Cel Rince

1.8K posts

Cel Rince

Cel Rince

@Celdazero

Vancouver Katılım Ocak 2009
156 Takip Edilen46 Takipçiler
Cel Rince
Cel Rince@Celdazero·
@NancyJPM @pdrobertson That is true, but it makes it worse, not better. Instead of a university discriminating, it's the federal government.
English
0
0
1
19
Nancy Prendergast
Nancy Prendergast@NancyJPM·
@pdrobertson The posting is for a Canada Research Chair which is funded by the federal government. It, not the university, makes the rule that certain positions cannot be filled by white men. If the university doesn't follow this, it loses the funding for the research position.
English
1
0
0
502
Dan Robertson
Dan Robertson@pdrobertson·
On the first day of the Battle of the Somme, 800 (overwhelmingly “white heterosexual”) men of the Royal Newfoundland Regiment went over the top. 68 answered roll call the next morning. Now their male descendants can’t work at NL’s only university which was named in their honour.
National Post@nationalpost

'Five active job postings by Memorial University explicitly bar applications from heterosexual white men' nationalpost.com/opinion/univer…

English
351
4.5K
22.3K
731.4K
Cel Rince
Cel Rince@Celdazero·
@RSPY_critical @aruvinchan Why would you call someone that you only went on a single date with just to tell them you're not interested?
English
0
0
2
90
RSPY
RSPY@RSPY_critical·
@aruvinchan I mean, you could to a bit more than this. Like, call them to say that. Idk,…
English
12
0
2
6.4K
Aruvin 💊
Aruvin 💊@aruvinchan·
Women really can't handle rejection, can they? 🤭
Aruvin 💊 tweet media
Barcelona, Spain 🇪🇸 English
167
87
3.2K
91.2K
Cel Rince
Cel Rince@Celdazero·
@kuch4mvp @liquoricebomb @jk_rowling You are delusional. There are many, many people who spew hateful rhetoric (such as yourself). But there are far fewer, by orders of magnitude, people who can get even a million (let alone plural) people to buy their writing.
English
0
0
8
141
Kuch4MVP
Kuch4MVP@kuch4mvp·
@liquoricebomb @jk_rowling When you spew hateful rhetoric it’s not hard to sell copies. Anyone could do it and be just as successful. We just choose to be better people!
English
21
0
2
3.9K
J.K. Rowling
J.K. Rowling@jk_rowling·
I think he thought I was going to devote several chapters of my autobiography to a couple of DMs I exchanged with a man I've never met.
J.K. Rowling tweet media
English
529
968
16.1K
472.4K
Roknese
Roknese@Roknese354450·
@MBtheMick @reddit_lies I had a girlfriend who had a daughter and nagged me and cried and bitched at me until i told her i loved her more than i loved her daughter (who i literally taught how to walk talk and ride a bike)
English
1
0
13
432
Cel Rince
Cel Rince@Celdazero·
@Livelongandpr18 @CarlWhi99454847 @newstart_2024 No, that's not how it works. If what you said was true then we wouldn't see countries with less equality (like Algeria) have more women in STEM. In reality women are just far less likely to choose to do it unless they are forced to by economic pressure.
English
0
0
2
23
Livelongandprosper 🇺🇸🇮🇱
Livelongandprosper 🇺🇸🇮🇱@Livelongandpr18·
@CarlWhi99454847 @newstart_2024 Self fulfilling prophesy. “Women aren’t interested in or suited for math/tech.” Women hear that and think, “Oh, I’m not supposed to do that.” You: “See, single data point, single data point!” Do you see why there might not be as many?
English
6
0
0
221
Camus
Camus@newstart_2024·
Heather Mac Donald dropped the blunt truth on women in tech: “Nobody’s keeping females out. They just aren’t interested.” Google is desperate to hire more women. Investors threw billions at Elizabeth Holmes. Yet the obsessive drive to code until 3 AM, conquer data, and push through failure remains disproportionately male. It’s not discrimination or lack of funding — it’s a difference in raw interest and intensity. A refreshingly direct take on why the gender gaps persist in high-stakes fields like AI and startups. Do you think the underrepresentation of women in tech is mostly due to barriers and discrimination, or largely due to differences in interests and drive?
English
280
1.2K
7.5K
240.7K
Cel Rince
Cel Rince@Celdazero·
@zhiheather @breakingbaht "Men have not experienced anything equivalent. Wrong. time.com/3393442/cdc-ra… "when asked about experiences in the last 12 months, men reported being “made to penetrate”—either by physical force or due to intoxication—at virtually the same rates as women reported rape
English
0
0
2
44
codestitcher
codestitcher@zhiheather·
@breakingbaht One in five women have been sexually assaulted. Not harassed. Assaulted. Men have not experienced anything equivalent. Especially at that scale. Frankly I'm surprised the numbers aren't higher.
English
13
0
4
817
Eric
Eric@breakingbaht·
Women see objective data that women have a psychotic hatred of men while men - do not have the same issue for women. Woman on twitter: "what did you expect, men hate women." We cant get out of this spiral with cooperation from women. I think we're essentially in the equivalent of a bad divorce collectively and women as a group are just beyond committed to destruction. You cant reason with someone who's connection and interpretation of - quantifiable data - is this warped.
darkacademician@darkacademician

