Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Triumph
765 posts


@Adam_YA_ @VincentOnyedik6 @Dinduchukwu @drkenon2 Oga truth no dey your mouth. If you are not in Nigeria, I might understand but if you are in Nigeria and you are saying this thing then you are not a sincere person.
English

@VincentOnyedik6 @Dinduchukwu @drkenon2 Like I said, she's entitled to her opinion but what I want u to understand is every story has 2 sides. U can't just believe one side and think the other side suffers more than d other. Northerners will say the suffer most. So which one should we uniformly believe?
English

“There two standards I see in Nigeria: one standard for the north & another standard for the south. Whenever a few Igbo boys have gotten angry & reacted, they sent Air Force, Navy & Military to go & stop them. They take armored tanks to the east. But we see Fulani boys stand & speak on the internet, they say anything, do anything, & nothing moves. Instructions are given for nobody to move.”
~ Pastor Sarah Omakwu
English

Yesterday defenders of democracy, today's destroyers, What a shame.
What an irony of history, that the acclaimed defenders of democracy and human rights who claimed to have fought for democracy during the era of General Sani Abacha now find themselves worse than the man they opposed.
Today, General Sani Abacha, once presumed face of oppression, will be remembered as seemingly more democratic and more respectful of human rights than the so-called champions of activism from the NADECO days. Power indeed reveals character.
A New Nigeria is POssible. -PO
English

@DonWillyBaba @AFG_0007 @DECLEX The same reason people kill to be in Government at the federal level... Na Federal Government we go blame.
English

@theikon001 @DatNaijaGuy1 @AFG_0007 Wait oh, he should tell you who to vote for? Is the Church a campaign ground. What he did is what he was supposed to do. I don't understand you guys again oh, una say make them call out Government, he did, now you say he should have told you who to vote for. Nawa oh, Nigerians.
English

@DatNaijaGuy1 @AFG_0007 you re from a lineage of foolish people..bcos d bible is der yet instead of reading it u listen to thousands of falsehood by this man...dullard dat dont know the difference between just telling nd influencing. the dire situation of the nation requires. dull failure
English

@ImJackBridger @ameralali76 @Afghan609 This is exactly what I have been saying... He is here attacking you and trying to make sure you change your view about Islam, when you are only judging by what you have seen.
He wants you to see black and somehow believe it's white.
Meanwhile he will do nothing to stop it. Evil
English

I read your post. I will double down. If you want this barbaric behavior to not be associated with Islam, it is you and every other Muslim to extinguish it from your religion.
It is on every Muslim nation to ban these barbaric practices.
It is not my duty or responsibility to excuse Muslims for allowing other Muslims to show me their interpretations of Islam.
I believe what I see and what I see is Muslims in the name of Islam oppressing women and other minority groups.
English

@ameralali76 @Afghan609 We know the group you belong. Go and preach it to them not us.
You left the people you are supposed to preach to and you are here defending nonsense.
After talking you do nothing to stop them, but want to raise your voice when we call them out... Evil
English

The issue is not Islam — the issue is misunderstanding it.
In Islam, the default principle regarding adultery is concealment, not exposure.
The story of the Ghamidiyyah woman is a clear example.
She came to Prophet Muhammad multiple times, confessing her sin and asking to be purified.
👉 But each time, he refused to punish her
👉 He told her: “Go back, seek forgiveness, and repent to Allah”
She was the one who insisted on the punishment — not him.
⸻
📖 The Full Context
The story of the Ghamidiyyah woman is an authentic incident from the time of the Prophet ﷺ, demonstrating the depth of repentance and the mercy of Islam.
•She came and said:
“O Messenger of Allah, I have committed adultery, so purify me.”
→ He turned her away and told her to repent.
•She returned again, insisting.
→ She admitted she was pregnant from the act.
→ He told her: “Go back until you give birth.”
•After giving birth, she returned with the child.
→ He said: “Go back and nurse him until he is weaned.”
•Only after she returned again — fully determined — was the punishment carried out.
⸻
🌟 The Key Statement
After the punishment, the Prophet ﷺ said:
“She has repented in such a way that if her repentance were distributed among the people of Madinah, it would be enough for them all.”
⸻
🎯 What does this prove?
•Islam prioritizes repentance over punishment
•The Prophet ﷺ actively tried to prevent the punishment
•The system encourages privacy, not public exposure
•Punishment is applied only in extreme, insisted cases with full admission
👉 This is not cruelty — this is mercy with justice
⸻
🧠 Closing Line :
If Islam were harsh,
he would have punished her immediately.
Instead… he tried to save her from punishment.
English

@TheHybridHulk @BentBongArtz @TheCryptoMando @FireNewz Nobody cares about your point be because it's pointless.
You are comparing a religion that allows the hitting of women to one that says the opposite, bcs of the fake statistics you concuted in your head. Even Christians who re fake, how many hits their wives?
English

