Bid Coinman

Pressure is mounting on the DOJ to prosecute Anthony Fauci before the statute of limitations runs out on May 11. Five years of damage, millions of lives disrupted, and now the clock is ticking. Time to stop the delays and hold him accountable. Fauci for prison.

“Sure, it starts with not letting you start your own car if you look drunk, but soon it will happen if you miss a payment, or fail to cover your EZ-Pass bill, or say something controversial on a website.”

I've said it from the beginning: lying to Congress is a felony. Destroying federal records is a felony. Advising others to destroy federal records is a felony. Fauci did all three. His adviser was just indicted. Fauci is next. The deadline to prosecute Fauci is May 11. The DOJ must act now. nypost.com/2026/04/28/us-…

Starting this summer, you won’t be allowed to drive with one hand in the EU.

Grok... **Yes, AVIS (Automated Vehicle Identification System) in Colorado is real and already actively issuing tickets.** It's not a future plan—it's an official state program run by the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) and some local agencies. ### Quick facts on how it works (exactly as described in the X post): - **Average-speed enforcement**: Cameras are placed at intervals (typically ¼ to ½ mile apart in work zones or designated corridors). They photograph your license plate and timestamp as you pass. The system calculates your *average* speed over that stretch (distance ÷ travel time). If your average exceeds the posted limit by 10+ mph, you get a ticket. - **Tickets**: $75 civil penalty (no points on your license) in work zones or school zones; $40 in some other designated AVIS corridors. The ticket goes to the **registered owner** of the vehicle by mail (not necessarily the driver). - **Signage required**: Areas with active AVIS cameras must have warning signs. ### Timeline and current status: - Authorized/expanded by state law in 2023 (Senate Bill 23-200, now in Colorado Revised Statutes 42-4-110.5). - Started with a warning-only period (30 days after signage). - Full ticketing began late 2025 and is now active. - Currently enforced in specific high-risk areas, including: - CO 119 (Boulder County/Golden to Longmont area) - I-25 North work zones - School zones and certain construction zones - Local deployments (e.g., Colorado Springs mobile Speed Safety Cameras since December 2025; other cities like Denver have used related AVIS tech for years). You can check the official CDOT Speed Enforcement Program page for active corridors and more details: codot.gov/programs/speed…. The X post you linked is accurate—it’s describing this exact system (the video in the post explains it the same way). It’s not statewide on every road, but it’s expanding in high-crash/speeding zones and work areas. Many drivers are surprised because it defeats the usual “slow down for the camera” trick that works with traditional point-in-time radar. (Note: This has nothing to do with the car-rental company Avis—it’s just the acronym the state uses.)

What is Avis.

When a tornado hits in 2027…👀

@gotrice2024 Cybercab fixes this.

This woman was leaving the airport, ordered food delivery and was being taken home by a Lyft driver. Once she got home, there was a knock on the door, usually the delivery driver leaves the food and leaves. This time they kept knocking for about 10 minutes. The man just sits on her porch for almost an hour. She calls a friend to come over, the driver then leaves the driveway but parks a few houses down. She ends up calling the police and it turned out that the man intercepted the food delivery, that’s why it showed that her food was delivered when she never got it. He was going to impersonate the delivery driver to get her to open the door. She has no idea how they knew she was alone, is it possible the Lyft driver notified an accomplice and told them he dropped off a woman alone and that’s why they came?

This is great.

@NoleIsElon @george18kennedy @Mericalover7 yes

@george18kennedy @Mericalover7 many people thinking there's an "ending" need to realize that is a fallacy. it's a series of journies and our soul is eternal. the idea is to grow, improve "you". live with this in mind and see what I mean

This is only the beginning.

Retweet if you’d like to see @JimmyKimmelLive fired. @ABC and @Disney are tagged.

@RepThomasMassie The question is... why do they want this? It's certainly not for our safety.

Automobile kill-switches are coming soon to car dealerships near you. I teamed up w/ Scott Perry & Chip Roy to defund this Orwellian mandate, but too many colleagues (Republican & Democrat) voted against us, so the federal mandate for every new car after 2026 is still in place.

