Victor

2.5K posts

Victor

Victor

@Avigdore

Katılım Haziran 2009
6 Takip Edilen24 Takipçiler
Victor
Victor@Avigdore·
@abbytencat @OccupyDemocrats @Mycatsarerocks Nothing limits the Presidency to 2 terms. What's limited is being elected to the Presidency 3 times. There are other ways to gain the Presidency besides being elected. Just ask Gerald Ford or read the 25th Amendment.
English
2
0
0
11
Carolyn 🌊💙
Carolyn 🌊💙@abbytencat·
@OccupyDemocrats @Mycatsarerocks Anyone who can't say POTUS is allowed to hold the office for only 2 terms, shouldn't have passed high school govt class, and absolutely should NOT be appointed to SCOTUS. Anyone approving of their nomination should be disqualified, because they've broken their oath of office.
English
1
3
8
130
Occupy Democrats
Occupy Democrats@OccupyDemocrats·
BREAKING: SOUNDS OF SILENCE — Senate hearing goes deadly quiet as Trump’s federal judicial nominees REFUSE to admit third term is illegal. . Donald Trump is nominating people to lifetime federal judgeships who won't confirm that he can't run for a third term when they come before the Senate for their approval hearings. Let that sink in. Senator Chris Coons of Delaware asked what should be the easiest constitutional law question in American history at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing this week. He asked Trump's judicial nominees about the 22nd Amendment. The first nominee, John Marck, said that his career had been in criminal prosecution and that he hadn't had occasion to use that particular amendment. A federal judicial nominee. Unfamiliar with the 22nd Amendment. Seeking a lifetime appointment to interpret the Constitution. Another candidate eventually offered that it "deals with the two-term limitation." Correct. Gold star. Coons then asked the simple follow-up: is President Trump eligible to run for president again in 2028? Marck's response was a masterpiece of evasion: "Without considering all the facts and looking at everything, depending on what the situation is, this to me strikes as more of a hypothetical." Coons was patient. He walked Marck through it like a kindergarten teacher explaining why you can't eat paste. Has Trump been elected president twice? "President Trump has been certified the President of the United States two times." Is he eligible to run for a third term? "I would have to review the actual wording of it." A man seeking a lifetime federal judgeship needs to review the actual wording. Of the 22nd Amendment. Which is 61 words long. Coons then turned to the full panel and asked if anyone — anyone — was willing to simply state that the Constitution of the United States bars Trump from seeking a third term. A heartbreakingly long silence ensued. He asked again. Anyone willing to apply the Constitution by its plain language? More ominous silence. Nobody. Not one of Trump's judicial nominees would say out loud, under oath, in a Senate hearing, that the 22nd Amendment means what it plainly says. This isn't ignorance. These are lawyers. They know what the 22nd Amendment says. They know Trump has been talking openly about a third term. And they calculated — correctly, based on what happens to people who cross this president — that telling the constitutional truth was more dangerous than staying silent. The frightening thing is that these are the people who will be interpreting your rights for the next 30 years. Please like and share this post if you think federal judges should be willing to say the Constitution means what it says — even when the president doesn't want to hear it.
Occupy Democrats tweet media
English
248
2.7K
3.8K
66.9K
Victor
Victor@Avigdore·
@OccupyDemocrats 3rd term isn't illegal. Being elected a 3rd time is illegal. There are other methods to gain the office of the Presidency other than being elected. Just ask Gerald Ford or read the 25th amendment
English
0
0
0
10
Victor
Victor@Avigdore·
@NickBryantNY If Obama were selected as Speaker of the House and Trump and Vance stepped down, Obama would (after resigning as speaker) -be- the President of the US. He is eligible, as the 22 only prevents him being -elected- a 3rd time.
English
0
0
0
105
Nick Bryant
Nick Bryant@NickBryantNY·
@Avigdore That’s where the 12th amendment kicks in which reinforces the 22nd amendment.
English
2
0
8
231
Nick Bryant
Nick Bryant@NickBryantNY·
This is really chilling. Like a scene from a dystopian movie, and alarming for anyone who cares about democracy. A judicial nominee flagrantly flouting the constitution about Trump's eligibility for a third term. The constitution is unambiguous. He is not eligible.
Brian Allen@allenanalysis

JUST IN: A Trump judicial nominee was asked point blank: is Trump eligible to run for a third term? Their answer: “I would have to review the actual wording…” Sen. Chris Coons then asked every nominee in the room to confirm the Constitution bars a third term. Silence. Every single one of them refused to say it. Trump is appointing judges who won’t affirm the 22nd Amendment to his face. Never stop connecting the dots.

