seudonym

1.8K posts

seudonym banner
seudonym

seudonym

@Bnonym

Bitcoin is Earth's digital unifying force.

Katılım Ocak 2023
576 Takip Edilen302 Takipçiler
seudonym
seudonym@Bnonym·
@AISmallBizGuru @hiarun02 isn't deciding what's important and what's not a useless burden that's costly? i don't know what you're building but you might as well max out the models for everything. workflows are a different story but for coding i just use the best
English
1
0
0
19
AI Small Business Guru
AI Small Business Guru@AISmallBizGuru·
@hiarun02 Use a good model (Claude, OAI5.5) for architecture, planning, problems and polish. Send the grunt work to a cheap model. I prefer Kimi 2.6 at the moment, but will try DS4 at some point. Others good too, MiniMax 2.7, Qwen 2.6 Pro, GLM 5.1 ...
English
1
0
5
1.2K
Arun
Arun@hiarun02·
If DeepSeek V4 can do the same coding task for $5 why are people still paying $100 for Claude Code?
English
323
25
1.1K
173.8K
TFTC
TFTC@TFTC21·
Founders, fund managers, and devs open the Bitcoin Brief every morning before markets. They told us: "other Bitcoin media is too surface-level." We go deeper. On-chain, macro, freedom tech. Free. tftc.io/bitcoin-brief
English
2
1
7
4.4K
Dev Shah
Dev Shah@devlikesbizness·
@KobeissiLetter When employees sell stock it usually means they think the price is at or near its peak. If they believed OpenAI was going to be worth 10x more in 3 years, they would hold. 600 people chose cash now, which is a quiet vote of no confidence, even if nobody is saying it out loud.
English
9
0
12
5.3K
The Kobeissi Letter
The Kobeissi Letter@KobeissiLetter·
BREAKING: OpenAI allowed more than 600 current and former employees to sell stock in October 2025, per WSJ. These employees collectively sold $6.6 billion worth of stock. That’s $11 million per person.
English
274
475
8K
1.1M
Santiago
Santiago@svpino·
@DeniCodes I don’t know because I’ve never used a thinkpad, I think.
English
1
0
1
988
Santiago
Santiago@svpino·
The Framework 13 Pro keyboard is better than both my MacBook Pro 16 and my MacBook Air keyboards. I honestly don't want to go back. MacBook keyboards are amazing, but the 13 Pro keyboard has more travel, and that makes it feel much nicer when typing. The difference is not earth-shattering, but you will definitely notice it. MacBook keyboard → short travel, softer Framework 13 Pro keyboard → more travel, crisper Besides the feeling when typing, I have the 3-colored keyboard (black, gray, and orange), and it's a delight to look at. I wish more manufacturers started to make less boring keyboards.
Santiago tweet media
English
69
25
816
55.6K
Diligent Denizen 🇺🇸
Diligent Denizen 🇺🇸@DiligentDenizen·
‼️🇺🇸: UFC PRESIDENT DANA WHITE HAS EPSTEIN-LIKE PAINTINGS ON WALL IN HOME 👀 When showing off a title belt, Dana had a painting of a s3x act behind him. AND, a portrait of child with blue butterflies 🦋—sign associated with s3x trafficking survivors. What is going on here? 😳
English
848
3.6K
10.7K
1.4M
VLAD HOSTS THE BEST PODCAST IN BITCOIN
I think I just had my Richard Stallman moment with a Canon printer I bought 10 years ago I’ve only used it 2-3 per year to print out a few pages, spent most of the time in the box But now it appears that the 2022 drivers are incompatible with the 2026 OS So I’ve asked Claude to code me an updated driver Claude said it’s not possible due to Canon’s proprietary communication protocols that would take months of reverse engineering of USB data packets. Lots of trial and error that doesn’t guarantee success. I think I’m gonna smash this useless piece of plastic and buy a new printer. The issue is: how am I gonna find something that will work in a few years?! I really don’t want to pay a monthly subscription just to have a functioning printer, wtf. When did it become such a challenge to print a piece of paper at home?! Aaargh *rage*
