porygon-z.eth

891 posts

porygon-z.eth banner
porygon-z.eth

porygon-z.eth

@BertrandCloudy

Cryptotourist since 2k17 Neotokyo citizen during a few seconds at the launch before I paper handed😆 oz🧙

Katılım Eylül 2018
833 Takip Edilen80 Takipçiler
porygon-z.eth retweetledi
Christophe Boutry
Christophe Boutry@Ced_haurus·
Palantir vient de publier son manifeste. Lisez-le. Pas pour ce qu'il dit sur la tech. Pour ce qu'il dit sur le politique. Sur l'idéologie de Karp et Thiel. Sur la guerre. Sur vous. Quand une entreprise privée se donne pour mission de définir qui doit être surveillé, ciblé, prédit, neutralisé, et qu'elle publie simultanément un texte expliquant pourquoi contester cela serait de la faiblesse civilisationnelle, on n'est plus dans la stratégie d'entreprise. On est dans la privatisation du souverain. Le droit de décider de l'ennemi, qui fut toujours le geste politique fondateur des États, est en train d'être racheté par une entreprise cotée au Nasdaq. Ce manifeste repose sur un seul tour de passe-passe, répété sous vingt formes différentes : rendre l'inévitable ce qui est en réalité un choix. Les armes à IA ? Elles seront construites de toute façon, alors autant que ce soit nous. La surveillance algorithmique ? La réalité géopolitique l'exige. Le réarmement de l'Occident, la hiérarchie des cultures, la disqualification du pluralisme comme naïveté dangereuse ? Simple lucidité face au monde tel qu'il est. C'est le geste idéologique par excellence : ne pas interdire la question, mais la rendre indécente. Ce que Palantir appelle réalisme est en fait une décision philosophique radicale : le conflit est la vérité permanente du monde, la délibération démocratique est une fragilité que l'adversaire exploitera, et une élite technologique privée est mieux placée qu'un peuple pour tirer les conséquences de cette vérité. C'est du schmittisme en hoodie. C'est littéralement la structure de leur pensée. Le danger n'est pas qu'ils soient fous. Le danger est qu'ils soient riches, cohérents, et déjà à l'intérieur des États. Palantir ne frappe pas à la porte des gouvernements pour vendre un outil. Elle arrive avec une cosmologie complète : voici comment fonctionne le monde, voici vos ennemis, voici pourquoi vous ne pouvez pas vous permettre de débattre, et voici notre contrat. Palantir est l'ennemie des peuples et de la démocratie. Ce qu'ils construisent, c'est un pouvoir technocratique que personne n'a élu et que personne ne pourra destituer.
Palantir@PalantirTech