English
53
624
1.8K
57.9K
Victor
Victor@Avigdore·
@NickBryantNY The 12th doesn't prevent a 3rd term either. It only prevents people constitutionally ineligible from being president at all from assuming the position such as under 35 years of age or not a natural born US citizen.
English
0
0
0
29
Victor
Victor@Avigdore·
@SenatorDurbin 'Reportedly said'? GTFO of here. Reported by whom? When? Where? Any evidence at all, whatsoever?
English
0
0
0
7
Senator Dick Durbin
Senator Dick Durbin@SenatorDurbin·
When discussing a bill that would tackle housing affordability, Trump reportedly said, “no one gives a [bleep] about housing,” insisting Republicans should pass his voter disenfranchisement bill, the SAVE America Act, instead. This Admin would rather undermine democracy than lower costs for families.
English
111
91
178
11.2K
Victor
Victor@Avigdore·
@allenanalysis The 22nd does not limit a President to 2 terms. The 22nd says that you can't be elected to the position more than twice. There are other ways to obtain the office of President, just ask Gerald Ford.
English
0
0
3
292
Brian Allen
Brian Allen@allenanalysis·
Trump just said: “When I get out of office in, let’s say, eight or nine years from now…” His current term ends in 2029. Eight or nine years from now is 2033 or 2034. The 22nd Amendment limits presidents to two terms. His own judicial nominees refused to confirm that on camera this week. He’s not hiding it anymore. Never stop connecting the dots.
English
1.2K
4K
12.9K
911.7K
Thomas Jason Anderson
Thomas Jason Anderson@LastGovWatch·
@jasonwhitlock Black communities lost the only law that protected their ability to elect people from their community for seats in Congress.
English
15
0
1
4.1K
Victor
Victor@Avigdore·
@LondonRiverSFW Which is why the gerrymandering in Virginia is still pending litigation.
English
1
0
0
26
London River
London River@LondonRiverSFW·
Hey “constitutional conservatives,” state constitutions are binding, just like the federal constitution is. They aren’t a wish list or a suggestion box.
English
7
3
54
655
Victor
Victor@Avigdore·
@RonFilipkowski His batting average on this would put him in the hall of fame, for sure.
English
0
0
0
60
Ron Filipkowski
Ron Filipkowski@RonFilipkowski·
Trump has called the following people “Low IQ” in Truth Social posts over the past 12 months: Hakeem Jeffries Candace Owens Gavin Newsom Ketanji Brown-Jackson Jasmine Crockett Ilhan Omar Rashida Tlaib Tim Walz Kamala Harris AOC Letitia James Robert DeNiro Joy Reid Al Sharpton Marge Greene Brandon Johnson Liz Cheney Donna Brazile
English
634
580
2.1K
80.3K
Victor
Victor@Avigdore·
@picasoblac @allenanalysis That's amazingly mature for this place. I really appreciate it. Hope you're having a great day.
English
0
0
0
5
Brian Allen
Brian Allen@allenanalysis·
JUST IN: A Trump judicial nominee was asked point blank: is Trump eligible to run for a third term? Their answer: “I would have to review the actual wording…” Sen. Chris Coons then asked every nominee in the room to confirm the Constitution bars a third term. Silence. Every single one of them refused to say it. Trump is appointing judges who won’t affirm the 22nd Amendment to his face. Never stop connecting the dots.
English
1.3K
16.3K
55.3K
2.1M
Victor
Victor@Avigdore·
@SarahIronside6 The point of Star Wars is that 'Noone is beyond redemption'. Do you think that -everyone- is redeemable?
English
2
0
1
68
Sarah Ironside 💙
Sarah Ironside 💙@SarahIronside6·
So many magas either never saw Star Wars or just missed the point of the movies entirely.
English
33
73
574
6.5K
Victor
Victor@Avigdore·
@TheTNHoller @ChrisCoons He can seek a 3rd term. He can't be elected to the Office of the President. If Obama ran for the House of Representatives and chosen as Speaker of the House and the President and VP stepped down, then Obama would be in his 3rd term as President. In accordance with the Const.
English
2
0
1
36
The Tennessee Holler
The Tennessee Holler@TheTNHoller·
SEN. @ChrisCoons: “Anybody else brave enough to say the Constitution prevents President Trump from seeking a 3rd term?” TRUMP JUDGE NOMINEES: 🦗 🦗 Yikes.
English
153
1.4K
5.5K
217.8K
Victor
Victor@Avigdore·
@chemimommy Redistricting does not disenfranchise anyone at all.
English
1
0
0
86
Victor
Victor@Avigdore·
@RealDianeYap Men lose access to their children and have to fund their ex-wives. Men's lives aren't harder due to losing what the wife provided, it's harder because they now have to pay for 2 households. What's to celebrate in that? I imagine I would be happier with someone funding my life.
English
0
0
1
49
Victor
Victor@Avigdore·
@USJewishDems @nytimes What happened to the non-minority people in those districts? Were they given the opportunity to vote for someone of their choice or were they discriminated against due to the color of their skin?
English
0
0
2
23
Jewish Dems
Jewish Dems@USJewishDems·
The VRA fundamentally changed Black Americans’ access to the voting booth, allowing Black voters a chance to vote for someone of their choice. Last week, SCOTUS gutted this provision. @nytimes shares how the VRA changed Black representation in the House in Southern states: nytimes.com/interactive/20…
English
20
6
11
5K
Rothmus 🏴
Rothmus 🏴@Rothmus·
“I’m not sorry these changes have occurred. I would rather see it coming up with some education, but they’ve got no education. And it’ll take them a couple of hundred years. They’ve only just come down from the trees.” Needless to say, this experiment failed. Diverse peoples from incompatible civilizations do not assimilate as equals. The drive for ‘equality and reconciliation’ has resulted in more racist laws today than under apartheid.
English
16
21
279
11.9K
Victor
Victor@Avigdore·
@Marc_Kenyon @allenanalysis Hell...beyond which, you don't have to RUN for an office to be elected to that office. As unlikely as it is, write-in candidates have won elections in the past, so the 'no state in the country would put them on the ballot' is also meaningless.
English
0
0
0
136
Marc
Marc@Marc_Kenyon·
@Avigdore @allenanalysis The operative word is "run". They are not eligible to run if they served two previous terms and no state in the country would put them on the ballot. So the answer is they can't run.
English
3
2
99
1.8K