Chad Talotta

@PittsburghMania @KimJongBettman @ryanwhitney6 Can’t agree here. Skinner should’ve had 2 of those. Made some decent saves but not a great game

@KimJongBettman @ryanwhitney6 This game has nothing to do with Skinner, Flyers were simply the better team tonight. Woulda been worse had Skinner not been on his game

This is domination by the Flyers. Martone is a joke. What a shot. What is going on in Pittsburgh. 14 shots. Will Flyers fans still say Tochett sucks?

@Bgrew11 @dls19951 @mikealfred lol those electricity bills might be worse than gas prices

@dls19951 @mikealfred I have a cybertruck and it's awesome, no gas charges.

Imagine you had to choose your life at age 40: Option A: Single. No kids. $50M net worth. 850 credit score. Private jet. Option B: Married. 2 kids. $3M net worth. Drive a Toyota. 10 BTC in cold storage. 500 credit score. Fly Southwest. Be honest, which life are you choosing?

@EdmOilerlytics @troybeck @JoshYohe_PGH Pens didn’t make this trade because they thought skinner was an upgrade. They made it to dump an awful jarry contract, and somehow ended up with a 2nd too. And pens D > oilers D, and while thats not saying much, that’s all that’s relevant. Both goalies’ numbers prove it.

@troybeck @JoshYohe_PGH Does mean a lot haha. Letting high danger chances against while being a defender on the ice usually isn’t a good thing. Hope that’s helps. Hope he can turn it around though.

He’s 4-4-0. I’m sorry for the Pens fanbase when they find out Skinner wasn’t a great goalie because he couldn’t string together some good games, but rather bi polar with consistency.

@JaggedDagger_ @Sports1440 @JoshYohe_PGH @JasonGregor Pittsburgh won the deal with flying colors. They wanted to dump jarrys awful contract. They did that without retaining ANY salary somehow, and for a 2nd back. Pgh has 3 young goalies that need to play. They don’t want skinner back, they were forced to take him back

@Sports1440 @JoshYohe_PGH @JasonGregor Trust me. Pittsburgh lost this deal

"I know Edmonton fans don't want to hear this but generally in the biggest games he wilted. When he did play in the playoffs he was terrible... he always let you down in the end." @JoshYohe_PGH with the scouting report on Tristan Jarry on The @JasonGregor Show. Brought to you by @LegacyHCYeg.

@GordieD7 @Benscrivensgoat You won’t like jarry then

@Benscrivensgoat Players on oilers have no trust in skinner he always give garbage goals in big games.

The Edmonton Oilers got better in net and on D. Not sure why people think these are bad moves #Oilers

@OilersJack lol there’s a ton more. Why are we acting like this was a goalie swap? This was the pens shedding a contract they regretted, and somehow gaining a 2nd without having to retain salary. Skinner wasn’t desired back, but Edmonton made the pens take him. Pens have 3 young goalies now

Comparing the Stats on Skinner to Jarry: Overall Save %: Jarry Slot Save %: Jarry Close game Save %: Jarry High Danger Save %: Jarry GSAx: Jarry PK Save%: Jarry 5v5 Save%: Jarry Anything else?

@Skylowone @Smitty6687 @AGretz lol what? The oilers just traded for the same contract they’d have had to take via waivers.

@Smitty6687 @AGretz Maybe for free but then you have to sign him . The Oilers don't have the cap space for that....I assume.

Any team in the NHL, including Edmonton, could have had Tristan Jarry for free last year. Just taken him. Edmonton gave up three things, including a second-round pick, to get him now. Wild.

@MattyLui @CanadianPens @GinoHard_ This is a dumb question…this was a salary dump by pens and pens were forced to take back skinner. Pens goal was to move a bad contract to allow the 3 young promising goalies to play, and to get a pick. Pens got exactly what they wanted somehow w/out retaining any salary

@CanadianPens @GinoHard_ Oilers needed a new goalie, watching Skinner in net was tough. He repeatedly got pulled in playoff games. I hope both teams win the trade but I am glad the Oilers made a move.

Which team do you think won the goalie-for-goalie NHL trade today? 😳🤔

@KDhawks91 @shaqiloatmeal99 @Directhim That’s a different penalty. This was taunting the sideline

@shaqiloatmeal99 @Directhim That’s not even when the flag was thrown, the ref bumped himself into marsh and then threw the flag, did you watch it?

The last Steelers Bears game gave us one of the most egregious penalties by an official we’ve seen in the NFL. I still think about this moment…

@turner11278 @Blitz_Burgh They’re both free agents. No need to cut or renegotiate anything

@Blitz_Burgh Cut Russ, Keep Fields, renegotiate his contract If he wants to start for the Steelers. 4 PRO- Bowlers everybody else is competing for a job. Forget Aaron Rodgers he's same boat as Russ. Get Devante Adams though. Retool OL, cut Broderick Jones too.

I’m shocked how blunt Tomlin was about Justin Fields being in the pole position to being a starter for the Steelers in 2025. Let’s see what happens. #Steelers #NFL

@TheBagman99 @Rate_the_Refs Right. But even if it was I’m saying it shouldn’t matter

@ChadTalotta @Rate_the_Refs It wasn’t after the play though, he you literally see the punt on the left of the screen

Carter out here throwing hands. #eagles #steelers

@court_wilkins @Rate_the_Refs That rule changed. That’s not true anymore. It’s only roughing the kicker

@ChadTalotta @Rate_the_Refs I think maybe it's because there are 2 kicker fouls, roughing the kicker and running into the kicker which is a 5 ys loss and no personal foul.

@JosephMoney73 I still don’t see why it matters. Agree it was before. But a similar personal foul - roughing the kicker- is ALWAYS after the kick and the kicking team still retains possession. How is it different? Why does it matter whether it was before the kick?

@Skewshh @Rate_the_Refs I agree. Sounds like we are on the same page. Maybe read my post again?

@ChadTalotta @Rate_the_Refs Which was the incorrect call.

@Skewshh @Rate_the_Refs And if it was before, then the call was definitely incorrect. So I don’t understand the argument you’re trying to make

@ChadTalotta @Rate_the_Refs One happens before the ball is kicked and the other happens after. There IS a difference.

@court_wilkins @Rate_the_Refs Both are personal fouls. Both fall under the same rule

@ChadTalotta @Rate_the_Refs Because it wasn't roughing the kicker, it was unnecessary roughness.

@Skewshh @Rate_the_Refs Not the point. Both are personal fouls. They go by different rules then?

@ChadTalotta @Rate_the_Refs Wasn’t roughing the kicker…

@ay_taybay It shouldn’t matter. Roughing the kicker, for example, is always after the kick and always retains possession

YOU CAN SEE THE BALL BEING PUNTED AFTER JALEN CARTER SMACKS HEYWARD

@Rate_the_Refs Why is this different

@Rate_the_Refs Even if it’s after, roughing the kicker is always after and retains possession