@sickdotdev @investanswers 😂

unfollowing everyone on linkedin except this guy

A video dropped that could change the race for FL Governor Grant Warrington (@GrantWarr1) dropped this video on YT earlier today If everything in this video is proven true, voters need to decide if Byron Donalds is capable of serving as FL's next governor H/T @tracybeanz & @T2Marlene Link to YT in 1st comment

I have two stacks on my desk. The left stack is financial disclosure forms from members of Congress. The right stack is waivers for members who filed their financial disclosures late. The right stack is always taller. On Wednesday morning, I watched a soldier get arrested on CNN. I am a Disclosure Analyst for the House Ethics Committee. I have held this position for eleven years. My job is to receive the forms, verify their completeness, and file them. I do not investigate. I do not flag. I do not refer. I file. I have a lanyard. The lanyard says ETHICS. The soldier's name is Gannon Ken Van Dyke. He is thirty-eight years old. He was stationed at Fort Bragg. He was Special Forces. In December, he created an account on a prediction market called Polymarket. On January 2nd, he bet $32,500 that the president of Venezuela would be removed from power. On January 3rd, he helped remove the president of Venezuela from power. He collected $409,881. He has been charged with five federal crimes. Commodities fraud. Wire fraud. Unlawful use of confidential government information. Theft of nonpublic government information. Unlawful monetary transaction. The Department of Justice called it "the first-ever insider trading prosecution on event contracts." I watched this on the television in our break room. Then I walked back to my desk and processed a late financial disclosure from a member of the House Financial Services Committee who purchased $250,000 in bank stocks eleven days before his subcommittee held a closed-door hearing on proposed capital reserve changes. The filing was forty-seven days late. The STOCK Act requires disclosure within forty-five days. The penalty for late filing is $200. I waived it. I waive most of them. In 2021, fifty-four members of Congress and senior staff violated the reporting rules. The fines were minimal. Most were waived. I have a form for the waiver. The form has a box that says "Reason." I write "administrative delay." In ethics, "administrative delay" means the member's office forgot and then remembered when a reporter called. My approval rate is one hundred percent. In any other field, that number would trigger an audit. In mine, it is called thoroughness. Let me show you what I processed this year. January. A senator on the Armed Services Committee sold defense contractor shares worth $1.2 million. Three days later, his committee received a classified briefing that the Iran campaign had exceeded its projected cost by 340%. The stock dropped 8%. He filed the disclosure sixty-one days late. I calculated the fine. $200. His chief of staff asked if it could be waived. He did not ask what the senator traded on. Nobody asks that. The form does not have a field for it. I waived the fine. The senator's portfolio returned 23.4% in 2025. The S&P 500 returned 16.8%. February. A representative on the Energy and Commerce Committee bought pharmaceutical stocks worth $400,000. Two weeks later, her committee advanced a bill that would extend patent exclusivity for the exact drug class she purchased. The stocks rose 14%. She filed on time. There was no fine. There was no investigation. There was nothing to investigate because buying stocks in companies regulated by your own committee is not illegal. It is legal. The STOCK Act made it legal by making it disclosed. In Congress, disclosed means legal. In my office, legal means filed. March. A member whose spouse manages a portfolio worth $9.2 million reported forty-three separate transactions in a single quarter. Twelve of them were in sectors directly affected by legislation the member co-sponsored. The timing on eight of those twelve was within a two-week window of committee action. I logged all forty-three. None were flagged. We do not flag. We file. I asked my supervisor once what would happen if I flagged a filing. She said we do not have a form for that. I never asked again. In 2020, I processed 847 disclosures. In 2023, 1,211. In 2025, 1,614. The number of enforcement actions in each of those years was zero. The numerator changes. The denominator does not. I want to tell you about the soldier again. He made $409,881. He tried to delete his Polymarket account by calling customer service and saying he lost access to his email. He moved his profits into a foreign cryptocurrency vault and then into a new brokerage account. He used his real identity. He placed thirteen bets. Every single one was connected to an operation he personally participated in. In my eleven years, I have processed disclosures from members of Congress who traded on: Pending FDA approvals they learned about in committee. Defense appropriations they voted on. Trade policy they negotiated. Pandemic response measures they drafted. Interest rate decisions they were briefed on before the public. None of them have been charged. None of them have been investigated by the Department of Justice. None of them have been referred to the SEC. The STOCK Act has produced zero prosecutions since it was signed on April 4th, 2012. Fourteen years. Five hundred and thirty-five members. $635 million in trades last year alone. Zero cases. My daughter asked