chimay_bleu

5.8K posts

chimay_bleu banner
chimay_bleu

chimay_bleu

@BleuChimay

#emptyheadz marketing department #rainbowsareflat #grabamic “Why bring a gun to a drone fight?” — Jim Jefferies

Oz / Land of the long white ☁️ Katılım Haziran 2019
122 Takip Edilen111 Takipçiler
Jeffery Parkinson🇨🇦🇬🇧
Jeffery Parkinson🇨🇦🇬🇧@JefferyParkins2·
@selbsman1 As this is a azimuthal projection from a spherical earth, then the circles are the same size but distorted due to the projection. Thanks for confirming the earth is a sphere.
English
1
0
1
10
Taylor D. Rhodes
Taylor D. Rhodes@TaylorDRhodes2A·
Australia has some of the strictest gun control laws in the world, and yet they don’t work. Evil finds a way. You must be able to protect yourself with equal force. Guns save lives.
English
2.5K
224
1.6K
153.7K
M C Toon
M C Toon@Mctoon27·
One Year ago today we were in Punta Arenas measuring the shape of the earth. As part of @TFEAntarctica trip. It's a globe. We invited the flat earthers that were along to participate, they did not. Before going we wrote up a list of experiments we planned to do. Including predictions based on 150 years of flat earth claims. I asked flat earthers for corrections on the predictions I made using flat earth. They had no corrections. I asked flat earthers for input on what other experiments to do. They had no other experiments to do. This video is the unedited recording of the experiments and other activities in Punta Arenas, Chile before we went to Antarctica. youtu.be/EsersKExXW0 Here is the list of experiments we did including the globe and flat earth predictions mctoon.net/tfe-experiment… Notice in the comments that there will be no flat earthers providing predictions based on flat earth. They are not able to participate in science.
YouTube video
YouTube
English
29
25
120
7.2K
chimay_bleu retweetledi
Alex Boge
Alex Boge@alexboge·
Flerf: “Gas pressure needs a container!” Normal person: “hmm, ok; what’s the container on flat earth?” Flerf: “Air tight dome” Normal person: “Can we see it? Radar reflection?” Flerf:
GIF
English
13
2
42
1.3K
Piper australis
Piper australis@AustralisPiper·
@ken_caudle @Macka254 @selbsman1 Ken, you still haven’t answered my question. These two polygons are on the same flat plane. Does one have a greater perimeter than the other?
Piper australis tweet media
English
2
0
0
47
Trevor Long
Trevor Long@TrevorL415·
Listen up, X crowd, teammates, globetards, it’s time to tear down Andrew McCarthy, the self-proclaimed “amateur” astro-photographer who’s nothing but a slick grifter peddling manipulated trash! I’ve been at observatories with 14-inch telescopes, same as his fancy gear, and guess what? The Moon’s a blurry, overexposed blob, and Saturn’s a faint dot—exactly like the raw shots I’ve shown you! That’s the real sky from Earth, folks, not his pretty little lies with craters and rings popping out like some sci-fi movie. My content and shots are the real deal : a washed-out Moon and a faint Saturn speck, no details, no rings, just light scattered by Earth’s atmosphere. But McCarthy? He churns out glossy images—crater-filled Moons, ringed Saturns—with vibrant colors and sharp edges. How? He manipulates raw light with stacking, contrast tweaks, and software like PixInsight, turning blurry messes into cash-cow art. This guy’s a fraud, plain and simple! His CosmicBackground site’s got prints from $10 to $30, and he’s hawking courses like he’s some celestial guru. I’ve seen the raw feeds—blurry disks, just like Artemis 2025’s unprocessed data release. No magical sight here, McCarthy is cooking the books with software, not capturing the cosmos! My observatory shots match what you all see with your own eyes or cheap scopes: a smeary Moon and a speck of Saturn. He’s banking on you not knowing the difference, but I’m calling him out. Earth’s has a messy layer of air, full of turbulence, dust, and temperature shifts, that scatters and bends light. That brightness you see isn’t hiding details behind a curtain you can magically pull back—it’s light getting jumbled up, no craters or shadows seen in the smeary glow. No tech can wave a wand and undo that; it’s a fundamental limit. With inflation soaring why are you fanboys tossing cash at his fake sky pics while many souls are scraping by?McCarthy’s “art” ignores the science. Earth’s atmosphere scatters light, period. Andrew acts like his ground-based gear sees through our air like X-ray vision? Bull!! The 2023 NASA study on atmospheric distortion shows a 14-inch scope’s limit is a fuzzy oval for Saturn—rings are a processed fantasy. He doesn't have skill, he has deception. Here’s the kicker: 84% of the world’s religious per 2020 data, the masses—Love God because He’s real, not some grifter’s manipulated void. McCarthy’s fanboys are funding his lies while so many others pray for rent money. His “awe-inspiring works” are a sham...check his threads; he admits tweaking exposure and color, but spins it as art. Art, my butt—it’s a con! The raw sky’s a messy gift from God, not a polished scam. I’ve got the proof from observatories worldwide because raw is raw, and his renderings are fraud. My raw Moon and Saturn shots are what scream the truth: no equipment bursts through that brightness or blur without cheating. McCarthy’s claiming his gear sees what mine doesn’t, but I've worked with the same scopes and know the limits. His “amateur astrophotographer” label is a sham—he’s a pro at manipulation, not capturing. The masses see that blur when they look up; they’re not dumb. He’s banking on your ignorance, while my images blow his cover wide open. We all know why he would never debate me and it's this simple...being a photographer doesn't necessarily make you smart 🤓 even if you put the word astro in front of it to try and claim some kind of superiority win over me and the "buy a scope" is always his go to cop-out...So, Andrew McCarthy, you’re done! Your light-manipulating grift’s exposed. Refund your fanboys, shut down your site, and face the truth.Your images are fake, your fame’s a fluke, and the masses are waking up.Your light-manipulating fraud ends here. The masses see through your scam as your images are renderings, not reality, and your fanboys are paying for a mirage. Step down, refund your marks, and let the truth...raw, unprocessed, Earth bound take the stage. Because the raw view is the truth.
Trevor Long tweet media
English
481
35
175
431.4K
chimay_bleu retweetledi
SLS
SLS@ScottLikedSLS·
This guy made a novel length hit oeice on someone that takes better pictures than him, only because he has no clue what he's doing
Trevor Long@TrevorL415

