AmandaG

Independent MP for Birmingham Ayoub Khan says the mockery and symbolic stripping off of the burka at Tommy Robinsons UTK rally was deeply offensive and degrading. Anymore offensive and degrading than your ideology making women wear it?🤷‍♂️

🚨JUDGE LIFTS REPORTING RESTRICTIONS BAN ON TWO BOYS WHO RAPED A YOUNG GIRL Guess what 2 Afghan Asylum Seekers Every other day another one of our girls falls victim The politicians who did this will be held accountable

@VividProwess @iIDasHuman It’s nothing but a funded jolly for them all

The Hamas useful idiots on the Gaza Flotilla boats are now throwing packets of chocolate in the ocean near Cyprus so it can get to "kids in Gaza." Holy shit they're so fucking stupid.

Many of the problems within society, summarised in this one clip: Self-entitlement Disregard of others Fake mobility issues Victim culture Compensation culture …To name but a few.

@AyoubKhanMP Islam: preaches "peace & tolerance" while mandating death for apostates, Jews, gays & critics, then cries "Islamophobia" when you notice. The world's most thin-skinned supremacist death cult.

@paulcWHL @Helen_Whately For what? I’m talking about Access to Work claims and workplace health passports - both of which definitely accept self diagnosis. I’ve lived it with my team and it’s wrong. It should be medical diagnosis

@AmandaGiranda @Helen_Whately Untrue. No self diagnosis without substantiation.

Blue badges for ADHD…how can this be right? Like the benefits system - opening up support for mental illness or neurological conditions is being abused and exploited.

Look, if you have Muslim MPs, you will get constant attempts at Muslim blasphemy laws. And if you have Muslim populations, you will get Muslim MPs. If you don't want Muslim blasphemy laws, you don't want Muslim populations in your countries. Don't let anyone pretend that there's a magic integration moment coming.

Approximately 85% of the world’s refugees are Muslims. But for some reason they don’t seek asylum in over 50 Muslim countries. They only want to go to non-Muslim countries. Any ideas why?!

Keir Starmer has commented on the San Diego Islamic Center attack. He took the knee for BLM and George Floyd. He is yet to say the names of Henry Nowak or Wayne Broadhurst, who were both murdered in the country he “leads”.

Deport.

Where in the manifesto was: joining the single market for food the 12 year cession of fishing grounds dynamic alignment the Product Standards Act EU rules on carbon pricing the electricity single market EU CBAMs £1 billion for Erasmus or the youth mobility scheme?

Lord Hannan, the Brexit legend, hits the nail on the head with a superb analogy of what went wrong. We simply did not do Brexit. The civil service has quietly stopped it more effectively than most people understand. This is the great betrayal that still haunts Britain today. @JuliaHB1 @DanielJHannan @TalkTV

The Party That Profited From The Crisis It Refuses To Solve. There is a multi billion pound industry built on the continuation of mass illegal immigration into Britain. It requires the boats to keep coming. It requires the asylum claims to keep flowing. It requires the hotels to stay full. It requires the legal challenges to keep blocking removals. Remove the crisis and the industry collapses. Which is why the industry has every incentive to ensure the crisis never ends and every incentive to fund the political parties that guarantee it will not. The Liberal Democrats are that party. Ed Davey campaigns for open borders, opposes every serious enforcement measure and demands Britain rejoin the EU customs union that would deepen its exposure to the same migration crisis now tearing the continent apart. His party has opposed the Rwanda scheme, opposed detention, opposed accelerated removals and opposed every legislative attempt to create a credible deterrent. The policy position is consistent. So is the funding. Safwan Adam was the Liberal Democrats' biggest election donor. He gave the party nearly £500,000 before the July 2024 election and over £750,000 across that year, confirmed by Electoral Commission records. Adam was a director of Stay Belvedere Hotels Limited, a company appointed in April 2021 with no prior track record in immigration accommodation. Within months it was running 51 hotels housing asylum seekers across England and Wales, providing approximately a quarter of all Home Office asylum places under a contract worth billions of pounds of taxpayer money. In the year to September 2022 SBHL reported nearly £705 million in income, almost entirely from government contracts. The company paid out £45 million in dividends. Adam and his co-director each received at least £7.8 million. Between 2020 and 2022 the company reported pre-tax profits of £75.7 million on a turnover of £888 million. The contract was subsequently stripped after the Home Office found significant elements of the company's behaviour fell short of what we would expect from a government supplier. Staff were reportedly paid as little as £5.60 an hour, below the legal minimum wage. The mechanism is not complicated. More crossings mean more asylum claims. More asylum claims mean more accommodation contracts. More accommodation contracts mean more dividends. More dividends mean more political donations. More political donations fund the party that opposes every measure that would reduce the crossings. The Liberal Democrats do not want to solve the small boats crisis. Their donor base depends on it continuing. This is not an isolated arrangement. It is the visible tip of an industrial complex that includes NGOs paid to process claims, human rights lawyers paid to challenge removals, accommodation providers paid to house arrivals and people trafficking networks paid to deliver them. Each component of that system profits from the continuation of the crisis. Each has a financial interest in open borders. Each opposes enforcement. And each, in one form or another, funds or lobbies the political parties that deliver the policy environment they require. The British public is told the small boats crisis is a humanitarian emergency requiring compassionate solutions. What it actually is, is a supply chain. People are the product. Taxpayer money is the revenue. Political donations are the return on investment. And the Liberal Democrats, the party of compassion and human rights, were a shareholder. Ed Davey wants to talk about foreign money in politics. He is right to raise it. The money that flowed from the asylum accommodation industry into his party's election fund is a reasonable place to start. "Safwan Adam was the Liberal Democrats' biggest election donor. He gave the party nearly £500,000 before the July 2024 election and over £750,000 across that year"

