COR3WIN

@Christojt @zissou_1958 @realmikolson @Hairball911 Matthew 28:18 Colossians 1:15-20

@zissou_1958 @realmikolson @Hairball911 Where does the Bible say that the Gospel is "only Jesus"?

Exactly. Roman Catholics can point to fringe liberal or prosperity “pastors” (like Joel Osteen or Paula White) and claim they represent all Protestants and evangelicals. They don’t. We don’t submit to anti-biblical leadership simply because a false teacher carries the title “pastor.” Scripture explicitly warns against that over and over again. These figures are not our representatives, our pontiff, or any kind of supreme authority. They don’t even reflect the overwhelming majority of Protestant belief—historically or today. Not even close. The irony is that, in Roman Catholicism, the pope does function as a supreme authority. He is the central figure to whom Catholics are expected to fully submit—as their Canon Law states—their “intellect and will” (yes, it really says that). So when a fringe “evangelical pastor” teaches or does something unbiblical, we’re free to reject it outright. No defense required. Why? Because the Scripture is our authority, and everyone, including church leadership, is wholly bound to it alone. But when a pope promotes something outright unbiblical (which happens often, as seen below), Roman Catholics are still bound—at least in principle—to submit. It functions like a cult in this manner.

@SpinFictionX @catholiccom @JimmyAkin3000 Truth. But it ultimately removes the Catholic church as an ultimate authority figure. Christ is who we should strive for and it is His grace that will save us.

@catholiccom @JimmyAkin3000 I'll simplify it down to the nugget of truth. At the end of the day, God can save whoever He wants. Doesn't mean we shouldn't all do our best to follow Christ, something he asked us to do, besides repentance, which is a work.

"The thief on the cross was saved by faith alone, not baptism!" @JimmyAkin3000's answer:

@catholiccom @JimmyAkin3000 God doesn't make exceptions, he makes the rules, full stop. Not the Catholic church. You folks really don't have a good answer for this one.

@exanxc @MattisRedacted @grok There's a difference between history and scripture. Where the hell do you get off thinking Baptists and Evangelicals aren't aware of Christianity's history? Tradition is fine as long as people don't worship the tradition, Christ should ultimately always be the only focus.

@MattisRedacted Hey, @grok, how many Evangelicals and Baptists are there combined, and how many classical Protestants are there combined? Which group has more members?

Nowhere in the Bible are the deaths of Jesus' apostles recorded except for James the Great (excluding Judas Iscariot). So, where did you get the idea that the other 11 apostles (including Matthias) were also martyred? Church Tradition?

@frenbilt @Xaekai You can do that in the right lanes you fucking retard

The SUV is more dangerous to society than any left lane camper

@Memewhile321 @Butch30586594 You don't understand the purpose of baptism if you're using it to avoid made up theological legalese to avoid going to hell for a technicality. Jesus made the decision to get baptized, we should also willingly make that decision ourselves when we accept Him into our hearts.

@Butch30586594 You have to be in your 30s to be baptized?

Deflection...many such cases

@MrCasey62 How the hell do you guys take THIS so literally, but bend over backwards to claim shit like Mary being the new "ark of the covenant" and being sinless by reading between the lines and fully embracing metaphorical readings of verses? lol

“The Word” is the 2nd Person of the Trinity. “…became flesh” is the Incarnation: Jesus. So “The flesh we are to ‘eat’ (consume)” is Jesus. Catholics totally agree. And we got it straight from the Bible.

@edward_mullany @JoshuaTCharles That's kind of the rub of the Catholic church bud lol.. historical inconsistencies are common, especially early on. A lot of the current dogma didn't get clarified until between 1100-1500. Which is fine, but lets not pretend that modern Catholic practices rolled out in 100AD.

Mark Driscoll, who left the Catholic Church, quite literally claims that the way in which the Catholic Church prizes celibacy, virginity, and monasticism primes it to be dominated by Islam, because it makes men “soft.” Except—it doesn’t. The Catholic Church is still here, and has not been dominated by Islam for the entire 1,400 years of its existence. When Catholics called the Crusades, they prized all the things Driscoll claims are “soft” far more than they do even now. Some “softening.” Does he not realize that by this standard, he’s disqualified the vast majority of the greatest saints throughout all of Church history? Most of the Church Fathers (who were extremely hard, tough men) were “soft”? OUR LORD HIMSELF? Finally, Driscoll says Islam will dominate because it allows polygamy, violence, etc. He obviously does not endorse this. But he seems far more confident in Islam’s ability to transform the world than Jesus’s, who said “the meek shall inherit the earth.” Just astounding. Let us pray that this fallen away Catholic comes Home! x.com/PastorMark/sta…

@LVDGuy @SecretFire79 Catholic worship of Mary is going to immediately turn off any actual practicing true Christian from even considering it.

