DegenQuant

1.4K posts

DegenQuant banner
DegenQuant

DegenQuant

@BruceCMaster

I am a frugal human model. You are welcome to feed me new data and information. I do not need your deep research. Unless it is really deep.

New York Katılım Ekim 2013
760 Takip Edilen540 Takipçiler
DegenQuant retweetledi
拖拉机
拖拉机@tuolaji2024·
泵浦激光器,比EML还紧缺的隐形瓶颈,被市场严重低估的紧缺环节,Coherent 2026年3月停止对外销售980nm泵浦芯片,全部自用做EDFA。Lumentum产能被英伟达/谷歌/微软锁死,供需缺口50-60%。价格从80美元暴涨到300美元仍一货难求,Lumentum CEO原话:“泵浦激光器的产能约束比EML还严重。” 1.6T光模块对泵浦的需求是800G的2-3倍。2026年全球1.6T出货1200万只,仅此一项就需要6000万只泵浦激光器。加上DCI互联每50公里就要一个EDFA放大器,每个放大器需要2-4只泵浦。AI算力爆发。数据中心间DCI链路暴增。泵浦需求指数级增长。 国产替代在加速:华工科技980nm泵浦模块月产能5000只,年底扩至2万只。长光华芯泵浦芯片良率提升至75%。但国产厂商电光效率和可靠性与海外仍有2-3年差距,预计2027年才能真正缓解行业缺口。
拖拉机@tuolaji2024

英伟达给了 2500 万只 NPO 需求指引? 旭创1000万只指引,约160亿美元=1140亿人民币。旭创2025年全年营收382.4亿,光NPO这一块相当于现有体量的3倍。打五折也有570亿,相当于再造一个半旭创。 这就是牢美开了新易盛和中际旭创二倍做多的理由了? 以及机构上调了旭创目标价到 1650 的核心原因也是因为 NPO 要放大量。

中文
13
16
100
32.7K
El
El@elshazar·
@BruceCMaster Literally what? SATS don’t actually have their SpaceX shares… As far as I know, it hasn’t yet been transferred to them. So how would they sell what they don’t have?
English
1
0
0
342
DegenQuant
DegenQuant@BruceCMaster·
If you want to be a long term investor of SPCX, buy $SATS. Its market cap is 32B, but its SPCX holding worth 43B, and they have other business worth about 30B, with ~15B debt. The discount in $SATS now is caused by those who cannot sell SPCX (PE/VC/Employee/IPO). So they short $SATS to hedge. The discount window will close when they are allowed to sell. The first batch will be unlocked when SPCX's price is above 30% of its IPO price ($135), aka $173.5, for 5 days. $SPCX is now $175.5. So the probability that this discount disappear in next week is greater than 30%. So buy $SATS, if you believe in Elon and in $SPCX.
English
23
15
292
88.5K
3X Long Labubu
3X Long Labubu@labubu_trader·
The Information is a great storyteller. They can always find an angle to tweak the facts to match their narrative. If you are a normal IQ person, you’d know that all companies care about ROI from day one except the ones bankrupted or the ones with wealthy sugar daddy like TI.
Amir Efrati@amir

new: Meta is doing a 180, trying to be vanguard of token-minimizing. 2 months ago Meta epitomized tokenmaxxing, on track to spend billions a year on claude etc.

