AliBHammy

@DixieNormu95224 Lank got this statement wrong, “The only statement that she was able to relay to Canton officers while on scene, was that she did not remember ever being at 34 Fairview Rd” However, You can hear Karen on dashcam saying, “I dropped off my boyfriend and he never came home.”

When Officer Lank documented who was in that house earlier that night… was Colin Albert not mentioned? Or was he not written down? Because those are two very different problems, and neither one helps clarify what actually happened

@DataDecoder11 Another thought…the night before Jen went to Lank’s house she was texting w/ her sister, Nicole. The following was the text exchange, “We’ll get more info tomorrow. Don’t want to text about it.” Could this be in reference to them knowing they were meeting Lank the following day?

Two weeks before testifying, Jen was told the defense had GPS proving she was at Lank’s house for 45 minutes. Watch how the story shifts: ➡️ Kerry’s version: Picked up Jen + kids → dropped kids at 1 Meadows → drove to Lank’s (daughter wanted to go) → Jen used bathroom → dropped Jen home. Never went near 34 Fairview. No reason to because it’s not on the way. ➡️ Jen’s version (Trial 1): Same route. Kerry dropped her daughter at Lank’s on the way home. Slowly drove by 34 Fairview but didn’t stop. ➡️ Jen’s version (Trial 2): AJ shows up with receipts to show Jen. GPS puts Jen at 34 Fairview for 4-6 minutes. Now she admits they stopped, but just “slowly stopped.” 🚨 What Jen’s actual GPS shows: 📍12:19pm: 1 Meadows 📍5:21 & 5:28pm: Jen’s house 📍5:36 & 5:40pm: 34 Fairview 📍5:43–6:28pm: Lank’s house 📍6:34pm: Jen’s house Why would Kerry pick up Jen to take her to 34 Fairview then to Lank’s and then drop her back off at home? Unless, the entire thing was made up because Jen needed an alibi for this 45 minute trip to Lank’s house. #justiceforjohnokeefe

@DataDecoder11 Remember when she said she may have gone inside Lank’s house to use the bathroom? Why would you need to use the bathroom at a house you are supposedly unfamiliar with when you were just at your own home and at your sister’s house minutes before???

@DBeck57030037 Was the defense aware that he had representation at the time the private investigator approached the witness? That makes a difference. If they didn’t know at the time, then it doesn’t apply.

Simple answer - Jessica Hyde was a CW witness & had no need to talk to them. Why not ask why #KarenRead & AJ were sooo afraid to question Higgins that they sent a pretty female PI to his door - even tho they KNEW Higgins was represented by counsel. Now that's a big No-No.

@DBeck57030037 You are wrong! It’s actually standard procedure.

@imnew_getoverit What would be very interesting…is this from her phone on 1/29/22 or is this an extraction from when her 2 phones were seized in January of 2024? The latter would be extremely problematic for the Commonwealth!

Does anyone know why this would be redacted in one area of the FOIA dump? It wasn't redacted here.

@trialchannel_ What I find fascinating about Sarah’s interview is that she was cognizant Jen was charging her phone & the specific location. Also, she was aware that this “friend” never arrived. When I was in my early twenties these are not details I would be aware of & I’m a detailed person!

From Sarah (with an H) Levinson's interview with Michael Proctor & Connor Keefe on 10/21/22 (MSP Report #56 written on 11/3.) I compared this to Sarah's relevant testimony, and I can't tell if Proctor is just really bad at writing reports, really good at fudging details, or what. But, I found it interesting enough to share.

@DoctorTurtleboy @DropMicrodots @Lawferio For everyone saying that Karen should speak up, all that would do is feed into the drama. People would pick up apart her words and analyze every word and then criticize her for speaking up for one person and not another. Best to not respond at all and not breathe life into it!

.@Lawferio literally everyone on the internet who matters has made a statement today in support of Kelly read, as a direct response to your mean girl attempts to smear her. That completely backfired, and everyone is sick of your shit. Go throw some of that Ozempic cash at BLT. Nobody likes you.

Over the past few years, I’ve met a lot of people. None of which I love and respect more than Kelly Read.

@BostonDefender @YannettiJohnson That is a bad ass video…gave me the chills! Congratulations on your new endeavor as Yannetti Johnson Criminal Defense Attorneys.

FYI: @YannettiJohnson deleted the previous version of our brand video and uploaded this one, to avoid the trigger warning. It didn’t occur to us that the video would be flagged by YouTube for the split-second posting of a pic that has already been shown hundreds of times in the media. But it certainly was not essential to the video anyway, so it’s far better that this was flagged early on while we are still working with our media company. We are very pleased with the final result.

@Case1034521625 @hungus14 @adamdeitch The door has already been opened to discovery with Karen filing her civil suit against them. I think it’s a way to get a portion of the jury pool on their side to believe the narrative that they are pushing as plaintiffs in the civil suit against Karen and TB.

@hungus14 @adamdeitch Think about this. If the plaintiffs are guilty of murder, why would they open the door to more discovery by filing this suit? If they got away with murder, they would ride off into the sunset as if nothing happened instead of opening a can of worms.

Someone smart has a theory about the defamation lawsuit. If the plaintiffs solidly lose on a truth defense by Aidan, that kinda equates to a probable cause threshold for a grand jury. Think about it- The plaintiffs are idiots. They’re asking for an indictment. @adamdeitch

@suspiciousauce @Dan_Donovan_17 Didi is spot on. CPD already knew the name. It was about the injuries sustained.

