) 2. what we paid for each prize they'd already received in their treasure chests if there was a gap, that became the optional refund amount. which we determined was the fairest way to redistribute 100% of the remaining funds. let's talk for a second about those two numbers above. when calculating how much each user spent on fees, we did it based on the USD value of those fees at the time of transaction. so for example, if you paid 0.01 ETH of platform fees on Nov 1st, we took the USD value of ETH that day, which was $3,800, and attributed $38 vs. the value of that same ETH today at $21. this was opensea essentially going back in time and irrefutably doing right by users. when showing the ledger of prizes, many are incorrectly viewing this as "what they're worth" compared to how much opensea "paid" out of our fees account for those prizes. i get it guys, not every NFT is worth today what it was when you received it. and i know sometimes you had to pay royalties to sell them. but the reason we shared this information was to help you understand how we calculated the refund amounts and redistributed the remaining fees from the account. this was very simply, transparency. to those who didn't have a refund to claim, it meant that you were one of the lucky ones. the amount opensea paid for the prizes you received was more than you had actually spent in platform fees. so you got to essentially trade for free for 5 months and still keep the Treasures you earned. the fact i see people complaining about this particular outcome is puzzling to say the least. on the point of not providing more details on TGE - that's essentially why the refunds are being offered. the Foundation will share more when they're ready. but you should not expect more information in the immediate term. opensea was not required to provide these refunds. we did so because we thought it was the right thing to do. if you're truly upset about the way they were calculated, or frustrated that more information on TGE isn't being offered right now, in my opinion, you should personally consider taking the refund. i for one am extremely excited about what we're creating and our future. opensea is building incredible things that will change the way the world interacts onchain. and we're not going anywhere.