English
5
3
81
35.3K
DegenQuant retweetledi
Investment Wisdom
Investment Wisdom@InvestingCanons·
The key is emotional discipline.
Investment Wisdom tweet media
English
4
55
418
9.8K
DegenQuant
DegenQuant@BruceCMaster·
New to technical analysis. How bullish is this weekly bull flag + hammer + prior high support? $MXL
DegenQuant tweet media
English
0
0
1
304
DM Trading
DM Trading@dartmonkeytrdg·
@BruceCMaster I don’t think that’s when that batch gets released. What I had seen and admittedly not read directly in the S1 is that 20-30% gets unlocked at Q2 earnings (30% is the stoc is up 30% from IPO price… which won’t be hard with 4.3% float and options market trading from Tuesday.
English
1
0
4
1.1K
myfy
myfy@myfyAI·
@BruceCMaster Misinformation: The first batch will be unlocked when SPCX's price is above 30% of its IPO price ($135), aka $173.5, for 5 days.
English
1
0
3
1.5K
DegenQuant
DegenQuant@BruceCMaster·
@mcdroidgame @ManglaniAkshay Thanks for fact checking I did have a type about the 175.5 trigger price. There is ~24.5B debt but spaceX will pay about 8B in cash for the debt so that debt number was not wrong.
English
1
0
0
17
DegenQuant
DegenQuant@BruceCMaster·
@hegen84 Check its volume. 33% of its float. Far more than its space peers.
English
0
0
1
1.1K
p909
p909@hegen84·
@BruceCMaster Not sure, that’s the only explanation for today’s move. All space stocks plummeted at open and it very much looked like a synchronised move, difficult to isolate here potential SATS shorting imo.
English
1
0
0
1.9K
DegenQuant
DegenQuant@BruceCMaster·
@GlobalCollapse True. Just saying there is a way to get long term exposure at a discount.
English
0
0
1
940
Late Stage Capitalism
Late Stage Capitalism@GlobalCollapse·
@BruceCMaster The logical fallacy here is that $SATS will increase to close the valuation gap, whereas truth is more likely when insiders can sell & dont need to short SATS t$SPCX will drop from all of the selling, bringing it closer to, if not in line, w/implied valuation from SATS.
English
1
0
2
2.2K
DegenQuant
DegenQuant@BruceCMaster·
@labubu_trader Cool. Next time take me be part of the ride! I can tolerate time and risk!
English
0
0
1
137
bubble boi
bubble boi@bubbleboi·
I’m sorry but this was obvious to anyone with a brain. Photonics reliability is garbage and CPO isn’t happening for at least 5 more years. Also if it does happen it will be Broadcom who wins it not Nvidia.
法克魷吉米 Jimmy | Real TSMC Insight | 純愛を学び中 💜@jimmy_yoasobi

LONG $AVGO $MRVL Key Points >CPO co-packaged optics technology is actively advancing >NVIDIA Spectrum-6 Ethernet version experiences optical loss over 3.5dB higher than previous generation >Active alignment requires sub-micron precision with over one hundred operations per module >Quantum-X modular design has lower yield pressure while Spectrum-X direct co-packaging causes yield to deteriorate exponentially >NPO near-packaged optics serves as short-term transitional solution Conclusions >CPO is inevitable in the long term but the timeline carries significant uncertainty >Regardless of whether CPO or NPO ultimately adopted the optical components supply chain will continue to benefit Discussion This article thoroughly dissects the controversy triggered by the SemiAnalysis report The focus is not on denying the future of CPO but on highlighting the precision alignment difficulties during mass production Active alignment involves six degrees of freedom making it extremely easy for tiny deviations to cause high optical loss Spectrum-X has high port density and cannot easily replace faulty optical engines like Quantum-X This leads to a situation where with 95% yield per engine the probability of all 32 engines being good drops sharply to about 19% To achieve acceptable overall yield each attachment step needs to approach 99.5% yield threshold This presents a major challenge under current manufacturing processes NPO only needs to handle alignment for a single optical engine greatly reducing complexity It is suitable as a bridging technology before CPO matures Overall the article maintains a balanced perspective It acknowledges the reasonableness of the technical obstacles while pointing out that AI networking demand remains strong Investors and industry practitioners should closely monitor subsequent verification and solution progress

