Brett Laird Francis Doyle MCS

Iranian American leaked Last October, Steve Bannon and Kash Patel warned that an Iranian spy network was influencing the Biden-Harris administration’s intelligence priorities, identifying Robert Malley, Ariane Tabatabai, and Maher Bitar. Tabatabai is now suspected of leaking Israel’s military plans to Iran, according to Sky News Arabia. On June 29, 2023, Robert Malley was placed on unpaid leave as Joe Biden's special envoy to Iran, with his security clearance suspended amid an investigation into the possible mishandling of classified information. On September 29, 2023, Semafor reported that Malley was involved in supporting, funding, and directing an Iranian intelligence operation aimed at influencing the U.S. and its allies based on leaked Iranian government emails. The emails reveal that Malley helped place Tabatabai, identified as an Iranian agent of influence, in key U.S. government positions—first at the State Department and later at the Pentagon, where she currently serves as Chief of Staff to the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations. On October 16, 2023, Revolver News reported that Maher Bitar, now Senior Director for Intelligence Programs on the National Security Council, was previously an executive director of “Students for Justice in Palestine.” The group reportedly responded to the recent Hamas attack on Israel by organizing a “Day of Resistance” in support of Hamas’ “historic win” against Israel. Bitar was photographed wearing a Palestinian keffiyeh in front of a sign reading, “Divest from Israeli Apartheid.” Despite these associations, he plays a critical role in shaping the administration’s intelligence priorities. Malley, whose security clearance was suspended by the FBI, placed Tabatabai in the Department of Defense as Assistant Chief of Staff for the Special Operations Office. In 2014, Tabatabai reportedly emailed Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif and members of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard, requesting permission to travel on behalf of the U.S. government. A year after these revelations, the Biden-Harris administration has unbelievably allowed Tabatabai to remain in her top role at the Department of Defense, retaining her top-level security clearance.

One illegal vote cancels a citizen's. Burden is minimal: ~90%+ of citizens have or can easily obtain docs (cheaper and faster than many government processes). Brennan Center's "21M without ready access" is a self-reported survey, not "impossible to get." Public support: 70–80%+ favor proof of citizenship for registration . The infographic recycles advocacy-group talking points (Brennan Center style) that overstate inconvenience while downplaying election integrity. The bill adds reasonable, common-sense safeguards with built-in alternatives—exactly like REAL ID implementation or passport/SS processes millions handle yearly. Existing voters are largely grandfathered; new safeguards prevent fraud without disenfranchising citizens. Claims of mass suppression don't hold up against the text or evidence.

