Michael Sylvester

1.1K posts

Michael Sylvester banner
Michael Sylvester

Michael Sylvester

@AutomationMikke

Marketing Model Builder. Founder @ Waypath + CirclStudio. Building a customer intelligence Operating System. Las Vegas, NV. United States.

United States Katılım Aralık 2010
360 Takip Edilen319 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Michael Sylvester
Michael Sylvester@AutomationMikke·
Marketing Al in 2026 took a left turn. Everyone and their dog is shipping "Al agents." Half of them are held together with API calls and hopium. But underneath, something actually interesting is happening. Hermes builds memory across every task. The ICP gets sharper every month because it remembers what closed. Competitor surveillance runs on a schedule and nobody has to check manually. The teams building this now won't just be faster. They'll have institutional knowledge their competitors can't replicate. We mapped the full stack on the research page. circlstdio.io/blog/ai-market…
English
0
0
6
550
Steven
Steven@StevBuilds·
The SaaS which truly solves distribution for founders will be one of the next unicorns. You have one in mind?
English
12
0
6
656
Leo
Leo@liutauras_liu·
@pizzaboy James Baker won't be happy
English
2
0
1
308
Dan
Dan@pizzaboy·
90% of my Claude use-cases
Dan tweet media
English
14
0
137
5.4K
Ry ⭐ (h/acc)
Ry ⭐ (h/acc)@ryanstellar·
YC is advising startups to do in-person sales, go to trade shows, and travel to see prospects. After a decade of advising that this was a waste of money
Ry ⭐ (h/acc) tweet media
English
15
5
188
18.5K
Daniel Brooks
Daniel Brooks@rackSpreader1·
What does a gtm egineer actually do?
English
47
0
42
7.3K
json
json@JsonBasedman·
2TB of VRAM would fix me
English
55
99
1.5K
47.7K
Tyler
Tyler@rezoundous·
It's sad that Gemini 3.5 Pro release has 0 hype
English
143
9
760
175.1K
Packy McCormick
Packy McCormick@packyM·
claude is down writing quality across the internet is up
English
28
5
193
14.6K
Michael Sylvester
Michael Sylvester@AutomationMikke·
Seed. Angel. Series A. Series B Every round you took, you sold a piece of your freedom. By the time you hit the big number, the big number isn't yours. The billion-dollar exit is one of the most misunderstood status symbols in tech. How many founders actually run the math before signing the term sheet? linkedin.com/posts/guillerm…
English
0
0
0
21
Rexan Wong
Rexan Wong@rexan_wong·
'how much did you raise for your startup?' sick and tired of all these SF tech bros asking this apparently being bootstrapped (and profitable) is not considered attractive in the great city of san francisco even if there is a chance to bootstrap, i see so many early stage founders jump to raise the biggest rounds without considering the strings attached even tho we all know there are so many bootstrapped founders who have built great businesses, without the politics and those strings attached to raising most often they only raised once they had booming recurring rev, and raising was the obvious answer to reaching the next step current trend in sf (especially among super green early stage founders) is to start raising talked with a lot of em and most dont understand the full economics of venture capital even, it's like getting sucked into a bet you dunno about i think being bootstrapped is beautiful, you learn the ins and out of the biz everything from biz operations, how to delegate and hire correctly, doing things that dont scale, distribution, fuffilment, etc being VC backed as a inexperienced early stage founder automatically makes your instinct to hire whoever fits a task you aren't the best at and are too lazy to get better at knowledge compounds tldr if u get 500K as a green early stage founder how do you know you're spending on the right ppl/things? typical 'f around and find out' until you get reminded if you fail to plan you plan to fail type stuff dont get me wrong tho, if raising is the obvious answer, by all means i wanna see you raise the fattest seed round ever good investors can compound so much, they are not only atms, they can be mentors, advisors, and the relationships you build will compound 100% for some companies in particular industry, bootstrapping wouldn't be an option but just the general trend of me being in sf and observing other companies and talking with other founders, ppl jump to talk about raising before even considering if they really needed to as jcole said there is beauty in the struggle beauty in bootstrapping. theres also a lot of fun! beauty in raising too (aura and stuff) but dont let that make bootstrapping NOT an option for your biz. consider that and feed the streets!
Rexan Wong tweet mediaRexan Wong tweet mediaRexan Wong tweet media
English
45
5
146
17K
Aryan
Aryan@aryanlabde·
Why is nobody building a SaaS that helps with marketing? that’s what most people here would pay for.
English
471
24
550
101K
Michael Sylvester
Michael Sylvester@AutomationMikke·
@forgebitz Once none builders got the ability to be apart of the conversation they realized that they have nothing to say.
English
0
0
0
33
Klaas
Klaas@forgebitz·
"everyone can now build anything" - people who never built anything
English
82
68
1.3K
24.3K
Censored Leak
Censored Leak@CensoredLeak·
Imagine this is real.. and everyone just assumes it's fake 💀
English
1.6K
6.9K
142.2K
16.8M
Michael Sylvester
Michael Sylvester@AutomationMikke·
@HarryStebbings @typesfast This is what it looks like when you don’t make boundaries at home. Probably struggles to take a shower in peace, let alone get work done.
English
0
0
1
1.3K
Harry Stebbings
Harry Stebbings@HarryStebbings·
Why Remote Work is White Collar Fraud. "I have a three-year-old and a five-year-old. The idea that I could do any work at my house is like a total fantasy. The kids come home at 3pm, your work day needs to keep going. I'm highly against it." @typesfast
English
1K
42
1.2K
5.1M
GitLawb
GitLawb@gitlawb·
do you want to have unlimited and FREE GLM 5.2 access in 24H? curious what you gonna build. please register to gitlawb.com/opengateway and send email to: freeglm@gitlawb.com for whitelist
English
82
45
537
45.6K
Cline
Cline@cline·
We've kept hearing how GLM-5.2 beats Opus 4.8, and are skeptical of benchmarks - so we tested them on a real bug from the Cline repo. While both models fixed the issue, GLM was the winner in terms of cost and code quality: - GLM used twice as many tokens (GLM 1.1m vs Opus 660K) but cost half as much (GLM $0.41 vs Opus $0.81) - Opus finished quicker - 1.6 min and 12 tool calls vs GLM 4.7 min and 28 tool calls - GLM cleaned up dead code and verified the build compiled before completing. Opus didn't - it left type errors that passed tests but broke the production build. Both runs used the same Cline harness prompting and tools, so it seems GLM is RL trained to spend more tokens verifying its work before completing. Impressive work by the @Zai_org team!
Cline tweet media
English
204
573
7.2K
810.5K
罗杰斯
罗杰斯@dhbrojas·
Trust me bro, it's only $20K bro, you only need four of them bro, you can run GLM 5.2 REAP INT2 at 20 tokens/s bro
English
28
18
505
36.2K
Michael Sylvester
Michael Sylvester@AutomationMikke·
@BrianEastwoodx Can someone explain why they don’t use the automated pool cleaners, seems like a permanent fix just to drop the machines in?
English
0
0
0
45
Michael Sylvester
Michael Sylvester@AutomationMikke·
@mysticainf Because people keep posting engagement bait all day. Tired of commenting on posts just farming comments and clicks.
English
1
0
2
75
Mystica🦋
Mystica🦋@mysticainf·
is tech twitter so quiet? I haven’t seen any posts about ppl building cool stuff for a while now
English
31
1
37
2.9K
Solopreneur Dad
Solopreneur Dad@JonBuildsHQ·
say one thing only a real person would say
English
33
0
21
3K