Because we get asked a lot. The Technological Republic, in brief. 1. Silicon Valley owes a moral debt to the country that made its rise possible. The engineering elite of Silicon Valley has an affirmative obligation to participate in the defense of the nation. 2. We must rebel against the tyranny of the apps. Is the iPhone our greatest creative if not crowning achievement as a civilization? The object has changed our lives, but it may also now be limiting and constraining our sense of the possible. 3. Free email is not enough. The decadence of a culture or civilization, and indeed its ruling class, will be forgiven only if that culture is capable of delivering economic growth and security for the public. 4. The limits of soft power, of soaring rhetoric alone, have been exposed. The ability of free and democratic societies to prevail requires something more than moral appeal. It requires hard power, and hard power in this century will be built on software. 5. The question is not whether A.I. weapons will be built; it is who will build them and for what purpose. Our adversaries will not pause to indulge in theatrical debates about the merits of developing technologies with critical military and national security applications. They will proceed. 6. National service should be a universal duty. We should, as a society, seriously consider moving away from an all-volunteer force and only fight the next war if everyone shares in the risk and the cost. 7. If a U.S. Marine asks for a better rifle, we should build it; and the same goes for software. We should as a country be capable of continuing a debate about the appropriateness of military action abroad while remaining unflinching in our commitment to those we have asked to step into harm’s way. 8. Public servants need not be our priests. Any business that compensated its employees in the way that the federal government compensates public servants would struggle to survive. 9. We should show far more grace towards those who have subjected themselves to public life. The eradication of any space for forgiveness—a jettisoning of any tolerance for the complexities and contradictions of the human psyche—may leave us with a cast of characters at the helm we will grow to regret. 10. The psychologization of modern politics is leading us astray. Those who look to the political arena to nourish their soul and sense of self, who rely too heavily on their internal life finding expression in people they may never meet, will be left disappointed. 11. Our society has grown too eager to hasten, and is often gleeful at, the demise of its enemies. The vanquishing of an opponent is a moment to pause, not rejoice. 12. The atomic age is ending. One age of deterrence, the atomic age, is ending, and a new era of deterrence built on A.I. is set to begin. 13. No other country in the history of the world has advanced progressive values more than this one. The United States is far from perfect. But it is easy to forget how much more opportunity exists in this country for those who are not hereditary elites than in any other nation on the planet. 14. American power has made possible an extraordinarily long peace. Too many have forgotten or perhaps take for granted that nearly a century of some version of peace has prevailed in the world without a great power military conflict. At least three generations — billions of people and their children and now grandchildren — have never known a world war. 15. The postwar neutering of Germany and Japan must be undone. The defanging of Germany was an overcorrection for which Europe is now paying a heavy price. A similar and highly theatrical commitment to Japanese pacifism will, if maintained, also threaten to shift the balance of power in Asia. 16. We should applaud those who attempt to build where the market has failed to act. The culture almost snickers at Musk’s interest in grand narrative, as if billionaires ought to simply stay in their lane of enriching themselves . . . . Any curiosity or genuine interest in the value of what he has created is essentially dismissed, or perhaps lurks from beneath a thinly veiled scorn. 17. Silicon Valley must play a role in addressing violent crime. Many politicians across the United States have essentially shrugged when it comes to violent crime, abandoning any serious efforts to address the problem or take on any risk with their constituencies or donors in coming up with solutions and experiments in what should be a desperate bid to save lives. 18. The ruthless exposure of the private lives of public figures drives far too much talent away from government service. The public arena—and the shallow and petty assaults against those who dare to do something other than enrich themselves—has become so unforgiving that the republic is left with a significant roster of ineffectual, empty vessels whose ambition one would forgive if there were any genuine belief structure lurking within. 19. The caution in public life that we unwittingly encourage is corrosive. Those who say nothing wrong often say nothing much at all. 20. The pervasive intolerance of religious belief in certain circles must be resisted. The elite’s intolerance of religious belief is perhaps one of the most telling signs that its political project constitutes a less open intellectual movement than many within it would claim. 21. Some cultures have produced vital advances; others remain dysfunctional and regressive. All cultures are now equal. Criticism and value judgments are forbidden. Yet this new dogma glosses over the fact that certain cultures and indeed subcultures . . . have produced wonders. Others have proven middling, and worse, regressive and harmful. 22. We must resist the shallow temptation of a vacant and hollow pluralism. We, in America and more broadly the West, have for the past half century resisted defining national cultures in the name of inclusivity. But inclusion into what? Excerpts from the #1 New York Times Bestseller The Technological Republic: Hard Power, Soft Belief, and the Future of the West, by Alexander C. Karp & Nicholas W. Zamiska techrepublicbook.com

Français
440
10.2K
25.3K
3M
porygon-z.eth
porygon-z.eth@BertrandCloudy·
@SophiaAram c'est ton soutien inconditionnel à un état génocidaire qui pue
Français
0
0
1
40
sophia aram
sophia aram@SophiaAram·
Pourquoi cet édito du Monde pue… 👇🏼 « Parler de “pax hebraïca” introduit une dimension identitaire. On ne parle plus d’un pays ; on évoque une domination associée à une identité juive. Ce type de glissement est précisément ce qui transforme presque toujours une critique politique en discours chargé de connotations beaucoup plus anciennes et obscures. » @JeanMizrahi @lemondefr
Jean Mizrahi@JeanMizrahi