slightly baffled by the shock and surprise this is eliciting. what did people expect? young men are consuming ideology that openly denigrates women -- at scale. young women can see that. results:

English
80
216
3.2K
96.9K
Cel Rince
Cel Rince@Celdazero·
@canwepause @BJurns48955 @katrosenfield Women are safer than men. Women have overall better health outcomes than men and live longer (in part due to government discrimination against men when it comes to health spending etc.). You are ignorant or dishonest.
English
1
0
1
43
just amused
just amused@canwepause·
@BJurns48955 @katrosenfield I'd argue a lot of those are societaly imposed. I'm talking about literally living in a female body. There'd be a lot of challenges like safety, health, predictability of life in general etc. that the average man takes for granted
English
3
0
0
75
Kat Rosenfield
Kat Rosenfield@katrosenfield·
Shocking-not-surprising statistic here that young women disproportionately believe “things are stacked against me, no matter how hard I try,” and while I know some people will find this deeply ironic (it sort of is) it’s also both understandable and really sad
The New Statesman@NewStatesman

ANGRY YOUNG WOMEN by @emilylawford and @Scarlett__Mag It was a Wednesday night and seven members of the University of Leeds’ feminist society had invited me to join their book swap. I asked how they felt about the young men they knew. “I don’t care for them,” said a girl called Ruby imperiously. “They’re not bad people, but they refuse to call out their friends who make other girls uncomfortable. They’ll laugh at jokes that are sexist, racist, homophobic, they don’t care about political issues… I don’t think they like women a lot.” If a man is attracted to you, she said, he might talk about things like toxic misogyny. If he doesn’t fancy you, he won’t bother. “I feel like a lot of it is quite sexually motivated with men.” I asked if they’d consider dating a man with different political views. They all immediately said no. “I don’t think I’d even be friends with one,” said one girl. “They don’t see you as human.” Only one woman, Evelyn, admitted to having male friends (though she was worried this made her a “pick me”, trying too hard for male attention). Evelyn was concerned about what the men she knew were watching online. “The stuff that’s being said about women is crazy,” she said. “They’re getting all these reels, talking about, like, bad stuff about women. And I get reels of women saying bad stuff about men. I try to think, not all men are like this, but…” On the internet, women and men have never been more alienated from each other. While the toxic, often hard-right politics of the manosphere have been exhaustively documented, the new generation of female influencers are nearly as extreme – just on the other side of the political spectrum. The “femosphere” spans a range of tones: there are misandrist dating coaches who urge women to reject men altogether, and more explicitly progressive content creators who cover global and domestic politics. Exclusive polling by Merlin Strategy for the New Statesman reveals that young women, aged between 18 and 30, are by far the most progressive demographic in the UK. Young women are 26 percentage points less likely to feel positively about capitalism than young men, and much less likely to feel the economy works in their favour. Gen Z women are more likely to support causes such as feminism, environmentalism and anti-racism than young men. They also feel much more negatively towards young men than young men feel about them. I spent the last few months in search of the new left-wing young women. It wasn’t difficult – they were everywhere. But it all felt impossibly bleak. They weren’t excited about their futures. They didn’t like the men they knew, or the idea of those they didn’t. Men were just a threat who had the potential to harm or trap them. This will almost certainly make relationships harder: fewer than half of young women feel men understand them. Young women are much less likely than men to date people who disagree with their politics. People will get lonelier, and angrier. Young women are twice as likely to not want children as young men. And it’s getting worse. Women under 25 are most likely to believe things are “stacked against me, no matter how hard I try”. A significant majority of young women feel isolated from the rest of the country. The two main political parties aren’t reaching out to them specifically. Many women told me they feared a Reform government pressuring them to have babies. Many say they will vote for the Greens in the upcoming local elections, but few seem to believe that will make a difference. They don’t feel represented by mainstream politics, and they don’t think anyone cares. Cover art by Carl Godfrey

