THE BITCOIN ONCOLOGIST

The BITCOIN ONCOLOGIST MANTRA -Take active care of you & your family -Eat healthy, mostly proteins & good fats -Avoid toxics, mainly alcohol, tobacco & fiat -Exercise, lift weights & cardio -Quality time w your beloved (no screens) -Smile, kiss, hug , love & sex -Save in Bitcoin

@RealVision @rvintern_ Altcoins doesn’t worth the risk anymore. Clearly underperformed Bitcoin last cycle and probably next one. Bitcoin is the real innovation that worth.

bitcoin:native just flipped green on the higher-timeframe Megatrend setup. +30% off the February low. Crypto equities following. Alts not far behind. If the cycle rhymes, this is where risk starts moving out the curve.

@AdamBLiv So good 🙌🏻

A NORMAL PERSON TRIES TO UNDERSTAND ANTI-SAYLOR BITCOINERS: “Let me get this straight.” “Okay.” “You believe people should buy Bitcoin?” “Yes.” “As much as they can?” “Yes.” “And hold it for the long term?” “Correct.” “Because fiat money is broken?” “Exactly.” “And Bitcoin is scarce?” “Yes.” “And the best way to protect yourself from debasement is to own the scarce asset?” “Now you’re getting it.” “Great. So Michael Saylor did that.” “No, that’s bad.” “Why?” “Because he did it with a company.” “A company owned by shareholders?” “Yes.” “Who voluntarily bought the stock?” “Yes.” “And the company voluntarily bought Bitcoin from sellers?” “Yes.” “At market prices?” “Yes.” “Using legal capital markets?” “Yes.” “And this changed Bitcoin’s fixed supply?” “No.” “Changed the code?” “No.” “Changed your node?” “No.” “Gave Saylor the ability to print more Bitcoin?” “No.” “Gave him the ability to reverse transactions?” “No.” “Gave him the ability to censor the network?” “No.” “So what exactly happened?” “He bought a lot.” “That’s the whole crime?” “It centralizes Bitcoin.” “No, it concentrates ownership. Those are different things.” “They’re the same.” “They are absolutely not the same.” “Explain.” “If one man owns a lot of gold, he does not control chemistry. If one company owns a lot of land, it does not control gravity. If Strategy owns a lot of Bitcoin, it does not control the protocol.” “But it’s dangerous.” “To whom?” “To decentralization.” “Again, no. Bitcoin decentralization is enforced by nodes, miners, consensus rules, and the inability of anyone to change the monetary policy. Ownership is a market outcome. Protocol control is a technical reality. You’re confusing the cap table with the constitution.” “That sounds too clean.” “It is clean. That’s why your argument needs fog machines.” “Saylor works for the financial-industrial complex.” “He works for shareholders.” “He’s helping Wall Street.” “He’s using Wall Street to buy Bitcoin.” “That’s the problem.” “No, that’s the part you’re mad about.” “But Bitcoin was supposed to be for the people.” “It still is. Nobody stopped the people from buying it.” “But now institutions are buying it too.” “Yes. That is what winning looks like.” “I don’t like the way it’s winning.” “There it is.” “What?” “The honest sentence.” “I’m serious.” “So am I. You spent fifteen years telling everyone Bitcoin was inevitable. Then a public company believed you at scale, and now you’re acting like the fire department is suspicious because they brought too much water.” “He has too much Bitcoin.” “Then buy more.” “That’s not fair.” “That’s the market.” “He got there first.” “That’s also the market.” “It feels wrong.” “It feels wrong because he understood the game before the people who claimed to be its priests.” “Bitcoin should be decentralized.” “It is.” “But ownership is uneven.” “So is intelligence. So is conviction. So is risk tolerance. So is patience.” “You’re being harsh.” “No, I’m being precise.” “Saylor could become too powerful.” “He can become rich. He can become influential. He still cannot change 21 million.” “But people will follow him.” “People follow anyone with conviction and results. That is called leadership. It is not a consensus attack.” “So you’re fine with corporations buying Bitcoin?” “I’m fine with anyone buying Bitcoin.” “Anyone?” “Yes. Individuals, companies, pensions, insurers, sovereign wealth funds, family offices, weird guys in cargo shorts, and bald men in orange ties with capital markets bazookas.” “That sounds chaotic.” “That sounds neutral.” “Bitcoin doesn’t care who buys it.” “Exactly.” “So the anti-Saylor argument is…” “People should buy Bitcoin, unless they buy too much. Institutions should adopt Bitcoin, unless they adopt it aggressively. Bitcoin should win, as long as it wins politely, slowly, and in a way that flatters the early podcast class.” “That’s brutal.” “That’s accurate.” “So what’s really going on?” “Simple. Saylor embarrassed the small imagination of his critics.” “How?” “They thought Bitcoin adoption meant vibes, conferences, and personal sovereignty lectures. He saw a global capital structure starving for collateral and built a machine to convert fiat demand into Bitcoin accumulation.” “And the critics?” “They’re standing outside the machine yelling that the machine is too effective.” “So the problem isn’t that Saylor betrayed Bitcoin.” “No.” “The problem is that he believed in it harder than they did.” “Now you’re getting it.”

