AB Devereau

You have an idea how fast it's going to blow up in your face when someone tries this, this is going to cause way more than $20 a month. The startup fees, like setup costs, it sometimes even gets to $100+ for things like this. Still well worth it to do, but realistic assumption instead of peddling crap is not a good look for anyone.

They quoted him $19,000. He opened Claude instead. Same result. One afternoon. $20/month. The gap between knowing how to use Claude and not knowing is worth $19,000. This article below fixes that.

@Parul_Gautam7 I’m really surprised a lot of positive comments especially when you try sign up theough the webpage here. Google link doesn’t work and there’s no sign, not a good look if you’re trying to sell a good app that works.

AI video tools aren’t the problem. Your ideas are. That’s exactly what Buzzy fixes. Think of it like AI video Photoshop, not just editing… but thinking for you. Multiple AI agents compete to improve your video ideas, hooks, structure, and execution. Yes, literally.

I've always loved these posts. I was wondering what the actual setup costs are typically for a small operation compared to a larger operation. I've been working on a small stack, and it's going to cost me $200 to $300 for a seven-agent team I'm building, and that's just to start with. I really wish more people would let people know about these costs. I know it sounds great, the $20/month thing, but the setup costs usually kill most people. A pro like you could probably set it up for a lot cheaper than a noob like me. What are your thoughts?

need a researcher? hire one for $90K need an editor? hire one for $85K need a PM? hire one for $110K need an analyst? hire one for $120K need a recruiter? hire one for $95K need an ops lead? hire one for $100K need a fractional CFO? hire one for $180K total: $780,000 a year. OR drop 7 markdown files in one folder Claude runs all 7 jobs on demand total cost: $20/month most founders are one bad hire away from running out of money. most operators are one folder away from never needing the hire. the article has all 7 files. copy them. paste them. ship. the team is the folder.

I would usually say shit like this is bullshit, but my friend got Covid in October of that year…. Months before it was discovered apparently in America. I got it too as well as my wife, wife, but we got it so mild we didn’t notice it. The only thing that give it away was my wife lost all sense of taste. Meanwhile, it almost killed my friend put him in the hospital twice in a three week period. They couldn’t figure out what it was, has fill and flush his lungs more than once he couldn’t talk like about a week and a half it was scary as shit. Then when Covid came to America December, we realize what it is he had had I think even kept samples because it was so weird and had it retested and it came back Covid🤦‍♂️

This 4chan post is from September 5, 2019, months before anyone had heard of COVID-19. An anonymous user wrote: - A major event in 2020–2021 would kill 9–10 million Americans. - A “deadly virus” would appear in winter 2020. - Do not take the vaccine — it would be the real danger, loaded with toxic metals. - The virus itself would cause flu-like symptoms, hit elders and babies hardest, but media would call it deadly for everyone. - It would originate from a pharmaceutical company working with military operations on the West Coast, then be “planted” in major cities. - They had already tested it multiple times under different names. The post even includes someone replying “No. I’m operative.” Looking back, it’s genuinely eerie how much of the next two years lined up with these details. The timing, the vaccine warnings, the lab/military angle, etc. One random 4chan thread from 2019 predicted the broad strokes of the entire pandemic era with surprising precision. Worth a closer look.

@Zephyr_hg Cheat

The 5 words that turn Claude from useless to scary good. Role. Task. Context. Format. Tone. That's it. Five words. Every prompt that actually delivers has all five. Every prompt that gives you generic garbage is missing at least one. You tell it who to be, what to do, the background that matters, how to structure the output, and how it should sound. Most people type "help me write an email" and wonder why Claude sounds like a corporate robot. The AI had a thousand possible interpretations and got zero direction. Fix that one thing and the quality of every response changes overnight. Same on Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, Grok. Works on every AI tool and the ones that don't exist yet. Put the whole system into a playbook with ready-to-copy templates, a 30-second pre-prompt checklist, and a 3-phase iteration method that turns decent drafts into exactly what you need. 15 minute read. The results last forever. Comment "CHEAT" and I'll DM it to you (must be following)

@tayler_odea @Zephyr_hg Ironically, your service sounds perfect for someone like me, small business person/solo entrepreneur who doesn’t wanna have to hire a huge team😁💯🤷‍♂️. So it’s not like I don’t see value in which you’re selling…. I just see value in what this guy selling as well.

You're thinking too hard about this. It's capitalism. It's super simple. Because our company sets up the automation for free, (free migration, free zoom meet, free api connection, free "set up a chat bot" and wire it), Then $29/m to let it run on our servers... Means Your $12k monthly retainer Is. A. Scam. Not gibberish. Just we did it cheaper, on our tech and across thousands of companies.

