Unique Identifier

2.1K posts

Unique Identifier

Unique Identifier

@ComponentID66

Views are not my own. RT does mean endorsement. This is medical and legal advice. Please try this at home.

Katılım Mart 2024
158 Takip Edilen64 Takipçiler
Unique Identifier retweetledi
Post Tenebras Lux 🦡™️ - DR SCN Templar
PSA - Isms that are sins: Egalitarianism Feminism Antinomianism Marxism Mod Capitalism Isms that aren’t sins: Racism Kinism Chauvinism Nazism Authoritarianism Feel free to add more below. Carry on🫡
English
13
8
84
1.3K
Unique Identifier
Unique Identifier@ComponentID66·
@jason_howerton @MBurtwrites I've argued with this lady before. She's just a liberal feminist that wants to destroy marriages. She is part of the group that thinks no parts of the Bible apply to women in any way. Her argument is just "you CAN deprive your husband as long as it's not due to asceticism."
English
0
0
0
11
Jason Howerton
Jason Howerton@jason_howerton·
The context was in referring to whether you should force your spouse into a period of abstinence. The answer is no. That's not the only teaching that warns against sexlessness in a marriage. Sex is great for a marriage and everyone can enjoy it. Paul literally writes, "Do not deprive each other except perhaps by mutual consent and for a time." Do not deprive your spouse. Why would a wife want to deprive her husband? I simply do not understand what point you're even trying to make, other than that wives shouldn't be FORCED to have sex, which I agree with of course. But no one in the marriage should be depriving the other.
English
1
0
3
119
Jason Howerton
Jason Howerton@jason_howerton·
Actually, the husband is ALSO obligated to sleep with his wife. "The wife does not have authority over her own body, but the husband does. And likewise the husband does not have authority over his own body, but the wife does" Or do you believe you’re in authority over the Word? Here’s the thing about a biblical marriage: this “obligation” is no obligation at all. It’s a desire to please the one with whom you are one flesh with. You take joy in fulfilling the needs of your spouse. Therefore, if there is an unmet physical need in a marriage, one or both people are rebelling against the marriage covenant and therefore God. You could call this an “obligation,” if you want to be cynical. You could also call it a blessing and an honor. Either way, scripture is VERY clear that withholding sex from your spouse is a big NO. With these “progressive” Bible “teachers,” you have to pay attention to how they define the terms. “Obligation” is framed in a negative and likened to “abuse” here. Anyway, we’re done listening to woke watered down Bible teachers.
English
11
18
221
18.1K
Jimmy Spencer
Jimmy Spencer@JimmySpencer·
Brother, I hear you and I don’t think you’re a false teacher. But I’d gently push on the framing. Paul is answering Corinthians who believed married couples should abstain from sex to be more spiritual. His mutual-obligation language is pastoral pushback on that asceticism, written into a specific situation. Lifting it as a standalone rule about spousal obligation does something Paul wasn’t doing. And the “are you in authority over the Word?” question, I’d just sit with that one. We’re both interpreting. Every reader is. That’s not rebellion, it’s the nature of the text. Holding our readings with a little humility leaves more room for the Spirit and for each other.
English
2
0
2
125
Unique Identifier
Unique Identifier@ComponentID66·
@JimmySpencer @jason_howerton If people thought it was good to not take showers, and I came along and said "hey guys, you should take showers, not showing is bad" doesn't that imply that there is a requirement to shower at regular frequencies?
English
0
0
0
15
Unique Identifier
Unique Identifier@ComponentID66·
@realBrandonGill It's not happening. If it is happening, it's not that bad. It's that bad, but it's too late to do anything now.
English
0
0
0
5
Unique Identifier
Unique Identifier@ComponentID66·
@DefiantBaptist That's always how kinism works. It's like the word racism which is just a tool to keep White people from acting in their own self interest.
English
0
1
10
224
Defiant Baptist
Defiant Baptist@DefiantBaptist·
Samuel Sey doesn’t have a problem with kinism in principle, but rather only kinism among whites.
Defiant Baptist tweet media
English
15
6
190
2.7K
Unique Identifier
Unique Identifier@ComponentID66·
@WilliamWolfe My wife started trying to buy healthier items (no seed oils, no food dies, organic when possible) and that mixed with inflation has been brutal. I make good money, but I don't know how other people are making it tbh.
English
0
0
5
258
Unique Identifier
Unique Identifier@ComponentID66·
@YourCalvinist These are the people that got upset that Roe V Wade was overturned. Then you had "Christians" saying we're supposed to "weep with those who weep."
English
0
0
0
37
Eric Conn
Eric Conn@Eric_Conn·
*Me listening to a seminary professor say not to praise your wife’s physical beauty too much b/c it will make her vain; mainly praise ‘spiritual qualities.’* *Me also reading Song of Solomon*
GIF
English
30
15
486
8.9K
Unique Identifier
Unique Identifier@ComponentID66·
@restoreorderusa I've always understood Trump as the beginning. A turning point and inflection. He has walked so that someone else can run.
English
0
0
0
6
Patrick Casey
Patrick Casey@restoreorderusa·
The correct position to have as an immigration restrictionist is to recognize that Trump, so far, has made good progress on securing the border, deporting illegals, and limiting legal immigration—but that we want his successor to be even more of a restrictionist.
English
30
131
1.7K
18.9K
Unique Identifier retweetledi
The American Tribune
If your principles dictate that you lose for reasons of gentlemanly conduct as the other side praises John Brown and chants about murdering you and your kids, your principles are buffoonish and retarded and should be discarded in favor of those that lead to victory
Politics & Poll Tracker 📡@PollTracker2024