Comment un simple éditorial peut refléter les tendances antisémites du quotidien "Le Monde". Cet éditorial du journal Le Monde aimerait apparaître comme une analyse géopolitique. En réalité, c’est surtout un texte d’accusation construit autour d’un postulat simple : Israël serait l’acteur central du chaos au Moyen-Orient et chercherait méthodiquement à imposer sa domination régionale par la guerre. Tout le texte est organisé autour de cette idée. Le problème, c’est qu’elle est posée comme une évidence et jamais réellement démontrée. Dès les premières lignes, le cadre est fixé : Benjamin Netanyahu serait engagé dans un projet de remodelage du Moyen-Orient par la force. Cette affirmation massive n’est étayée par aucune analyse stratégique sérieuse. Pas de doctrine citée, pas de débat militaire, pas de confrontation d’hypothèses. C’est une thèse politique présentée comme un fait. À partir de là, le reste de l’article consiste à empiler des éléments qui doivent confirmer cette vision. Le biais principal est évident : l’éditorial efface largement les autres acteurs du conflit, et ce qu'ils font subit depuis des décennies à Israël. Le Hamas n’apparaît que brièvement pour mentionner les massacres du 7 octobre, comme un simple point de passage narratif avant de revenir immédiatement aux bombardements israéliens. Aucune analyse sérieuse de la stratégie du Hamas, de l’utilisation de civils comme boucliers, ni du rôle des organisations armées soutenues par Iran dans la région comme le Hezbollah et les Houtis. Tout est ramené à une logique simple : Israël agit, les autres subissent. La complexité du Moyen-Orient disparaît complètement. Le vocabulaire utilisé renforce encore cette construction. Le texte accumule les mots à forte charge morale : “hécatombes”, “ruines”, “terreur imposée”, “impunité”. Ce n’est plus une analyse politique, c’est un registre d’accusation. L’éditorial n’essaie pas de comprendre une situation stratégique ; il cherche à produire une indignation. Les mots remplacent les démonstrations. Autre excès : la présentation d’Israël comme un acteur presque omnipotent. Selon l’article, Israël profiterait de chaque événement régional — l’expulsion de l’OLP du Liban, la chute du régime irakien en 2003 — pour étendre sa domination. Cela donne l’impression d’un État capable d’exploiter systématiquement toutes les crises du Moyen-Orient pour consolider une sorte de pouvoir plus ou moins occulte. C’est une vision simplificatrice au point de devenir presque caricaturale. Les rivalités arabes, les ambitions iraniennes, les dynamiques internes des sociétés de la région disparaissent. Tout tourne autour d’Israël. Tout ce qui va mal est à cause d'Israël. Cette construction rejoint des schémas narratifs très anciens. Quand un texte suggère qu’un acteur juif — ici l’État d’Israël — manipulerait les crises régionales depuis des décennies pour renforcer sa domination, on retrouve une structure familière dans l’histoire européenne : l’idée d’une puissance juive capable d’orienter les événements politiques à grande échelle. Ce thème existe depuis longtemps dans la propagande antisémite, notamment dans les fantasmes de complot mondial attribué aux Juifs. L’éditorial ne reprend évidemment pas ces thèses de façon explicite. Mais la structure du récit — un pouvoir juif supposé tirer profit de toutes les crises et orienter les rapports de force — rappelle clairement ces imaginaires. La formule finale de l’article est particulièrement révélatrice : la notion de “pax hebraica”. C’est un choix de mots lourd de sens. Dans un contexte géopolitique, parler de “pax israelica” aurait peut-être décrit une stratégie d’État (et encore...). Parler de “pax hebraïca” introduit une dimension identitaire. On ne parle plus d’un pays ; on évoque une domination associée à une identité juive. Ce type de glissement est précisément ce qui transforme presque toujours une critique politique en discours chargé de connotations beaucoup plus anciennes et obscures. L’éditorial repose donc sur plusieurs procédés discutables : réduction extrême de la complexité régionale, concentration de la responsabilité sur un seul acteur, vocabulaire moral accusatoire, et représentation d’un État juif presque omnipotent qui orienterait les crises à son avantage. Le résultat est un texte très violent, mais surtout très pauvre analytiquement. On n’y trouve ni véritable analyse stratégique, ni effort sérieux pour comprendre les dynamiques régionales. Au lieu d’éclairer le conflit, l’article produit un récit simple : Israël serait une force centrale de destruction et de domination au Moyen-Orient. Ce récit a l’avantage d’être clair et mobilisateur pour une large fraction de la gauche. Mais il a un défaut majeur : il simplifie à l’extrême une réalité géopolitique infiniment plus complexe, et il mobilise des schémas narratifs qui, volontairement ou non, résonnent avec des représentations très anciennes autour de la puissance supposée des Juifs. C’est ce qui rend cet éditorial non seulement biaisé, mais profondément problématique. "Le Monde" ne cesse de renouer avec ce genre de pratique, depuis des décennies. Ce n'est certainement pas le fruit du hasard.

