Carpenter 4 Trump 🇺🇸

@Chicago1Ray @realDonaldTrump Ken Paxton @KenPaxtonTX would make an outstanding AG. Same with Mike Lee @BasedMikeLee

Just Announced 🚨 Short list of possible replacements for Pam Bondi released and thankfully Todd Blanche ain't on it Judge Jeannine Lee Zeldin Harmeet Dhillion Ron DeSantis If you want @realDonaldTrump to appoint Judge Jeannine as (AG) let him know.. he'll see this

@DrMargaretShow @Megavolts001 @TulsiGabbard The autopen pardoned the elf.

🚨🔥 **HOLY SMOKES, AMERICA — THIS IS THE BOMBSHELL WE’VE BEEN WAITING FOR!!!** 🔥🚨 DNI @TulsiGabbard just CONFIRMED on The Megyn Kelly Show that she’s leading a full investigation into Anthony Fauci for **alleged perjury** and his direct links to U.S.-funded gain-of-function research at the Wuhan lab as part of the COVID-19 origins probe! Finally… **accountability is coming**. The truth about what really happened is about to explode! 🇺🇸💥 Here’s the **FULL video transcript** so you don’t miss a single word: ☑️Tulsi Gabbard:** “But the thing that we are working with Jay Bhattacharya, the new NIH director on, as well as Secretary Kennedy, is looking at the gain-of-function research that in the case of the Wuhan lab, as well as many others — many of these other bio labs around the world — was actually U.S.-funded and leads to this dangerous kind of research that in many examples has resulted in either a pandemic or some other major health crisis.” ☑️Megyn Kelly:** “Let me ask you specifically… we already know that EcoHealth Alliance was partnering with this Wuhan lab to do gain-of-function research. We just have never been able to have somebody say, ‘And it was that exact experiment that led to this COVID bug.’ But have we gotten there? What’s the new thing you’re digging into?” ☑️Tulsi Gabbard:** “We are working on it with Jay Bhattacharya and look forward to being able to share that hopefully very soon — that specific link between the gain-of-function research and what we saw with COVID-19. I mean, that would be extraordinary. Because just so the audience knows, if it was Peter Daszak’s research with the Wuhan so-called ‘bat lady’ that caused this pandemic, then Anthony Fauci helped fund the thing he denied over and over and over to Senator Rand Paul… under oath. So is it any wonder that he sought a preemptive pardon… by President Biden before he left office? And then strong-armed and smeared people like Dr. Jay Bhattacharya — anybody who came out and said ‘I don’t know if that’s natural. This actually smacks of lab.’ And the reason why this is so important is not just what happened in the past, it’s because this research is happening in bio labs around the world… Who knows what kinds of pathogens are in these labs and if released could create another COVID-like pandemic… But in order to protect the American people’s best interest, we have to bring about an end to it.” ☑️☑️This is **huge**, y’all. The American people deserve the full truth! Who else is fired up for real justice?! Drop your thoughts below and RT if you’re ready for answers! ☑️☑️ 👉 Watch the clip: x.com/brandonstraka/… #FauciInvestigated #COVIDOrigins #TulsiGabbard #TruthIsComing #DrMargaretShow

@McFaul **capped on paper **

Trump’s comments last night about “Obama’s Iran deal” were simply wrong. It wasn’t perfect, but it capped uranium enrichment at 3.67%. Since Trump scrapped it, Iran has enriched to 60%—much closer to weapons-grade. And that stockpile still hasn’t been eliminated.

@georgetang2015 @PfHamburguesa @MsMelChen Use them for whatever the hell we want to use them for. Hope that helps.

@Calidecks @PfHamburguesa @MsMelChen You did use them and have been using them since late January. Detail matters.