@Dan_Donovan_17 Everyone that attended the scene knew the name of the person in the ambulance. Why is Proctor having CPD officers make these calls?? He told Lank an hour before that he wasnt responding. And he testified that after speaking to Lank, he contacted Flematti.

So at 7:59am on Jan 29, 2022 Michael Proctor has no clue who is in the Ambulance. No idea THE NAME of the person in the Ambulance, Ted Leigh has to call the Fire Department for him to get the info. Why if he is already DEEP into the coverup at this point does he not know this?

@little_foot777 @DoctorTurtleboy Isn’t Tully 46? Graduated from Stonehill College in 2002.

Brian Tully of the Mass State Police, age 51, has retired as of April 8, 2026. As we all know, Tully has had his hands in many of the controversial cases like the Karen Read case, the Sandra Birchmore case, and he is the lead investigator of the @DoctorTurtleboy case. Tully was transferred out of Norfolk County in 2024 and was the subject of an Internal Affairs investigation related to the Karen Read case. After all his shenanigans and corruption, I say, "Don't let the door hit ya where the good Lord split ya!" Buh Bye Tully. 🙋🏻‍♀️ #FreeTurtleboy #FKR #usticeForSandraBirchmore #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #BrianTully #MSP

@1_and_only_Wade Yup, I’ve done this when I needed to send an early morning text and was afraid of either oversleeping or forgetting. Sometimes technology is your best friend and other times…well…not so much!

Is it true that iPhone users are able to draft and schedule texts to be sent and delivered to a specific phone number/contact without actually sending the texts in real time? If true, am I the last person to learn of this?!

@KimChap62933992 @JulieCar94 @DixieNormu95224 And the rug design is the same as well.

@JulieCar94 @DixieNormu95224 except the chairs are the same.

Do you know right down the street from the Boch Ice Arena, where i play hockey with some whom also happen to be law enforcement,there’s a hotel there. Yeah. That one. The Dedham Hilton. weird coincidence that this is the same location that the jurors were bussed to daily, during two trials. Which makes this whole 400 people at the Worcester Regency Hotel & Conference Center” story even better. Because now I’m hearing privately that the event wasn’t in Worcester at all… it was at the Dedham hotel the whole time. And anyone who’s ever been inside that place knows yes, they have a ballroom… but they also have a bunch of smaller banquet rooms that look exactly like the one in that photo. You know… the one with about two dozen people standing around, not exactly shoulder-to-shoulder in a 400-person convention hall. So once again, the story started as Huge crowd Big venue Worcester Hundreds of supporters And somehow it turns into Small room Dedham Hilton Local function space And a number that keeps shrinking every time someone looks a little closer. next time you pick a location, maybe don’t choose one that people from around here actually know.

@DixieNormu95224 Come on Jon…stop making sense 😉

Seeing Lt. Mike Lank at the Canton High hockey game reminded me of one of those little details from the Karen Read trial that somehow never gets less strange the more you look at it. Jennifer McCabe testified that on the morning of January 30th she left 1 Meadows, drove to Mike Lank’s house on Oakdale, and only went past 34 Fairview because that’s the normal way to get there. And to be fair, from 1 Meadows to Oakdale, yes… you could pass Fairview depending on the route. No problem there. Except for one small issue. Her Life360 data shows she didn’t go straight from 1 Meadows to Lank’s. It shows she went from 1 Meadows to Country Lane (her house) then she left her house and drove past 34 Fairview, then to Oakdale (Lank’s) Once you go to Country Lane first, driving past Fairview is no longer the natural route to Oakdale. Not even close. You would have to go out of your way to go by 34 Fairview. But in court, the explanation was simple…“We drove by Fairview because that’s the way we go to Lank’s.” Right. That works… only if you ignore the part where the phone data shows you went home first. Just one of those little coincidences in this case where the phones keep telling one story…and the witnesses keep telling another. But sure. Totally normal morning. Nothing to see here.

@TuesdayGazette @MBeachlover ARCCA only testified that the damage to the tail light as seen in the sally port photos would not produce that extent of damage. They never testified that backing up into the traverse would not crack or create some type of damage.

I have a question for people who believe Karen was framed. How did she “crack” her taillight? If ARCCA dismisses the possibility that it could break from a slow reverse out of the garage… And ARCCA never even took the time to test or measure both vehicles alignment (which is, arguably, the most important thing they should want to prove)… And Dr Welcher, who did do the digital scan measurements and alignment came to the conclusion that Karen’s taillight does not and would not touch the traverse due to the bumpers… Then how did it break?

@mabbe_8 I was speaking of privileged communications with attorneys that discuss strategy, information, details surrounding the case. Things that any party would not want the opposing side to have. Like I said, phones are like diaries…they are very personal!

@AliBHammy She waives privilege once she includes a third party (Adrian Kearney) in her communications with her lawyers.

''I'm dead. I'm f"****g dead. Do you have any clue what's on the phone that they took?" -Karen Read

@TheFutureFlashx @GrantSmithEllis My comment was about the misrepresentation by plaintiff’s counsel. Judge has concerns due to what plaintiff claims is on recording but we all know that is not what Karen says. Judge may feel differently when he hears what is actually said.

@AliBHammy @GrantSmithEllis haha..thats not what that means...He makes it clear that there is reason to keep them... Theres no further need for the Plaintiff to prove malfeasance. Sounds more like leaning toward keeping them. but will have the conference.

BREAKING; Diller and O'Keefe's lose motion to prevent Karen Read from obtaining her phones! More as I know it.