Français
143
563
1.7K
67K
porygon-z.eth retweetledi
Simpatico
Simpatico@Anouar_____·
Quand le plateau de Pascal Praud se prend un KO en douceur.
Français
47
636
2.4K
153.8K
porygon-z.eth
porygon-z.eth@BertrandCloudy·
@dcfgod @megaeth Yeah ppl complaining for nothing, ppl that aped at 1bln in november are still even or in profit while any other alt bet would have been a net loss now
English
0
0
0
238
DCF GOD
DCF GOD@dcfgod·
So @megaeth is doing everything right - no token until they hit metrics that warrant a token - no rush into a points campaign until there’s apps / enough stuff worth incentivizing - holders carefully curated for their contribution or on min 1y locks (for when there is a token) - refunded $500M that raced into their predeposit vault because they didn’t want to set the wrong expectations / give a bunch of tokens to farmers looking for a quick flip - eth aligned being a L2 Why any salt? Note: dcf cap seeded megaeth
English
42
13
283
24.3K
porygon-z.eth
porygon-z.eth@BertrandCloudy·
@sjdedic acting like everybody should care about this 😆
English
1
0
0
14
Simon Dedic
Simon Dedic@sjdedic·
The level of audacity from Binance is ridiculous. After paying billions in fines, with CZ stepping down as CEO and even going to prison, just two years later they don’t seem to care at all. They continue to ignore compliance requirements, and CZ is clearly back in the decision making role since getting out of prison. How will this ever change if you keep using their exchange? If you keep paying horrendous listing fees? If they can continue treating this industry like an infinite money printing machine? As long as nothing changes, they’ll simply remain too powerful, and they’ll keep laughing at the rules because they can just buy their way out of trouble. At your expense. Stop using CEXs.
English
40
37
305
29.5K
porygon-z.eth retweetledi
dave the wave🌊🌓
dave the wave🌊🌓@davthewave·
You see a complete callousness by one of the most powerful militaries in the world in dropping a bomb on a rowing boat full of children. This kind of evil, complete disregard for human life, is what happens when you dehumanize a population. The world was supposed to put guardrails in place to ensure this could never happen again. But apparently not. The Israeli government not only continues to act with impunity but feels emboldened by the US failure to push back on them... it's as if the political elite have been captured somehow.😒
MO@Abu_Salah9

A horrifying clip. Today, Israel dropped a bomb on children aboard a small boat off the coast of Gaza in an act that has shocked the conscience of the world. A crime broadcast live.

