TOM

2.7K posts

TOM banner
TOM

TOM

@1sn4o

web3 1sn4o / early-stage investor @echodotxyz / member-owner @coinage_media / certified shelter dog walker

here Katılım Eylül 2009
1.3K Takip Edilen1.2K Takipçiler
TOM
TOM@1sn4o·
we must look up to @mdudas and spell it out even more clearly: Circle still eyes 'em CBDC businesses; they're demo-ing for all the rich nations. p.s. @griffgreen 's chat with @zGuz on @coinage_media was brilliant. go watch the full interview!
Wu Blockchain@WuBlockchain

Arbitrum Security Council Member: Circle Is Clearly Not Full of Good Men Arbitrum Security Council member Griff Green @griffgreen states that Tether actively freezes hacker funds, while Circle does nothing. He believes Tether consists of traditional crypto natives who value early crypto principles, whereas Goldman Sachs-backed Circle only cares about profitability. He suggests that the community might need to sell off USDC to force these institutions to take action against hacker threats.

English
0
1
3
196
TOM
TOM@1sn4o·
That’s 1 exploit/hack each day of April 2026
Francesco Andreoli ᵍᵐ@francescoswiss

wow, i want to re-iterate here, the @wasabi_protocol exploit isn't really a story about a stolen key. It's a story about what happens when one EOA controls a batch of upgradeable vaults with no multisig, no timelock, and no DAO governance as @evilcos and @zachxbt both pointed out within an hour of the drain (it should have never happen) The mechanics: deployer EOA grants ADMIN_ROLE to an attacker contract → UUPS upgrade replaces the perp vaults & LongPool with malicious logic → strategyDeposit() called on 7 vaults → drain(). 3 minutes, $5M+ across Ethereum, Base, Berachain & Blast. Largest single hit: 840.9 WETH (~$1.9M) from wWETH. Wasabi has acknowledged the issue and asked users not to interact with contracts. @blockaid_ flagged that all Wasabi/Spicy LP-share tokens minted by these vaults should be treated as compromised the underlying assets are gone. If you have funds anywhere in the protocol: withdraw and revoke approvals via @RoscoKalis's @RevokeCash. Big shoutout to him, the tool everyone reaches for on days like this. 34th major incident this month. April 2026: 30+ exploits, ~$630M drained. The recurring pattern keeps writing itself: privileged EOAs over upgradeable contracts, no governance friction, one phished signature away from zero.

English
0
0
0
8
tether wallet
tether wallet@tetherwallet·
The @btc faucet is open again! Claim Your Free Sats ⚡🚰 Step 1: Get your @ tether.me handle (Download Tether Wallet). Step 2: Post tagging @btc + your @tether.me handle. Step 3: Receive free Sats instantly! Follow @btc & @tetherwallet
English
3.5K
913
2.6K
178.1K
TOM
TOM@1sn4o·
@SEAL_911 👏👏👏 With Defi United and now this, is the Community meta back? I sure hope so 🥹
David Hoffman@TrustlessState

I want to share a quick story from a friend, who recently had ~$450k almost phished from a wallet Thanks to @SEAL_911 - it was all completely recovered and returned. A happy ending that deserves highlighting! I knew SEAL 911 existed, but this was the first time I've saw them in action. Here's the story: A friend got phished from a fake Ledger Live app (on the Apple App Store 2 weeks?!). His ETH was staked on Figment, and the phisher executed the withdrawal transaction, and the ETH entered the withdrawal queue. He reached out to the Seal 911 group and within 15 min, he was on a discord call with the White Hat Recovery team. You could imagine how shitty my friend felt, assuming that the $450k of ETH was simply going to be withdrawn and immediately captured by the attacker. They made him feel at ease, shared case studies of similar rescues and said they charge 5% (totally agreeable amount imo) of whatever funds they recovered. The tension was all down to the single block that the ETH became available for withdrawal after the exit-queue finished. $450k riding on a 12 second window. My poor friend had to wait 4 days while this all hung in the balance lol. The day finally came. Seal 911 has set up a script with Flashbots to engage in the bidding war required to access the funds. At 11pm that night, he received the long-awaited message: “got it all, best possible outcome.” Within 10 min, the funds were distributed to his new ETH wallet and the job was done. Kudos to the Seal 911 team, really amazing group of professionals.