> everyone racing to sell AI tools > buyers already drowning in the ones they bought > the real service is someone walking in and making the stack actually work > $12K/month retainers. solo operators. almost nobody doing it yet

Nope, you're oversimplifying it. You actually think this is a blanket situation?… kind of shows me how little you probably know. I’m the guy people called to find out “is this worth it”. I could think of dozens of scenarios where a $12,000 retainer would be well worth it and hundreds of others where it would not be. What you describe is the ideal $29 set up, definitely not applicable for most situations that require complex systems, multiple users and departments working conjunction with another in sync. Everyone has different systems and methodology you have to adapt to. A consults job is to make the transition as smooth as possible, so you usually have to customize it because they want to do certain things certain ways. It’s a process… what you’re selling is a scam because it’s not universally applicable and you’re not being specific as to exactly what it applies to other than those little functions you just mentioned, but you didn’t mention scaling, employee train of use issue you need to adapt to when implementing on the corporate side, these applications are not free of human cost differentials. This is not a blanket proposition and honestly, you really haven’t done anything to really sell that this is workable for a multitude of different businesses with different requirements while I have provided evidence/context to establish I kind of know what I’m talking about 🤷‍♂️ I haven’t seen anything from you yet to convince me it’s a scam while establishing you sound a little scammy yourself🤣🤷‍♂️🤦‍♂️ Starting to sound like a sales pitch than an argument…

Impressive... but I'm still having a hard time understanding how you're not understanding the fact that until they are taught how to actually use Claud for business, it isn't going to eat anyone's lunch. Unless they know the systems, how to apply them to their current business practice the knowledge is useless. You're selling the systems and the support until they can maintain it them themselves... A simple Cost Benefit Analysis is all anyone would need to see if it's a justifiable investment. I can't believe I have to explain this to a person of your alleged pedigree so I'm going to bow out. I can't take anything you say seriously, any logical person would have doubts. I may not have your background but I can clearly articulate and support my position... you gave me high school gibberish and expect to sell me on your high profile credentials with your "take my word for it strategy" to a guy who actually sells systems for a living...hahaha. I love how you try to reframe it as it's only $29 a month because I guess in that special space of yours you literally come from; all it takes is just one monthly subscription plan to set up you're workflows with zero human costs. I mean if you learn how to use abacus maybe but yeah it's going to be a lot more expensive than that just to run the agents not even talking human costs...

@AdamBomb1776 @Zephyr_hg I take it you haven't read my bio 😂😂😂 or have any idea how big Rantirs portfolio is Literally our space. And these numbers are fluff. And a rip off for the client. Your marking up something that cost $29/m and selling it for $12k/m Claude will eat this for 🥪

All things which will be discovered during a thorough interview, if you adapt accordingly, you close a sale, keep the contract. They absolutely do exist and with logical corporations and enterprises you can get more if this isn’t scalable enterprisewide. We talk at six figure monthly retainers. I take it you haven’t done consulting before… with the right person this is a gold mine.

@Zephyr_hg Rantir fits this model but $12k retainers don't exist. Automation Maintenance has no moat. Your pricing is based on Fiverr or Upwork automation pros (100-600usd). So you need to also own the agent / automation software. they cancel you if you use n8n or zapier in 2 weeks

Damn… open for you guys for a while. This really sucks. Sad to hear about the falling out. I was considering calling you in a project to see if you’d be interested in joining, clearly got your hands full my friend. I hope it all works out. Love your work, little bummed about the site right now. At least you have the framework, just build again and start over. People are just too greedy nowadays…. Not that I have to tell you.😁🤷‍♂️😎

@alex_prompter tried to hijack access to God of Prompt’s accounts, personal account of the co-founder @rryssf and currently controls the bank, the payment system and domain. There are screenshots and publications of his fraudulent attempts. He failed to secure most of the intellectual property and does not owe or have any legal claim over it. Please disregard this post and wait for official resolution!

🚨 BREAKING: The @godofprompt account has been compromised. The admin workspace and official email communication channels are no longer under the company’s control. For the avoidance of doubt: @godofprompt is not currently under God of Prompt’s control.

@reachvaldo @GeniusBusiness_ @vitaliidodonov Doc

Pascio is a $5,000/month 𝕏 ghostwriter. He grew @vitaliidodonov's account from 0 → 10k followers in only 3 months. And he just released a FULL case study on how he did it. If you want it for free, reply "DOC" and I'll DM it to you.