VLAD HOSTS THE BEST PODCAST IN BITCOIN tweet media
English
47
1
40
5.2K
seudonym
seudonym@Bnonym·
"Unit Cost ContextRecent U.S. Army budget data shows the unit cost for a HIMARS launcher has dropped to ~$7.8 million in FY2027 (from $10.3 million in FY2026), thanks to higher production rates and economies of scale from domestic + FMS orders. Rough math for 17 launchers at ~$7.8M each: ~$132.6 million. This leaves the majority of the $1.13 billion for supporting requirements, overhead, inflation adjustments, FMS-specific modifications (e.g., country-unique configs, documentation, training), and other program costs across multiple buyers. " WTF
English
0
0
0
5
Mario Nawfal
Mario Nawfal@MarioNawfal·
🇨🇦 Canada just quietly hopped on the HIMARS train. With zero public announcement, Ottawa got added to a massive $1.1 billion U.S. contract with Lockheed Martin for M142 HIMARS rocket systems. 17 launchers are being built by 2028, and Canada is one of the buyers (they originally wanted up to 26). After years of dragging its feet on military modernization, Canada is finally getting one of the most lethal and battle-proven long-range artillery systems out there. Quietly going big on HIMARS. Interesting move. Source: CBC News Media: Archive footage
English
172
219
1K
148.2K
nvk 🌞
nvk 🌞@nvk·
Good morning. Buy Bitcoin. Buy more Bitcoin. Stack in HWW. Buy GPUs. Mute bitcoin derps. Move out of cities. Make babies. Touch grass. ✌️
English
13
4
168
3.4K
seudonym
seudonym@Bnonym·
@nvk The laptop would cost them 30$ more They could also add an airtag to it.
English
0
0
2
247
nvk 🌞
nvk 🌞@nvk·
Why haven't apple add eSIM to MacBooks yet? imagine closing the lid on a running process that needs connection and it still runs while you move around...
English
7
2
65
6.5K
Alex Finn
Alex Finn@AlexFinn·
It’s happening. 3 months ago I predicted in the next 2 years all hardware costs would triple Base Mac Mini’s would go from $600 to $1,800 Top of the line Mac Studios would go from $10,000 to $30,000 Everyone called me insane. They said it was engagement farming. Yet it’s happening faster than I predicted. I urged you to buy your own compute. I said intelligence will not get cheaper anytime soon. Only more expensive (100% true) Now it’s all playing out in real time It all makes too much sense. As openclaw and personal agents get more popular and powerful, people will need more compute, all while hardware is facing shortages Even the top labs like Anthropic don’t have enough compute to serve models from months ago. Limits going down every week Own your own compute. Host your models. Localize your agents. Do it before having powerful intelligence is reserved only for the elite.
Alex Finn tweet media
English
168
53
865
123.1K
TBH
TBH@tbh_tnh·
@nvk I’m planning on buying an M5 machine next quarter to host local model. Mainly want to do a bunch of coding. Any advice?
English
2
0
0
223
nvk 🌞
nvk 🌞@nvk·
The future is local LLMs for 99.99% of the work We are ultra early & but already this far Honestly Opus is horrible at coding, it's great at talking and writing. GPT 5.5 is 20x better code quality, that's not an exagenration. Qwen & open models are always JUST behind, and free
Xiaoyin Qu@quxiaoyin