English
0
0
0
14
TOM
TOM@1sn4o·
@griffgreen Sorry to hear that. May I ask what grounds did the debtor use to deny you of your claims? You went through the Kroll portal process right?
English
0
0
0
49
Griff Green - griff.eth
There has been so much fund recovery in crypto... and its very rare any lawsuits arise. And when they do... THEY ARE WORSE OUTCOMES. For instance, I lost 75% of my wealth in the Luna/UST crash, and their legal team denied me any claim to their recovery. I appealed and lost. @lex_node's theories here might sound nice & risk adverse... but when legal teams get involved in situations like this, the outcomes are almost always worse not better.
_gabrielShapir0@lex_node

there's no halfway with this shit. you're either in a legal regime or an alegal one. now security council or DAO can debate the next step in a gray area they have no preexisting policies or procedures for and worry who might sue if the choice goes wrong. but sure, I'm the bad guy for pointing out how badly equipped an L2 is to be an arbiter of justice.

English
10
3
45
8.4K
Tay 💖
Tay 💖@tayvano_·
For stolen funds, pig butchering, fraud, etc. it makes its way through various processes (depending on the jurisdiction and facts and circumstances of each case) and eventually recovered to the victim the assets were taken from. For Iran, seized assets historically have made their way back to families of those killed or abused by the Iranian regime. Other times, frozen assets are just sorta in limbo and can be used as a bargaining chip / during peace negotiations. Tether specifically has a burn function. When that is used, it usually comes alongside a mint for the same amt to a new address. If that doesn’t happen, it means the underlying asset has been wired somewhere (victim, government agency, etc.) If Tether is okay with them being in limbo (the underlying asset is still earning interest after all) they can chill and the govt will probably chill too. If they want to get rid of the assets they can push law enforcement and courts to move faster to formally seize the funds. Which can be done onchain (remint to new address) or offchain (burn the tokens, wire the money to USMS) aljazeera.com/news/2026/4/15…
English
5
5
36
3.6K
TOM
TOM@1sn4o·
@mdudas mad quotable moment ser. you tethered circle; circle is tethered. tethering amazing. future tagline for circle: go get tethered. 💯💯
English
0
0
2
142
TOM
TOM@1sn4o·
"Circle is government-Tethered!" 🤣 👏 Quotable 1-liner that might be a keeper in crypto's history book. * I hope AI didn't help write that... Thank you @mdudas for 1-shotting the occam's razor that explained Circle's posture on freezing USDC: They want that CBDC business. Once you realize that everything made sense. But yes keep repeating that because we and all retails need to realize that.
The Rollup@therollupco

Mike Dudas says Tether has blown Circle away: “It’s pretty clear that Circle’s strategy is to be as close to a CBDC as possible.” “Circle is a bald guy with a suit who’s in DC three times a week and basically would rather a judge tell him what to do, so he can absolve himself of any responsibility…” “Tether has blown Circle away in terms of decision making about how to handle absolute black and white decisions over the past month.”