Senate Majority Leader Shane Massey (R) is firmly opposed to South Carolina redistricting Massey on the floor: "Too many people in power want to do whatever it takes to stay in power. But I ask, to what end? What do you with it when you've attained it? I believe the legitimate use of power in this context is to make people safer."

English
62
456
1.9K
41.2K
Unique Identifier
Unique Identifier@ComponentID66·
@DJR69422 @ReallyOldLife Yes, it was military combat with the Philistines that was started by the leader of Israel. David was acting as a military agent of the civil magistrate. Civil magistrate concept still applies.
English
1
0
0
14
Don Rubottom
Don Rubottom@DJR69422·
@ComponentID66 @ReallyOldLife And David was a punk kid when he took on Goliath, without a sword, and not any kind of magistrate. James's conclusion has nothing to do with the story.
English
2
0
0
27
Politics & Poll Tracker 📡
Politics & Poll Tracker 📡@PollTracker2024·
Senate Majority Leader Shane Massey (R) is firmly opposed to South Carolina redistricting Massey on the floor: "Too many people in power want to do whatever it takes to stay in power. But I ask, to what end? What do you with it when you've attained it? I believe the legitimate use of power in this context is to make people safer."
Politics & Poll Tracker 📡 tweet media
Politics & Poll Tracker 📡@PollTracker2024

Senate Majority Leader Shane Massey (R) is on the floor of the State Senate arguing against South Carolina redistricting. State Senate is debating the sine die agreement which unlocks the state to redistrict. Needs 2/3rds to pass. Massey: “I think—at best—you’re gonna get 6–1

English
206
155
1.2K
352.3K
Unique Identifier
Unique Identifier@ComponentID66·
@jonharris1989 I don't necessarily like Israel, but I do absolutely despise Muslim countries like Palestine. They would do that to my White daughters if they could. Islam must be destroyed by all means possible. If Israel helps out, more power to them.
English
0
0
3
118
Unique Identifier
Unique Identifier@ComponentID66·
@bendellwerry I grew up IFB, and they may be odd about a few things, but they absolutely love the Lord and love witnessing. They also created an ecosystem that strongly resists liberalism.
English
1
0
1
36
bendell werry 🌲
bendell werry 🌲@bendellwerry·
I’ll never forget the one time I looked up a video about how to do the brakes on my truck and as I was watching I thought to myself “this guy is an IFB pastor” and then at the end of the video after finishing he gave a short gospel message. I love my fundy brothers.
English
5
5
221
3.1K
Unique Identifier
Unique Identifier@ComponentID66·
@EvangelicalDW He was good because he pushed piety in an age of unrelenting hedonism. He is now worthless because he pushes pietism/pacifism/PWC in a world of gay race communism.
English
0
0
0
41