English
86
15
408
94.5K
Cel Rince
Cel Rince@Celdazero·
@SCHIZO_FREQ @progressief_lib @breakingbaht Are you trolling or just unable to understand simple words? If experiencing sexual assault is the main cause, then there must be a correlation between the two. But it's the opposite; younger women are less likely to be sexually assaulted but more likely to hate men.
English
0
0
2
35
Jim
Jim@WillsWingSport·
@Devon_Eriksen_ @JonathanShuerg1 @monsterhunter45 When the novel 1932 opens, some West Virginians are transported back to the 30 Years War, whereupon they see some soldiers committing an atrocity on a woman. IIRC. They decided those soldiers needed killin' and grabbed their guns....
English
1
0
8
198
JonathanShuerger
JonathanShuerger@JonathanShuerg1·
The time has come to pitch this again. Ever wondered why the military sucks in every movie or show w the zombie apocalypse? “Wait, we gotta prop up our feminist wannabe Mary Sue that can magically field-strip weapons with zero training!” I came at it with a different take. What if the zombies rose, and facing them was a horde of inordinately-excited United States Marines with machine guns and weaponized autism? Welcome to Semper Die.
JonathanShuerger tweet media
English
22
13
267
6.3K
Cel Rince
Cel Rince@Celdazero·
@reddit_lies No, they are just lying. What the article actually said is that there's a porn site and some of the videos there were about rape. The 62 million visits (not people) were for the site as a whole, not the videos about rape.
English
0
0
90
1.8K
Cel Rince
Cel Rince@Celdazero·
@progressief_lib @breakingbaht Except you're lying. Notice how younger women are more likely to hate men, yet are obviously less likely to be victims of sexual violence.
English
1
0
14
328
Ric
Ric@progressief_lib·
There is a reason why we're seeing these data though. A significant percentage of women are victims of sexual violence. This isn't really the case with men. Her explanation may not make sense, but honestly I feel the same about stuff like 'women as a group are just beyond committed to destruction'. I mean, you're almost proving her right at this point, even when she isn't.
English
20
0
5
3.3K
Jay-Jay
Jay-Jay@JayJay33737432·
@BonifaceOption "The discourse on talented young men being abused in public school is painful to read" The amount of men who believe they were genius level intelligent in 5th grade but their lives were ruined because they got yelled at for disrupting class is the really painful part
English
7
1
7
378
Andrew Isker 🌳🪓
Andrew Isker 🌳🪓@BonifaceOption·
The discourse on talented young men being systematically abused in public school is painful to read. We all have these stories. Reflecting upon it, this experience was useful to prepare us for trashworld. At a certain point you realize being smart and having agency is a thing that threatens most people who have authority over you. My whole life in school I thought "oh when I get into the real world it won't be like this, what I can do will finally be valued" but then you discover, the whole rest of the world is actually like this, too. You learn to play dumb and hide it except when the conditions are right to use it. This of course is not good. It is the sign of a civilization collapsing. Third world societies cannibalize their best and brightest which is why they remain the way they are. Greatness threatens them and they immediately snuff it out. Great civilizations recognize brilliance and elevate it. A young man can come from nothing and become a brilliant thinker, engineer, industrialist, or statesman. Even the Soviet Union, as horrid as it was, would find a place for those on the right side of the bell curve. We sacrifice the best on the altar of mediocrity and we do it from a very early age. Egalitarianism is the great idol of our age and must be destroyed.
English
47
234
1.7K
21.9K
Creighton Madeira
Creighton Madeira@JudgeIsOnVinyl·
@Avonleebythesea The stories are all nonsense. Saw a dude making this claim and then it turned out he refused to do any homework and got a lower grade because of it and that’s what he was describing as brutal punishment for being smart. Come on.
English
1
0
0
146
Rebecca 📖
Rebecca 📖@Avonleebythesea·
There are a slew of stories going around of mainly male students who had one or multiple nightmarish experiences w female elementary teachers, often because they were bright or energetic and the teacher felt threatened by that. I wonder what percentage of women go into the teaching field specifically because they dislike men and know this is a way to exercise near total control over them. It’s horrifying to think about, but seems substantiated.
Scarlett Maguire@Scarlett__Mag

Strikingly, young women are *a lot* more negative about the opposite gender than young men. ✴️U30 women are 3x as likely to hold a negative view of young men than the other way around ✴️Just 35% of u25 women hold a positive view, only 11% a very positive view