@PrestonPysh Missing you already. Always amazing content and the best attitude on every interview. Enjoy the deserved family time.

A personal note.  After years of public discussion/work: the podcast, social media, venture capital, everything — I'm stepping back to focus on my family. My kids are growing fast.  My wife deserves the best of me.  To everyone who listened, read, grew, and built alongside me — thank you. What a blessing you all have been!

@Rajatsoni @saylor What a Bitcoiner extermination camp!

@saylor 34,164 WHOLECOINERS ELIMINATED IN A WEEK Holy shit 🤯

Strategy has acquired 34,164 BTC for ~$2.54 billion at ~$74,395 per bitcoin and has achieved BTC Yield of 9.5% YTD 2026. As of 4/19/2026, we hodl 815,061 $BTC acquired for ~$61.56 billion at ~$75,527 per bitcoin. $MSTR $STRC strategy.com/press/strategy…

Elon Musk on why the smartest people drop out of college: "You don't need college to learn. Learn stuff. Everything is available basically for free. You can learn anything you want for free. It is not a question of learning." Musk explains what college actually provides: "There is a value that colleges have, which is seeing whether somebody can work hard at something, including a bunch of annoying homework assignments, and still do their homework, and kind of soldier through and get it done. That's the main value of college. And also, you probably want to hang around with a bunch of people your own age for a while instead of going right into the workforce. So I think colleges are basically for fun and to prove you can do your chores. But they're not for learning." On hiring at his companies: "There is a requirement of evidence of exceptional ability. I don't consider going to college evidence of exceptional ability. In fact, ideally you dropped out and did something. Obviously, Gates is a pretty smart guy, he dropped out. Jobs was pretty smart, he dropped out. Larry Ellison, smart guy, he dropped out. Obviously not needed." Musk shares how education should work: "Generally, you want education to be as close to a video game as possible. Like a good video game. You do not need to tell your kid to play video games; they will play video games on autopilot all day. If you can make it interactive and engaging, you can make education far more compelling and far easier to do." He challenges the current system: "You really want to disconnect the whole 'grade level' thing from the subjects. Allow people to progress at the fastest pace that they can, or are interested in, in each subject. It seems like a really obvious thing." Musk criticizes traditional teaching: "Most teaching today is a lot like vaudeville. Somebody's standing up there lecturing to you. They've done the same lecture several years in a row. They're not necessarily all that engaged. That lack of enthusiasm is conveyed to the students; they're not very excited about it. They don't know why they're there. 'Why are we learning this stuff?' We don't even know why. A lot of things people learn, probably there's no point in learning them, because they never use them in the future." On whether university is necessary: "A university education is often unnecessary. That's not to say it's unnecessary for all people. But I think you learn about as much, the vast majority of what you're going to learn there, in the first two years. And most of it is from your classmates. If the goal is to start a company, I would say no point in finishing college." Musk started his own school for his kids: "I created a little school. It's small, only 14 kids now, and it'll have 20 in September. It's called Ad Astra, which means 'to the stars.'" He explains what makes it different: "There aren't any grades. There's no grade one, grade two, grade three. Not making all the children go in the same grade at the same time, like an assembly line. People are not objects on an assembly line. That's a ridiculous notion. Some people love English or languages. Some people love math. Some people love music. Different abilities at different times. It makes more sense to cater the education to match their aptitudes and abilities." Musk shares a key principle: "It's important to teach problem-solving, or teach to the problem, not to the tools. Let's say you're trying to teach people about how engines work. A more traditional approach would be: 'We're going to teach you all about screwdrivers and wrenches. You're going to have a course on screwdrivers, a course on wrenches.' This is a very difficult way to do it." He offers a better approach: "A much better way would be: 'Here's the engine. Now let's take it apart. How are we going to take it apart? Oh, you need a screwdriver, that's what the screwdriver is for. You need a wrench, that's what the wrench is for.' And then a very important thing happens: the relevance of the tools becomes clear." The result: "It seems to be going pretty well. The kids really love going to school. I think that's a good sign. I hated going to school when I was a kid; it was torture. The fact that they actually think vacations are too long, they want to go back to school. Weird, I know." Musk reframes what education really is: "If you think about it, what is education? You're basically downloading data and algorithms into your brain. And it's actually amazingly bad in conventional education. It shouldn't be this huge chore. The more you can gamify the process of learning, the better."