@BentBongArtz @TheCryptoMando @FireNewz The problem is that there are very few real Christians. That is my point.
English

@Mmanagementpro @FireNewz @Court1066408 @1bigJawBone Can you imagine? You can't even have sympathy on her
English

@alikibria00 @SizweBansii Yes we can say that because he never traveled there. All his journeys were ordered by God.
Even Ishmael never stepped foot in Mecca or Medina.
Ishmael and Abraham never built anything...
English

So you're saying Abraham can travel 2000+ kilometres from Ur to the Holy land, but can't travel south from the Holy Land to the Hijaz area (Makkah and Madina) being around 1500 kilometres.
The bible is a history book for the Israelites, why would an Israelite book go into detail about Ishmaels story. The Israelites were jealous of Ishmael, so of course there won't be detailed history about him.

English

🚨Must watch : Did Islam Restore Abraham or Relocate Him?
Young black woman destroys Islam ☪️ with the most pertinent questions they can never answer
Another proof that Islam ☪️ is fake and empty — and will never make sense
#IslamInvadesViaLeft
English

@Kryptotajeer @realMaalouf You can imagine. A religion that wants to change the laws of people, is that a religion or a political movement?
Let's call it what it actually is.
English

@Vision20771 @Victor_E_NYC @EYakoby @grok You see the problem? Someone is speaking in front of a crowd, the fact that they were listening to him is enough to let you know he is prominent.
English

@Victor_E_NYC @EYakoby @grok Ok @grok but in what context does this man explains those silly arguments ? Any fool can be filled saying ridiculous things. Is this an official Iranian mollahs recognized by his peers in power ? Or is he an isolated lunatic ?
English

@TosinBamidele8 @SegunShowunmi @mehdirhasan It's called head to head for a reason...
There's a reason why it was Bwalla that was selected for the interview...
From Mehdi's introduction you should know exactly what's coming.
English

@SegunShowunmi @mehdirhasan He called a guest in to humiliate him and people call that journalism.
How then do the viewers get the chance to hear from the guest even if it’s going to be inaccurate?
A true journalist asks critical questions, allowing the guest to speak and let the bone the judge.
English

Hostility Is Not Journalism. Mehdi Hassan Take Note.
There is a clear difference between tough journalism and outright hostility. One serves the public interest. The other serves the ego of the interviewer. Unfortunately, the recent exchange between @mehdirhasan and presidential spokesperson @BwalaDaniel fell squarely into the latter category.
What viewers witnessed was not a serious interview. It was an attempted public ambush.
From the outset, the tone was aggressively confrontational. Questions were framed less as inquiries into governance and more as prosecutorial traps. Responses were repeatedly interrupted before they could develop. Clarifications were brushed aside. The atmosphere was unmistakable: this was not a conversation designed to inform viewers but a spectacle designed to embarrass the guest.
Serious journalism does not operate this way.
The craft of interviewing demands discipline. It requires the ability to ask difficult questions while still allowing the guest to articulate answers. It requires intellectual confidence strong enough to permit disagreement without descending into open hostility. Above all, it requires a commitment to substance over theatrics.
That commitment was glaringly absent.
Nigeria is currently grappling with a range of serious national challenges economic restructuring, security threats, governance reforms, and the complex work of stabilizing a large and dynamic democracy. A responsible interviewer would have used the opportunity to interrogate the administration’s policies on these matters: What strategies are being deployed? What reforms are underway? What outcomes should citizens expect?
Instead, viewers were treated to an exercise in selective outrage and repetitive interruption.
Even more troubling was the insinuation that political realignment is somehow illegitimate. Democratic politics is built on shifting alliances. Individuals and movements evolve. Former opponents become partners when national circumstances demand cooperation. This is neither shocking nor dishonorable; it is one of the defining characteristics of democratic political life.
History provides countless examples. Leaders across the world have entered alliances with former adversaries when the demands of governance required it. To pretend otherwise is either intellectual dishonesty or a deliberate attempt to create sensationalism where none exists.
But the deeper problem in the interview was tone.
A journalist who openly ridicules or repeatedly attempts to humiliate a guest crosses an important professional boundary. The role of the interviewer is to hold power accountable not to behave like a courtroom prosecutor seeking a viral “gotcha” moment. When the pursuit of humiliation replaces the pursuit of insight, journalism loses its credibility.
Audiences deserve better than that.
They deserve interviews that illuminate policy, probe governance, and help citizens understand how leaders intend to confront the pressing challenges of the day. What they do not need is a theatrical performance in which hostility is mistaken for intellectual rigor.
Respectful engagement does not weaken journalism; it strengthens it. Firm questioning does not require contempt. Professionalism does not require aggression.
If global media wishes to retain its claim to moral authority as a watchdog of democracy, it must remember a basic principle: the goal of journalism is to inform the public, not to stage spectacles at the expense of civility and substance.
The interview in question did neither. It was not a demonstration of fearless journalism. It was a demonstration of how easily the craft can slide into something far less admirable when provocation becomes the objective and professionalism is abandoned.
Otunba Segun Showunmi
The Alternative