Infographic claiming the SAVE America Act would create 8 major "risks" of disenfranchising U.S. citizens. These include forced DHS "purges" with high error rates, penalties only on officials, in-person passport requirements, omission of REAL IDs/marriage certificates , vague alternatives, & strict photo ID rules. The infographic exaggerates burdens while ignoring the bill's explicit safeguards, real-world data on non-citizen voting, and overwhelming public support. Here's a point-by-point debunk based on the bill text, audits, and evidence:1–2. "Forced submission of voter lists to DHS SAVE 'purge' with 14% errors... no penalties for bad purges but jail for officials"The bill requires states to maintain accurate rolls (already mandated by the National Voter Registration Act) and use tools like DHS's SAVE system to cross-check citizenship—not automatic purges. States must notify voters of any issues and allow proof/appeals. The "14% error" comes from one Texas county sample where SAVE flagged naturalized citizens whose records weren't updated; those voters fixed it by providing proof. Overall flags affect ~0.01% of voters, with multi-step verification to avoid errors. Penalties target willful violations by officials registering ineligible people (protecting against fraud). List maintenance has always had due-process rules—errors don't mean "no accountability." This is standard maintenance, not suppression.3. "In-person proof of citizenship (passport expensive) for new/update registrations"Acceptable primary documents include a U.S. passport, certain REAL IDs showing citizenship, military ID + birth record, or government photo ID + certified birth certificate. Birth certificates cost $10–30 and are orderable online/by mail from vital records offices. Passports aren't mandatory. The bill applies mainly to new registrations or updates (e.g., moves, name changes)—existing voters aren't forced to re-prove unless changing status. In-person is required for primary docs to prevent fakes, but see alternatives below. 4–5. "Omits standard REAL IDs & marriage certificates, barriers for 69 Million women' w/ name changes"False on both. The bill explicitly accepts REAL IDs (or enhanced driver's licenses) that indicate U.S. citizenship. Marriage/divorce certificates are accepted as additional evidence to link maiden vs. current names—exactly how women already handle passports, driver's licenses, Social Security, & bank accounts. The "69 Million women" figure is a partisan talking point based on the ~90% of married women who ever changed names; it ignores that documents link easily & already-registered voters are unaffected. Officials & fact-checkers have called the claim "zero validity" fear mongering. 6–7. "Vague/unspecified alternative process with affidavits" The bill mandates that every state "establish an alternative process" for anyone w/o primary documents. Applicants can submit "other evidence" of citizenship + a perjury attestation, followed by an official determination. Timelines & procedures follow existing state practices. This directly addresses edge cases (elderly, naturalized citizens, name changes). Critics calling it "vague" ignore the explicit requirement in the text. 8. "Strict photo ID to vote" Separate from registration proof: Voters must show eligible photo ID . This is already law in 36+ states w/ no evidence of mass disenfranchisement—turnout has held or risen. Free IDs are widely available. Polls consistently show 80%+ American support (including majorities of Democrats & Black voters). Broader context the infographic omits: Non-citizen voting is real: Audits found thousands of potential ineligible registrations and dozens of actual votes . Self-attestation under perjury isn't enough when millions of non-citizens live here.

We can refute every argument they throw at the SAVE America Act And we have We must keep doing that—day after day, and week after week—until this bill passes Pass it on

Veritas 💯‼️👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 Sen. Michael Bennet (D-CO) is misrepresenting the SAVE America Act primarily by framing it as outright “voter suppression” that will “make it harder for millions of American citizens — especially women, rural voters, & seniors — to vote,” while calling it “Donald Trump’s” bill aimed at blocking eligible citizens rather than securing elections. Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT) & Republicans have pushed back on these Democratic arguments as a false narrative that downplays the bill’s targeted safeguards & built-in flexibilities. What the bill actually does is amend the National Voter Registration Act to require documentary proof of U.S. citizenship for new federal voter registrations & updates. Existing registered voters are grandfathered _ unaffected unless they update their info. Acceptable proof includes:U.S. passport Birth certificate + photo ID Certain REAL ID-compliant documents indicating citizenship Military ID + service records showing U.S. birth Naturalization/Citizenship Certificate Or other government-issued photo ID paired w/secondary evidence Key flexibility often omitted in criticism: The bill explicitly requires states to create an alternative process for anyone lacking standard documents — allowing “other evidence” of citizenship + a sworn statement under penalty of perjury, followed by state verification. It also addresses common name-change issues (e.g., for married women) & requires states to help w/ access to documents (many at no or low cost). It adds a photo ID requirement for voting but builds on existing state laws. States must audit rolls using federal databases to flag & investigate potential non-citizens. Specific ways Bennet’s portrayal misrepresents it. Republicans, led by sponsor Sen. Lee, argue these points distort the bill:Exaggerates “millions disenfranchised” & targets specific groups: Bennet & Democrats repeatedly claim it will block women (name changes), seniors, rural voters, & working families from registering or voting, w/ some estimates of 12–21 million affected. In reality, the bill does not strip anyone’s existing registration, applies only to new/updates (millions register/update annually but w/ state assistance), & includes the alternative process + name-discrepancy fixes. Most citizens already have or can easily obtain proof; the “burden” is verification, not an absolute barrier. Lee has highlighted on the floor that this is reasonable election integrity, not suppression. Calls it “Trump’s” personal suppression bill: Bennet’s posts & statements label it “Donald Trump’s SAVE America Act” & say Trump is “holding the Senate hostage” to pass it for partisan gain. Sen. Lee in the Senate — it’s longstanding GOP legislation focused on closing self-attestation loopholes. Downplays or ignores the non-citizen voting problem it addresses: By emphasizing that non-citizen voting is already illegal & “extremely rare,” Bennet implies the bill is unnecessary overkill. Lee counters that even the small numbers confirmed in state audits prove self-attestation + weak checks are insufficient. “Even one is too many,” and the bill prevents dilution of citizen votes without removing eligible Americans. Implies strict “in-person only” or passport/birth-certificate mandate w/ no options: Floor remarks (e.g., Bennet’s opposition speech) contrast the current flexible system with new “requirements to present proof of citizenship in person,” suggesting mass barriers. The bill text allows state flexibility in submission methods & mandates the alternative evidence path — details Democrats often skip when calling it extreme. In short, Lee & Republicans say Bennet’s line (shared by many Democrats) turns a common-sense proof-of-citizenship rule - supported in polls by majorities across parties - into a Jim Crow-style voter-suppression scare tactic, while ignoring the bill’s accommodations & the real (if limited) evidence of non-citizen registrations from audits.

