BlackJack

5.4K posts

BlackJack

BlackJack

@BlackJackPartII

Katılım Ekim 2022
445 Takip Edilen2.5K Takipçiler
BlackJack
BlackJack@BlackJackPartII·
The US must be close to toppling the Iranian regime because the blackpilled commentary is totally off the charts on X.
English
0
0
3
87
BlackJack
BlackJack@BlackJackPartII·
@bonchieredstate That’s why he framed it as “I would like to” vs “I will” or “I commit to” etc. I think Pentagon accepted Mellon’s contribution to troops last shutdown - do you know if it was actually distributed to soldiers?
English
2
0
1
233
Bonchie
Bonchie@bonchieredstate·
If Democrats were smart, they’d immediately take him up on this and offer to pass an appropriation of only this donation to the Treasury. It’d allow them to prolong their shutdown and cost Musk hundreds of millions in the process. But they aren’t.
Elon Musk@elonmusk

I would like to offer to pay the salaries of TSA personnel during this funding impasse that is negatively affecting the lives of so many Americans at airports throughout the country

English
21
29
241
10.4K
Eli Lake
Eli Lake@EliLake·
DC insiders tell me Trump will have a hard time convincing most democrats to support the Iran war. ‘The president is not very popular right now with the dems.’ Developing …
English
78
12
196
20.9K
BlackJack
BlackJack@BlackJackPartII·
Walk through verbal FAQ. If you’re a citizen and already registered, nothing to do even if you got married and changed your name. If you’re registering for the first time or just moved…. If you don’t have a passport or other documentation… Combat all the lies with real examples
English
5
5
121
1.1K
Mike Lee
Mike Lee@BasedMikeLee·
On the Senate floor speaking in support of the SAVE America Act Just yielded briefly to my friend @RogerMarshallMD Will resume my remarks in a moment Let me know if there are points you’d like me to raise I’ve got more than enough to material, but if you’ve got ideas LMK
English
1.3K
1.6K
9.3K
76.7K
Autism Capital 🧩
Autism Capital 🧩@AutismCapital·
Here's our top requests for you consideration: - Satire button content disclosure (just a simple extra checkbox next to paid partnership and AI generated) - The ability to edit replies to a post (within the editable time window) - The ability to edit your original post after you've already replied to it with a follow up post (provided you're within the editable time window) - Scheduled posts on mobile - Images in drafts carrying over between mobile/desktop - The ability to opt out of being added to lists - The ability to have a video properly embed when you use the "post video" function on a person's post if you type a post long enough to require the "show more..." button to appear. Right now if you embed a video using this function if you go into the "show more" length of post the video just appears as a hyperlink and not as an embed. (this is huge) These would be huge quality of life improvements.
English
1
1
7
1.2K
Nikita Bier
Nikita Bier@nikitabier·
We’re rolling out summaries for Articles now. Just tap the Summarize button if you want to know if it’s worth your time to read it (or if your attention span is 12 seconds).
English
1.3K
288
4K
1M
BlackJack
BlackJack@BlackJackPartII·
Don’t sleep on the SLU Billikens
GIF
English
0
0
0
104
BlackJack
BlackJack@BlackJackPartII·
@unseen1_unseen Trump will just be moving from CEO to Shadow Chairman. As long as he’s alive he’ll make sure his voters show up for his candidate.
English
1
2
32
384
unseen1
unseen1@unseen1_unseen·
There is no 40% cult of personality. Keep believing that talking point and keep losing elections. Vance or Rubio can easily capture the maga base as long as they run on the same issues Trump ran on. Tax cuts, secure border, deportations, supply side polices for energy and manufacturing, and Peace through strength.
FischerKing@FischerKing64

There is a cult of personality quality to the 40% voting base. Whoever comes after Trump is not going to have an unshakable 40%. The rift opening up with the latest war is going to make the 2028 primaries brutal if it doesn’t wind up soon.

English
24
75
443
8.9K
BlackJack
BlackJack@BlackJackPartII·
@SuitablePolitic Also explains why she’s against a federal law enforcing voting integrity and limiting mail in ballots in federal elections…
English
0
0
12
1.6K
Derek. 🇺🇸
Derek. 🇺🇸@SuitablePolitic·
This is a great read. As I implied in the thread, I was familiar with a lot of the shenanigans that contribute to her winning. But I had truly no idea how she enjoyed a constituency sufficient to make any of that matter. Great explanation of the political dynamics at play.
J.T. Alexander@JTAlexander_

Its a combination of corruption, Libertarianism, and the Natives. Murkowski is more easily understood in the context of understanding "Uncle Ted." Not Kaczinsky, but Stevens. Ted Stevens was put on trial for corruption-type charges in 2008. Everybody knew he was guilty. The Feds had to put him on trial in DC because they couldn't get a fair trial in Alaska. They couldn't get a fair trial in Alaska because Alaskans didn't care. So what if Ted got some free furniture? Alaska was thriving largely off of his excellent work. Alaskans have far more tolerance for corruption and inertia than they claim to have. Alaskans are, in my experience, far more prone to talk than action. Murkowski wins off of this. She famously got her start being appointed to her Senate seat when her dad, the previous occupant, died. This should have been a major red flag, but Frank Murkowski was pretty popular so it was tolerated. Murkowski lost a primary in 2010, but ran as a write-in and somehow allegedly won, despite not even being on the ballot and running against both a Republican and a Democrat. The map here shows the results of that 2010 election. That big red area that voted for the Republican is Alaska's traditional "Red Wall." Where Murkowski got all of these write-in ballots from is (1) Anchorage, and (2) everywhere not on the road system. Mail-in ballots have always been legal in Alaska. Alaska takes forever to count votes because, legitimately, a third of the population lives in places only accessible by boat, plane, ATV, or dogsled. Alaskan Natives are an overwhelmingly Democrat-voting bloc, yet somehow Murkowski outperformed everyone on the ballot. This is one of those things that defies every political rule and trend in the book, and so its obviously fraudulent, but nobody could ever prove it. Litigation happened, but it went nowhere. Since 2010, this map has also shown the overall constituency of Alaska's Senate delegation: Murkowski represents the people in the green area, and Sullivan the people in the red area. The problem is the people in the green area aren't Republicans. They vote for... well, I'll just leave at these areas vote Democrat. "Democrat" is also a bad word in Alaska. Even most of the Democrats there don't like to identify themselves as one. They usually run as "Independent" or "Unaffiliated." So, Murkowski has built herself a coalition of Alaskan Natives, Libertarians, and the Alaskan Elites. Democrats can't beat her because the Red Wall hates Democrats so much, but a Republican challenger can't beat her either because she has sufficient vote dominance (and probably enough fraud) in the bush to overcome the challenge.