Listen up, X crowd, teammates, globetards, it’s time to tear down Andrew McCarthy, the self-proclaimed “amateur” astro-photographer who’s nothing but a slick grifter peddling manipulated trash! I’ve been at observatories with 14-inch telescopes, same as his fancy gear, and guess what? The Moon’s a blurry, overexposed blob, and Saturn’s a faint dot—exactly like the raw shots I’ve shown you! That’s the real sky from Earth, folks, not his pretty little lies with craters and rings popping out like some sci-fi movie. My content and shots are the real deal : a washed-out Moon and a faint Saturn speck, no details, no rings, just light scattered by Earth’s atmosphere. But McCarthy? He churns out glossy images—crater-filled Moons, ringed Saturns—with vibrant colors and sharp edges. How? He manipulates raw light with stacking, contrast tweaks, and software like PixInsight, turning blurry messes into cash-cow art. This guy’s a fraud, plain and simple! His CosmicBackground site’s got prints from $10 to $30, and he’s hawking courses like he’s some celestial guru. I’ve seen the raw feeds—blurry disks, just like Artemis 2025’s unprocessed data release. No magical sight here, McCarthy is cooking the books with software, not capturing the cosmos! My observatory shots match what you all see with your own eyes or cheap scopes: a smeary Moon and a speck of Saturn. He’s banking on you not knowing the difference, but I’m calling him out. Earth’s has a messy layer of air, full of turbulence, dust, and temperature shifts, that scatters and bends light. That brightness you see isn’t hiding details behind a curtain you can magically pull back—it’s light getting jumbled up, no craters or shadows seen in the smeary glow. No tech can wave a wand and undo that; it’s a fundamental limit. With inflation soaring why are you fanboys tossing cash at his fake sky pics while many souls are scraping by?McCarthy’s “art” ignores the science. Earth’s atmosphere scatters light, period. Andrew acts like his ground-based gear sees through our air like X-ray vision? Bull!! The 2023 NASA study on atmospheric distortion shows a 14-inch scope’s limit is a fuzzy oval for Saturn—rings are a processed fantasy. He doesn't have skill, he has deception. Here’s the kicker: 84% of the world’s religious per 2020 data, the masses—Love God because He’s real, not some grifter’s manipulated void. McCarthy’s fanboys are funding his lies while so many others pray for rent money. His “awe-inspiring works” are a sham...check his threads; he admits tweaking exposure and color, but spins it as art. Art, my butt—it’s a con! The raw sky’s a messy gift from God, not a polished scam. I’ve got the proof from observatories worldwide because raw is raw, and his renderings are fraud. My raw Moon and Saturn shots are what scream the truth: no equipment bursts through that brightness or blur without cheating. McCarthy’s claiming his gear sees what mine doesn’t, but I've worked with the same scopes and know the limits. His “amateur astrophotographer” label is a sham—he’s a pro at manipulation, not capturing. The masses see that blur when they look up; they’re not dumb. He’s banking on your ignorance, while my images blow his cover wide open. We all know why he would never debate me and it's this simple...being a photographer doesn't necessarily make you smart 🤓 even if you put the word astro in front of it to try and claim some kind of superiority win over me and the "buy a scope" is always his go to cop-out...So, Andrew McCarthy, you’re done! Your light-manipulating grift’s exposed. Refund your fanboys, shut down your site, and face the truth.Your images are fake, your fame’s a fluke, and the masses are waking up.Your light-manipulating fraud ends here. The masses see through your scam as your images are renderings, not reality, and your fanboys are paying for a mirage. Step down, refund your marks, and let the truth...raw, unprocessed, Earth bound take the stage. Because the raw view is the truth.