English
0
0
1
32
TOM retweetledi
Zack Guzmán
Zack Guzmán@zGuz·
Our @coinage_media interview with @griffgreen on the @arbitrum decision to freeze $72 million in hacked funds from reaching North Korea is now leading Yahoo's North Korea news page 🇰🇵
Zack Guzmán tweet media
English
1
5
17
4.4K
TOM retweetledi
PaperImperium
PaperImperium@ImperiumPaper·
Lots of people are dunking on the Circle proposal to shift Aave rates, and I have, inevitably, been asked my opinion. I’ll share it here publicly. Gordon’s proposal is not incorrect directionally. He correctly diagnoses that the market is not clearing, and provides a pretty standard solution that would fit into half the textbooks on my bookshelf. Where I disagree with him are on his rate (in)sensitivity assumptions. Going straight to 40% seems destined to force liquidations. In the current market, contagion risk is already high, so cascades would need to be mitigated. I don’t know if Aave can throttle the liquidation throughput like the old Maker vaults could, but that would be a way to do that. It’s an open question whether this would be a good idea. I’m open to considering it, but am not convinced at this time. Gordon doesn’t say that the goal is repayment or liquidation, though. He believes this is a way to finance attracting supply, which I agree WOULD be the best way to unstick the market for the moment. However, the rate can’t just be the usual mechanics. For starters, anyone who has been in DeFi knows that juicy rates get diluted quickly in a floating rate lending protocol. Given the high probability of at least some loss, why would a lender put their stables to work even for a temporary (maybe a week?) 40% rate? Imagine you had $100m, and you saw this 40% deposit rate on Aave. Knowing there is more than $1b of impaired collateral in the system, are you going to risk your clients’ money for $109k/day? You’d need a week and a half just to break even on a 1% loss to your deposited funds. Except this is a floating rate. Once danger has passed, the rates drop down. And if they stay elevated it’s likely because the situation hasn’t gotten better. The calculus COULD be different if it was 40% for 6 months or a year. But you’re really just getting outsized rates for a few days in the best case scenario, and it is rising or realized risk that would let you keep earning that rate. This is at its heart a risk that is unmeasured, and so you can’t know what is the correct rate to price it at. You can’t tell if this is picking up nickels in front of a steam roller or the trade of the century. So I think depositors are the most rate insensitive group at the moment, and due to a very wide range of possible outcomes at the intersection of distressed collateral assets, ultimate recovery rates on those assets, timeline to realize that recovery, secondary damage that has created bad debt, and governance risk around things like implementation of Umbrella or the funds seized by Arbitrum. Basically everyone is standing around keeping rsETH marked to some imaginary number because we don’t have enough guidance from Kelp (and possibly L0 and now Arbitrum) for Aave to know how to begin liquidations and realize losses without accidentally taking on someone else’s loss because they were too pessimistic in valuing the impaired collateral. I do think at this point, Aave would be better off making an “ok” plan and acting today than waiting for a “good” plan that requires information from Kelp/L0/Arbitrum/law enforcement that may not be available for some time.
Jeremy Allaire - jerallaire.arc@jerallaire

A proposal on AAVE USDC market and liquidity parameters from Circle's Chief Economist @gordonliao governance.aave.com/t/arfc-improve…

English
20
11
124
43.4K
TOM retweetledi
Coinage ♻️
Coinage ♻️@coinage_media·
NEW: SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce says she’s “optimistic” Congress will pass the crypto CLARITY Act despite markup delays ⬇️
English
1
8
19
5K
TOM retweetledi
Arkham
Arkham@arkham·
ARBITRUM RECOVERS $70.9M FROM KELPDAO EXPLOITER The Arbitrum Security Council just removed $70.97M ETH from the KelpDAO Exploiter’s addresses. They sent it to the address 0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000DA0 North Korea stole the money and Arbitrum stole it back.
Arkham tweet mediaArkham tweet mediaArkham tweet mediaArkham tweet media
English
295
327
2.7K
252.4K
TOM retweetledi
Erik Voorhees
Erik Voorhees@ErikVoorhees·
In crypto and defi (ie in honest markets), when a component fails, those closest to the component—whether wildly negligent or innocent victim—suffer the loss, and are burdened with that responsibility. Unequal, but proper. In tradfi and banking (ie in coercively manipulated markets), when a component fails, the entire society is forced under the burden of its resolution. Costs are socialized. Equal, but improper. The former, with time, becomes self-correcting, self-improving, and crucially, retains vitality. The latter, regardless of time, becomes stagnant and soulless, and here everyone can wallow in an equivalent grey. Any man of agency should prefer the former, taking care over that to which he is proximate. It is from this that the virtue of markets emerges.
English
135
283
1.7K
213.7K
TOM
TOM@1sn4o·
They've rented out this iconic Hong Kong Dim Sum place (relocating) for a big party tonight; I'd bet the parties involved are currently based in HK, likely a mix of expats and locals. These posters are all over island side as we speak. Tonight is likely the final pump before the dump.
TOM tweet media
English
1
0
9
2.6K
RaveDAO
RaveDAO@RaveDAO·
We have observed heightened market volatility in $RAVE We encourage all users to remain mindful of the associated risks and to exercise caution, particularly when using leveraged positions
English
594
61
1.1K
378.4K