English
29
40
538
17.4K
Cel Rince
Cel Rince@Celdazero·
@JohnDoe19th @Ole_is_right No. Learn to read. First tweet: "It's incredibly unethical that anyone supports the woman in the McDonald's case."
English
1
0
0
13
JohnDoe
JohnDoe@JohnDoe19th·
@Celdazero @Ole_is_right you were complaining about the lawsuit because it infringed on our liberties, but it hasnt.
English
1
0
0
10
💟Ole IS Right, Esq.
💟Ole IS Right, Esq.@Ole_is_right·
Yall remember that McDonald’s hot coffee case a few years back? Where a woman sued the restaurant because her coffee was too hot; she won a couple million bucks; and everyone said the result was an indictment of the American legal system, because people shouldn’t be so litigious. But, in reality, the plaintiff in that case suffered horrific, life altering burns across 20-30% of her body, which required several days in the hospital, multiple years of disability, and skin grafting operations. The Alani case *may* prove to be a similar story. The lawsuit doesn’t say “kid drank caffeine. Kid died. Money please.” The allegations are that the company which distributes and markets Alani, falsely labels it as a heath and wellness drink— particularly targeting that advertisement to kids via things like influencer campaigns (which are more likely to have a younger audience). Despite this marketing, the drinks have significantly more caffeine than the rest of the market (having 200mg of caffeine, compared to 160mg in Monster, or 80mg in Red Bull). Equally, the girl who passed away had no preexisting heart conditions, and there’s plenary evidence that she was swayed by the aforementioned marketing. The case isn’t 1:1 with McDonalds and the coffee— hell, the causes of action that are most likely to carry the day, aren’t even the same. But the perception of the cases, certainly rhymes. To the extent that people want companies to behave ethically and safely (which is something we all want), lawsuits like this serve the purpose of sitting down lines as to the proverbial rules of the game. At why point does influencer marketing towards kids, on a product that is even labeled as being dangerous for kids— start to run afoul of law and common sensibilities? Honestly, that’s not my place to answer— it’s the jury’s. Everyone can have their opinion on whether this type of conduct is okay. But, the lawsuit is far from frivolous, or shaking a money tree.
Miss Sandrist@foreverimbetter

So a teenager was drinking multiple energy drinks a day and died so the family is suing the energy drink company? Are parents ever gonna realize that parenting is their job?

English
74
525
6K
1.2M
Cel Rince
Cel Rince@Celdazero·
@SunnylandProds @TyJay2022 @Ole_is_right How is it a troll to say that people should have the right to sell (and therefore buy) drinks that are very not or near boiling? If you're stupid enough to hurt or kill yourself by pouring it on your body, that's your problem. Doesn't mean it should be illegal.
English
0
0
0
27
Cel Rince
Cel Rince@Celdazero·
@JohnDoe19th @Ole_is_right ...People think it should be illegal to sell (and therefore to buy) very hot drinks. That stance is advocating for an infringement of liberty, and therefore bad. You need to work on your reading comprehension. Also your honesty. Not hard to stop lying.
English
1
0
0
16
Cel Rince
Cel Rince@Celdazero·
@WallStHoops @RealRickRule ....There are only about 340 million people in America. The top 0.15% would be about 500K people. That's half a million, not "millions more rich people". Math DEFINITELY wasn’t your best subject, LMAO #idiot.
English
0
0
3
70
warren buckets 🥽
warren buckets 🥽@WallStHoops·
@RealRickRule Lmao she said the top .15% and ur dumb ass responded with “billionaires”. Which is more like the top .00024%. The top .15% includes millions more rich people… Math DEFINITELY wasn’t your best subject, nor was economics. Or reading comprehension. Or critical thinking. Lmao #idiot
English
3
0
6
1.7K
Rick Rule
Rick Rule@RealRickRule·
Madam, the aggregate net worth of American billionaires ( according to the IRS) is $7T . I guess math is not your best subject? Economics? Maybe not so good either?
Elizabeth Warren@ewarren

A wealth tax on the top .15% of the richest families would generate $6.2 trillion in revenue. That could pay for: Universal childcare Millions of new homes Slashing child poverty Medicare for people aged 55+ Universal paid family leave Tuition-free community college And more.

English
135
90
1.4K
115K
Cel Rince
Cel Rince@Celdazero·
@wombat_ashe @Ole_is_right And? No one said life doesn't matter. I said it's completely fine to sell near-boiling drinks and anyone who claims it should be illegal is either anti-liberty or just an idiot.
English
0
0
0
30
Cel Rince
Cel Rince@Celdazero·
@JohnDoe19th @Ole_is_right Did you forget what we were talking about? People claim that McDonald's was in the wrong and shouldn't have been allowed to sell coffee at near-boiling. That is wrong and an infringement of liberty. I do like how you lied multiple times, got called out, then kept doubling down.
English
1
0
0
19
JohnDoe
JohnDoe@JohnDoe19th·
@Celdazero @Ole_is_right so she won her lawsuit and nothing changed afterwards. so what was your problem about 'freedoms' then?
English
1
0
0
17