English
10
2
124
3.9K
chimay_bleu retweetledi
Piper australis
Piper australis@AustralisPiper·
Fuck me, this Aussie flat earther thinks the stars we see in Oz appear to rotate around Polaris
Piper australis tweet media
English
5
3
38
602
chimay_bleu retweetledi
Ken Kirtland IV
Ken Kirtland IV@KenKirtland17·
Bro takes photos of the Moon and the Sun which look like the Moon and the Sun I can go outside and see. Flat earth lore is so tangled (and untethered) i get lost as to what the conspiracy would be here. The moon and the sun are real, but good pics of them aren't?
Trevor Long@TrevorL415

Listen up, X crowd, teammates, globetards, it’s time to tear down Andrew McCarthy, the self-proclaimed “amateur” astro-photographer who’s nothing but a slick grifter peddling manipulated trash! I’ve been at observatories with 14-inch telescopes, same as his fancy gear, and guess what? The Moon’s a blurry, overexposed blob, and Saturn’s a faint dot—exactly like the raw shots I’ve shown you! That’s the real sky from Earth, folks, not his pretty little lies with craters and rings popping out like some sci-fi movie. My content and shots are the real deal : a washed-out Moon and a faint Saturn speck, no details, no rings, just light scattered by Earth’s atmosphere. But McCarthy? He churns out glossy images—crater-filled Moons, ringed Saturns—with vibrant colors and sharp edges. How? He manipulates raw light with stacking, contrast tweaks, and software like PixInsight, turning blurry messes into cash-cow art. This guy’s a fraud, plain and simple! His CosmicBackground site’s got prints from $10 to $30, and he’s hawking courses like he’s some celestial guru. I’ve seen the raw feeds—blurry disks, just like Artemis 2025’s unprocessed data release. No magical sight here, McCarthy is cooking the books with software, not capturing the cosmos! My observatory shots match what you all see with your own eyes or cheap scopes: a smeary Moon and a speck of Saturn. He’s banking on you not knowing the difference, but I’m calling him out. Earth’s has a messy layer of air, full of turbulence, dust, and temperature shifts, that scatters and bends light. That brightness you see isn’t hiding details behind a curtain you can magically pull back—it’s light getting jumbled up, no craters or shadows seen in the smeary glow. No tech can wave a wand and undo that; it’s a fundamental limit. With inflation soaring why are you fanboys tossing cash at his fake sky pics while many souls are scraping by?McCarthy’s “art” ignores the science. Earth’s atmosphere scatters light, period. Andrew acts like his ground-based gear sees through our air like X-ray vision? Bull!! The 2023 NASA study on atmospheric distortion shows a 14-inch scope’s limit is a fuzzy oval for Saturn—rings are a processed fantasy. He doesn't have skill, he has deception. Here’s the kicker: 84% of the world’s religious per 2020 data, the masses—Love God because He’s real, not some grifter’s manipulated void. McCarthy’s fanboys are funding his lies while so many others pray for rent money. His “awe-inspiring works” are a sham...check his threads; he admits tweaking exposure and color, but spins it as art. Art, my butt—it’s a con! The raw sky’s a messy gift from God, not a polished scam. I’ve got the proof from observatories worldwide because raw is raw, and his renderings are fraud. My raw Moon and Saturn shots are what scream the truth: no equipment bursts through that brightness or blur without cheating. McCarthy’s claiming his gear sees what mine doesn’t, but I've worked with the same scopes and know the limits. His “amateur astrophotographer” label is a sham—he’s a pro at manipulation, not capturing. The masses see that blur when they look up; they’re not dumb. He’s banking on your ignorance, while my images blow his cover wide open. We all know why he would never debate me and it's this simple...being a photographer doesn't necessarily make you smart 🤓 even if you put the word astro in front of it to try and claim some kind of superiority win over me and the "buy a scope" is always his go to cop-out...So, Andrew McCarthy, you’re done! Your light-manipulating grift’s exposed. Refund your fanboys, shut down your site, and face the truth.Your images are fake, your fame’s a fluke, and the masses are waking up.Your light-manipulating fraud ends here. The masses see through your scam as your images are renderings, not reality, and your fanboys are paying for a mirage. Step down, refund your marks, and let the truth...raw, unprocessed, Earth bound take the stage. Because the raw view is the truth.

English
31
6
438
28.7K
chimay_bleu
chimay_bleu@BleuChimay·
@AustralisPiper @Capt_Scorch @Macka254 @selbsman1 I’m sure I told you we had a pommie bloke work with us on a project for a couples of weeks. He was a flerf - although I didn’t find out until after was kicked off the site- and was a dopey fucker if ever there was one
English
1
0
2
26