Bombonchik

I have successfully graduated School of Solana Season 8 by @AckeeBlockchain! I went from @Solana basics to advanced programming and security topics, and wrote a working Solana program. Join the waitlist for Season 9! ackee.xyz/school-of-sola…

The first VS Code extension for Solana is here. Real-time security analysis + fuzz coverage visualization. Built by the auditors and educators behind School of Solana. Thread ↓

Potential Rugpull on @AffineDeFi 1/ Today, I realized that the team behind @AffineDeFi - including @TarikMoon, @heemzers, @WCRoller, @CryptoSherpaAI and other members was last active on X around April - May 2025. Since then, their Discord has been completely silent with zero support. What's going on? 🧵

I just created an entry on the @EthTimeCapsule 🕰️✨ It will be revealed on 30 July 2026. View my encrypted entry and create your own: ethtimecapsule.com/gallery.html?c…

1inch @ETHGlobal Prague 🧠 Our toughest track — cross-chain swaps (Fusion+) — had teams tackling @SuiNetwork , @Aptos, @ton_blockchain & more. Winners ($2K each): Moleswap, 8inch, Donnut (@BOmb0nchik, @tsatscha), goulHash (@hornedSphere99), CrossChainer (@GashiDite), HTLC AVM-EVM (@BiatecGroup)

Hello at Rootstock @rootstock_io

@monad_xyz 0x268dC0F694ba3219d0c541D5F7a17B93ad24eC72

drop your Monad address below within the next 24 hours to receive your soulbound NFT

just went on pump fun for first time in a while bro what the hell are you guys storing on my rpcs how do I explain this to my father

Ethereum's @drakefjustin announced Beam Chain yesterday. It was a communications blunder: ➔ Poor problem framing. He positioned Beacon chain as “kind of old” and “frozen” five years ago, creating little urgency. ➔ Prolonged timeline. His biggest mistake was the timeline visual. He set a prolonged timeline, aiming for 2030 just to improve the consensus layer. Hard to get excited about something so distant, making Ethereum seem increasingly out of touch compared to Solana's "apps NOW" mindset. ➔ Missing North Star. The deeper purpose of Beam Chain for Ethereum was unclear, basically boiling down to "redesign with the latest research ideas from the research roadmap." In such a fast-changing world, Beam Chain's relevance — and ultimately Ethereum's — became more opaque, making it hard to inspire emotional buy-in. I'm a big believer and fan of the Ethereum brand, and Justin's substance was there. But he could have really COOKED without that timeline and better positioning.

I just stopped by the @0xpolygon Merch Shop and I'll I got was this.... #agglayer #aggregation

@fhenix @EthCC Will it be recorded and posted on YouTube?

The single most interesting side event at @EthCC is coming up quickly. That's right, Encryption Day is almost here! Join Twitter anons, cracked coders, and sleep-deprived founders to discuss all things Ethereum encryption at this flagship event on July 9th: lu.ma/encrypt Check out the stacked speaker list ⤵️

Our new prover Stwo just blew our mind 🔥 Here's a demo by @PapiniShahar and @EliBenSasson of our next-gen prover, Stwo, and its groundbreaking performance: proving 620,000 hashes per second using an M3 laptop! This is x1000 better than our current prover, Stone, and is the fastest in the market 💨 Stwo will be in production in early 2025, meaning that all Starknet-powered chains will be much faster to prove and more cost-effective! Tech Specs: We measured throughput for proving invocations of the Poseidon2 hash over M31 field on a MacPro M3 machine. Deep dive into Stwo here: github.com/starkware-libs…

Airdrop failure from @zkSync or where is the decentralization? Blockchain is a transparent territory. Traces remain, even if someone leaves an airstream for maneuvering. The @zksync team has made a sensation in the crypto community with the most opaque distribution possible. Some points are simply absurd. @gluk64 @frogmonkee @Ozhar @Yogi13031997 @stonecoldpat0 @TrustlessState @Caneleo55 @heycape_ @0x_Lens @gluk64 @TheZKNatiou #zksyncscam 1) 13,000 wallets with 0 tx in the zkSync network received an allocation. And what use are these users to the project if they haven't even come in contact with it? dune.com/realpeha/zksyn…

Oh Ruslan… 🤣🤣🤣

@taikoxyz @daniel_taikoxyz @dani_who_daniel Someone from Taiko's team wrote the following message in the discord (screenshot). I completely disagree with this. I understand the situation when a person just wanted to test the network, made a bridge, made 2 transactions in the network and did nothing else, and he or she will not be eligible for airdrop. But the situation is quite different here. You create Galxe quests and simply exploit people. If I'm not mistaken, you had 16 Galxe quest campaigns. In each of them, a person had to subscribe to your social networks, like you, retweet you, download apps - to generate completely fictitious social activity for free. No one in their right mind would do this without expecting some kind of reward. You can say that you didn't force people to do this, and that's true, but you informed everyone about the new campaign every time, encouraging people to give you fake metrics as much as possible. At the end of the day, you brag about this activity to investors, thus raising the valuation of your project. In order to get a significant number of points in your quests, you needed to have a Gitcoin Passport or Galxe Passport. It became unrealistically difficult to get 20 points in Gitcoin Passport after their last change (to do this quickly you need to go through 2 kyc verification), most people chose Galxe Passport because here you need to go through 1 kyc verification and pay about $6-8. If a person doesn't want to go through these terrible verifications, they can't get a significant amount of points. The Trust Bonus campaign on Galxe was completed by 735 thousand people. And you are ready to airdrop only for 300 thousand. You are now completely devaluing the work that people have done while you have been exploiting them for a long period of time. And you say that it is difficult for you to choose from 1.2 million 300 thousand wallets. So you wouldn't have to choose so hard if you allocated at least 10% of the issue for the airdrop, not 5% for 7 large groups of participants. Where is the decentralisation? Has anyone seen it in crypto at least once in the last year? And don't talk to me about 2 airdrop. 2 airdrops are always shit. I fully agree that teamwork is more valuable than a Twitter subscription, but someone in the team does more and someone less. But for some reason, you don't choose 20% of the team to receive salaries and tokens. So why do you take it upon yourself to despise the work of ordinary people whom you have exploited, choose the "best" of them, and leave the majority of people with nothing?

gm gang, we've been hard at work building the Aztec L2 and I want to give an update! We're building a full end-to-end testnet and we're close to completing this breakthrough technology It will be the world's 1st decentralized, privacy-first programmable L2. Kind of a big deal.

@Justin_Bons 2/2) VCs, developers, airdrop hunters - they all earn good money solving the problem by L2s scaling. The L2s production line is running and I don't think it will be stopped even if Justin Bons writes a 1096 twitter thread.

@Justin_Bons 1/2) Even if all the words you wrote are completely correct, the scaling trilemma can be solved by L1 scaling, but there is one important thing that prevents it. Money, money, and more money makes people choose L2 scaling.

1/96) Scaling a blockchain exclusively with L2s is a terrible idea: Horrible UX due to fragmentation, terrible economics & worse trust trade-offs! Pushing users into centralization & ultimately into scalable L1 competitors! That is what makes "L2 scaling" a losing strategy:🧵