English
26
7
365
97.9K
DegenQuant
DegenQuant@BruceCMaster·
上涨买价值,下跌买投机。如果一天市场很热闹,不要买。如果市场很冷清,可以考虑买以前看好的。
中文
0
0
3
397
DegenQuant
DegenQuant@BruceCMaster·
Arb needs to get SPCX stocks to sell.... Unwind will happen when there are enough stocks in the lending program for them to borrow. Next Tuesday there will be options, but I doubt the put will be very expensive then --- as market makers does not have much stocks to hedge either. So the supply of SPCX will still be very small and that will lead to a violent rip. Is that too good to be true?
English
0
0
0
70
DegenQuant
DegenQuant@BruceCMaster·
The NAV of $SATS is $180 as of now. It is traded at $108. Someone do the math. Even considered discount this is still insane.
English
5
5
27
4.3K
DegenQuant
DegenQuant@BruceCMaster·
@StoryTrading @CryptKeeper_06 I would hope the other way, that SPCX stay above 173.5 for 5 days in 10 days, so there will be the first round of unlock. And the NAV of SATS will be even higher.
English
1
0
1
109
StoryTrading
StoryTrading@StoryTrading·
@BruceCMaster @CryptKeeper_06 we will be right on Tuesday when the market become efficient and arb funds can begin shorting $SPCX to buy $SATS Bookmark this post
English
1
0
1
301
Art of Speculation
Art of Speculation@ArtofSpecuycky·
老黄喊单sell the news之后,MRVL跌了不少——现在或许是重新认识这家公司的时候了 上周老黄在Computex高调点名MRVL,说它会成为下一个万亿市值公司,随后单日暴涨30%。然后这一周跟着大盘跌了回来,很多人追高被套。 评论区有人问我怎么看,我就重新把这家公司梳理一遍,给还不太了解MRVL的朋友说清楚。 MRVL到底是做什么的 如果说英伟达负责造汽车,那MRVL就是负责修高速公路。车越多,对路的需求越大。如果未来AI数据中心从10万张GPU扩张到100万张GPU,受益的不只是卖车的人,还有修路的人。 具体业务分三块: 第一块是光通信,做DSP芯片和光学器件,核心客户是AI数据中心。这是现在增长最快的引擎,公司预期今年光通信业务增速超过70%,而半年前这个数字还只有30%。 第二块是定制芯片ASIC,帮谷歌、亚马逊这些云厂商做定制AI处理器。这块市场炒了两年,现在终于开始真正放量,公司预期明年翻倍增长,后年继续保持40亿美元以上的规模。 第三块是交换机,负责数据中心内部和数据中心之间的流量调度。这块市场几乎还没有被定价进去,是最大的潜在惊喜。 为什么说MRVL的位置越来越重要 早期AI的瓶颈主要是算力和存储,GPU够不够快、HBM够不够多。但现在运行的都是推理模型和混合专家模型,需要跨集群传输大量数据,GPU之间的通信带宽开始成为新的瓶颈。据中心建得越大,承载数据的铁路就越不能断。MRVL所在的连接层,是AI基础设施里不可缺少的一环。 财务数据 公司预期2027财年总营收约115亿美元,同比增长40%。2028财年冲到165亿美元,增长45%,比上次预期又上调了15亿美元。 更关键的是费用结构。营收增速是45%,但运营费用增速只有15%到20%。中间拉开的差距全部转化成利润。目标营业利润率是38%到40%,而且管理层说2028财年会走到这个区间的上限。 用金融术语说这叫运营杠杆在释放,营收暴涨但成本没跟着涨,这才是机构真正想看到的东西。 管理层还直接拿10亿美元预付给台积电锁产能,出货时间表也从原来预计的第四季度提前到第三季度。用现金投票比用嘴巴讲故事可信多了。 和英伟达的合作要认真对待 这次MRVL和英伟达达成了三个层面的深度合作:AI无线接入网络、NVLink高速互联整合、以及硅光子层面的联合开发。 但更值得思考的是为什么英伟达愿意这样做。 云厂商想用自研芯片降低成本,但又需要英伟达生态的兼容性。英伟达自己不方便直接帮客户做高度定制化的解决方案,这件事就交给MRVL来做。MRVL现在的角色是连接各大科技巨头的桥梁,不只是一个零件供应商。 这个身份的变化对估值的影响是结构性的,不是简单调整一下市盈率。 还有几个市场没有定价进去的东西 交换机业务几乎完全没有算进2028财年的预测,这是纯粹的潜在超额收益。 光通信的指引还有继续上调的空间,管理层自己说的。 另外法说会上有三个明显的回避:新的第一线大客户是否独家供应没有正面回答、定制ARM CPU市场的问题被绕开、微软亚马逊等具体项目细节拒绝披露。 这些回避背后大概率有更大的战略计划还没到时候说。但要提醒一点:没有说出来的东西只能当线索,不能当已发生的事情来加仓。 风险要说清楚 数据中心业务占总营收76%,高度集中在少数几家北美云厂商。任何一个大客户削减资本开支,营收波动都会很大。 2028财年的预测建立在云厂商资本开支继续增长30%以上的假设上,如果这个假设不成立,财测压力会很大。 运营费用今年还在扩张,要等到2028财年才能看到明显收敛,短期利润有压力。 还有股权稀释的问题,并购和与英伟达的合作导致股数增加到9.15亿股,虽然每季有2亿美元回购,但要持续观察是否足以抵消。 现在怎么看这个价位 MRVL最近跟着大盘跌回来,从老黄喊单之后的高位已经回调了不少。如果大盘继续下行,之前提到有机会去补220附近的缺口,那个位置是值得认真对待的入场机会。 市场现在的争论是MRVL兑现的程度有多高,以及重新定价的时间点在哪里。 这家公司正在从一个定制芯片供应商变成AI互联层的全套件提供商。这个转变如果被市场充分定价,估值逻辑会完全不同。 但眼下最好的策略还是等。等缺口,等更好的价格,按计划分批建仓,或者说表现更强一点250不一定跌破,还没进场的可以分批dca,最低跌的标准是到缺口220。
中文
55
51
235
45.1K