Mark_K

551 posts

Mark_K

Mark_K

@AVadm1n

Techno-optimist Brit into clean energy, innovative transport solutions, tech and AI. Classical Liberal

Katılım Aralık 2023
116 Takip Edilen27 Takipçiler
Mark_K
Mark_K@AVadm1n·
@LauraTrottMP Your pushing of age verification / digital ID is the reason people should be worried about voting Conservatives. Many conservative people have explained to you why they are adamantly opposed, yet you try to force it on them anyway. You're the same as Starmer. Stop helping him.
English
0
0
0
8
Robert Peston
Robert Peston@Peston·
Reform UK told the BBC that he paid in cash for his £1.4m house in Surrey with his “I’m a Celebrity” fee from ITV and not with the £5m gift from crypto billionaire Christopher Harborne - which Farage says was to provide him with security (physical, not financial). But the ITV “Celeb” fee was £1.5m, which would be £825,000 after tax, for a top-rate taxpayer like Farage. That’s £575,000 less than the price of the house. And even if the fee was paid into his “Thorn in the side” media company rather than directly to him, it would still be taxable, one way or another
English
295
619
2.3K
217.2K
david webb
david webb@davidwebb536144·
@KarlTurnerMP @DPJHodges @Keir_Starmer @AndyBurnhamGM I live in Manchester, and the majority of labour voters i speak to want Starmer to as PM. I'm sick to death of MPs dragging our party to the fringes where elections can't be won. The last few days should have been the death of the reform party. You made it about labour instead.
English
2
0
7
100
Karl Turner MP
Karl Turner MP@KarlTurnerMP·
Of course @Keir_Starmer would have wanted the NEC to block @AndyBurnhamGM again. But the reality is he doesn’t have any authority left. None whatsoever. It’s game over now. So no matter the result of the by-election we will have a new leader by the summer recess.
(((Dan Hodges)))@DPJHodges

Keir Starmer pledged to Cabinet colleagues he would allow Andy Burnham to stand in Makerfield. Then desperately tried to block him > Daily Mail > dailymail.com/news/article-1…

English
48
53
195
36.5K
Mark_K
Mark_K@AVadm1n·
@mandotheway100 @Jenny_1884 I think having his close friends on all 3 sides in the Chagos 'deal' shows he was far from clueless. Philippe Sands has been representing Mauritius since 2010. Starmer went there in 2013, met their PM. Mauritius has promised it's people tax cuts due to this windfall. On our side?
English
0
0
0
17
Mando
Mando@mandotheway100·
@AVadm1n @Jenny_1884 He just didn’t have a clue. Not everything has to be a conspiracy. Some politics are just totally shite.
English
1
0
0
18
Mark_K
Mark_K@AVadm1n·
@mandotheway100 @Jenny_1884 I'd like to think you are right, but how do you explain Chagos giveaway? Yes the Tories negotiated, but weird that his bestie Philippe Sands is representing Mauritius, his ex girlfriend Phillippa Kaufmann representing Chagossians, his other bestie AG Richard Hermer pushing it?
English
1
0
0
50
Mando
Mando@mandotheway100·
@Jenny_1884 No. He is doing what he believes in. However his actions are those that many of us don’t agree with.
English
12
0
4
2.5K
Mark_K
Mark_K@AVadm1n·
@LauraTrottMP But you in particular are collaborating with Labour to impose digital ID on all of us via age verification. What are your views on jury trial curtailment and indiscriminate deployment facial recognition?
English
0
0
0
54
Laura Trott MP
Laura Trott MP@LauraTrottMP·
What has Labour really done to education? They have taken a wrecking ball to the cross party consensus that drove up school standards across this country. Labour looked at the evidence and chose ideology instead. They are following Wales down the same failed path. They promised that taxing education would create 6,500 new teachers. There are 400 fewer teachers. The Government claimed only 3,000 pupils would leave the private sector after their vindictive tax. The DfE’s own figures now show around 11,000 fewer pupils in private schools by mid 2025. And meanwhile schools are being pushed into the red by Rachel Reeves’ jobs tax & unfunded pay rises. Ministers talk about teacher satisfaction while the threat of strikes grow. Labour have failed to help students trapped on Plan 2 loans. They are doing nothing about dead end degrees that leave young people buried in debt with no serious job prospects. They have botched Ofsted reform and weakened accountability across the system. They have even made it illegal for people to donate school uniforms 🤯 They axed higher level apprenticeships and starts among U25 year olds fell in the last academic year. After dragging their feet for 18 months, they have watered down the guidance on gender questioning in schools. Children as young as 5 can according to their guidance “socially transition” at primary school. This is wrong. The £2 billion SEND blackhole remains & Labour will not tell parents whether the money will come from schools or SEND provision. Childcare costs have only been cut in half because Conservative reforms are working. Reforms Labour opposed every step of the way. Attendance has seen its best improvement in over a decade because they continued the changes that were already working. Behaviour remains a crisis in schools. Social media is fuelling violence and knife crime. Labour mocked our calls to ban phones in schools and introduce restrictions for under 16s. Thankfully this was one of their many u turns. Knives are still being brought into schools by children as young as six. Labour blocked out proposed tougher measures to crack down on knives in schools. Their curriculum review opens the door to more ideological teaching under the banner of “citizenship” for children as young as four, taking time away from the core knowledge and skills children need. Labour rejected our amendment to give parents the right to see what their children are being taught in school. Party politics over common sense. That is Labour’s record on education. They are trashing the progress we made and the country won’t forgive them for it.
Bridget Phillipson@bphillipsonMP