Let’s be real here. Europe has spent decades freeloading on American security. Even now, with every NATO member finally hitting the 2% GDP target in 2025. But beyond the financial contributions, the real rupture is philosophical and the Iran crisis has shown a spotlight on it. Europe worships process. Endless committees, consultations, and “predictability.” Macron actually calls it a virtue. For Trump, this is paralysis as his style is to articulate a threat, fix a target, and act. The Americans are men of conviction and purpose. Europe on the other hand lives by bureaucratic liturgy and in high-minded abstractions. Sure, Americans might make mistakes when acting. But Europe never considers what the costs of not acting actually are. Just look at how their nations are doing on various fronts, especially on the border crisis, and you see the same cancerous rot that undergirds their foreign policy approach play out domestically. It's the same problem on a different scale. Iran is currently holding the Strait of Hormuz hostage, choking 20% of global oil and spiking prices past $100 a barrel. Meanwhile, the regime is bleeding from strikes, its nuclear ambitions are still alive despite degraded capability, and its proxies are firing missiles at allies and oil tankers. If this isn’t a clear and present danger to the global economy - of which Europe is a part - then I don’t know what is. Yet when Washington asked to use European bases to finish the job - bases the US has defended for generations, the response was hesitation and hand-wringing. The US did strike from RAF Fairford, but only after warnings that British soil could become a “legitimate target.” If you cannot agree that a theocratic regime with eschatological ambitions who have shown no restraint in hitting out at Gulf countries and threatening the world’s energy jugular is an enemy worth confronting, then what, exactly, are we allies about? Europe loves to preen about being tough on Russia. They issue condemnations and speeches and slap sanctions that hardly work to cripple the Russian economy. Now here was a chance to do something concrete: let the Americans use the bases they already pay for, help clear the Strait, and actually degrade the Iranian war machine that arms Moscow’s proxies. Turmp didn’t ask for boots on the ground or any kind of more offensive action. All he wanted was permission to operate from the infrastructure America has underwritten for decades. They couldn’t even manage that. So can you blame the Americans for seeing NATO for what it is? A paper-tiger alliance that expects Washington to bleed and pay while Brussels and London convenes and deliberates. If Europe refuses to treat Iran as the threat it is while happily letting American power keep the Strait open and the lights on, then the alliance is already dead. Trump is simply stating the obvious and the Americans are becoming very reluctant to subsidize the European delusion any longer.

@BillKristol So he hired "the women" but suddenly became anti women and fired them? What the actual fuck?

Bondi was awful, but no worse than Patel. Noem was terrible, but no worse than Hegseth. Funny that it’s only the women who get fired.

@Amy_Siskind So he hired them as women and suddenly became against women and fired them? How TF do you square that circle?

Trust me, I am no fan of Noem, Gabbard or Bondi, but I do find it notable that of the cabinet members Trump has fired or is reportedly considering firing, all three are women. How about Hegseth? Kennedy Jr. can't even find a CDC Director to match with his craziness. Patel is a laughing stock, and so on. Why aren't they being fired?

@ShipHappens1965 @TBerlaga @McFaul @dilanesper Why because you say it? Still nothing but an opinion.

@Calidecks @TBerlaga @McFaul @dilanesper It was less than the 3.67% purification level allowed by the treaty. Verified multiple times by the IAEA. Not sure what isn’t clear about that. I guess logic or critical thinking aren’t your thing.

Iran has more uranium at higher levels of enrichment because Trump tore up the 2015 nuclear agreement! Had we stayed in the JCPOA, they would not have it today.

@McFaul I am an Iranian, no offense. But you are ignorant. Ayatollah and IRGC deceived Obama, took money and advanced their ballistic missiles while in HIDDEN continued their nuclear research. You are so simple minded

BREAKING: Colorado appeals court throws out Tina Peter's 9-year prison sentence. Trial court violated her free speech rights! Free Tina Peters!!!!

@ShipHappens1965 @TBerlaga @McFaul @dilanesper So no data? Without proof of your statements they are just your opinion.

@TBerlaga @McFaul @Calidecks @dilanesper President Trump announced the U.S. withdrawal from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA, or Iran nuclear deal) on May 8, 2018. At that time, Iran was fully complying with the deal’s limits, as repeatedly verified by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

@sharinfl @McFaul

@Calidecks @McFaul When the President of the United States can be easily seduced by people who are nice to him we have a problem. Backing away from NATO because of his love for Putin and starting this war in Iran because of Netanyahu have gotten us to this disaster.

Trump's threat to withdraw from NATO is a giant gift to Putin.

@AndreasShrugged @MsMelChen @BaldingsWorld Nope that's not what was asked. We just wanted to use our bases in Europe. That's it nothing else.

@MsMelChen @BaldingsWorld I'm sorry. European politicians are still answerable to their citizens why they would need to spend billions and risk their soldiers' lives to...do what exactly? Everything Trump desires? That's not much of a winning line right now.

@GnXLibertarian @MsMelChen All we asked was to be able to use our bases in Europe. That's it nothing else.