English

@DonAzag @SegunShowunmi @mehdirhasan Boss don't waste your time responding to those guys abeg... They think it's that thing they do in Nigeria that's Journalism...
English

You can write all the epistles you like, but there are things you simply cannot include in your epistle. You cannot include that Mehdi Hasan is a supporter of Peter Obi or Atiku Abubakar. You cannot include that he is a secret member of the African Democratic Congress. You cannot include that he is an ethnic bigot or that he hates the All Progressives Congress.
What happened was very simple. A journalist did his homework. He researched his guest, pulled up the guest’s own past statements, and used those exact words to ask questions. That is basic journalism. Yet suddenly all the favour-seeking politicians and their defenders want to gaslight the situation, as if asking someone about their own recorded words is now an attack.
Nobody put those words in his mouth. Nobody manufactured those clips. A journalist simply brought the receipts and asked the questions. Now the spin machine wants to turn preparation into bias.
And thank God he is not one of those Nigerians whose mouths have been sealed with cellotape out of fear of persecution.
English

@Kryptotajeer @ruffydfire Its about humanity right? What does Islamic Regime mean? Why should a Country be governed by religious fanatics... The regime itself is religiously driven, that is the threat to humanity for your information.
English

I wish those Nigerian Christians will shut down their ignorance and listen to you even if they cannot study history, this is not about “we are in the same faith” so yoi got my support, its about humanity. The Americans doesn’t care about your religion, they akways find a good excuses to enter your country and take what they want in the name of protecting or liberating the citizens…
English

@all_abt_alamin @Bonemantle @EYakoby You guys don't understand how these things work... IRAN will never have a Nuclear Weapon. If they were close to having one, they would be very quiet and pretend until it is ready, they would even strike a deal with the US to distract everyone. That's how Islam operates
English

@Bonemantle @EYakoby This is just the beginning of the game. Iran will have nuclear bomb sooner or later
English

@Truth_Tribunal @Elena5510522 @chikajoash @ruffydfire Are you sure? They don't have yet, and they have been linked to all the terrorists organizations in the world. I don't even understand how some people think. A country that basically chants death to another Nation, and you say they will not attack.
English

@Elena5510522 @chikajoash @ruffydfire Iran isn't the USA or Israel, Isreal has nukes as a deterrent, they aren't going to attack anyone because of religion
English

Hypocrisy of the West and Christian Nationalists
Israel can own nuclear weapons, but Iran can’t.
For a saner world, no country must own nuclear weapons.
This unfairness will never give us a better world.
America only wants a regime that favours it in Iran.
That’s why they conducted Operation Ajax!
America can’t challenge Russia’s deployment of nuclear weapons in Belarus.
America hasn’t gone after North Korea!
Yet Iran should never have a nuclear weapon, but the same America had no problem with the Atom for Peace programme under the Shah.
English

@OlufemiObembe @Chima_Obi1234 What questions have you asked about Tinubu? If e reach Obi everybody go dey ask questions? Ask about Tinubu na
English

@Chima_Obi1234 Did PO lodge Anambra money in Fidelity bank while serving as a governor? If yes, what was d purpose of that? It is one thing for you to tell me how righteous you are, it is my responsibility to believe that based on information available to me. That's the essence of education.
English

“I don’t have a house in Abuja, I don’t have a land and I’m not preparing to have because I don’t need it.
“The more you have all these things the more headache you put on your head, for years I have never been sick, why would I? Because it’s not necessary.
“I was the chairman of our regulatory body, Security and Exchange Commission, SEC; the day I was announced, I arrived and the DG showed me a jeep, a Prado and they told me how much allowance I have for accommodation and I told the DG, ‘I just want to come for meetings here, I don’t need anything from you, any day you fix meeting, tell me I would come. I don’t want your sitting allowance, your car, and your house.
"He said it’s my entitlement, but I said whatever I’m entitled to, God has given me.’
“You can go and ask whether when Peter Obi was the chairman, did he collect anything?
“I was Chairman of Fidelity Bank and they told me that I’m entitled to Mercedes 500 or Range Rover, the bank is still there, go and ask them if I collected anything. I told them that I’m the chairman and whatever I need in my house I have, unless you want to bring a headache to yourself.
“I have enough, I don’t need to do give away but what I need I have.”
- HE Peter Obi, 17.01.2026

English