The Tories haven't tabled a debate on education for the King's Speech. I wonder why? Maybe they don't want to talk about all the things Labour are doing to give children growing up in our country the best start in life – so here's your reminder. 👇

English
36
135
531
29.5K
Mark_K retweetledi
Pugh Himple
Pugh Himple@GBullstein·
The Labour government, Starmer, and Hermer do not believe in civil liberties. The communist Soviet Union also did not believe in civil liberties. Civil liberties are the fundamental individual rights and freedoms that protect citizens from excessive state interference, such as freedom of speech, assembly, privacy, and fair trial.
English
3
37
95
809
Mark_K
Mark_K@AVadm1n·
@MatthewStadlen @Jonathan_Hinder 20% of the electorate is not a landslide. It's certainly not a mandate to undermine our historic freedoms, jury curtailment and digital ID. Or cancelling elections. Your grasp of current low grade politics doesn't seem to equate to having any common sense.
English
0
0
6
107
Jonathan Hinder MP
Jonathan Hinder MP@Jonathan_Hinder·
The Brexit Derangement Syndrome is off the scale at the moment. Reform (formerly known as the BREXIT PARTY) just swept to victory across working class areas. Response? Oh, it’s obviously time to rejoin the EU… Do these people even believe in democracy?
English
887
1.6K
9.5K
242.1K
Mark_K
Mark_K@AVadm1n·
@PreppingGB @BowBelle69 @Wishitwasthewa1 It's not a data collection problem. That horse has bolted. This will be used to control access to the things you need. People who are 'not conducive to the public good' can have 'privileges' suspended...internet, your own devices, travel. "Driving is a privilege, not a right"
English
1
0
2
44
Prepare GB
Prepare GB@PreppingGB·
@BowBelle69 @Wishitwasthewa1 Your driving licence is your digital ID. Your phone that you post on is your digital ID. Your bank. Finance. Passport. Health records. Fitness apps and phone. All digital, all you. The data centres will be used to collate that all. Movements, contacts, the lot.
English
2
0
4
148
Mark_K
Mark_K@AVadm1n·
@blueboy2710 @Katie_Lam_MP Have you considered why 3 million of your countrymen took the time to sign a petition against it? They must have reasons. If you comply, you help normalise it, undermine their historic freedoms as well as your own. Better to stick together.
English
0
0
1
7
David
David@blueboy2710·
@AVadm1n @Katie_Lam_MP Really don’t understand the opposition to digital id cards 🤷🏼‍♂️
English
2
0
0
27
Katie Lam
Katie Lam@Katie_Lam_MP·
Labour have revealed their plans for the next year - and whoever ends up in charge, they'll serve up more of the same. More taxes, more small boats, and higher energy bills. How can they remain so oblivious to the damage that they're doing?
English
195
748
3.7K
46.4K
Mark_K
Mark_K@AVadm1n·
@blueboy2710 @Katie_Lam_MP It's not a card, valid for a few years like a passport. It will be used to control your access to the things you need, public services, internet services, your own money, your own devices. Speak out, and your 'privileges' can be suspended with a click or by AI Too much gov power
English
0
0
0
21
Rosemary Locke
Rosemary Locke@Abso1Posey·
@AVadm1n @Katie_Lam_MP Genuine question, is Reform opposed to this rollout of digital surveillance throughout all government departments?
English
3
0
1
31
Mark_K
Mark_K@AVadm1n·
@Abso1Posey @Katie_Lam_MP Yes, I just saw a Farage tweet saying that they will roll it back. Pity the Tories can't seem do the same.