@AnthropicAI’s business model just got disrupted by @deepseek_ai v4 pricing. Anthropic’s all about subscription locked-in: – Claude Code Max: $200/mo – Same usage via API: $5,000 – You still get rate limited; New limits added every few hours (not daily, not weekly — hours). If exceeding you will pay api pricing which can cost $100+ an hour. – Caps on parallel threads - can only use max in max not Hermes/openclaw – SDK requires the API, so devs eat the $5K DeepSeek: - do whatever. No subscription. 100x cheaper. No rate limit. No parallel limit. No usage limit. Whatever. The problem is, can Claude catch up? Yes Claude’s smarter still but most coding tasks DeepSeek is enough. Then what?

English
10
8
119
11.6K
seudonym
seudonym@Bnonym·
@tbh_tnh @nvk Get a cheaper M4 Max, what do you need advice with? Get minimum 96gb
English
0
0
1
26
seudonym
seudonym@Bnonym·
@brian_trollz @hodlonaut His entire article is worthless? It's very long, How does your small correction invalidate the whole thing.
English
0
0
3
41
Shinobi
Shinobi@brian_trollz·
@hodlonaut You are a fucking buffoon and a clown. x.com/i/status/20380… You lied and misled people about this PR in your first slop trash piece, and you just continue the same lie in your second slop trash piece even after it was totally debunked.
Shinobi tweet media
Shinobi@brian_trollz

I don't know, maybe taking an innocuous PR (one of which was closed BTW, Jon got his way) over how nodes relay other nodes IP addresses, and painting a completely distorted picture of the entire situation? The reality: John gave some innocuous advice to split up a PR, because part of it was not relaying a list of node IPs to blocks only nodes, who wouldn't relay or do anything with them. The other was changing how nodes are selected to relay very small IP lists, because only two peers are chosen in that case. She was trying to give maximal odds those peers get those IPs propagated widely. He was giving advice to a junior developer he was mentoring, to simply split up changes so individual changes can be looked at individually, which is good practice. Over two stupid tiny changes to make sure Bitcoin nodes do the best job possible finding each other. The "semantic widening" (which is nonsense bullshit buzzwords you chose probably just to make people associate it with spam without knowing what the actual PR was) didn't exist. Nothing about how messages were interpreted or what they made nodes do (the message semantics) changed, just how your node decided to send them or not in the first place. All that IRC log snippet shows in reality, when you ACTUALLY research those PRs and what they did, is actually _Wladimir_ having an autistic sperg out about something that wasn't happening. You take a random innocuous PR, and A SENIOR DEVELOPER ADVISING THE JUNIOR HE WAS MENTORING to break up two changes that should be done separately, one of which was CLOSED, and paint that as some nefarious background influence. It was a senior developer giving good advice to a junior developer, you fucking clown. Then you go further, twisting Johns interaction with Wlad as some evidence of John's "influence" meeting resistance. It was literally just Wlad autistically sperging out about something he thought was happening, that wasn't happening. You are a fucking gaslighting propagandist clown, and that entire piece was clear and obvious LLM slop.