This is actually a really great analogy for Bitcoin and why people distrust it

This is the biggest story in finance. Yet few are aware what's happening.

@AmericaPapaBear So fake 🤣 it expand to double size

This is soo good and true…

Gold Counterparty Risk. This is why Bitcoin is a better sovereignty store of value.

@dotkrueger The unique thing that you can sell to buy it lower in future with a 100% chance is Fiat

they won't be able to buy it back lower. they just screwed up the trade of the decade. oops.

@Strategy Most of questions already addressed in @saylor & Phong Le in last public appearances & interviews but people keep asking them again & again because they don’t like the answers or they don’t really understand the Strategy , the changes accomplished & the evolution of the company.

What questions would you like @Strategy's management team to address on our Q4 2025 Earnings Call on Thursday, February 5 at 5 PM ET? Share them in the comments below.

Precious Metals are ripping and you can bet with leverage on them even in the supermarket. I think that the top is in for this fantastic shiny rocks bull market. Let’s see.

@BritishHodl @_DannyKnowles I think Saylor is brilliant and his leadership in finance & Bitcoin is impressive but I found him in this conversation too agressive against an educated Danny, when responding to some of the questions.

Great exchange between @saylor and @_DannyKnowles on Bitcoin Treasury Companies. Bitcoin is for all people, companies and countries. Be very mindful of bad traders complaining about Bitcoin Treasury Companies because of terrible entries and inability to hold through volatility. Those of us (me) that bought MSTR on DAY ONE of Bitcoin Treasury announcement in 2020 understand how this journey goes. I choose MSTR because I allocate based on a risk adjusted return way of thinking with everything collapsing into Bitcoin as the hurdle rate. Nevertheless - the more companies owning Bitcoin - the better.

Happy Three Kings’ Day

First time since BTC yield is scored (sept 2024) that a BTC buy is dilutive.

@saifedean Amazing and deserved! When The Gold Standard in Spanish sir?

My books have been translated to 39 languages and counting! Find out how you can get my books in your language here: bit.ly/43GeuKl If one of my books is not available in your language and you would like to translate & publish it, please contact info@saifedean.com

@saifedean @thefiatstandard Imagine eating beek in 100 years, you have te be a prince…or bitcoiner…

As explained in @TheFiatStandard, there is no inflation if you replace your steak with a soy burger👍

@RoaringRagnar @saylor @Strategy He is another mastermind

@saylor @Strategy Love to see Phong being more public recently.

“We are not Bitcoin traders — we’re Bitcoin investors.” — Phong Le, @Strategy CEO

8178 Bitcoin more in ⁦@Strategy⁩ treasury . Go ahead ⁦@saylor⁩