They wouldn’t even pass a clean voter ID bill—even though they’ve been saying they’re on board with it Shameful

Why is geriatric nursing home patient still in the Senate? When will the American people wake up and realize that once they are to where McConnell is, there's almost NO CHANCE of their actions being guided by what's best for America. KICK THE SEWER RATS OUT OF DC.

I seriously wonder if he even sees these critiques. Does he know how to access X? I doubt that his loyal staff tells him what people are thinking. It's a retirement community for deluded legislators. Thank you sincerely for your service, but when it's time, it's time.

3-Minute Recap for Thurs, 19 March: Two potential BOMBSHELL cases you’re not hearing about…!

One of Donald Trump's superpowers is that his highly "credentialed" opponents believe he is an idiot. It's glorious.

On the news that USAID funded Boko Haram, I couldn't help but think back to 2014 when Alex Jones then alleged Boko Haram was being secretly backed by the Obama CIA

John Cornyn is trying to convince voters that he's a new man, and the next 6 years will be different. I want you to know that I'm going to fight every bit as hard as I always have. Unlike Cornyn, no Democrat president will ever thank me for restricting gun ownership.

These 250 people had no idea that they were about to get released from prison in Belarus! I have had to keep this a secret until it actually happened!!!

@LauraLoomer 🤣😂🤣💯‼️🤠🤙🏻🇺🇸

Proven right again. Last year I told you all that Kent leaked President Trump’s private meeting schedule, particularly his meetings with Jewish Republicans, to Tucker Carlson and Max Blumenthal. When admin officials caught Kent, who was in the hallway to Trump’s office when he was seen picking up his phone and texting Tucker, he was confronted by Senior White House officials who wanted to see if he would lie to their faces. So they cornered him and asked him if he leaked to Tucker. They said they knew it was him. Kent confessed. Kent was then told, “if you ever do that again, you’re fired.” Again, this is now a confirmation of everything I reported last year. When I posted my reporting, Kent retaliated against me by posting a vague tweet that insinuated I am a Mossad agent. A total abuse of power.

BREAKING: Federal law enforcement says that Joe Kent shared secret government information with anti-Trump figures like Tucker Carlson. A second administration official said that Kent leaked classified information from a server to a member of the media.

There will never again be a free and fair election in Europe so long as the EU can pick every country’s winners and losers by using its Digital Censorship Act to rig every election in favor of the candidate race it wants to win.

Don’t Listen to Idiots About the Iran War Editor's Note: For decades, former presidents have been all talk and no action. Now, Donald Trump is eliminating the threat from Iran once and for all.  townhall.com/columnists/kur…

My newest skateboard. My flight was delayed so I drew it at the airport.