English
21
1
37
5.2K
hodlonaut #BIP-110
hodlonaut #BIP-110@hodlonaut·
CAPTURE An investigation across four articles into how informal power over Bitcoin Core was assembled, exercised, and defended. Article Two: The Lever citadel21.com/the-lever
English
64
205
592
113.8K
seudonym retweetledi
International Cyber Digest
International Cyber Digest@IntCyberDigest·
‼️🚨 BREAKING: An AI found a Linux kernel zero-day that roots every distribution since 2017. The exploit fits in 732 bytes of Python. Patch your kernel ASAP. The vulnerability is CVE-2026-31431, nicknamed "Copy Fail," disclosed today by Theori. It has been sitting quietly in the Linux kernel for nine years. Most Linux privilege-escalation bugs are picky. They need a precise timing window (a "race"), or specific kernel addresses leaked from somewhere, or careful tuning per distribution. Copy Fail needs none of that. It is a straight-line logic mistake that works on the first try, every time, on every mainstream Linux box. The attacker just needs a normal user account on the machine. From there, the script asks the kernel to do some encryption work, abuses how that work is wired up, and ends up writing 4 bytes into a memory area called the "page cache" (Linux's high-speed copy of files in RAM). Those 4 bytes can be aimed at any program the system trusts, like /usr/bin/su, the shortcut to becoming root. Result: the next time anyone runs that program, it lets the attacker in as root. What should worry most: the corruption never touches the file on disk. It only exists in Linux's in-memory copy of that file. If you imaged the hard drive afterwards, the on-disk file would match the official package hash exactly. Reboot the machine, or just put it under memory pressure (any normal system load that needs the RAM), and the cached copy reloads fresh from disk. Containers do not help either. The page cache is shared across the whole host, so a process inside a container can use this bug to compromise the underlying server and reach into other tenants. The original sin was a 2017 "in-place optimization" in a kernel crypto module called algif_aead. It was meant to make encryption slightly faster. The change broke a critical safety assumption, and nobody noticed for nine years. That bug then rode every kernel update from 2017 to today. This vulnerability affects the following: 🔴 Shared servers (dev boxes, jump hosts, build servers): any user becomes root 🔴 Kubernetes and container clusters: one compromised pod escapes to the host 🔴 CI runners (GitHub Actions, GitLab, Jenkins): a malicious pull request becomes root on the runner 🔴 Cloud platforms running user code (notebooks, agent sandboxes, serverless functions): a tenant becomes host root Timeline: 🔴 March 23, 2026: reported to the Linux kernel security team 🔴 April 1: patch committed to mainline (commit a664bf3d603d) 🔴 April 22: CVE assigned 🔴 April 29: public disclosure Mitigation: update your kernel to a build that includes mainline commit a664bf3d603d. If you cannot patch immediately, turn off the vulnerable module: echo "install algif_aead /bin/false" > /etc/modprobe.d/disable-algif.conf rmmod algif_aead 2>/dev/null || true For environments that run untrusted code (containers, sandboxes, CI runners), block access to the kernel's AF_ALG crypto interface entirely, even after patching. Almost nothing legitimate needs it, and blocking it shuts the door on this whole class of bug...
International Cyber Digest tweet mediaInternational Cyber Digest tweet media
English
231
2.7K
11.7K
2.4M
Coin Bureau
Coin Bureau@coinbureau·
🚨CANADA MOVES TO BAN CRYPTO ATMS IN MAJOR CRACKDOWN Canadian government plans to prohibit crypto ATMs, labelling them a key tool for scams and illicit money flows. With the world’s highest crypto ATM density per capita, the crackdown impacts nearly 4,000 machines nationwide.
Coin Bureau tweet mediaCoin Bureau tweet media
English
215
218
772
88.4K
The Hat 🎮
The Hat 🎮@thehat2k5·
I'm in 🇨🇦, there is one BTC atm within a 15 minute radius by car, I've never used it. No way in hell I'm putting my I.D. and bank card in it or paying the crazy 10% fee to use it! Is this the "scams" they are talking about? Because I can't imagine a criminal willing to KYC on one either 🤔
English
16
0
28
2.3K
seudonym
seudonym@Bnonym·
@AskVenice It's a bit annoying that you can't see anything coming until it finishes. Also the model goes at about 9tok/s.
English
0
0
0
176
Venice
Venice@AskVenice·
GLM 5.1 is now live on Venice with end-to-end encryption. Z.AI's flagship with the highest privacy guarantees on Venice. Hardware-attested encryption, 200K context, controllable reasoning. Included for free in Pro, Pro+, and Max subscriptions.
English
28
22
180
51.8K
seudonym
seudonym@Bnonym·
@ErikVoorhees It's a bit annoying that you can't see anything coming until it finishes. Also the model goes at about 9tok/s.
English
1
0
0
110
seudonym
seudonym@Bnonym·
@Cointelegraph It's not "a BTC" they called it ecash so there's zero confusoin. People are f dumb and they consider any shitcoin as the next Bitcoin so not totally wrong.
English
0
0
2
50
Cointelegraph
Cointelegraph@Cointelegraph·
⚡ TODAY: Dev proposes a BTC fork that would redistribute Satoshi's wallet.
Cointelegraph tweet media
English
204
119
431
60.1K
Veo Xue
Veo Xue@vocean813·
@Cointelegraph Touching Satoshi’s coins is where Bitcoin stops being Bitcoin. That fork won’t be quiet.
English
5
0
59
1.6K