English
3
8
41
4.9K
runner.rodeo
runner.rodeo@RunnerRodeo·
if you’re seeing this, you’re early. a new attention market is coming to @solana. any interaction will be considered for priority access. 🐎🐎🐎
runner.rodeo tweet media
English
213
53
512
25.3K
porygon-z.eth retweetledi
ZachXBT
ZachXBT@zachxbt·
@Polymarket Yet another Logan Paul scam Why do all of the prediction market teams have to run deceptive marketing?
ZachXBT tweet mediaZachXBT tweet mediaZachXBT tweet media
English
316
404
8.1K
414.2K
porygon-z.eth retweetledi
Ethereum
Ethereum@ethereum·
Ethereum continues to be foundational infrastructure for AI, governments, institutions, global financial systems, and more. Here are 28 things the Ethereum ecosystem shipped this month. 0/ @Fidelity announced the launch of FIDD, a USD stablecoin built on Ethereum and issued by Fidelity Digital Assets, reinforcing Ethereum’s role as institutional-grade settlement infrastructure. 1/ ERC-8004, a new standard for AI agents, went live on Ethereum. Onchain Identity, Reputation, and Validation registries will enable secure AI agent discovery and interaction across organizations. There have been over 24,000 agents registered, 80+ agent services verified, and 685+ feedback exchanged. 2/ The @ethereumfndn formed a new Post-Quantum (PQ) research team, marking an important inflection point in Ethereum’s long-term cryptographic strategy and resilience against future quantum threats. 3/ @MorganStanley proposed a spot Ethereum ETF, expanding regulated institutional exposure to ETH. 4/ An Ethereum Community Hub launched in Hong Kong, expanding local access to Ethereum education, collaboration, and ecosystem coordination. 5/ @thedaofund launched and will activate more than 75,000 ETH to strengthen Ethereum’s security, sourced from unclaimed “edge case” funds from the original DAO recovery process. 6/ The Ethereum L1 reached a new all-time high in transaction activity, underscoring sustained demand for mainnet settlement, security, and composability. 7/ The second Blob-Parameter-Only (BPO2) fork went live on Ethereum mainnet, increasing blob targets and limits to strengthen data availability as part of the Fusaka upgrade path. 8/ @OndoFinance expanded Ondo Global Markets with 98 new tokenized stocks and ETFs on Ethereum, bringing total onchain offerings to 200+ equities. 9/ @Aave integrated with @balance_canada, enabling institutional clients to earn yield on assets held in offline or warm storage. 10/ @fileverse launched Offline Mode v2, enabling document creation, access, and recovery without an internet connection. 11/ @worldcoin launched a redesigned World App, positioning it as a consumer super-app for humans in the AI era. 12/ @arbitrum activated the ArbOS Dia upgrade, adding Fusaka EIP support and improving performance and user experience. 13/ @Optimism introduced OP Enterprise, offering production-grade, managed blockchain infrastructure with enterprise guarantees and revenue capture. 14/ @Mantle_Official upgraded to Ethereum blobs as its primary data availability layer, advancing toward a full Ethereum ZK rollup architecture. 15/ @0xPolygon surpassed $1B in daily USDC P2P payments, driven by everyday, real-world transactions. 16/ @Lighter_xyz launched Lighter EVM, an EVM-equivalent rollup enabling low-latency composability with onchain trading liquidity. 17/ @uncapfinance announced the launch of a WBTC yield vault on Ethereum mainnet. It enables users to deposit WBTC on Ethereum and access curated strategies on @Starknet through a single interface. 18/ @LidoFinance launched Lido V3 on Ethereum mainnet, introducing modular stVaults for customizable, builder-native staking infrastructure. 19/ @AlloraNetwork launched mainnet on @Base, enabling predictive AI signals for risk-aware lending, adaptive liquidity, and agent-driven trading. 20/ @ensdomains data is now live on @googlecloud BigQuery, enabling large-scale ENS analytics using simple SQL. 21/ @phylaxsystems went live on @LineaBuild, integrating its Credible Layer directly into the sequencer to prevent exploits before execution. 22/ Following its public debut on the NYSE, tokenized @BitGo became accessible via @OndoFinance Global Markets 23/ @MetaLeX_Labs v2 launched, expanding from DAO legal infrastructure to an onchain corporate finance stack for real-world startups. 24/ @Lighter_xyz enabled 24/5 equity perpetuals, expanding onchain access to traditional market exposure. 25/ @zapper_fi launched a redesigned mobile app featuring gas-less wallets, social graphs, and real-time onchain discussion. 26/ @Corkprotocol launched Cork Phoenix on Ethereum mainnet, a programmable risk layer for RWAs, vault tokens, and yield-bearing stablecoins. 27/ @jumperapp launched Jumper Earn and Jumper Portfolio, unifying cross-chain capital movement, deployment, and management in a single interface.
English
226
397
2.2K
279.3K
porygon-z.eth retweetledi
Focus
Focus@FocusinfosFr·
🇺🇸🇺🇳ALERTE INFO - Washington impose des sanctions « de niveau terroriste » à Francesca Albanese et des membres de la CPI en gelant leurs avoirs et en entravant les enquêtes sur les crimes de guerre, rapporte Reuters le 6 février. Albanese et les membres du personnel de la CPI sanctionnés figurent désormais sur la liste des ressortissants spécialement désignés du département du Trésor américain, aux côtés de personnes soupçonnées d'appartenir à Al-Qaïda, de trafiquants de drogue mexicains et de marchands d'armes nord-coréens.
Focus tweet media
Français
317
2.3K
3.9K
393.6K
porygon-z.eth retweetledi
vitalik.eth
vitalik.eth@VitalikButerin·
In these five years, the Ethereum Foundation is entering a period of mild austerity, in order to be able to simultaneously meet two goals: 1. Deliver on an aggressive roadmap that ensures Ethereum's status as a performant and scalable world computer that does not compromise on robustness, sustainability and decentralization. 2. Ensures the Ethereum Foundation's own ability to sustain into the long term, and protect Ethereum's core mission and goals, including both the core blockchain layer as well as users' ability to access and use the chain with self-sovereignty, security and privacy. To this end, my own share of the austerity is that I am personally taking on responsibilities that might in another time have been "special projects" of the EF. Specifically, we are seeking the existence of an open-source, secure and verifiable full stack of software and hardware that can protect both our personal lives and our public environments ( see vitalik.eth.limo/general/2025/0… ). This includes applications such as finance, communication and governance, blockchains, operating systems, secure hardware, biotech (including both personal and public health), and more. If you have seen the Vensa announcement (seeking to make open silicon a commercially viable reality at least for security-critical applications), the ucritter.com including recent versions with built in ZK + FHE + differential-privacy features, the air quality work, my donations to encrypted messaging apps, my own enthusiasm and use for privacy-preserving, walkaway-test-friendly and local-first software (including operating systems), then you know the general spirit of what I am planning to support. For this reason I have just withdrawn 16,384 ETH, which will be deployed toward these goals over the next few years. I am also exploring secure decentralized staking options that will allow even more capital from staking rewards to be put toward these goals in the long term. Ethereum itself is an indispensable part of the "full-stack openness and verifiability" vision. The Ethereum Foundation will continue with a steadfast focus on developing Ethereum, with that goal in mind. "Ethereum everywhere" is nice, but the primary priority is "Ethereum for people who need it". Not corposlop, but self-sovereignty, and the baseline infrastructure that enables cooperation without domination. In a world where many people's default mindset is that we need to race to become a big strong bully, because otherwise the existing big strong bullies will eat you first, this is the needed alternative. It will involve much more than technology to succeed, but the technical layer is something which is in our control to make happen. The tools to ensure your, and your community's, autonomy and safety, as a basic right that belongs to everyone. Open not in a bullshit "open means everyone has the right to buy it from us and use our API for $200/month" way, but actually open, and secure and verifiable so that you know that your technology is working for you.
English
778
617
4.2K
878K
David Hoffman
David Hoffman@TrustlessState·
The Iranian Regime just projects their own strategy on Israel “Whose payroll are you on??” - Iran finances multimillion dollar internet astroturfing campaigns and bot networks “Israel’s genocide of Palestine” - Actually, it’s a war against Hamas who invaded their land. It’s the Islamic Regime that’s committing mass murder against a group of indigenous people - the Iranians “Zionism” - Actually, Judaism is the one religion that just wants to be left alone. On the contrary “Islam” is a religion that wants to totally dominate world and will do so by any means necessary. The narrative of the Islamic Regime simply takes its own strategy, and projects it upon Israel and psyops the west into believing it.
blobby@blobby977211