@SecretFire79 I’m convinced this RZ guy deep down knows Catholicism is true but for personal reasons just can’t admit it. He went from being ecumenical to polemical to now attacking in a way that seems downright personal. His whole theology is digging through ancient councils that “contradict”

Protestantism is on its last peg leg

@CahaLLoOla @lilsistweets @MrCasey62 The contents of Mass are not unique to the Catholic church. The specific tradition based elements within the current Catholic Mass (ie eucharist) do not predate new testament scriptures

@COR3WIN @lilsistweets @MrCasey62 Mass is older than all the new testament, for starters.

Evangelicals: “Catholics should dumb down everything to OUR level. They need to cater to US! They should make everything subject to OUR ignorance!” No, thanks, we’re Catholics. We do what’s right—whether it meets with your approval or not. 🤣

@carsonweber @renewingprotest No wonder Catholics have only a surface level understanding of scripture.

The Catholic Church historically forbade Bible reading in the vernacular, banned lay interpretation, punished those who questioned tradition, burned translations (Tyndale, Wycliffe, etc.) and declared at Trent that anyone using Scripture against Catholic dogmas is anathema. If Catholic doctrines were truly supported by Scripture, none of this would have been necessary. Systems that fear Scripture always fear truth.

@lilsistweets @MrCasey62 None of your traditions and how they are presented, predate scripture

@COR3WIN @MrCasey62 Tradition predates scripture

@MrCasey62 @lilsistweets No one wants you to cater to them, they're expressing a hope that you might stop the heretical deification of Mary. You're just so insolated via the Catholic institutionalized non-scripture tradition mindset that no one actually thinks you be able to.

@lilsistweets It’s getting more common. Nothing more laughable than the whole Evangelical, “Catholics need to cater to us and do whatever meets with our approval right now!” nonsense. Like we care what they think. 😂

@Catholicizm1 Continuing the Pharisee tradition

Protestants are enraged with jealousy that their pastors can’t make water Holy.

@beetle67a @ChadTheBad @PastorMark Idol worshipping retard says what?

@ChadTheBad @PastorMark Very good. Goes along with dying in the arena and combating the great heresies. Of course Protestants essentially *are* Muslims when you reflect on it, but still.

This is one of the problems with the Catholic papacy and why Islam is dominating and growing at such a rapid pace.

@LordPerzival @ross_neuberth @WallStreetApes HE doesn't have to prove anything, WE have eyes and WE can clearly see they're completely full of shit. Makes veterans look like shit, so yea, I'm going to call it out.

@COR3WIN @ross_neuberth @WallStreetApes When has he proven that anyone isn’t actually deserving of their compensation? The clips may look bad but you don’t know their medical history. They don’t delve into it either. They go over the amount and for what. He’s not a doctor.

This man was only in the Navy for 2 years He now has a normal job and gets paid $5,800 per month Despite this, he also gets from the VA: - $2,070 per month from VA Disability per month (tax free) - He’s about to get an additional $2,400 extra per month from the VA for starting school again - He also is about to get the VA PhD stipend which is an additional $4,000+ per month depending on school He will get over $10,000+ per month from the VA for only being in the Navy for 2 years All paid for by taxpayers The system is broken Disability is tax-free and paid monthly regardless of employment or school status

@LordPerzival @ross_neuberth @WallStreetApes He's able to confirm that someone claiming to be a disabled vet isn't actually disabled beforehand?

@COR3WIN @ross_neuberth @WallStreetApes You realize he selects his guests and has access to their info beforehand, correct?

@LordPerzival @ross_neuberth @WallStreetApes Every veteran that's been on the show has been milking the system, how is that Caleb's fault? lol

@ross_neuberth @WallStreetApes It’s like some military guy stole Caleb’s girlfriend and now he’s bitter about it.

@ross_neuberth @WallStreetApes Talk to anyone who has actually been in the military and they'll tell you straight up that there is rampant VA claim fraud. It's not a psyop, its just finally getting noticed.

@WallStreetApes What’s this weird psyop going after military benefits and calling it fraud. God knows it looks like a distraction from some of the actual fraud in this country.