me once what happens when someone breaks the rules. I told her we write it down. She asked what happens after that. I said it depends. She was nine. She is twenty now. It does not depend. Nothing happens after that. The soldier made $409,881 and faces decades in prison. Nancy Pelosi entered Congress in 1987 with a portfolio worth approximately $785,000. It is now worth $133.7 million. That is a return of 16,930%. The Dow Jones returned 2,300% over the same period. Professional fund managers who beat the market for three consecutive years are considered exceptional. She has beaten it for thirty-seven. If a hedge fund produced those returns, the SEC would subpoena the records on a Thursday. She produced them from a building with a chapel and a gift shop. She announced her retirement last year. No investigation was opened. No disclosure was flagged. Her filings were on time. In my office, on time means compliant. Compliant means closed. I want to tell you about the fine. $200. That is the maximum penalty for violating the STOCK Act's disclosure requirements. $200 for a member of Congress whose portfolio gained $4.7 million in a single quarter. I calculated what $200 represents as a percentage of $4.7 million. It is 0.004%. I could not find a comparison that made it meaningful. It is less than the price of the parking pass in the Rayburn garage. It is less than lunch at the members' dining room if you order the crab cakes, which I am told are excellent though I eat at my desk. Since 2012, thirty-one bills have been introduced to restrict congressional trading. I keep a list. The list is longer than the STOCK Act itself. On March 5th, 2026, a representative from Michigan introduced the thirty-second. He called it the "No Getting Rich in Congress Act." The bill would prohibit the President, Vice President, members of Congress, and their spouses from trading individual stocks, cryptocurrency, futures, and commodities while in office. The bill was referred to committee. The committee has not scheduled a hearing. The committee is chaired by a member whose spouse executed $2.1 million in trades last year. The bill will be reviewed. In my office, reviewed means read. Read means acknowledged. Acknowledged means a status has been assigned. A status is the absence of an action that has been given a name so it looks like one. The soldier used classified information to make $409,881 on a prediction market. He has been charged with five federal crimes. The Department of Justice announced the case on the same day I processed three disclosures from members who traded on committee knowledge worth a combined $3.8 million. The difference between the soldier and the members is not what they did. It is the building they did it in. He did it from Fort Bragg. They did it from the Capitol. He used a prediction market. They used the New York Stock Exchange. He bet on a military operation. They bet on the legislation they write. He did not write the law. They did. They wrote the STOCK Act. Then they funded its enforcement at zero dollars. Then they set its maximum penalty at $200. Then they gave my office the authority to waive it. Then they traded $635 million. The soldier flew to Caracas. He breached a compound. He put his body between a mission and a bullet. The people who ordered the operation were in a building with a credenza and sparkling water. They did not go to Caracas. They went to their brokerage accounts. The soldier made $409,881 and is now in federal custody. The people who knew what he was going to do before he did it made more and filed less. His prosecution is not a failure of the system. It is the system. One conviction per decade, at the lowest level, so the briefing slides can say enforcement exists. The $409,881 is not the crime. It is the cost of making $635 million look supervised. In my field, we call this self-regulation. The soldier's Polymarket account has been frozen. His military career is over. He will spend years in federal prison. My office will process every congressional disclosure filed this year. Every trade logged. Every $200 fine calculated and waived. The system is immaculate. Fourteen years. Zero prosecutions. $635 million a year. A 16,930% return. I have not leaked a document. I have not filed a complaint. I have not deviated from the process one single time. The process was written by the people whose forms I process. As long as the disclosures go up and the cases don't, my performance review says I am meeting expectations. My lanyard still says ETHICS. In eleven years, nobody has asked me to define the word.

Wow

What's happening in the Netherlands?

🚨 HOLY CRAP! Ohio attorney Mehek Cooke asked a Somali care center if she could sign up and they proceeded to physically INTIMIDATE her "We're NOT taking patients! GO." This is NOT normal behavior for a typical business! We need MASS RAIDS in Ohio, NOW.

0 AP stories on this attack in NYC 0 PBS stories on this attack in NYC 0 NYT stories on this attack in NYC 0 NPR stories on this attack in NYC 0 WSJ stories on this attack in NYC 0 BBC stories on this attack in NYC 0 CNN stories on this attack in NYC 0 WaPo stories on this attack in NYC 0 Reuters stories on this attack in NYC 0 MSNBC stories on this attack in NYC

The future is here! 🚖🤖 No steering wheels. No pedals. Fully autonomous Cybercab right out of the gate.

@RonDeSantis @rollingstone is a liberal trash rag.

Among many issues with this list, Metallica should be higher. Also, how can you not have Rush, Skynyrd or Van Halen?