English
1
0
0
22
Mark_K
Mark_K@AVadm1n·
@BarmiesNiagara @thecoastguy Only if we let it start. Some parties have already committed to abolishing it That will require telling people to wake up and see where it's heading, unfortunately.
English
1
0
0
13
Stephen Crook
Stephen Crook@BarmiesNiagara·
@AVadm1n @thecoastguy I think the same is true of the other aspects unfortunately, with the advance in digital technology some kind of electronic “panopticon” was always going to happen. The car issue is already starting in the states, and on other things. You either live with it, or go off grid.
English
1
0
0
19
Mark_K
Mark_K@AVadm1n·
@BarmiesNiagara @thecoastguy I fully realise that they have a complete profile of me, you everybody. That horse has bolted, unfortunately. The issue is government controlling your access to things like your own money, car,devices and public and private services. Access subject real time online gov check
English
1
0
0
19
Stephen Crook
Stephen Crook@BarmiesNiagara·
@AVadm1n @thecoastguy the Thompson Local Directory? Came through your door free, lots of local information, nice friendly cat on the cover and the tv adverts? Seemed benign, but it was actually a very comprehensive exercise in information gathering. And where do you think that information went?
English
1
0
0
23
Mark_K
Mark_K@AVadm1n·
@pritipatel Of course they had a plan: to crush dissent digital ID Jury trial curtailment censorship trying to cancel elections gerrymandering in rural constituencies and under 16 voting Not incompetence, they are making progress. You lot are not joining the dots, not calling it out
English
0
0
0
68
Priti Patel MP
Priti Patel MP@pritipatel·
Labour entered government without a plan, and now the consequences of their incompetence is clear.
English
91
97
534
12.3K
Mark_K
Mark_K@AVadm1n·
@BarmiesNiagara @thecoastguy The problem is more serious than data collection. This will control your access to things you need. In Starmer's World your future car won't even start iwithout your driving licence in your digital wallet app or an unpaid parking ticket. And so on.. and so on. Wake up
English
1
0
0
38
Stephen Crook
Stephen Crook@BarmiesNiagara·
@thecoastguy “Nope” says a man who gave personal digital information to Musk so he could have his little blue checkmark. Honestly, how are people so fucking dim?
English
1
0
1
82
Mark_K
Mark_K@AVadm1n·
@chasperlicious @ZiaYusufUK This will control your access to things you need. In Starmer's World your future car won't even start if you don't have your driving licence in your digital wallet app or if you have an unpaid parking ticket. And so on.. and so on. That's where it's heading. Resist
English
0
0
1
10
chasperli
chasperli@chasperlicious·
@ZiaYusufUK Digital ID will make it easier to prevent people working who should not be working in this country.
English
35
0
24
1.8K
Zia Yusuf
Zia Yusuf@ZiaYusufUK·
So ‘squatting Starmer’ is pushing through Digital ID in the King’s Speech. Yet another horrific policy that was NOT in Labour’s manifesto. He has no mandate for this. Reform will SCRAP Digital ID.
English
720
4.1K
23.5K
218.8K
Mark_K
Mark_K@AVadm1n·
@FlorenceWoodle1 @Katie_Lam_MP Yes, of course they "partly' did with age verification, while the official line is that they oppose mandatory digital ID. As bad as Labour with the obfuscation and gaslighting
English
0
0
1
37