It’s no wonder people are angry. 18,000 people are waiting for a council home in Southwark …. Yet SIERRA LEONE’S First Lady has a London council flat, even though she’s living in a presidential palace in Africa! It’s indefensible, Just evict her !🤡

I was only given four minutes to speak on the King's Speech, so I focused on two-tier attitudes to threats to security and why Labour, especially, always feels more comfortable targeting the 'far right' rather than tackling the more dangerous issue of Islamism. I used the 'tale of two demos' at the weekend to make my point.

@TheGriftReport I’ll pass

Emma Willis, Josh Widdicombe, and Johannes Radebe confirmed as new Strictly Come Dancing hosts Thoughts?

@Keir_Starmer These people were murdered in our country by migrants and you won't even say their names And you want to talk about something on another continent Go f*ck yourself

You might have heard of Maggie Oliver. She's a former Greater Manchester detective who, in 2012, was ordered to abandon her investigation into the systematic rape of children in Rochdale, and decided she would rather resign her warrant card rather than do so. Maggie, as that would imply, is one of the good ones. I constantly ask how our police can consider themselves worthy of the badge if they are not willing to return the badge rather than commit injustice in its name. Maggie did just that; she was asked to cover for criminals, so she told the shirts to stuff themselves and handed back her commission. She won a small but consequential victory in the High Court on Friday. Mr Justice Kimblin granted her foundation a full judicial review of whether the British state has actually done anything about the recommendations it accepted, in 2022, at the end of a seven-year inquiry into the institutional cover-up of decades of child sexual abuse. Maggie Oliver is one woman. She has no political party behind her and no standing in Whitehall. She has no peerage, no chambers, no billionaire foundation footing her bills. She was ordered, by senior officers, to drop her investigation into a network of men who were raping children in industrial quantities in her city, because of the demographics to which those men belong made the whole thing a bit awkward. Fourteen years on, she has done what nobody else in this country has been able to. She has hauled the British state into open court to answer for the choice it made, over four years and under two governments, to hold a seven-year, £200 million inquiry into the institutional cover-up of child abuse and implement, deliberately, none of that inquiry's recommendations. The Home Office accepted those recommendations in 2022. So did the Department for Education, the police inspectorates and the Crown Prosecution Service. And then nothing happened. The recommendations sat. The departments restructured. Ministers rotated. The girls and women who had given evidence aged. More such operations continued around the country, while the men who had run the previous set of them either walked free, left the country, or drew their own pensions. The state, in the manner of every institution Tony Blair ever built, had decided that the writing of the report was the action, and the doing of the report could be handed off to history. That is what Maggie Oliver has now forced into court. And the political class knows what that means. The Home Secretary has not commented. The Prime Minister has not commented. The candidates jockeying through the post-Starmer Labour succession have, at the time of writing, failed even to speak her name, as though they know that, if they do, lightning will flash in the sky and they'll be turned into a pillar of Tesco's-own-brand dishwasher salt. They are silent because they recognise, accurately, that the answers a judicial review will produce - to the question of why their inquiry's findings were treated as ornamental - will, should, must end the careers of every official who was supposed to act on them and did not. That councillors and councils, mayors, indeed entire political parties, will be caught under ultraviolet light and shown for their guilt. It's time a government did what the British state has spent twenty years declining to do. Take on institutional failure. Name the institutions that failed, in public, on the record. Name the officers and officials who covered it up, and the officers and officials who pressed for the cover-up too. Prosecute them under the standards that any other employee of a public organisation defrauding the public would expect to face. The recommendations the inquiry produced must be implemented in full, alongside whatever further measures a second look at the evidence then demands. There will not be another inquiry into the inquiries. There will be the verdicts. Maggie Oliver is one of the bravest people in Britain. She has earned, by her own resignation and by fourteen years and a foundation and a court case carried on her back, the right to expect from a future British government the simple thing that ought to have happened in 2014, in 2016, in 2018, in 2022 and in every other year of this national disgrace. She has not yet been given it; we have not yet been given it. But it will be given, and soon.

Keir Starmer has a new "Adviser on Women and Girls". She's already offered a seat in the House of Lords to a Labour councillor who tried to block a grooming gang inquiry in Oldham. How can victims, and the public, have any confidence in a government that behaves like this?

Why are some protesters being fast-tracked through the courts, while grooming gang survivors are left waiting decades for justice? This betrayal is just another example of two-tier justice under this government.