English
2
3
39
2.8K
BlackJack
BlackJack@BlackJackPartII·
@FOOL_NELSON @DataRepublican She’d benefit from one of her famous deep dives on this topic. Will take a while to get her arms around it all, but she’ll have a very different view when done.
English
1
0
1
50
FOOL NELSON
FOOL NELSON@FOOL_NELSON·
I actually can't tell if she was using real events for her analogy or if she was fictionalizing Russiagate to make an analogy so my apologies if it was the latter @DataRepublican
English
2
0
12
817
DataRepublican (small r)
DataRepublican (small r)@DataRepublican·
I read you quite a bit back then. Thank you for all your coverage. They can still knowingly break the rules and still be sincere. Which might be also what happened here. Only they know what’s in their own intents. Even allowing for and taking out genuine malicious actors, it’s clear a lot of people bought into the “Russia is everywhere” hysteria and started seeing the slightest Russia connection as proof of Russian control of our government.
English
55
10
287
12.6K
DataRepublican (small r)
DataRepublican (small r)@DataRepublican·
Ok, I'm apparently not good at writing parables, because nearly everyone interpreted it wrong. I used a parable because I want to respect others' service records, especially when not all the facts are out yet. So let's pivot to a much more direct analogy. In 2016, career intelligence professionals, people who had genuinely spent their lives fighting America's enemies, became convinced that a foreign power had compromised the incoming president. They had data points. Real ones. Trump had business dealings in Moscow. He said nice things about Putin on camera. People in his orbit had meetings with Russian nationals. A dossier appeared with salacious claims. Each data point individually was... a data point. But they were looking for Russia. So they found Russia. Everywhere. They were so certain they were right that they leaked to the press. They used classification authority to spy on American citizens. They presented unverified opposition research to a FISA court as intelligence. Peter Strzok texted about "insurance policies." Andrew McCabe authorized leaks. They were experienced professionals who genuinely believed the republic was in danger. Their service records were real. Their concern was sincere. And they were wrong.
DataRepublican (small r)@DataRepublican

I'm a Smurf. I've been hired to run counter-intelligence operations at Smurf Village. My role is political; I've personally gone up against the evil wizard Gargamel. But once I'm on the inside, I discover that Smurf Village has a relationship with a goat-riding human boy called Peewit. Peewit isn't a Smurf. He's caused a lot of damage with his antics over the years. Why is he even here? I start digging. I pull up Papa Smurf's history with Peewit. Papa Smurf has been collaborating with this kid for years. Protecting him. Making excuses for him. Why? Peewit is reckless. Peewit makes messes. But Papa Smurf keeps letting him back in. The more I dig, the more Peewit I find. He's everywhere. In every file, behind every favor, connected to every mess. A picture forms in my head: if I'm looking for Peewit everywhere and I keep finding Peewit, the only logical conclusion is that Peewit is the one controlling Papa Smurf. Then a prominent Smurf gets assassinated. They say Gargamel's people did it. Case closed, move along. But I get access to the dead Smurf's private messages. And there's Peewit. Right there in the chats. The same Peewit I've been laser-focused on all year. Pressuring him. Making demands. I bring this to Papa Smurf and his inner circle. I bring it with alarm. Papa Smurf looks at me funny. And then — just like that — I'm kicked out of the investigation. No explanation. Just... out. This is the final proof that Peewit is controlling the Smurf Village. I know what I saw. I have to get the truth out there. So I do the unthinkable. I leak the information.

English
700
737
5K
306.3K
BlackJack retweetledi
HonestReporting
HonestReporting@HonestReporting·
🧵 THREAD: This was coordinated. Joe Kent goes on Tucker Carlson. Within minutes, the exact same clip, same caption, same outrage floods the internet. Not organic. Not coincidence. HonestReporting.ai Labs tracked it in real time. What we found will shock you.
HonestReporting tweet media
English
309
2.4K
7.7K
840.8K
BlackJack
BlackJack@BlackJackPartII·
It’s doable in a more watered down version that creates a federal national citizenship database and ties federal funding to states for elections to submitting voter rolls and certifying they’ve been cross-checked against that database. Could require tax filers to attest to their citizenship on their tax returns with attendant penalties for perjury. Could fund a more robust federal enforcement apparatus. Can’t include things like requiring citizens to provide proof citizenship etc. Better than nothing.
English
0
0
0
15
The Reckoning 💥
The Reckoning 💥@sethjlevy·
Trump couldn’t let anyone know at the beginning that Kharg Island was his ultimate aim. And Iran cutting off Hormuz gave him his justification. He played them. Chess not checkers.
English
49
221
1.9K
51.3K
BlackJack
BlackJack@BlackJackPartII·
And military funding.
English
0
0
3
54