NATO’s original charter was a defense alliance against aggression by the Soviet Union and her Warsaw Pact minions. Now Soviet Union and the Warsaw Pact have been dissolved before Gen Zers and most millennials were even born. In fact, most of the members of the Warsaw Pact are now part of expanded NATO. Other than being the mechanism that continues to allow Western Europe to be freeloading on American funded defense, what is NATO good for? They can talk all day about 9/11 being the only time Article 5 was ever invoked. Fact is Islamic terrorism is a threat to Weatern civilization, not just American civilization. The ensuing quarter century has shown Europe has no will to fight that front. If Iran is not Europe’s fight, than for sure Ukraine isn’t America’s. Time to dissolve NATO. We can’t count on Europe to defend Taiwan against China anyway. Time for US to focus on a Pacific alliance instead of an Atlantic one.

@PfHamburguesa @MsMelChen I we asked to do was use our bases in Europe. That's it nothing else.

As a proud American, Europe - at the very least - just wants some degree of consultation, planning and dialogue. You’re not completely wrong about your characterizations of the 2 sides, but that’s where the U.S./Europe often works well together (including winning the Cold War) - meeting somewhere in the middle between reckless action and stagnant bureaucracy. It’s inarguable that this war effort would be in much better shape if allies had been consulted, better protection brought in for our troops and hardware in the Gulf, drone warfare experts (like Ukraine) brought in from the start, production of key munitions ramped up in advance, and so on. From my vantage point, that’s all the European nations wanted - this war of choice was never going to be popular, but I think they would’ve swallowed it if Trump weren’t such an asshole, hadn’t tried to steal Greenland, and talked to them for at least 5 minutes before attacking the shit out of Iran.

@joekent16jan19 @Peoples_Pundit Victory is decided by the objectives being met.

The purpose of POTUS’s speech this evening was to show that we can declare victory when we choose. This is only possible if POTUS restrains the Israelis 1st. Israel needs us committed indefinitely, we are seeking a quick end to the war. We have drastically different goals than Israel & must act accordingly.

HB929 Passed the senate. To the Governor for signing! HB929.. This bill amends Idaho Code to add section 41-1854, prohibiting health carriers from preventing providers from offering discounted cash prices to insured individuals for health care services. It allows covered people to pay out-of-pocket at negotiated rates lower than the plan's negotiated allowed amount, with such payments counting toward deductibles and annual out-of-pocket maximums upon submission of required documentation. Providers must accept cash payments as full settlements. legislature.idaho.gov/sessioninfo/20…

So you pick someone that confirms your bias that has absolutely nothing to do with the question. I asked him if HE thinks we should be a theocracy because he asked "what would Jesus do". Then he made the claim that he was pointing out "Christian hypocrisy". But the problem with that is no one was even discussing the Christian side of anything. He just assumed he was Christian. Keep up.

@Calidecks @Somerandomcd7t @RealTheoWold @MZHemingway youtu.be/A6R_-AvCUsQ?si…

Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will hear one of the most consequential cases of the last 50 years: Whether the 14th amendment grants birthright citizenship to the children of illegal aliens. When I worked in the first Trump admin, I drafted the original executive order ending birthright citizenship for illegal aliens that ultimately went unsigned until the beginning of last year-- and now finds itself at the center of this case. To put it simply: President Trump has every single legal and historical precedent in his favor. When the 14th amendment's birthright citizenship clause was written, illegal immigration was a foreign concept. The 14th Amendment was specifically intended to clarify citizenship for the children of freed slaves. It did not guarantee that a 9-months pregnant Guatemalan could illegally cross the Rio Grande, give birth, and have their child considered an American citizen. The Left always cites the Wong Ark Kim case from 1898 to claim this as settled law, but that case did not apply to illegal aliens. The plaintiff was the son of one of the thousands of Chinese laborers who were brought legally to America during the 19th century to work on the transcontinental railroads. The Supreme Court has never adjudicated the question of whether children born within our borders to somebody who broke our nation's immigration laws are legal citizens. The answer is “no,” and the Court should absolutely uphold the President's executive order. We don't give citizenship to the children of foreign diplomats born in America. In the same way, we should not give citizenship to children of illegal aliens. No European country, not even the Vatican, grants birthright citizenship to children born to unlawful residents. Democrats are naturally freaking out about this case. Why? Because it's a terrifying prospect for the future of their party. They've seen the data showing how much population loss blue states have seen over the last few years. It's possible that California could lose up to six electoral votes in the next census. The only way they can maintain their power is by continually replacing the population with the children of illegals. It's one of the major pillars of Democrat power and it may just be coming to an end.