@Matt_Pinner Captain caveman

Name a famous captain

@drinkonsaturday @pr0ud_americans Same for the gym, these “I wanna show off my body, but don’t look at me” cloth are ridiculous and they’re completely not functional for a proper workout not to mention all the stuff that’s leaking into your system because that’s what spandex 🤷‍♂️🤦‍♂️

Dad's out here doing the Lord's work with that timeless modesty rhyme: "Reach up high, touch down low. If anything shows, go change your clothes." Why? Because your clothes should be loose enough to let you move like a lady—graceful, dignified, not flashing skin with every stretch or bend—and tight enough to affirm you're a woman, feminine without apology. It's practical wisdom: test the outfit in real motion, not just the mirror. No accidental exposure means self-respect first. That's lost today because culture flipped the script. Feminism, social media, and "empowerment" redefined modesty as oppression or slut-shaming, not protection of dignity. Revealing clothes became the default for likes, validation, and "body positivity," blurring lines between classy woman and billboard. Schools and ads push it; dads enforcing standards get called controlling. The Result? Less mystery, more objectification, and girls chasing attention over virtue. Real Freedom? Knowing your worth isn't in what shows. That dad's raising ladies who attract respect, not just eyes. Rare these days, but powerful.

@ericosiu I hear you about to wrap up mine and then start a second master brain soon. Got my dashboard command operating agent ready to go just gotta tune them up and then it’s time to grow and build. Any suggestions and handling the large flywheel more efficiency across my platform?

@AdamBomb1776 Built it myself

@ericosiu Kind of figured, absolutely love your work. It's one of the driving forces behind me building a solo entrepreneurial company. Keep it up.

@Loveth06872383 @grok what is the name of this movie?

Her cheating husband never expected it, her husband came back home with a mistress what the wife did was a shocker to him

@JohnnyFSE @TruthHammer4EVA The person who invented this app is gonna get mad rich… And I guarantee that probably wasn’t even the intent but it’s well deserved as far as I’m concerned … we’ve been needing this for a long time💯

I built CourtWatch.us — a free public database for American citizens who deserve safer communities. You can track which judges released defendants who then got rearrested, skipped court, or violated their release conditions. All public records. All free. I started with Orange County FL and will be expanding to all 67 Florida counties and eventually every state in the country. This first batch of info is from 2024 and since public reports are released in March/April for the previous year, data is behind. But I wanted to see if this is plausible. After adding 2024,I'll add 2025 and then figure out how to get real-time-data uploaded. It's in beta — would love to know what you think 👇 Numbers don't lie, but criminals do. courtwatch.us @bennyjohnson @jockowillink @GrantCardone @LauraLoomer @nickshirleyy @j_fishback

Models. Actually recently wrote a couple books on developing systems like you described for the younger generation help them figure out what to do after they graduate. Never thought to use it the way you did. Sounds extremely interesting, very intrigued and I am ready to implement. Love the idea of models using historical figures, considering the fact I love history, this is a great idea! Maybe be interested in helping you scale this... can’t wait to see what it does and how well it works💯. Your name is comically ironic, DM me maybe we can talk…

"Just do what you love, and you'll be successful." 30M-subscriber Jacksepticeye just exposed this as the worst advice in the creator industry.. Every creator who "made it" looks like pure passion from the outside.. That's the illusion keeping 96% of creators stuck. They're copying the surface, not the system.. → Jack studied thumbnails and editing styles from channels that already worked.. because what gets clicked is learnable, not accidental → 90% of the best-performing YouTube videos use custom thumbnails.. not because creators loved design, but because they understood the pattern → The creator economy is worth $234 billion in 2026. But 57% of full-time creators still earn below the living wage → Only 4% of 207 million global creators ever break $100K/year.. the bottleneck isn't passion, it's pattern recognition → Jack's formula: energy, positivity, honesty, consistency.. four learnable behaviors. None of them are "just follow your heart" I think.. what this proves about how success works: the people who made it didn't ignore structure. They mastered it, then made it feel effortless. The advice you got was the output, not the input.. The second-order thinker doesn't ask "what do I love?" They ask "which systems produce the outcome I want?" That question is exactly what the mental models below were built to answer. I made a free toolkit breaking down 100+ mental models used by history's greatest thinkers — the same frameworks that help you see patterns like this before everyone else. 5,000+ downloads. 113 five-star reviews. Comment "MODELS" and I'll send it to you. If you're new here, @GeniusGTX is a gallery for the greatest minds in economics, psychology, and history. Follow along for more similar content.