@TrustlessState @realDonaldTrump Yeah dude they've killed more people than Israel carpet bombing Gaza for 6 months. Whose pay roll are you on? (we know)

English
166
53
535
151K
porygon-z.eth
porygon-z.eth@BertrandCloudy·
@PopPunkOnChain okk lol this shitter is now called shentu definitely still a solid project 🤣
English
0
0
1
24
Pop Punk
Pop Punk@PopPunkOnChain·
Cool, I get to talk about Certik again. I've spent the last few years pretty aggressively calling this company out for egregious and malicious behavior. Certik IPOing is a massive net negative to our industry. Here's a refresher for you: 1. Certik black hat exploited kraken and washed funds through Tornado Cash (dlnews.com/articles/defi/…) 2. Certik was soliciting security vulnerability reports on their platform to then use to front run researchers and submit themselves on bounty platforms. (rekt.news/whitehat-graya… & x.com/PopPunkOnChain…) 3. Certik tried scrubbing all evidence that they were behind the above platform when called out. (x.com/PopPunkOnChain…) 4. Certik gives platforms bogus security scores just because they don't work with Certik. This happened to my previous company. We were maliciously and manually added to their website with an unreasonably low security score on our protocol THAT WAS NOT EVEN RELEASED YET. It was only removed after I threatened them with a defamation lawsuit. (x.com/PopPunkOnChain…) This is just a SMALL handful of things I was able to quickly pull up. They're a horrible company and an embarrassment to blockchain security and our industry as a whole.
DEGEN NEWS@DegenerateNews

NEW: CERTIK EYES IPO AT $2 BILLION VALUATION AS IT TARGETS ‘FIRST PUBLIC WEB3 CYBERSECURITY’ LISTING - THEBLOCK SOURCE: theblock.co/post/386882/ce…

English
84
61
780
104.5K